back to indexAre Calvinists Inconsistent with Romans 9?
00:00:00.000 |
1) Romans 9 – The chapter Romans 9 has been mentioned almost 300 times in emails. 00:00:12.200 |
Lots of questions about that chapter. Today a question about why Calvinists so often speak 00:00:16.520 |
of election of believers as unconditional, but the reprobation of the non-elect as conditional. 00:00:24.240 |
Question from Henry, "Dear Pastor John, hello. In Romans 9 10-13 Paul says God loved 00:00:30.600 |
Jacob and hated Esau before either had done anything good or bad. I've heard many Calvinists 00:00:37.240 |
say election has nothing to do with works alone, good or bad, present or foreseen. That's 00:00:42.840 |
true and glorious. However, many of those same Calvinists say that when God predestines 00:00:48.400 |
people to hell, he ensures that they are deserving of judgment due to their past sins. This sounds 00:00:54.720 |
contradictory to me. If election is unconditional, why is perdition here so often presented as 00:01:04.000 |
Let's put the text, the key text, in front of us and make sure we understand the question 00:01:10.440 |
in context. Here's what Paul wrote in Romans 9 11-13. "Though Jacob and Esau were not 00:01:18.660 |
yet born and had done nothing either good or bad." Really important. Really important. 00:01:27.640 |
They had done nothing good or bad. In order that… Now, Paul is explaining why he chooses 00:01:36.480 |
the way he does. In order that God's purpose of election might continue not because of 00:01:43.000 |
works but because of… And you might expect him to say because of faith. No. He says not 00:01:50.280 |
because of works but because of him who calls. Rebecca was told the elder will serve the 00:01:58.240 |
younger. As it is written, "Jacob I loved, Esau I hated." 00:02:03.760 |
Now what Paul had said in verse 6, that was verses 11-13, what Paul had said in verse 00:02:09.800 |
6 was that the promises of God to Israel have not failed, even though many Jewish people 00:02:17.400 |
are perishing according to verse 3, being accursed and cut off from Christ. And the 00:02:23.320 |
reason the promises of God to Israel have not failed, even though some are perishing, 00:02:30.280 |
is that "not all Israel is Israel." That is, the saving promises of God do not guarantee 00:02:39.520 |
the salvation of every single ethnic Israelite, but only the true Israel. That's the point 00:02:49.200 |
of verses 6-8. Not all the descendants of Abraham are the children of God. 00:02:57.080 |
Then Paul shows the deepest root of what makes a person part of the true Israel, the saved 00:03:04.840 |
Israel, and that deepest root is God's unconditional election, meaning God's choice of one person 00:03:15.280 |
and not another, not based on any good deeds or any bad deeds, not based on any good deeds 00:03:25.240 |
or bad deeds, one person is chosen and not another. Chosen for what? Choice for what? 00:03:32.200 |
What choice are you talking about? Well, what Paul is dealing with in verse 3 is how can 00:03:38.840 |
so many individual Israelites be lost, be cursed, and cut off from Christ, verse 3? 00:03:46.880 |
So the issue is eternal salvation. Paul is burdened by his kinsmen according to the flesh 00:03:54.280 |
who are lost, eternal cursedness. So election here means election of who will be the true 00:04:04.000 |
Israelites, verse 6, the true children of God, verse 8, and who will not be. 00:04:10.680 |
Now what Henry is pointing out is that the Scriptures—not just Calvinists—the Scriptures 00:04:18.680 |
teach that everyone who is sentenced to eternal condemnation, hell, deserves to be there. 00:04:28.320 |
That's biblical teaching. Nobody is in hell because they don't deserve to be there. 00:04:36.200 |
They will be there because of their unbelief and their sin. And Henry is saying this sounds 00:04:43.880 |
contradictory. Unconditional election on the one hand, conditional damnation on the other 00:04:51.760 |
hand. When God decided not to choose a person, he did not base his decision on foreseen unbelief 00:05:02.600 |
and sin. But when God condemns a person, in the end, it is based on unbelief and sin. 00:05:12.480 |
And Henry wonders if that's a contradiction. And my answer is no, it is not. There are 00:05:19.760 |
good reasons for why God elects in the beginning in the way he does, and there are good reasons 00:05:26.400 |
for why God judges in the end the way he does. And these acts of election and condemnation 00:05:33.240 |
and these reasons are not contradictory. He condemns in the end on the basis of unbelief 00:05:41.160 |
and sin because he's just. And the principle of justice in the Bible is, Exodus 23, 7, 00:05:48.760 |
do not kill the innocent and righteous. And Proverbs 17, 15, it's an abomination to the 00:05:55.920 |
Lord to condemn the righteous. And Romans 2, 8, those who do not obey the truth but 00:06:02.340 |
obey unrighteousness, there will be wrath and fury. That's the biblical principle of 00:06:07.440 |
justice, and God is just. So God's final decision to assign someone to hell will be 00:06:14.400 |
because they deserve it. There will be no injustice. No one will be in hell who does 00:06:22.700 |
not deserve to be there. And no degree of punishment in hell will be out of proportion 00:06:30.960 |
to the greatness of the guilt of the sinner, Luke 12, 47. So God condemns on the basis 00:06:38.300 |
of unbelief and sin because he's just, but he elects before the foundation of the world, 00:06:46.800 |
not based on unbelief and sin, because he's free and independent of all external constraints 00:06:55.640 |
in forming his own plan. Let me say it again. Here's the way Paul puts it. He seems to 00:07:01.160 |
be laboring to make this clear. Though they were not yet born and had done nothing good 00:07:06.840 |
or bad in order that God's purpose of election might continue, not because of works, good 00:07:15.440 |
or bad, but because of him, his purpose, his will, his counsel, alone, his freedom. She 00:07:25.760 |
was told the elder will serve the younger. So here's why I think Henry says this sounds 00:07:31.320 |
contradictory, that God condemns on the basis of unbelief and sin, but he elects before 00:07:39.240 |
the foundation of the world, not based on unbelief and sin. And I think Henry says that 00:07:46.160 |
sounds contradictory because we don't know how God sees to it that all those who are 00:07:55.600 |
not elect do in fact become guilty of condemnation. Let me say that again. We don't know how 00:08:05.080 |
God renders it certain or sees to it that all those who are not elect do in fact become 00:08:17.400 |
guilty of condemnation. How does real guilt become a certainty for all the non-elect? 00:08:24.800 |
Which is another way of asking, how does a sovereign God govern the heart choices of 00:08:31.280 |
all human beings, and yet those human beings be accountable for their heart choices? And 00:08:37.800 |
I am happy to let that be one of the hidden things that belongs to the Lord, Deuteronomy 00:08:44.880 |
29.29. What we do know is this. Both are taught in the Bible. God governs the choices of all 00:08:55.360 |
people, and all people are accountable for their choices. That's not a contradiction. 00:09:01.760 |
It is a mystery, or it may be a mystery. Some think they may have figured it out. I haven't. 00:09:09.000 |
It may be a mystery. That is, we don't know how—that's the key word—we don't know 00:09:14.640 |
how God does it, but we do know he does it. The king's heart is a stream of water in 00:09:23.920 |
the hand of the Lord, and he turns it wherever he will, Proverbs 21.1, and that king is accountable 00:09:32.760 |
Amen. A divine mystery indeed. Thank you, Pastor John. And we've now surpassed 1,300 00:09:39.040 |
total episodes in this podcast. Thanks for your interest and your questions over those 00:09:42.600 |
past six years as we enter now our seventh year on the podcast. You can search all of 00:09:47.920 |
those episodes. You can read full transcripts and send us your own questions all at our 00:09:51.760 |
online home at DesiringGod.org/AskPastorJohn. 00:09:54.000 |
Well, why does God withhold good things from his children, from us? It's a perennial question. 00:10:02.680 |
It's older than Psalm 73, and most recently it came to us from a 27-year-old woman who 00:10:07.760 |
is waiting for marriage. It's a great question, applicable to the not-yet-marrieds, but in 00:10:14.080 |
principle applicable to all of us. I'm your host Tony Reinke. We'll see you back here