back to index

What Is Your Take On the "Stop By Office" Chat?


Chapters

0:0 Cal's Intro
0:13 Cal reads a question about office chatter
1:0 The negative of context shifting
1:55 Find an alternative

Whisper Transcript | Transcript Only Page

00:00:00.000 | [MUSIC]
00:00:05.000 | All right, our next question here comes from Christoph.
00:00:09.000 | Christoph asks, what is your take on the informal
00:00:13.000 | stop by the office chat?
00:00:16.000 | He notes it's synchronous but also disruptive.
00:00:19.000 | Instead of multiple emails, a quick chat with my boss while I walk by his office
00:00:22.000 | and he waves me down, gets a quick informal project update.
00:00:26.000 | What is your take on these type of informal meetings?
00:00:30.000 | Well, Christoph, there's two different forces
00:00:34.000 | that are working cross-current when it comes to this habit of office stop by.
00:00:38.000 | So the positive force is that it helps the boss feel more
00:00:42.000 | connected to his or her employees, and I think it actually
00:00:46.000 | does achieve that effect, right? It means that you get to have
00:00:50.000 | a regular interaction with the people you work with that might not otherwise really happen at all
00:00:54.000 | and quite infrequently that does have a social cohesion effect which is positive.
00:00:58.000 | The negative force that this creates, of course,
00:01:02.000 | is context switching. We now know because we've all read my book, A World Without
00:01:06.000 | Email, we've all venerated the book, we all talk about it all the time with our bosses
00:01:10.000 | and buy numerous copies for our friends and relatives in the upcoming holiday season.
00:01:14.000 | We all know from that book that there's a really non-trivial cost to having to switch
00:01:18.000 | the target of your attention from one thing to another. Christoph, you probably
00:01:22.000 | feel a sense of fatigue, cognitive fatigue, after your
00:01:26.000 | boss stops by, grabs you, you do an update, and you're trying to go back to the things you're doing. You probably
00:01:30.000 | feel that fatigue that makes it hard to get going again. Maybe you just devolve into
00:01:34.000 | "Let me go into my email inbox. I just don't have it anymore."
00:01:38.000 | That's not random. That's the cost of the attention residue of having to completely
00:01:42.000 | switch your cognitive context from whatever you were doing to what the boss is doing. So there's a really big
00:01:46.000 | footprint from that that can give you cognitive fatigue and more generally lower your
00:01:50.000 | cognitive capacity. So we have a positive and a negative.
00:01:54.000 | I think the right thing to do here, in my personal opinion, is find
00:01:58.000 | an alternative way of accomplishing the same positive benefit
00:02:02.000 | of the stop by, the social cohesion benefit, that sidesteps the
00:02:06.000 | context switching cost. So what this means is
00:02:10.000 | let's have a regular way that we can talk with each other, but it's predictable.
00:02:14.000 | I know when it's going to happen. It's not going to happen in the middle of something
00:02:18.000 | else I am doing. If you practice office hours,
00:02:22.000 | which I think almost every office environment should, where everyone
00:02:26.000 | says on a set days at set times, "Here are my office
00:02:30.000 | hours. My door is open. My zoom is on. My phone is on.
00:02:34.000 | I expect to do nothing in here but to talk to people, call me with questions,
00:02:38.000 | stop by my office with questions." If you practice office hours, now
00:02:42.000 | the boss can basically circumnavigate those office hours.
00:02:46.000 | And now you can get that same effect if you're the boss by saying
00:02:50.000 | "I keep track of when all of my different employees' office hours are
00:02:54.000 | and I want to stop by each employee's office hours once per week."
00:02:58.000 | No disruption because that's the point of the office hours, but
00:03:02.000 | you also get that social cohesion. I can regularly be talking to you. So I think that's probably the right
00:03:06.000 | balance, but you are correct to note that cost you feel.
00:03:10.000 | That cost you feel accruing from the
00:03:14.000 | stop by is real. That's actually a neurological, a qualia
00:03:18.000 | of the neurological dance that goes on when you have to keep switching
00:03:22.000 | your attention from one target to another, then back again.
00:03:26.000 | [Music]