back to indexWhat Is Your Take On the "Stop By Office" Chat?
Chapters
0:0 Cal's Intro
0:13 Cal reads a question about office chatter
1:0 The negative of context shifting
1:55 Find an alternative
00:00:05.000 |
All right, our next question here comes from Christoph. 00:00:09.000 |
Christoph asks, what is your take on the informal 00:00:16.000 |
He notes it's synchronous but also disruptive. 00:00:19.000 |
Instead of multiple emails, a quick chat with my boss while I walk by his office 00:00:22.000 |
and he waves me down, gets a quick informal project update. 00:00:26.000 |
What is your take on these type of informal meetings? 00:00:30.000 |
Well, Christoph, there's two different forces 00:00:34.000 |
that are working cross-current when it comes to this habit of office stop by. 00:00:38.000 |
So the positive force is that it helps the boss feel more 00:00:42.000 |
connected to his or her employees, and I think it actually 00:00:46.000 |
does achieve that effect, right? It means that you get to have 00:00:50.000 |
a regular interaction with the people you work with that might not otherwise really happen at all 00:00:54.000 |
and quite infrequently that does have a social cohesion effect which is positive. 00:00:58.000 |
The negative force that this creates, of course, 00:01:02.000 |
is context switching. We now know because we've all read my book, A World Without 00:01:06.000 |
Email, we've all venerated the book, we all talk about it all the time with our bosses 00:01:10.000 |
and buy numerous copies for our friends and relatives in the upcoming holiday season. 00:01:14.000 |
We all know from that book that there's a really non-trivial cost to having to switch 00:01:18.000 |
the target of your attention from one thing to another. Christoph, you probably 00:01:22.000 |
feel a sense of fatigue, cognitive fatigue, after your 00:01:26.000 |
boss stops by, grabs you, you do an update, and you're trying to go back to the things you're doing. You probably 00:01:30.000 |
feel that fatigue that makes it hard to get going again. Maybe you just devolve into 00:01:34.000 |
"Let me go into my email inbox. I just don't have it anymore." 00:01:38.000 |
That's not random. That's the cost of the attention residue of having to completely 00:01:42.000 |
switch your cognitive context from whatever you were doing to what the boss is doing. So there's a really big 00:01:46.000 |
footprint from that that can give you cognitive fatigue and more generally lower your 00:01:50.000 |
cognitive capacity. So we have a positive and a negative. 00:01:54.000 |
I think the right thing to do here, in my personal opinion, is find 00:01:58.000 |
an alternative way of accomplishing the same positive benefit 00:02:02.000 |
of the stop by, the social cohesion benefit, that sidesteps the 00:02:06.000 |
context switching cost. So what this means is 00:02:10.000 |
let's have a regular way that we can talk with each other, but it's predictable. 00:02:14.000 |
I know when it's going to happen. It's not going to happen in the middle of something 00:02:18.000 |
else I am doing. If you practice office hours, 00:02:22.000 |
which I think almost every office environment should, where everyone 00:02:26.000 |
says on a set days at set times, "Here are my office 00:02:30.000 |
hours. My door is open. My zoom is on. My phone is on. 00:02:34.000 |
I expect to do nothing in here but to talk to people, call me with questions, 00:02:38.000 |
stop by my office with questions." If you practice office hours, now 00:02:42.000 |
the boss can basically circumnavigate those office hours. 00:02:46.000 |
And now you can get that same effect if you're the boss by saying 00:02:50.000 |
"I keep track of when all of my different employees' office hours are 00:02:54.000 |
and I want to stop by each employee's office hours once per week." 00:02:58.000 |
No disruption because that's the point of the office hours, but 00:03:02.000 |
you also get that social cohesion. I can regularly be talking to you. So I think that's probably the right 00:03:06.000 |
balance, but you are correct to note that cost you feel. 00:03:14.000 |
stop by is real. That's actually a neurological, a qualia 00:03:18.000 |
of the neurological dance that goes on when you have to keep switching 00:03:22.000 |
your attention from one target to another, then back again.