back to indexWill Baby Boomers Crash the Stock Market? | Portfolio Rescue 56
Chapters
0:0 Intro
2:25 What to do with extra cash.
6:30 Inflation
11:20 Publicly traded REITs vs non-traded.
18:35 Strongest performing sectors out of this market downturn.
24:30 Selling pressure.
00:00:00.000 |
Welcome back to Portfolio Rescue. Each week, you send us a bunch of questions. We don't 00:00:21.840 |
always have all the answers, because sometimes finance questions don't have black or white 00:00:25.320 |
answers. So our goal here is to provide some context, analysis, data, maybe a little perspective 00:00:29.600 |
to help you make better decisions. Remember, our email here is AskTheCompoundShow@gmail.com. 00:00:34.320 |
Today's sponsor, Portfolio Rescue, is sponsored by Craneshares. Craneshares is an investment 00:00:38.400 |
company that allows you to invest in China. Now, I'm going to have to admit, I don't have 00:00:41.880 |
a great read on the Chinese economy, and the entire way that country operates is kind of 00:00:46.200 |
confusing to me. I really didn't know who to trust or who to believe for a lot of things. 00:00:50.160 |
That's why I read Brendan Ahern's "China Last Night" newsletter. Brendan's a CIO there. 00:00:54.760 |
We've had him on "Animal Spirits" before. I think he's been on "Compounded Friends" before. 00:00:59.080 |
He created this great newsletter. You can choose to get it on a daily or a weekly basis. 00:01:03.360 |
Just about the Chinese economy, the companies, the news, all that stuff in one place. He 00:01:06.560 |
summarizes it. Makes your life easier to be an investor in the know about China. If you 00:01:10.040 |
want to subscribe, go to Chinalastnight.com. And to learn more about investing in their 00:01:14.220 |
funds, go to Craneshares.com to learn more about the risks. 00:01:17.280 |
Also, ni hao to any Chinese viewers right now. 00:01:20.360 |
Okay, we do have an international audience. We've got some questions today from international 00:01:23.760 |
viewers. So we're getting creamed again today in the stock market. Apparently Jerome Powell 00:01:27.960 |
doesn't like Santa Claus. He just ended the Santa Claus rally. It's interesting how much 00:01:33.600 |
back and forth we've had. I looked at just the date, because we're down 2.8% or something 00:01:37.680 |
in the S&P last time I checked. This, including today, would be the 23rd 2% or worse day this 00:01:43.840 |
year. So at 8x, we've been down 3% or worse. Alternatively, we've been up 2% or more 23x, 00:01:50.960 |
and we've been up 3% or more 4x. So I just think with the constant back and forth like 00:01:56.040 |
this where you think everything is up and it feels great, okay, late at the end of the 00:02:00.080 |
tunnel, and then, oh wait, we're down again, getting crushed, okay, now we're going to 00:02:04.320 |
get creamed again. It's constant back and forth. And I think just, I just want to give 00:02:09.240 |
everyone out there, if you just survived this year without making a huge mistake or blowing 00:02:12.720 |
yourself up, I think you can give yourself a pat on the back. Right? That's my Christmas 00:02:18.800 |
I can't. I can't give myself a pat on the back. 00:02:20.920 |
No pat on the back for you? All right. Sorry. You've got a nice sweater though. All right, 00:02:26.600 |
Okay. Up first today, we have a question from Jay. I'm 36 and based in the UK. I own my 00:02:32.040 |
own home with no mortgage, max out my pension contributions, have 93,000 in cash and a tax 00:02:37.880 |
advantage savings account with Vanguard called an ISA here. You can only contribute $20,000 00:02:43.000 |
or 20,000, I guess, pounds a year, and 55,000 cash in a non-tax advantage savings account 00:02:50.000 |
earning minimal interest. I was looking for advice on how to best invest the cash I have 00:02:54.200 |
in these accounts. It seems like the market has fallen a lot, although less so in the 00:02:58.040 |
UK than in the US and Europe, not to brag. My words, not theirs. And I've read that it's 00:03:03.480 |
best to invest lump sum balances all at once rather than slowly over time. But that is 00:03:08.720 |
quite a scary proposition in this environment. What would you suggest as the best approach? 00:03:12.720 |
Should I just put it all in Vanguard index funds all at once? If not, what advice would 00:03:16.640 |
you give for how much and how often to invest? 00:03:19.880 |
Like I said, this is a global show. We get a lot of questions from international investors 00:03:24.200 |
and viewers. Many U.S. investors might not know that the UK stock market is whipping 00:03:29.040 |
the U.S. stock market this year. John, throw that up. This is just the iShares. I think 00:03:33.400 |
this is as of yesterday, so it doesn't include today's losses. It was basically flat on the 00:03:38.080 |
year in the UK, and the S&P down 14% or so. I think from the perspective of a UK investor 00:03:44.240 |
not taking into account the moves in the dollar, you're probably doing even better. Obviously, 00:03:48.200 |
the lump sum dollar cost averaging question is one we get a lot and we've touched on before. 00:03:53.360 |
It's one of those things that there's no easy answer because it's a spreadsheets versus 00:03:56.160 |
emotions question. The spreadsheet tells you lump sum is a higher probability event. The 00:04:00.280 |
stock market is up three out of every four years on average. That's a pretty good ... If 00:04:03.600 |
you had a 75% winning percentage at the casino, you'd take that every day, right? Unfortunately, 00:04:08.520 |
those long-term market averages include a wide range of results. Personally, I use the 00:04:13.680 |
lump sum if I get something. I don't want to invest. I know if I'm investing in stocks, 00:04:17.200 |
it's going to be for 10+ years, call it. More in most cases. But I understand why so many 00:04:21.880 |
people prefer dollar cost averaging. There's a higher probability of regret if you put 00:04:25.640 |
that lump sum in and you're wrong. I recently helped someone this year implement a dollar 00:04:30.360 |
cost averaging strategy. So, we decided, "Alright, I'm going to take this lump sum and break 00:04:34.160 |
it into six parts. We're going to make one investment of those six parts every 15th of 00:04:39.960 |
the month, come hell or high water." It actually worked out better than a lump sum this year 00:04:44.680 |
because the stock market was so volatile. So, they were able to invest a bunch of points 00:04:47.920 |
that were much lower than when we started the year. And then, we came to the last time 00:04:52.480 |
that they could invest. So, they made their first five investments. They're pretty happy. 00:04:56.160 |
The sixth one comes and they say, "Well, we've had a little bit of a bear market rally here. 00:05:00.160 |
What if we just pulled back and waited on this last one?" And I personally was against 00:05:04.440 |
this strategy. I think the whole point of creating a plan in advance, especially with 00:05:07.960 |
something like this, is that you don't know what's going to happen in the future. There's 00:05:11.720 |
this great story from The Making of an American Capitalist, which is the Roger Lowenstein 00:05:15.920 |
book about Buffett, where I think in 1966, the market fell like 22%, a pretty decent 00:05:20.200 |
bear market. And a bunch of Buffett's investors called him after that bear market already 00:05:24.760 |
happened and said, "Hey, the stock market is going lower. Don't put your cash to work 00:05:27.920 |
yet." And Buffett responded with something like, "If you didn't know in February that 00:05:32.080 |
the Dow was going to get crushed, then why didn't you let me in then? And if you didn't 00:05:37.080 |
know what was going to happen back then, how do you know anymore now?" So, the point is, 00:05:40.640 |
the future is never clear, even when it feels like it is. So, I told my dollar-cost averaging 00:05:44.880 |
friend, "Stick with the strategy you chose six months prior," because that was the plan 00:05:48.440 |
at the time. So, I don't think there's any amount or interval that... There's no right 00:05:53.600 |
or wrong answer there. It's horseshoes and hand grenades, close enough, basically. So, 00:05:57.760 |
I just think you pick an amount, you pick an interval, and you follow it hell or high 00:06:02.000 |
water. And I think that's the simplest strategy, if obviously you can't handle that lump sum, 00:06:06.680 |
which it sounds like this person can't. Right. And Nick Majulie has written a lot about this. 00:06:11.200 |
We have kind of a legendary video of him and Josh that, if you haven't seen, you should 00:06:15.320 |
check out on our channel, where they're talking about this very thing of dollar-cost averaging. 00:06:19.000 |
Yeah, Nick's kind of definitively proven the lump sum makes more sense. But I think if 00:06:23.680 |
you realize, "I can't handle a lump sum," then just pick a strategy you can stick with. 00:06:27.200 |
Right. Alright, let's do another one. Okay, up next we have a question from Sharon. "When 00:06:32.800 |
my husband and I bought our first home in 1998, our mortgage rate with a 20% down payment 00:06:37.160 |
and excellent credit was about 8.5%, and that was lower than rates had been. We would have 00:06:42.320 |
loved to get a 7% interest rate, which you think of as high. The opposite point of view, 00:06:47.080 |
which you didn't talk about, is that we don't want 6% to 8% inflation getting entrenched. 00:06:53.400 |
You're talking about the bad things from high interest rates, but what about the bad things 00:06:57.180 |
from persistently high inflation? It really lowers the value of your savings. Taking a 00:07:01.720 |
pause and seeing what happens, as Ben suggested, is what the Fed did in the '70s, isn't it? 00:07:07.200 |
Inflation just kept going higher. Didn't Volcker have to cause a recession before inflation 00:07:10.760 |
slowed down?" They sound like they're talking about a very specific comment, I guess, by 00:07:16.560 |
I think a lot of times -- and Twitter, it's called a subtweet. This is like a sub-question, 00:07:21.640 |
where they're taking some shots at me, which is fine. 00:07:23.200 |
I was thinking, does this person like Ben or hate Ben, as a reading reviewer? 00:07:26.320 |
I've been hearing from a lot of people who lived through the '70s, who keep saying that 00:07:29.200 |
I'm nuts to think that the Fed should slow down a little bit with their rate hikes. No 00:07:32.480 |
one wants a repeat of the '70s, when I think inflation averaged more than 7% for the entire 00:07:36.160 |
decade. That's what the Fed official was saying, too, in the Treasury. Janet Yellen said, "I 00:07:40.200 |
came of age and studied economics in the '70s. I remember what that terrible period was like. 00:07:44.160 |
No one wants to see that happen again." That's the Fed's whole line of thinking right now. 00:07:47.480 |
I understand that sentiment, that people who dealt with high inflation in the past don't 00:07:52.640 |
Let me offer some counterpoints first. In 1998, the median single-family home price 00:07:57.160 |
was around $130,000. I circled it right there. Assuming 20% down, that would be a monthly 00:08:02.520 |
mortgage payment of around $800, even with those 8.5% interest rates. Today, the median 00:08:07.560 |
price of a single-family existing home is like $385,000. Do the same 20% down payment 00:08:13.040 |
at 8.5%, and we're talking a $2,500 a month payment. Even if you adjust that for inflation, 00:08:19.360 |
that 1998 number is more like $1,400, so housing is way more expensive today. The way the housing 00:08:25.260 |
market is today, we can't really handle higher interest rates like they had back then. Housing 00:08:29.920 |
I don't think you could get a parking spot in Brooklyn today for $800 a month. 00:08:34.200 |
That sounds about right. There are some similarities for the '70s analogy. Both periods saw this 00:08:38.760 |
massive increase in government spending. Obviously, for different reasons. There was no pandemic 00:08:42.040 |
back then. There was this commodity shock, especially in energy and food prices back 00:08:46.240 |
then. And then, we both periods saw above-trend wage growth. 00:08:49.200 |
John, throw out my wage growth here. This is wage growth versus inflation by decade. 00:08:53.600 |
In the '70s, you had massive wage growth, but that's because inflation was high. '80s, 00:08:59.500 |
same thing. It's high and high. 2000s, we had slow inflation, slow wage growth. 2010s, 00:09:05.100 |
same thing. Through the end of September, when I have my wage data through, wages were 00:09:10.460 |
up 17% this decade already, which is almost as much as the whole previous decade. We're 00:09:15.820 |
two years in, three years in. CPI was up just 16% then. That relationship is holding. 00:09:21.260 |
This is why the Fed is worried about inflation, and why people who are concerned about the 00:09:24.820 |
'70s, same thing. Here's the thing. The money supply was rising throughout the '70s. The 00:09:29.740 |
Fed didn't step in as aggressively as they are now. It's currently crashing. John, throw 00:09:32.500 |
out my M2 chart here. M2 money supply. This is the year-over-year change. You can see 00:09:37.460 |
it's crashing. The government is not spending anymore. This is already back on trend or 00:09:41.420 |
below it. Also, in the 1970s, oil prices went from $2 a barrel to $34 a barrel by 1981. 00:09:48.900 |
It was a 17-fold increase. Oil started this decade at like $60 a barrel. To match that 00:09:54.980 |
gain, it would have to go to $1,000 a barrel. Anything is possible. That seems highly unlikely 00:09:59.020 |
to me. Workers also had way more bargaining power back then, because unions were more 00:10:02.540 |
prevalent. There's no more unions these days, right? Also, things that we have today that 00:10:09.260 |
didn't happen in the '70s, like technology, this huge deflationary force. Baby boomers 00:10:13.340 |
were in the prime years back then, just like the millennials today. But they didn't have 00:10:17.140 |
the offsetting demographic like the baby boomers now, that are kind of an offset. I just think 00:10:25.820 |
that the Fed is so much further along. I'm just saying, chill out for a while. Plus, 00:10:32.380 |
the thing is, the New York Fed puts this out every month, I think. Inflation expectations 00:10:37.560 |
are coming down. The New York Fed said inflation expectations are like 3% for next year, for 00:10:42.140 |
the next year and the next three years. The '70s was about those inflation expectations 00:10:46.140 |
becoming entrenched. That's not happening right now. I still think it could be a while 00:10:51.020 |
until we get 2% to 3% inflation, but I don't see a repeat of the '70s. I don't see the 00:10:55.620 |
need to crash the economy if you don't have to. That's my whole stance here. Good pushback, 00:11:00.860 |
Yeah, that sounds like a pretty solid, fair point. I think your time as a full-fledged 00:11:06.180 |
apologist for the Fed, though, has probably hurt your take on this, in some people's eyes. 00:11:15.120 |
John Cain's quote? Yes. All right, let's do another one. 00:11:19.020 |
Okay. Up next, we have a question from Charles. Josh Brown mentioned on a recent show that 00:11:23.540 |
he is not a fan of non-traded REITs. Can you explain the difference between publicly traded 00:11:27.820 |
and non-traded REITs? I'm considering an investment in the real estate space and trying to figure 00:11:32.200 |
out the biggest risk for each option. Talking about risk. 00:11:35.540 |
Yeah, let's ask the man himself. Let's bring Josh in. Josh Brown, downtown. 00:11:40.420 |
Am I on? I can't see. Oh, there I am. Okay. I was watching for some reason on regular 00:11:46.580 |
YouTube instead of watching from behind the scenes. I don't know why. All right. Hey, 00:11:51.580 |
guys. Great to be with you, Duncan. I love your sweater. Ben, can I make one announcement? 00:11:57.860 |
Okay. Listen to me. This is the best personal finance show on all of YouTube. I'm saying 00:12:03.860 |
that. And I have looked at the other shows that are covering topics like this, and they're 00:12:09.100 |
just not good. They're very un-good. This is the best one. So you guys have grown this 00:12:14.500 |
audience all year. It's only going to get bigger. And at a certain point, I don't even 00:12:18.860 |
know how you're going to walk in public, because people are going to be like, "That's my personal 00:12:23.700 |
finance, guys." So I just wanted to say it's the end of the year. I watch every episode. 00:12:27.580 |
Early Christmas present from Josh. What a guy. 00:12:29.020 |
I'm a huge fan of what you guys are doing every week, bringing on really smart people 00:12:33.620 |
besides me, actual experts on topics, and it's awesome. 00:12:38.020 |
Well, I think the first time I ever heard about non-traded REITs was your book came 00:12:44.840 |
Backstage. And you called it a murder hole. Is that right? 00:12:47.700 |
They still are. Don't buy non-traded REITs. All right. So just let's invert. What is the 00:12:56.500 |
advantage of a non-traded REIT over a public REIT? Historically, you may have been able 00:13:02.140 |
to make the argument that, "Well, I can invest in niche real estate that doesn't have a publicly 00:13:07.460 |
traded version." That's no longer true. In fact, there are so many REITs, they have their 00:13:12.780 |
own sector in the S&P today. I think that's a change that happened five or six years ago. 00:13:17.860 |
There used to be 10 S&P sectors and they threw the REITs under financials. Now there's actually 00:13:24.120 |
a real estate sector. So throw that out. You got plenty of choices. 00:13:28.340 |
The second argument is, "Well, private real estate is cheaper. You're getting better valuations." 00:13:34.940 |
That's also completely false. The only way it can be true is if they are late to mark 00:13:41.540 |
the actual values of the property to match with what reality is saying. And I think if 00:13:46.620 |
you ever have to choose between who's right, the public markets or the private markets, 00:13:51.580 |
like 99 times out of 100, trust the public markets. They'll be more volatile, but they're 00:13:58.260 |
going to get to the truth faster because they can, because there are transactions. 00:14:03.180 |
So do the people who create the non-traded REITs just not want to go through the process 00:14:07.980 |
No, no, no. They want to create something that's exclusive. So when they sell it to 00:14:12.380 |
wealth management clients or they sell it to family offices, it's got this mystique 00:14:18.420 |
to it. Like, "Oh, no one else can get in on this." Or, "I'm bringing this to you today 00:14:24.700 |
and you can't access it somewhere away from me." 00:14:27.220 |
It's like developing a group at a nice club kind of thing. 00:14:29.820 |
Yeah. And then there's really high fees. There's very little transparency. And it's not that 00:14:36.020 |
they're all bad. There are obviously good versions of it, but how would you know? And 00:14:41.260 |
there have been so many scandals with non-traded REITs. There have been so many frauds, so 00:14:47.620 |
many situations of people getting income distributions that are actually just the person getting 00:14:52.420 |
their own money back. It's almost like a crime wave over the last 20 years. It's all I've 00:14:58.020 |
ever seen is every time real estate comes down, yeah, the public REITs go down in price, 00:15:04.740 |
but the private ones go to zero and they end up in court. 00:15:08.060 |
So it's no disrespect. If you're in the private REIT space, I'm not saying everything you're 00:15:13.300 |
doing is bad or it can't ever be good. I'm saying from an investor's perspective, if 00:15:18.700 |
you're not getting a discount on the real estate, which we know now private markets 00:15:23.540 |
if anything are more frothy than public markets. Just look at tech. You could buy publicly 00:15:28.740 |
traded technology companies now at 25 times earnings. What people were paying for startups 00:15:35.340 |
over the last five years is outrageous. So I think that the same dynamic exists in private 00:15:41.100 |
real estate. There's not discounts. So I think there's a lot of reasons not to do it. I can't 00:15:48.140 |
think of any to do it. So I would always be biased toward publicly traded, liquid, New 00:15:55.700 |
And I've heard you talk in the past about thinking about making private transactions 00:15:59.740 |
yourself and you thought like, "It's not worth the headache. I'm just going to buy REITs." 00:16:02.740 |
Talk a little about that, why you think that way. 00:16:05.200 |
So I was talking to a friend of mine who buys property. He builds million dollar, multi-million 00:16:11.100 |
dollar homes. He doesn't renovate houses. This is all he does. He knocks down 50-year-old 00:16:17.940 |
homes and builds brand new, really beautiful homes. And he got involved with strip malls 00:16:25.380 |
and he's a real estate guy. His father was a real estate guy. This is all they do. And 00:16:33.500 |
I was like, "I have some money. I have a lot of exposure to the stock market and the bond 00:16:38.320 |
market because of my job. Most of my net worth is tied up in Ritholtz Wealth. And I don't 00:16:44.420 |
need more stocks. I'm good on stocks. I want to do real estate." And he's just like, "I 00:16:50.860 |
don't think that's a good idea." I'm like, "No, I just want to give you money and you 00:16:55.620 |
do what you do and I share the returns with you. I just want to be the capital." He's 00:16:59.100 |
like, "I don't need your money and it's a bad idea." Because real estate, you're either 00:17:04.680 |
doing it or you're not doing it. It should not be a side hustle. 00:17:10.020 |
If you're doing it well. And especially for me, my side hustles have side hustles. So 00:17:20.240 |
I'm not going to pay any attention to it. So I love publicly traded REITs. I own them 00:17:24.840 |
in my IRA. I try to own them in a tax-deferred account because the income on a REIT is not 00:17:31.640 |
like an equity dividend. You're paying ordinary income taxes, REIT for your taxes. So you 00:17:41.600 |
want to own REITs in an IRA. And the second thing that I think you want to do, don't take 00:17:46.500 |
the money. Reinvest. You want those distributions to go right back into buying more shares if 00:17:57.680 |
you're not taking the money anyway. So those are the two things that I tend to do with 00:18:05.020 |
It makes sense. All right, Duncan, let's do another one. 00:18:09.680 |
Okay. The one thing, that's called qualified versus non-qualified dividend, right? That's 00:18:15.140 |
I don't know. It's your show. What do you think? 00:18:18.300 |
I've just heard that thrown around a lot. That's why I was... 00:18:23.700 |
Okay. I think that's what it is. I have no idea. 00:18:28.680 |
I was just wondering if that's what that means. I hear people talk about qualified versus 00:18:34.040 |
Okay. Got you. Got you. All right. So up next, we have a question from Eric. "What industries 00:18:40.800 |
or sectors will perform best coming out of this market downturn? My best guess is that 00:18:45.560 |
risk assets, tech stocks with smaller market caps, will perform the strongest. I'm wondering 00:18:50.440 |
if I should start buying these risk assets given the current economic environment. I'm 00:18:55.000 |
young and I don't mind catching a falling knife." Famous last words. "I want to position 00:19:00.300 |
myself best to capture the most return on the eventual upswing in our future. Do you 00:19:04.600 |
think I should wait for the Fed to stop raising rates before I start buying?" So it sounds 00:19:07.920 |
like they already have in mind what they want to do, right? 00:19:09.720 |
I have thoughts on the Fed thing here, but let's start with the winners coming out of 00:19:12.720 |
a crisis. My only rule of thumb here is that the winners going into it are basically never 00:19:17.280 |
the winners coming out of it, right? I think a recession is like a pivot point. You saw 00:19:20.840 |
this from the pandemic. Tech stocks going in, anything long duration, and then coming 00:19:25.960 |
out of it after that whole transition period, we have value stocks and cash flow producers, 00:19:31.400 |
and it wasn't the same stocks. It was energy stocks that were getting crushed before. So 00:19:34.360 |
that's my only rule of thumb, is that if you think the thing that was doing well going 00:19:37.480 |
into it is going to be the same coming out of it, you're probably going to be wrong. 00:19:40.800 |
100%. And the classic example is to look at the leaders of the '90s. And some of them, 00:19:48.340 |
it took 15 years. The companies are still relevant today. It took until 2017 before 00:19:57.480 |
Microsoft was like 14 years to go back to peak. 00:20:00.680 |
And here's what's important about that. Let's separate the stock from the business. A lot 00:20:05.680 |
of people don't understand this. Microsoft actually grew earnings all that time. Steve 00:20:11.600 |
Ballmer gets ridiculed. He's a billionaire. People are laughing at him. OK, fine. But 00:20:20.140 |
Sure. He is hilarious. A lot of aspects of him are hilarious. But think about the worst 00:20:27.240 |
timing in history to become the CEO of Microsoft. I think Bill Gates handed him the reins in 00:20:31.960 |
the year 2000. So then he runs this company, and he does dumb stuff, of course, like everybody. 00:20:37.960 |
The Zune is an obvious example. He mocks the iPhone. OK, fine. But still, I think Microsoft's 00:20:44.680 |
earnings doubled or tripled under his leadership. 00:20:48.840 |
But it was time for a change, and it made sense. But it's not like he didn't run the 00:20:53.080 |
business well. He might have missed some opportunities. But Microsoft's fundamentals were fine. It's 00:20:58.160 |
the stock price, the valuation. That was the problem. 00:21:02.700 |
Another example is Cisco. The valuation that you were paying for Cisco in 2000 was so outrageous 00:21:08.940 |
that the company actually has grown in size substantially since then, and it's been steady, 00:21:14.900 |
and they buy back stock, and it pays a dividend, and like everything you would want a company 00:21:19.380 |
to do, and it still hasn't retaken that old valuation. It's 22 years ago we're talking 00:21:28.100 |
That is a big reason why the leaders of the prior bull market aren't usually—because 00:21:35.460 |
the fact that they were leaders led to this huge valuation overhang that almost no matter 00:21:41.500 |
what these companies do, they're going to underperform. I'm giving you one example, 00:21:49.820 |
So I don't love the idea of let me buy some small market cap tech. The other thing with 00:21:56.660 |
that is like 70% of all companies that have ever been publicly traded disappeared. Is 00:22:00.620 |
that the number? You know this information, right? 00:22:12.740 |
The other thing, this is a young person. I don't like the idea of using the Fed to time 00:22:16.740 |
your purchases as a young person. You're buying in a down market. 00:22:21.260 |
In 30 or 40 years, you're not going to be mad at yourself for buying a little early. 00:22:25.220 |
If markets keep going down from here and you bought now and then you buy again later, you're 00:22:29.420 |
not going to kick yourself for buying in a bear market. 00:22:31.820 |
So trying to time in the market, guess what? The market is not going to wait around for 00:22:36.020 |
The market is going to move before the Fed does and it's already been trying to. 00:22:38.900 |
So I think using the Fed to try, I know it seems like the Fed has their tentacles and 00:22:42.540 |
everything these days and they kind of do, but using them to time your purchases just 00:22:46.780 |
Last thing on this, I highly recommend going to Verdad Capital and finding, I know they've 00:22:53.900 |
written about this a bunch of times, but there was something they did specifically six months 00:22:57.760 |
ago about where to be into the next recovery, like the first sectors to react and the biggest 00:23:06.180 |
reaction on the way out and it's small cap value. 00:23:10.960 |
And actually I think they just raised a fund that they're planning to hold in cash and 00:23:15.900 |
they're waiting for like high yield bonds to blow up and they're going to start looking 00:23:23.400 |
at either the equities of those issuers or the bonds themselves. 00:23:27.340 |
But that is where you get the most bang for your buck if you're playing for a recovery 00:23:35.140 |
Things that have never happened before happen all the time, but that mentality, like what's 00:23:40.020 |
going to lead us out or what's going to give you the best chance to optimize a portfolio 00:23:45.260 |
coming out of a recession, it's almost never going to be small cap speculative stocks. 00:23:53.220 |
It's just not what people are looking for in that moment. 00:23:55.900 |
- And my biggest advice to people that are trying to do this, just don't do it with your 00:24:01.100 |
If you want to take a piece and try to time the next winner, that's fine, but don't do 00:24:04.500 |
it with your whole portfolio, because if you're wrong, you're going to kick yourself, because 00:24:07.180 |
the whole market's going to take off without you potentially. 00:24:10.380 |
- John Carlo is asking, he always thought that this TV set was my house. 00:24:16.660 |
It is one of my many offices, shout to John Carlo. 00:24:20.700 |
Tom Lowry said I'm taking over the show, I apologize, I'm going to talk less. 00:24:27.460 |
- We've got another question anyway, let's do it, Duncan. 00:24:31.020 |
- Okay, so last but not least we have a question from Jeff. 00:24:34.980 |
Collective wisdom is that markets go up over the long term. 00:24:37.600 |
While this may have been the case in the past, it's the baby boomers who control the vast 00:24:40.980 |
majority of the equity market on a generational basis, and they are in the process of selling 00:24:45.620 |
out in mass due to financing retirement over the next decade. 00:24:50.940 |
Is there a real cause for concern that could trigger endless selling pressure and keep 00:24:56.580 |
I'm coming at this question as a 30-something, thanks. 00:24:59.260 |
I like this question, it's like philosophical. 00:25:01.400 |
- I was at a holiday party last week, and my dad is still known as the finance guy in 00:25:05.660 |
People go to him with finance questions before they come to me, and one of the like younger 00:25:11.260 |
- He was a CFO at a hospital, so he's still like the tax finance guy. 00:25:16.060 |
- But one of the Gen Z cousins' husbands kind of said, "Is Social Security actually going 00:25:21.660 |
to be here for me when I get older, or are the baby boomers just going to take it all?" 00:25:24.300 |
I think there is, and we tried to set him straight on that, but there is this idea that 00:25:28.980 |
the cupboards are going to be left bare by the baby boomers, and I think there's a few 00:25:35.780 |
First, the biggest thing is just that 10% of the households own 90% of the stocks. 00:25:40.860 |
Most of these people are going to pass the money down and not going to have to sell it. 00:25:43.900 |
It's not like there's this huge cohort of people that are going to be force sellers 00:25:46.980 |
in the next 10 years, and I think most of it's just going to go to the Millennials and 00:25:54.580 |
John, throw up the chart here on the demographics. 00:25:57.980 |
Gen Z and Millennials are going to be there to step in and buy those shares from the baby 00:26:03.540 |
Look at, I mean, the biggest demographic right now is 20 to 34, 35 to 49 is just as large 00:26:10.420 |
There's plenty of young people coming up to step in and Millennials are, I know people 00:26:15.020 |
complain the Millennials say we don't have any money, but they went to college more than 00:26:20.500 |
They're going to be in their primary years to buy the stocks from the baby boomers. 00:26:23.820 |
Josh, are you going to talk about your own witless bid? 00:26:30.380 |
I'm going to remain calm, but when I hear this demographic cliff stuff, this is when 00:26:35.620 |
I wrap barbed wire around a baseball bat and start busting heads like this has been the 00:26:41.540 |
stupidest argument to not be invested that has persisted the longest that like of any 00:26:49.140 |
of the arguments I can think of, this is the worst, most persistent one is so dumb. 00:26:54.460 |
First of all, people were worried about this in the nineties. 00:26:58.860 |
Like second of all, Harry Dent, who is a level three charlatan, he has been, he's been 00:27:06.460 |
using this as a reason to scare people into buying his books or investing in his piece 00:27:14.840 |
This has been something that he, and it's been wrong all the time because it's, it doesn't 00:27:21.980 |
I've been in the wealth management industry for 20 years. 00:27:24.140 |
I have never once seen a baby boomer or older. 00:27:31.280 |
I have never in the wild actually seen somebody spend down their portfolio and die. 00:27:39.060 |
If there's a financial advice, if there's a financial advisor in the chat who would 00:27:43.320 |
like to share an anecdote of actually watching a client, a wealth management client spend 00:27:49.080 |
down their money, sell all their stocks and then die, please inform me. 00:27:57.540 |
Like for middle class people who are going to have to sell down their financial assets, 00:28:01.020 |
they have more of their money in their house than they do in the stock market. 00:28:03.460 |
So you could probably make the case that it's going to impact the housing market more. 00:28:06.300 |
But even then those houses are going to get passed on to the next generation. 00:28:10.980 |
My whole block, my whole block where I live turned over. 00:28:17.780 |
Now I moved in with a two year old daughter in a stroller and my wife pregnant. 00:28:21.780 |
And now my kids are babysitting and it's all because life goes on. 00:28:26.380 |
And by the way, Generation X was smaller than the baby boomers. 00:28:30.140 |
And this is where this nonsense all got started. 00:28:34.620 |
Generation X is like there's like 66 million of us and the boomers I think at their peak 00:28:40.420 |
So that's where all this stuff really started. 00:28:42.980 |
The thing is though the millennials are 73 million. 00:28:47.140 |
There are more millennials now alive than there are baby boomers. 00:29:04.500 |
They're making TikToks about the coffee bar at Meta. 00:29:14.060 |
And the other thing is you made the point before that people's retirement plans in the 00:29:22.300 |
They're going to live so much longer than people did in the past that their retirements 00:29:26.540 |
It's not like it's this end date that we have a cliff coming where everyone's going to sell 00:29:30.620 |
They're going to live for 20, 30 years in retirement. 00:29:34.380 |
Not only do they not sell down their stocks en masse all at once, the newest innovation 00:29:40.420 |
in wealth management, and it hasn't blown up yet, maybe it never will, is securities 00:29:47.400 |
So now they get to live the lifestyle as though they were liquidating their equity portfolio 00:29:53.820 |
I think they get a 50% borrow against their bonds, treasuries, and munis, and like a 30% 00:30:04.180 |
So like the market has to really collapse for any of those loans to require a capital 00:30:10.900 |
So now, thanks to innovations on Wall Street, and this has been going on for a long time. 00:30:17.740 |
Now you've got people living a retirement lifestyle and then dying and then passing 00:30:22.860 |
on an entire portfolio of equities to the next generation. 00:30:28.100 |
So if that's your reason to be worried about the markets, all you have to do is think one 00:30:34.960 |
step beyond demographics, which I'm not an expert in demographics. 00:30:41.140 |
You just have to think, how do people actually live? 00:30:45.060 |
They don't say, "Oh, I'm 70, better sell my stocks." 00:30:48.600 |
That's just not, life expectancy, there's a whole other thing we could go into. 00:30:54.100 |
So it's, please, don't pay attention to that stuff. 00:30:58.260 |
- The other thing is, literally everyone who pays attention to this stuff knows this is 00:31:02.060 |
It's not like the market couldn't get ahead of this and see it coming, right? 00:31:04.900 |
It's pretty easy to look at the census data and know what the demographics are going to 00:31:08.780 |
If this is that big of a threat, don't you think on some level, the equity market has 00:31:16.220 |
- Okay, so the stock market is not going to die from the baby boomers dying off. 00:31:22.060 |
Woody tighties with the blue and yellow waistband, when the baby boomers die, those are never 00:31:30.340 |
- I don't even understand how that hasn't happened already. 00:31:42.460 |
- Wait, you're not a fan of aggressive nudity? 00:31:45.060 |
- Just wandering around naked with a chest full of gray hair. 00:31:52.580 |
- So my generation doesn't do that shit and there's no way yours and Duncan. 00:32:02.140 |
From my age on down, we're in jean shorts under the towel. 00:32:08.820 |
So that's another thing that will die with the boomers. 00:32:16.140 |
- New Compound and Friends, yeah, tomorrow night. 00:32:20.140 |
- The audio will go up Saturday because we're doing it live. 00:32:26.540 |
By the way, Duncan and John and Nicole, they're all going to be working on this stuff on a 00:32:32.100 |
And I want to reiterate, you guys have done an amazing job on the show all year. 00:32:37.420 |
If you haven't told your friends about it, that's all I would ask you to do today. 00:32:47.540 |
We got Bill Sweet answering your end of the year tax questions. 00:32:56.300 |
- If you listen on Spotify, do the Spotify wrapped. 00:32:59.540 |
We like seeing how much you've been listening to us.