back to indexE134: Ukraine counteroffensive, China tensions, COVID Patient Zero, RFK Jr reaction & more
Chapters
0:0 Bestie intros!: Bad conference lunches, hair fluffers, and focus groups
12:36 Zuck vs. Elon cage match
15:50 Ukraine / Russia updates: underwhelming counteroffensive, reported peace deal rejection
33:25 Blinken's China visit, Biden's "dictator" gaffe, Taiwan's future
51:49 RFK Jr's Rogan appearance, big pharma's impact on media via advertising dollars, COVID origins
69:59 Secondary market for depressed startup shares heats up
76:36 Ford to receive $9.2B federal loan to build out three EV factories, industrial policy to on-shore US supply chain
00:00:06.360 |
conference or at some banking conference, SACs. 00:00:11.000 |
CO2 CO2 is a large investor is in a hedge fund private equity. 00:00:16.240 |
There are late stage fund. It's a big late stage fund 00:00:18.440 |
summit's a really big word. Was that a summit? Or is it more 00:00:21.880 |
Well, it's like a two day conference in Santa Barbara. 00:00:27.400 |
They've done a number of years in a row now. Last year, Brian 00:00:37.000 |
No, let's go. Who's got crazier hair right now? You or SPF? Give 00:00:41.320 |
us a quick take that hat off for a second. Take that Moncler off 00:00:44.640 |
for a second. Let's get a side by side. Oh, my god. SACs is 00:00:51.680 |
It's not that bad. You're starting to look like the 00:00:54.560 |
Emperor, like Senator Palpatine from Star Wars. I mean, people 00:00:58.160 |
are having a field day with this crazy hair. But what was the 00:01:01.120 |
vibe? If you said there was a vibe two years ago, the vibe was 00:01:04.440 |
crypto mania. SPF was the bell of the ball. I suppose will be 00:01:08.720 |
the bell of the ball when he goes in the who scout as well. 00:01:11.320 |
No, it looks like he's getting off. He's getting up. I thought 00:01:14.720 |
he was getting off. I guess the fix in is the fixes in God. I 00:01:20.360 |
agree. Can you imagine if he gets off? He's almost as 00:01:24.280 |
Here we go. Okay, everybody. freeberg's not here this week. 00:01:29.120 |
Insert jokes and conspiracy theories for the mids. There's 00:01:33.160 |
going to be about 8000 messages on a subreddit about freeberg 00:01:36.520 |
missing this week and sacks missing last week. I'll let you 00:01:38.680 |
guys all read into it. But what would you say Brad? Brad 00:01:42.000 |
Gerstner back? Of course, if bestie, Brad, what would you 00:01:44.560 |
say the vibe was at this one? If it was SPF lunacy two years ago, 00:01:50.920 |
Well, you know, first, they put on an incredible events called 00:01:53.680 |
East meets West. And it was really about bringing, you know, 00:01:57.240 |
CEOs and founders from China to the states and connecting them 00:02:01.560 |
with founders and CEOs in the United States. Listen, I think 00:02:05.880 |
it's somber, right? There's a recognition that we've seen a 00:02:09.080 |
bounce in the public markets, you know, off of this 00:02:12.800 |
devastation in 2022. But I think listen, they gave a great tough 00:02:18.520 |
love speech discussion with the 1400 unicorns that are out there 00:02:23.800 |
and they said, Do not expect your own profitable tech company 00:02:27.720 |
to bounce like one of the magnificent seven, right? Those 00:02:31.360 |
are highly profitable companies traded 1920 times earnings. And 00:02:35.680 |
if you are burning cash today, there, you can't come back to 00:02:39.440 |
the well. So you need to either figure out how to get profitable 00:02:43.200 |
figure out how to get fit. Or you need to sell your business. 00:02:48.360 |
Because you know that there's not an endless stream of money. 00:02:51.160 |
So I thought it was a sober view. You know, Larry Summers was 00:02:54.880 |
there. And I think a lot of the people called 22 right, we're 00:02:59.480 |
looking for a hard landing in q1 of this year, probably 00:03:02.600 |
including, you know, Larry was probably more in that camp. And 00:03:07.400 |
I think everybody still views this distribution of 00:03:10.640 |
probabilities over the course of the next four quarters. And, 00:03:12.880 |
you know, whether it's Druckenmiller Sternlicht this 00:03:15.280 |
morning on CNBC, or whether it's Larry Summers, they're all 00:03:18.240 |
saying, well, we could 30% chance of a hard landing q4 q1. 00:03:21.600 |
So I would say it was so yeah, I could tell it was sober, Saxe. 00:03:26.120 |
Well, I would say last year, it was somber in a different way. 00:03:29.800 |
Because you got to remember, in the first half of 2022, you had 00:03:32.280 |
this huge decline in the markets around growth stocks, because 00:03:35.200 |
interest rates had started going up, we had the whole regime 00:03:37.640 |
change. But I don't think founders had internalized the 00:03:40.600 |
way that it applied to them. And then the thing that has happened 00:03:44.400 |
over the past year is that sales have been hit, you know, every 00:03:49.720 |
software company I know is re forecasting down. It's so much 00:03:53.880 |
hard to grow customers are consolidating vendors, 00:03:56.960 |
sharpening their pencils, seed expansion has been replaced with 00:04:03.560 |
it's, it's much harder now to sell software than it was, let's 00:04:07.440 |
say a year ago, you know, two x is now the new three x, if you 00:04:11.680 |
can go to x in this environment, it's basically it's going through 00:04:14.600 |
x before it's funny to me that how much the feds actions impact 00:04:23.360 |
understand. Cology is distinctly different. Yeah, 00:04:25.760 |
yeah, the psychology really is different. Yeah, I mean, we knew 00:04:28.720 |
that the feds behavior influence valuations and sort of capital 00:04:32.640 |
markets, but the way that it influences the business outlook 00:04:38.520 |
and CO2 is no different. I see they hired Billy McFarland from 00:04:41.480 |
fire festival to do the food. What is this? I mean, coach who 00:04:46.680 |
should be ashamed of themselves. Look at this focaccia. Some 00:04:51.320 |
vegetable soup with the broth trained out super 00:04:54.280 |
stimulating. So wrong. That is so wrong. Look at this. I mean, 00:04:59.880 |
Brian and I opened our lunchbox and we're like, let's let's go 00:05:03.240 |
somewhere else. We got to go to on a budget. Wow. It look a 00:05:07.400 |
surprise that someone to put a surprise in our 00:05:10.120 |
box. Friedberg's dog. Surprise in the coach to lunchbox. Wow. 00:05:15.920 |
Well, listen, it's good coach. He's very happy looking at that 00:05:22.640 |
right. Should we tell the SPF story from last year summit? I 00:05:25.440 |
mean, last year, we talked about the maybe founders hadn't 00:05:28.600 |
internalized yet, but the markets had corrected but the 00:05:30.680 |
one founder who was super bullish and optimistic and 00:05:34.080 |
talking about how he was spraying money all over the 00:05:37.200 |
place and he was acquiring companies and who was followed 00:05:40.440 |
around by minions and had everyone like a beehive 00:05:44.560 |
surrounding him and trying to talk to him was SPF. And so I 00:05:50.280 |
remember Yeah, so I remember thinking like, who's gonna be 00:05:52.640 |
this year's SPF? You know, somebody here was somebody with 00:05:59.000 |
So basically, the CO2 conference went from bullshit to dog shit. 00:06:06.800 |
I'm like, look at Brad is so uncomfortable. Brad's like, I 00:06:10.960 |
like this invite. I got a good invite. Chamath and I are 00:06:15.240 |
invited to nothing. We give no shits about CO2 or their budget. 00:06:20.120 |
They do put on a really good event. Incredible firm. And I 00:06:22.600 |
think that the message they gave to founders for the event this 00:06:26.400 |
year and last year was great. It was actually really appropriate. 00:06:29.160 |
Whether founders choose to listen is a different story. But 00:06:32.320 |
the message they've been conveying is similar to the 00:06:33.920 |
message we've been conveying for the last year and a half 00:06:36.760 |
HM off any more jokes we can make about CO2 since you and I 00:06:40.840 |
No, I mean, I'm not making fun of CO2. I was just making fun of 00:06:44.560 |
the fact that we went from literally bullshit with SPF to 00:06:49.080 |
By the way, I bet they would invite you if you wanted to go. 00:06:54.000 |
I'm pretty sure they would send 10 invitations if I if I even 00:06:57.440 |
fainted desire to go. But I'm in Milan right now. The pods very 00:07:02.840 |
popular there. By the way, I know you did a focus group. Tell 00:07:05.880 |
everybody I can we play the focus group or was that I think 00:07:09.640 |
it just a fan a fan came up to me. I mean, when I say fan, this 00:07:12.960 |
is like a very high profile person. This woman works at 00:07:15.880 |
Netflix. She works at Netflix and her husband is the founder of a 00:07:20.280 |
startup. She said she's a fan of the pod. So I started asking her 00:07:22.840 |
questions about it. The focus group because you know, we've 00:07:26.160 |
been having this debate over the last couple of weeks about what 00:07:28.720 |
issues we should be talking about. And certain people on the 00:07:32.400 |
pod never want to discuss politics. It's not like I only 00:07:35.960 |
want to discuss politics. I just don't want to exclude it. I 00:07:39.440 |
think we should just be talking about whatever the biggest 00:07:41.320 |
issues are in the world in any given week current events. Yeah, 00:07:45.040 |
I mean, whether it's business markets or politics, and she 00:07:48.320 |
confirmed that was basically right, don't change it. So I 00:07:51.280 |
don't know why we would want to change the formula for the pot 00:07:54.240 |
Every week, sex. There's a group of people who are like, stop 00:07:57.640 |
talking about politics. And then there's another group of people 00:08:00.240 |
and their feedback is why didn't you talk about a hundred Biden 00:08:02.920 |
Ukraine, Ukraine, Putin, China, whatever. And so the docket is 00:08:07.920 |
the docket just to let the audience know, not that it's 00:08:12.520 |
like all that big of a deal, it should be fairly obvious. 00:08:15.160 |
Everybody has equal input on the docket. So it's not like anybody 00:08:18.240 |
owns the docket. If you want to talk about something, you talk 00:08:20.800 |
about something, but some people want to not talk about politics. 00:08:22.920 |
Some people want to talk about a lot of politics, the 00:08:25.280 |
magnificent seven for those people who didn't catch the 00:08:27.100 |
reference is I think something Kramer has been talking about on 00:08:31.400 |
CNBC. Seven stocks make up the most of the gains this year 00:08:35.560 |
meta Tesla, Nvidia, Amazon, Alphabet, Microsoft and Apple. 00:08:39.580 |
Can I tell you guys my welcome back to Milan story? Oh, yeah, 00:08:43.400 |
absolutely. So I'm back in Milan for the summer on his throne. 00:08:46.960 |
So chef Stefano and if you could say hi to Stephanie, all my 00:08:51.800 |
friends, butlers, everybody tell you're back in Italy because the 00:08:54.920 |
buttons are gone. I'm working from my office here. But this 00:08:58.760 |
morning, I went to Coppola, which is my stylist, my 00:09:02.400 |
hairdresser. Oh, and the thing is, there's like a hierarchy, 00:09:06.600 |
the hairdressers. And so Roberto, this guy, Roberto, he's 00:09:09.000 |
like the sort of top of the ticket. And Nat has first dibs 00:09:12.520 |
with Roberto. And I have this other guy who's excellent. His 00:09:14.640 |
name is Joaquin. Oh, yes. You guys will see Joaquin in a few 00:09:17.440 |
weeks. Anyways, the best thing about the haircuts at this 00:09:20.780 |
place, Coppola is you get a hair fluffer, which means that as 00:09:24.680 |
your keynote Roberto cuts your hair, a guy comes in, he just 00:09:28.880 |
like he like does this and then he like, you're padding your 00:09:33.240 |
hair in a very he he fluffs your hair. Very uncomfortable. It's a 00:09:39.080 |
laughing that doesn't exist anywhere that will never get 00:09:42.480 |
disrupted by AI. And it's incredible. A hairstyling for 00:09:48.080 |
the hair fluffer, the air buffer gets like a 50 euro tip doesn't 00:09:51.200 |
matter what he does. Wow, when sacks rolls in, you're gonna 00:09:55.680 |
need to fluffers with that. One on each side. I mean, the tufts 00:09:59.560 |
are getting crazy. Saks tell me if you want your keynote to cut 00:10:02.160 |
your hair because when you come because he will do it, he'll do 00:10:04.880 |
an incredible job and I'll ask him to bring the air fluffer. 00:10:07.280 |
All right, listen, I think we just going back to the CO2 00:10:10.760 |
thing. I know we're in a high interest rate. lunch environment. 00:10:14.440 |
The herb environment is hard right now for everybody, but we 00:10:16.900 |
did get the feedback. Let's play the feedback. 00:10:19.600 |
Hey guys, I'm at the CO2 summit and just met a fan who wants to 00:10:24.760 |
explain the magic of the pod because you guys keep wanting to 00:10:30.440 |
my husband and I were listening to your podcast pretty much 00:10:35.320 |
religiously. And there is this incredible magic that the four 00:10:38.920 |
of you have the repartee back and forth. It's super 00:10:41.920 |
informative, but you're all sort of rooting for characters 00:10:44.080 |
almost. So it's almost like a scripted show in some way. So I 00:10:46.880 |
have my favorite character. My husband has his favorite 00:10:48.720 |
character. I won't say who's who. I want you all to stay 00:10:51.760 |
together and keep doing the show. But it's fantastic. And we 00:10:57.840 |
I work at Netflix back in the day I produce shows. So pick up 00:11:00.640 |
the show. I was just telling David trying to get that magic. 00:11:02.880 |
You can put any number of scripts together. But once you 00:11:04.920 |
get the cast on the floor, and actually start getting you know, 00:11:07.920 |
that chemistry going, that's when the magic happens. And you 00:11:11.920 |
Alright, so that's a professional right there. So 00:11:15.200 |
stop screwing with the formula. Stop protesting. 00:11:19.400 |
I mean, the camera really does that 10 pounds, doesn't it? 00:11:25.760 |
I take two things away from this. Number one, she's much 00:11:29.400 |
more charismatic on camera than sacks. She stole the show. She's 00:11:33.040 |
delightful. And then to that sweater. Oh, my Lord. 00:11:36.240 |
What's fantastic. No, the sweater is fantastic. The shirts 00:11:39.560 |
fantastic. I just think they may not have been. I don't think the 00:11:43.040 |
intention was to mesh the two together. But there are too many 00:11:46.480 |
buttons for you to mouth. No, bro. When you have a cream 00:11:49.680 |
colored sweater, you can't wear a red checkered shirt. It's just 00:11:52.320 |
not. Yeah, yeah, I agree. Red Striped. Anyways, it's a Yeah. I 00:11:58.160 |
mean, it looks like you're wearing an Italian tablecloth 00:12:00.560 |
under there from a pizzeria. Combined with like an $8,000 00:12:03.640 |
sweater. It's great. But the hair, I mean, the hair is out of 00:12:06.600 |
control. I think there's fantastic. I do. Do not cut the 00:12:11.840 |
hair. Don't let your kino touch your hair, bro. 00:12:14.120 |
I'll just get a fluff. I'll tell him just flop it. Don't just 00:12:25.200 |
And instead, we open sources to the fans and they've just gone 00:12:38.520 |
Oh, yeah. Oh, my God. This is a little worried for my friend 00:12:42.520 |
here. Yeah. So I don't know if he's on is completely up to 00:12:46.440 |
date on what kind of shape Zuck is in. Zuck is in tremendous 00:12:50.400 |
shape. He's got like a dojo at his house. He's been getting 00:12:53.320 |
training in you know, mixed martial arts from jujitsu 00:12:57.480 |
increases or whoever, you know, Brazilian jujitsu. Yeah, 00:13:00.680 |
competing in events. Zuck is in tremendous shape. And no joke 00:13:05.720 |
here. Now. Elon's a big guy. Elon's a monster. But I mean, 00:13:09.280 |
Elon's not he was not in this kind of shape. You don't have 00:13:12.320 |
time to work out like this. I hope you get some sort of Gracie 00:13:16.400 |
on your team to train you up for this thing. Also, Elon has a neck 00:13:20.880 |
injury that he got. Yeah, from that sumo thing years ago. Yes. 00:13:26.000 |
And he's had to have surgeries on it. So it really suck if that 00:13:30.440 |
Here's the thing, though, he did take on a sumo wrestler. We were 00:13:33.840 |
there for that at his birthday party. And he held his own 00:13:38.080 |
against the giant sumo wrestler. If you want does get on top of 00:13:42.120 |
and do the waris on top of zuck zuck has no chance. You're 00:13:50.280 |
abandon the mission to Mars. Yes. Stop electrifying the 00:13:57.280 |
world. And stop free internet around the world. Yeah. So he 00:14:10.000 |
This is the dumbest fucking idea I've ever heard in my life. Oh my 00:14:14.480 |
god. I love the banter between the two of them. And let's just 00:14:17.800 |
say we can all agree out of all the companies, right? There's 00:14:21.440 |
only one contender to zuck getting fit. Right getting that 00:14:25.600 |
company fit getting himself fit. Zilon Yeah, 75 80% of the people 00:14:31.320 |
gone and product velocity is on fire at Twitter. So this is 00:14:35.360 |
this would be a cage match between the two who have 00:14:40.480 |
All right, let's get to the docket here. What the fuck are 00:14:44.800 |
you talking about? He's using the fitness guy burned a quarter 00:14:48.840 |
trillion dollars and then found a way to stop it. 00:14:51.240 |
That's very different than firing on all cylinders and 00:14:57.800 |
By the way, I am the only one of anybody I think that knows. Well, 00:15:03.560 |
maybe sacks. Well, it's kind of like, you know, if you've got 00:15:06.280 |
like a faucet running, and it's spilling over the sink, and then 00:15:09.400 |
you turn it off. That doesn't make you a firefighter. 00:15:15.560 |
Stop spending money on there's this feature of a bathtub where 00:15:22.240 |
when you get into it, and the water gushes so violently over 00:15:26.320 |
the over the outside of it, and then there's a drain at the top 00:15:29.400 |
as well as the bottom. And so then eventually it just stops. 00:15:33.000 |
Yeah, but Chamath raised a good point, which is look, Elon's a 00:15:37.120 |
big guy. If he got training in MMA, I'm sure he'd do fine. But 00:15:41.360 |
we don't want Elon spending two hours a day for the next six 00:15:44.600 |
months or whatever. Because that's been doing MMA, I guess 00:15:47.400 |
for a while, a couple years, maybe years into it. Yeah. All 00:15:49.920 |
right. Well, listen, there's been some updates. 00:15:54.200 |
between Russia and the Ukraine or the invasion of Ukraine by 00:15:59.200 |
Russia. You wrote a piece about it in what was it the Federalist 00:16:03.240 |
I think this week titled the truth about Ukraine's falling 00:16:07.320 |
failing counter offensive and the peace that could have been 00:16:11.840 |
why don't you give us an overview of what you wrote and 00:16:14.320 |
what your take is on the state of affairs right now? 00:16:16.080 |
Well, the thing that's been going on since around June 4, 00:16:19.280 |
or June 5, is this long awaited Ukrainian counter offensive. 00:16:23.520 |
This has been touted for a long time as is going to reverse 00:16:27.440 |
Russian territorial gains. Ukraine's gonna use all this 00:16:31.080 |
modern Western equipment, these leopard tanks that have come 00:16:34.720 |
from Germany and Bradley's from the United States, and a lot of 00:16:38.920 |
other NATO or American equipment, and they're going to 00:16:42.480 |
push Russia out of their country. This has been told to 00:16:46.040 |
us since the fall of last year, since that sort of car key 00:16:50.040 |
counter offensive, produce some Ukrainian territorial gains, 00:16:54.840 |
you've had former generals like Ben Hodges and Petraeus say 00:16:59.400 |
that this counter offensive is going to be highly successful. 00:17:01.760 |
Where it stands right now is that around 18 or 19 days into 00:17:05.920 |
it, it has produced minimal gains. In fact, it's been 00:17:10.720 |
somewhat of a disaster. It's hard to get conclusive estimates 00:17:15.720 |
of personnel and material losses. But I think as many as a 00:17:20.240 |
quarter of the tanks and armored vehicles have already been 00:17:24.920 |
destroyed. And the casualties may be as high as around 10,000 00:17:29.720 |
out of an army that was trained up for this purpose of around 00:17:32.160 |
50,000. So so far, it has not gone well, the the Ukrainian 00:17:36.560 |
army hasn't even made it to the first line of defense. So what 00:17:42.320 |
the Russians did is they created three fortified lines or belts 00:17:47.160 |
of defense. And then in front of that is what they call a gray 00:17:51.040 |
zone or security zone or crumple zone, which is an area they can 00:17:54.600 |
test, but it's not technically a fortified line. The Ukrainians 00:17:58.080 |
are still in that sort of gray zone, they are not punching 00:18:01.640 |
through they are not even at the first Russian fortified line to 00:18:05.000 |
give you some idea of what's involved here. The Russians have 00:18:09.280 |
these obstacles, there's basically trenches have been 00:18:12.520 |
dug, there's ditches that would stop tanks or sort of force them 00:18:17.280 |
to go in a certain direction, steer the traffic, there's 00:18:20.440 |
extensive minefields, they've got these things called dragon 00:18:23.680 |
teeth, which are concrete bollards that stop tanks or move 00:18:27.920 |
them in a certain direction. Then the Russians have massive 00:18:31.200 |
amounts of artillery, they've got infantry on the ground that 00:18:33.440 |
helps spot the artillery. And if all of that doesn't take out 00:18:37.280 |
these Ukrainian tanks, they've got these attack helicopters that 00:18:41.960 |
come in almost uncontested. Because at this point, it 00:18:45.280 |
doesn't look like the Ukrainians have any air defense. And 00:18:48.000 |
they've also got fixed wing aircraft that are capable of 00:18:50.800 |
dropping precision munitions. So it really seems like the Russians 00:18:55.840 |
have fixed a lot of the problems that they had last fall in their 00:18:59.880 |
army. And so far, it seems like this counter offensive is not 00:19:03.520 |
We're 16 months into this trim off and clearly fatigue is 00:19:08.800 |
setting in. It's not commanding the new cycle here in America. 00:19:12.520 |
And on a percentage basis, even the neocons and Republicans are 00:19:19.480 |
dropping their support for this at a pretty precipitous rate, 00:19:22.160 |
which is predictable. Americans don't want to be in forever 00:19:27.200 |
wars. We all know that. So what's your take on how this 00:19:30.120 |
winds up, especially in relation to a, our budget and be this 00:19:36.000 |
upcoming election, which this seems to be will be a major 00:19:39.800 |
issue if this isn't resolved. By the time we get into the 24 00:19:43.560 |
As part of answering this, I have a question for sacks. But 00:19:46.520 |
is it true that there was a ceasefire like Putin had a press 00:19:49.720 |
conference where he showed a document that he said was a 00:19:53.640 |
ceasefire that then the United States apparently sent Boris 00:19:57.280 |
Johnson over to Russia, Ukraine to basically blow up blow up 00:20:04.240 |
This wasn't a ceasefire. This was a peace deal before the war 00:20:10.200 |
There were rounds of negotiation before the war. Notably, there 00:20:14.760 |
was a round of diplomacy between Blinken and Lavrov in January, 00:20:18.520 |
the month before the war, where Blinken said that we cannot 00:20:21.680 |
compromise on NATO's open door policy, that that sort of 00:20:24.840 |
diplomacy fell apart. But then after the war, there was a 00:20:28.360 |
meeting of the Russian delegation and Ukrainian 00:20:30.880 |
delegation in Istanbul, under the supervision of Erdogan in 00:20:35.640 |
Turkey, Naftali Bennett also had a similar process. In both 00:20:43.000 |
Allegedly, we don't this is Putin we're talking about. 00:20:45.680 |
Hold on a second. Let me come back to the evidence for in a 00:20:48.920 |
second. But yeah, what the deal would have provided is that the 00:20:52.120 |
Russians would move back to pre war lines. If the Ukrainians 00:20:56.520 |
would agree not to become a member of NATO. However, the 00:21:00.760 |
Ukrainians could still receive specified security guarantees 00:21:04.000 |
from the West. That was the deal. Now, well, we have now 00:21:08.880 |
multiple data points. You've got Naftali Bennett saying that he 00:21:11.880 |
thought a deal was on these lines, but it was rejected by 00:21:14.640 |
the West. You also have now Putin showing the very document, 00:21:18.480 |
which was signed by the Ukrainian delegation. So this 00:21:21.800 |
was the document document, right? Nobody has this document. 00:21:24.760 |
It hasn't been released yet. I hope the Russian government 00:21:27.280 |
releases it for the purposes of history. So we can inspect it. 00:21:30.600 |
But nobody can test this document is real. Remember, if 00:21:33.680 |
he's just making this up, you would think that Erdogan would 00:21:36.720 |
basically come forward and say, No, this is fake. There's too 00:21:38.960 |
many people who are in that room who'd be able to say this 00:21:41.240 |
document is fake. No one has done that. So I think there's 00:21:44.040 |
every reason to believe this document is real. Now, it is not 00:21:46.800 |
a final agreement, it appears to be a preliminary agreement or an 00:21:49.800 |
outline. But the outline is that Russia is saying we will move 00:21:53.560 |
back to pre war lines, if you agree not to become part of NATO 00:21:57.200 |
and that deal was rejected when Boris Johnson flew into Kiev, 00:22:01.400 |
and basically told the Ukrainians, we do not want to 00:22:04.000 |
make a deal with Putin, we want to pressure Putin. And the 00:22:07.040 |
source for that is not the Russians. The source for that is 00:22:11.040 |
a Ukrainian publication called Ukrainian Pravda, up. And they 00:22:17.520 |
ran an article in May of 2022 that I can put on the screen. 00:22:21.400 |
And it is the source for saying that Boris Johnson came in and 00:22:24.960 |
told Zelensky, we do not want to make a peace deal. We the West 00:22:29.080 |
are not ready to make a deal with Putin. We want you to fight 00:22:32.000 |
Putin or pressure Putin. And if you do, we will give you advanced 00:22:35.320 |
weapons systems. And that is when the deal fell apart. If you 00:22:38.400 |
look at the timing of it, this is this has been so this has 00:22:42.360 |
been lightly sourced here. So let's go there. But you have to 00:22:44.960 |
consider the source here. This is a pro Ukrainian publication, 00:22:48.600 |
writing in May of 2022. Now, the tone of the article and what they 00:22:53.280 |
basically say in this article is that Zelensky accepted Boris 00:22:57.440 |
Johnson's offer. In other words, he took the gamble. And at this 00:23:00.800 |
point in time, you've got to remember, this is two months 00:23:02.640 |
after the war started, it looked like the Ukrainians were doing 00:23:04.640 |
well. So up was essentially praising Zelensky in this 00:23:08.600 |
article, for taking the West up on this deal to pressure Putin 00:23:12.800 |
rather than make peace. Now, a year later, it looks like this 00:23:16.720 |
gamble was a disaster. Yeah. And so that is the real conclusion 00:23:20.760 |
here. A deal was available, but the West chose not to take it. By 00:23:24.880 |
the way, Fiona Hill, who is a Russia hawk. And you could 00:23:30.720 |
almost put her I'd say, neocon adjacent has basically said that 00:23:35.000 |
this type of deal was available. The West did not want this deal. 00:23:38.480 |
I think Jason, maybe to give you an answer. My thought is that 00:23:41.480 |
this week was a very bad week for establishment politics and 00:23:45.880 |
institutions. Because on the one hand, if you take the Russia 00:23:49.760 |
incident in the Ukraine war, what you saw was that there were 00:23:53.280 |
ample numbers of off ramps that we chose, frankly, to not take 00:23:58.480 |
so that we could engage our enemy in some long drawn out 00:24:02.840 |
war on the hopes that it just depletes their resources. That's 00:24:08.320 |
kind of rolling the dice, I think, in a very dangerous way. 00:24:12.360 |
I think this week, we also saw some published stuff on COVID 00:24:16.720 |
and the COVID vaccine, which also debunked a lot of widely 00:24:20.880 |
held truths. And it turned out that folks that may have been 00:24:23.760 |
conspiracy theorists, quote, unquote, were right there as 00:24:26.040 |
well. So I think it's just an uncomfortable set of facts that 00:24:31.400 |
again, just reinforce that if you're not really thinking for 00:24:33.760 |
yourself, you're not going to see the totality of what's 00:24:35.720 |
actually going on. I think with respect to Russia, Ukraine, 00:24:39.400 |
everybody has moved on. And so sadly, the only people that are 00:24:44.800 |
left over are the people that have to fight the war, we're 00:24:49.720 |
still separated from their families, there's the people 00:24:51.800 |
that are dying. There was an article I think today, they 00:24:55.240 |
recruit prisoners, right. So obviously, some of the prisoners 00:24:57.680 |
that Russia users are still pretty crazy. That person went 00:25:00.560 |
on some rampage inside of a train, killed a couple people 00:25:04.920 |
stabbed some other people, there was just pictures of blood 00:25:07.160 |
everywhere. I mean, this is just a horrible situation. And it's 00:25:11.520 |
still not clear to me why we didn't take the offer. If in 00:25:16.400 |
fact, it's real. So I just want to keep putting that disclaimer 00:25:19.320 |
out there. Because Putin flashing a document doesn't make 00:25:21.920 |
all this true. It doesn't mean it's not true. 00:25:25.640 |
Well, Jason, I would say what about I am just being clear 00:25:29.720 |
here that none of the data points you need, I would say 00:25:33.240 |
what are you talking about? Naftali Bennett confirmed it. 00:25:35.560 |
What incentives the Israeli former Israeli leader have to 00:25:39.560 |
Here's what I would say, Jason, I think that something like that 00:25:43.280 |
is so profoundly important, that if it were not true, I think it 00:25:49.800 |
would have been very important for the powers that be to 00:25:52.800 |
discredit it almost immediately, so that they didn't have to look 00:26:01.200 |
Can I also up level and connect to this point about the 00:26:04.720 |
establishment? Because I think there's been a lot of pushback 00:26:08.720 |
to even challenging the status quo, even having a conversation 00:26:14.240 |
about Ukraine or having a conversation about COVID. And I 00:26:17.880 |
think if there's one thing this pod represents the fight going 00:26:21.640 |
on at Twitter represents is the need to have this conversation. 00:26:26.760 |
If we look at the wars the US has engaged in since September 00:26:30.600 |
11, it's estimated three to 4 million people have died in 00:26:36.760 |
Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, we spent $8 trillion. Inflation 00:26:44.360 |
adjusted, we spent 4 trillion in World War Two. 8 trillion 00:26:50.200 |
represents 25% of our entire national debt. And I've yet to 00:26:56.120 |
meet a single parent who said to me, I care so much about this 00:27:00.360 |
Ukraine situation, I would be willing to put my children in 00:27:04.680 |
harm's way to fight for the defense of Europe. Okay, so 00:27:08.680 |
those data points tell me at a very minimum, we need more of 00:27:13.080 |
this discussion, more of this debate, not less. 00:27:16.120 |
The idea that that we could be tiptoeing closer and closer to 00:27:19.640 |
some land war in Europe unnecessarily. And I think the 00:27:24.200 |
bigger issue is and you can't trust what you're being told. 00:27:29.200 |
problematic is a bigger picture. And just so we're clear here, 00:27:31.520 |
I'm not saying I'm on either side of this. I'm just pointing 00:27:34.920 |
out that this is all still very thinly sourced. 00:27:38.640 |
Until the West confirms any of this, I think expect the West to 00:27:41.960 |
do you expect the State Department to issue a press 00:27:44.040 |
release saying, yep, we fucked up. It's on me. 00:27:46.480 |
My theory. My, my theory has been I and I've been very clear 00:27:51.920 |
on this podcast. My theory has been since the beginning, they 00:27:54.560 |
want to deplete Russia and they want to deplete their army and 00:27:59.160 |
not capabilities and have regime change and Putin. I'm not saying 00:28:08.400 |
That is what they that is what they plan on doing. Yes, I think 00:28:12.720 |
believe Austin, our Secretary of Defense said that our purpose 00:28:15.440 |
was to weaken Russia. Yeah. So to knock it out. 00:28:17.920 |
I agree. That's what our purposes. Yes. I think they 00:28:21.080 |
That's what Boris Johnson went to Kiev and said, we want to 00:28:22.920 |
pressure Putin not make a deal with him. So they ordered this 00:28:28.480 |
beginning preferred to fight a proxy war of choice. That was 00:28:32.040 |
I'm not endorsing that. I'm not endorsing that. 00:28:36.080 |
This is not about you, Jason. I'm asking a simple question. 00:28:38.520 |
But Saks just said it was too much. So I'm just clearing. He 00:28:42.440 |
just said that was your position. And I'm correct. 00:28:45.760 |
Have the right to correct you. That was not my position. I 00:28:48.320 |
I actually agree with you. If you're saying that that was our 00:28:52.000 |
government's objective, which was to weaken Putin. I agree 00:28:55.680 |
with you. They've chose to fight an optional proxy war of choice 00:28:59.640 |
that was easily avoidable if they just take a NATO expansion 00:29:02.400 |
off the table, because they thought it would weaken Putin. 00:29:04.640 |
But here's the rub on this. It has not weakened Putin. It has 00:29:08.840 |
weakened the United States and our allies. Anyway, you want to 00:29:12.200 |
look at this thing, look at just the weapons and munitions. So we 00:29:15.880 |
are out of 155 millimeter artillery shells, we cannot 00:29:20.400 |
produce enough. This is the crazy thing. We spent 800 00:29:23.160 |
billion a year plus on the Pentagon and our national 00:29:26.720 |
defense. We're out of ammo. I mean, we must be getting so 00:29:29.920 |
royally ripped off by the military industrial complex. 00:29:33.000 |
Okay, we cannot produce ammo fast enough. That's why 00:29:35.680 |
Ukraine's losing this war. The balance of artillery favors 00:29:38.640 |
Russia. Russia is basically using about 20,000 shells a day. 00:29:43.040 |
The Ukrainians are using somewhere between three and 6,000. 00:29:46.280 |
We are out of ammo, we cannot produce enough. 00:29:48.960 |
And this actually dovetails nicely with another story this 00:29:52.520 |
week. There is a journalist named Matt. Euglesius is that 00:29:57.880 |
his pronounce his name? Yeah. Euglesius. And he said, I mean, 00:30:03.360 |
he literally said the quiet part out loud. And I'll just quote, 00:30:07.600 |
because he was criticizing you and Chamath for hosting RFK, 00:30:12.720 |
we'll get to that in a second. But he basically said, this is 00:30:16.240 |
actually a really good idea for us. Basically, NATO equipment 00:30:18.720 |
plus Ukrainian lives are being traded for Russian equipment and 00:30:21.840 |
Russian lives, which leaves NATO coming out ahead. That's doubly 00:30:25.440 |
true, because NATO is much richer than Russia. So we win a 00:30:28.600 |
long term game of everyone explode their weapons as fast as 00:30:31.600 |
they can make them again, though, what makes that really 00:30:35.600 |
true is NATO material is killing Russian soldiers, while Russian 00:30:38.960 |
material is killing Ukrainian soldiers. That's a deal in our 00:30:43.840 |
to be clear of that. Yeah, he wrote that last year in defense 00:30:47.800 |
of the war, basically, like all the neocons, he's sort of an 00:30:51.120 |
establishment approved intellectual, they think he's 00:30:53.320 |
smart, I think he's really foolish. He basically wants to 00:30:55.480 |
fight the last Ukrainian here, for the sole purpose of blowing 00:30:58.600 |
up Russia's stockpiles. The reason this is so dumb is Russia 00:31:01.440 |
can always make more, those lives aren't coming back. But 00:31:04.200 |
they can always produce more artillery, more weapons. And in 00:31:07.080 |
fact, the Russian war machine is now ramping up to full 00:31:10.560 |
production. Okay, they are ramping up the number of people 00:31:14.360 |
in their army, I think it's estimated that by the end of the 00:31:16.320 |
year, they're gonna have 750,000 men under arms, they've ramped 00:31:20.160 |
up artillery shells production, they're at something like one 00:31:22.960 |
and a half million. At the beginning of the war, we were 00:31:25.480 |
only producing 14,000 artillery shells a month, mostly for 00:31:29.120 |
training purposes in the United States. We've since ramped that 00:31:31.560 |
up to 20,000. But that's still massively trails what the 00:31:34.840 |
Russians can do. And they're trying to hold on, they're 00:31:36.760 |
trying to ramp it up to 90,000 a month. But that's going to take 00:31:39.560 |
till 2028. Because, you know, it takes time to build it, you got 00:31:43.040 |
to build up new factories, new production lines, you got to 00:31:45.240 |
issue contracts to suppliers or vendors, it takes time to do 00:31:49.600 |
this. But the Russians have ramped up their war machine. And 00:31:53.000 |
then the other thing that's happened is that Russia and 00:31:56.720 |
China have entered a de facto alliance, and including Iran. So 00:32:01.360 |
you now have the cementing of this giant alliance in Asia, 00:32:06.280 |
between China, Russia and Iran. They're sharing equipment now 00:32:11.160 |
together, Iran is producing drones for Russia, Russia is now 00:32:15.240 |
going to be giving advanced fighter jets to Iran. So this 00:32:18.480 |
idea that this war has made the West stronger is depleting the 00:32:21.880 |
West over an objective, we didn't need to fight this war 00:32:25.160 |
was easily avoidable. And we have now created, I think, the 00:32:27.920 |
most fearsome opponent that America has ever faced, we have 00:32:32.520 |
never faced a adversary with a combined manufacturing capacity 00:32:38.400 |
and raw materials of China, Russia and Iran. If we were to 00:32:42.640 |
get in a war, a new world war against this sort of new axis, 00:32:46.480 |
we could lose, they actually have more manufacturing capacity 00:32:50.200 |
to produce weapons of war, and munitions and ammo than the 00:32:55.080 |
China has been clear that they're not going to provide 00:32:56.760 |
weapons to Russia. And so I'm not sure that that alliance is 00:33:03.400 |
They've given us no such assurance. All they've said is 00:33:07.320 |
It's a theoretical thing that you're talking about here that 00:33:09.360 |
could be very serious. I think your point and this is to Brad's 00:33:12.000 |
point, we should be having a very thoughtful discussion here. 00:33:14.360 |
Because if China did pick Russia, which they haven't, and 00:33:19.200 |
Well, we should talk about the China relationship, actually. 00:33:24.600 |
Yeah. Okay. Lincoln just went to China. And this was the first 00:33:28.600 |
trip for an American Secretary of State. Since 2018. Obviously, 00:33:33.800 |
things have been strained with the spy balloon and the visits 00:33:38.800 |
to Taiwan. Blinken gave some basic goals for this engagement 00:33:44.160 |
with China, the fentanyl problem, some detained Americans 00:33:49.080 |
and protecting US citizens working in China. Those were 00:33:51.560 |
kind of the easy checkboxes. But they wanted to create also an 00:33:58.760 |
open line of communication between our militaries, which 00:34:01.880 |
China wasn't super stoked on wouldn't agree to. 00:34:06.560 |
Tony did a great job. Yeah. Okay. I think what's really 00:34:10.440 |
disappointing is that while Tony's over there doing this 00:34:13.080 |
hard work, which is must be tough to do, because it must 00:34:15.240 |
have been a little bit like dancing on eggshells a little 00:34:18.800 |
bit, right? He had to be intense. Yeah, he had to be very 00:34:21.720 |
thoughtful, very measured. But as far as I could tell, he did a 00:34:25.640 |
fabulous job. Now, full disclosure, he's a friend of 00:34:29.120 |
mine. So maybe I'm biased. But then over here, Biden at some 00:34:33.200 |
mid level fundraiser in California is calling she a 00:34:36.200 |
dictator. How hard must it be for you to try to do your job 00:34:39.760 |
when your boss is just like, completely undisciplined, like 00:34:43.320 |
here. And here's the problem with that is that if the United 00:34:46.840 |
States actually thought that she was a dictator, do you think 00:34:50.240 |
that a mid level fundraiser that we were all invited to in 00:34:53.240 |
Northern California that none of us said yes to is the place to 00:34:56.480 |
announce a foreign policy shift like that? Absolutely not. So it 00:34:59.680 |
just means that again, there's just more evidence about Biden 00:35:03.360 |
being very undisciplined. Now, again, that could be an age 00:35:07.000 |
issue, it could be a mental acuity issue. We don't know 00:35:10.440 |
because we're not given a chance to really prosecute that 00:35:13.080 |
problem. Meanwhile, Tony's there trying to do the best job he can 00:35:17.240 |
and the sand shift underneath him. Thank God he was able to 00:35:20.280 |
get the trip done before this thing happened is what I think 00:35:22.680 |
but that gap was a very big gap and a very big problem. I think 00:35:26.960 |
because whatever goodwill he built up was practically flushed 00:35:30.600 |
down the toilet if you saw the reaction from the Chinese, which 00:35:33.800 |
was to be deeply offended. And it makes no sense to poke. Yeah. 00:35:39.160 |
When he went to see NPS and they had to negotiate a fist bump 00:35:42.520 |
versus a handshake. Like what is all of this either unplanned or 00:35:46.240 |
undisciplined theater? Why are we engaging in any of this stuff? 00:35:52.400 |
moth Joe, Joe Biden's always been known for being a liability 00:35:55.880 |
in terms of these statements. When he worked for Obama, he was 00:35:59.480 |
the VP. He also said things you know, he shot from the hip a lot 00:36:02.560 |
you should not be calling him a dictator when you're trying to 00:36:04.720 |
do this critical work. It's a stupid move. I think everybody 00:36:07.520 |
can agree. You were gonna say something, Brad? 00:36:09.960 |
Yeah, I was just gonna say, you know, kind of market reaction 00:36:13.960 |
going in. So the K web, the Chinese index was up about 20% 00:36:18.040 |
heading into the series of meetings. Now, notably, Blinken 00:36:21.520 |
was not scheduled to have a meeting with she. And so what 00:36:27.840 |
happened is on day one, there's a meeting with the foreign 00:36:30.360 |
minister, right? And it seems that there was some positive 00:36:33.840 |
trend lines coming out of these first two meetings with the top 00:36:37.000 |
diplomat with foreign minister, which led to the meeting. And 00:36:40.160 |
notably in the meeting, he did say, the United States has not 00:36:43.400 |
changed his policy on Taiwan, we don't support Taiwanese 00:36:46.240 |
independence. Now, the market reaction post visit was down 10%. 00:36:51.560 |
And I think this is owing to what Chamas said that people 00:36:55.640 |
felt like maybe we took a step forward here that we at least 00:36:58.800 |
had a meeting, but then it was a another step back. And so I 00:37:03.840 |
think where we sit at the moment is there probably going to be 00:37:06.880 |
some follow on meetings coming out of this. This was not, you 00:37:10.400 |
know, a path back to where we were, but I think it was a 00:37:14.120 |
stabilizing moment. And, you know, again, we were just at the 00:37:18.680 |
East meets West conference, where there are a lot of Chinese 00:37:21.520 |
CEOs and founders who were there. And I think the idea there 00:37:25.160 |
was like, things are stable, like not getting worse. And by 00:37:27.880 |
the way, six months ago, there was a real concern that things 00:37:31.240 |
were deteriorating quickly. So I think it's, you know, you can 00:37:35.000 |
see something constructive coming out of this, 00:37:36.800 |
not getting worse was how I felt coming out of it. And then 00:37:40.520 |
Biden then makes it worse is really it is a I agree, it's 00:37:44.800 |
Let me tell you about some of the reporting from the Chinese 00:37:47.520 |
side. So after these diplomatic events, and you're right, 00:37:50.720 |
Blinken met with Wang Yi for seven hours, then he got an 00:37:53.920 |
audience with Xi Jinping. They do these readouts where each 00:37:57.920 |
side basically produces a public summary of the meeting. In the 00:38:01.560 |
Chinese readout, they said that US Chinese relationships are at 00:38:05.760 |
the lowest point they've ever been. I mean, since I guess, 00:38:10.440 |
diplomatic relations were kind of reestablished under Nixon, so 00:38:14.440 |
that from the Chinese standpoint, they believe that 00:38:16.920 |
relationships are at the worst they've ever been. Moreover, the 00:38:22.400 |
US sought to put Ukraine on the agenda. The Chinese response to 00:38:26.840 |
that was we are not interested in discussing our relationship 00:38:30.440 |
with Russia, that is none of your business. So this idea, 00:38:34.160 |
there's been this neocon fantasy, that somehow China 00:38:37.520 |
would help us in this war between Russia and Ukraine. And 00:38:41.200 |
I've said all along that the last thing China wants is for 00:38:44.800 |
neocons to achieve their objectives with respect to 00:38:47.880 |
Russia, because then China alone will be in the gun sights of US 00:38:52.040 |
talks. So China will do what it has to do to support and even 00:38:56.440 |
prop up Russia, if they have to. Remember, China, and, and Russia, 00:39:02.640 |
and specifically Xi and Putin. They're the two leaders who've 00:39:06.360 |
met with each other more often than any other leader, and 00:39:08.560 |
they've called each other their best friends or most I think the 00:39:11.920 |
language they use was most besties. Well, most bosom 00:39:15.560 |
friends was what they called it. Okay, that's a little weird. 00:39:19.440 |
there's somebody great TV show. Good. Yeah, exactly. 00:39:21.760 |
To give people exactly what happened. Biden, when he was at 00:39:25.440 |
this campaign fundraiser in NorCal that, again, yeah, we 00:39:29.280 |
were probably invited to people on the show. He was talking 00:39:32.400 |
about the military, Chinese spy balloon, and he said she got 00:39:36.560 |
very upset, quote, that this was a great embarrassment for 00:39:40.240 |
dictators when they don't know what happened. And he continued 00:39:43.960 |
to say that she didn't know the balloon had been over the 00:39:46.200 |
continental US and was off course near Alaska. And this is 00:39:49.080 |
the kind of thing where he's basically saying she is stupid, 00:39:51.640 |
or, you know, whatever. Or there's some level of 00:39:54.920 |
incompetence over there. It's exactly the wrong message you 00:39:57.240 |
want to send, calling him a dictator and calling him stupid 00:40:00.120 |
and saying he was embarrassed. Like, why would you provoke 00:40:02.080 |
that? To raise money or to be a tough guy? It makes no sense. I 00:40:05.760 |
mean, it sounds like Trump's version of foreign 00:40:08.160 |
from the Chinese standpoint, they thought the whole balloon 00:40:10.200 |
thing was a travesty. I mean, I don't know what the truth of it 00:40:13.360 |
is. But they feel like it was just this continuous drumming up 00:40:18.160 |
of outrage on the American side against China. And they wanted 00:40:22.800 |
to put that behind us in terms of the relationship. I heard 00:40:26.360 |
Blinken interviewed about this term. I agree with you. I have 00:40:28.800 |
no complaint with Blinken in terms of how he handled this 00:40:32.760 |
meeting. I have a complaint about how I have a complaint 00:40:35.560 |
about how he's handled Moscow, but but not Beijing. But they 00:40:40.520 |
wanted to put this balloon business behind them. My guess 00:40:43.560 |
I've always said that it never made sense to me that the 00:40:46.960 |
Chinese would use such a ham fisted way of conducting 00:40:49.680 |
espionage to fly, deliberately fly a balloon over the US. It 00:40:53.800 |
never deliberate. It never made sense to me. Yeah. And it became 00:40:58.200 |
this cause celebre in the US. And I think the Chinese at a 00:41:02.080 |
minimum wanted to put it behind us. And then Biden reopened the 00:41:05.240 |
issue. Like this submarine tragedy, the balloon is like 00:41:08.360 |
made for network television, because it's a live event where 00:41:11.920 |
you can put live cameras up. And you can cover 24 seven. It's 00:41:15.120 |
just like, we better be really careful. It's just media. It's 00:41:20.520 |
We have to be very careful. Now, I think in our relationship 00:41:22.760 |
with China, because again, you now have this Asiatic alliance 00:41:26.680 |
between China, Russia and, and Iran. It is the most capable, 00:41:30.960 |
let's say, average 30, the United States ever faced 00:41:32.960 |
remember, that when we face the Soviet Union, their economy was 00:41:36.280 |
never bigger than one third of the US economy, the Soviet 00:41:38.720 |
bloc versus the Western bloc, the Chinese economy, on a 00:41:42.080 |
purchasing power parity basis is roughly the same size as the US. 00:41:45.880 |
And they've got more manufacturing capacities. If you 00:41:48.240 |
think about the type of manufacturing capacity United 00:41:50.920 |
States had during World War Two, that now belongs to China, not 00:41:56.680 |
I just don't understand why, why our foreign policy, Brad, I'll 00:42:00.640 |
bring you into this discussion, why our foreign policy isn't 00:42:03.400 |
being driven by some of the things that we could do 00:42:06.080 |
together to collaborate on, like we have global warming, we have, 00:42:09.840 |
you know, issues on this planet that we could collaborate on. 00:42:12.800 |
And it seems like we're spending no time on those issues and 00:42:15.720 |
saber rattling Cuba, another example, why can't we set a goal 00:42:21.040 |
for the United States to normalize relations with Cuba 00:42:23.840 |
and get them on our side, since they are the equivalent of, 00:42:26.400 |
let's say, Ukraine, David, to America, you've, you've brought 00:42:29.720 |
it back comparison, why don't we make peace with Cuba? Why can't 00:42:33.400 |
we have a peace based foreign policy where we're trying to 00:42:36.480 |
build bridges, God, Cuba and United States could do amazing 00:42:40.160 |
things together. And we should be trying to win that 00:42:43.160 |
relationship instead of living 50 years in the past over it. 00:42:48.200 |
there was legitimate outrage over the past week, because we 00:42:50.400 |
discovered that China was planning on they already have an 00:42:53.880 |
intelligence outpost in Cuba, listening outpost, but also 00:42:57.360 |
they're thinking about doing training of troops in Cuba. And 00:43:02.560 |
that would be a violation of Monroe doctrine. And we should 00:43:05.000 |
basically get our backs up over that the Monroe doctrine states 00:43:09.440 |
that no disengraved power can bring troops, weapons or bases 00:43:13.640 |
into the Western Hemisphere. United States spent over 100 00:43:17.920 |
years basically enforcing Monroe doctrine, it would greatly 00:43:21.120 |
diminish us security, if we allowed any foreign great power 00:43:25.400 |
to have troops in the Western Hemisphere. So we deserve to 00:43:28.200 |
have our horns out over that the problem is that we have our 00:43:31.920 |
horns out over everything. And so we're not really taken 00:43:34.320 |
seriously. We've cried wolf so many times. I don't think we're 00:43:36.760 |
really taken seriously by the Chinese on this. And this should 00:43:39.600 |
be a teaching moment to the foreign policy establishment, 00:43:42.080 |
because this is Russia's objection. Russia's objection 00:43:46.440 |
is to having American troops, weapons and bases directly on 00:43:49.720 |
their border. This is our objection to what China is 00:43:53.960 |
Okay, Brad, you want to add something to that? Or can we 00:43:56.360 |
code? Just real quickly, I would say, yeah, there's a real 00:43:59.000 |
appetite in the business community to be engaged this 00:44:02.320 |
idea that we're going to decouple the world never have to 00:44:04.920 |
deal with these folks, right is just a farce. ByteDance bought a 00:44:09.360 |
billion dollars worth of Nvidia chips announced this week, 00:44:12.640 |
right? Like, like the world is entangled. And I think we would 00:44:16.640 |
be better off having our political and business leaders 00:44:20.160 |
in more sync over how to achieve this long term safety and 00:44:25.600 |
prosperity, as opposed to what feels like a disjointed foreign 00:44:30.440 |
policy relative to the global reality around AI and, and 00:44:36.880 |
I agree. Well said, yeah. And I mean, it's just so obvious, why 00:44:41.200 |
can't we be collaborating on stuff? And we see when you and I 00:44:44.160 |
made our trip to the UAE. And then we see the Saudis, you 00:44:47.400 |
know, bringing movies back, we have certain regions, we're 00:44:49.640 |
doing a pretty good job of engaging with engagement. You 00:44:55.440 |
It's because and I think RFK has said this, we have created a 00:45:00.840 |
very dangerous revolving door between our most critical 00:45:04.560 |
institutions and the largest industrial companies in the 00:45:08.080 |
United States. And that revolving door creates all kinds 00:45:12.440 |
of conflicts of interest. And those things get sorted out via 00:45:16.960 |
revenue and dollars and profits, incentives. And so those 00:45:21.440 |
incentives will drive us if it's the military industrial complex 00:45:24.640 |
to go to war. And you're seeing that it'll complicate our foreign 00:45:28.400 |
policy. So this is why I've always said, the most important 00:45:31.360 |
thing that we're doing is something that the military 00:45:35.000 |
industrial complex cannot stop, which is our energy 00:45:38.080 |
independence. And when you have energy independence and abundant 00:45:41.440 |
costless energy, I do think that the biggest thing you get is 00:45:44.600 |
this peace dividend, you stop fighting these wars, you become 00:45:47.080 |
much more rational abroad. And you're like, Okay, I don't need 00:45:49.680 |
to fight with all of these people. Because, you know, 00:45:53.760 |
You're so right, because we actually have stopped those 00:45:56.040 |
wars. And now we've created two other ones, Russia, Ukraine, we 00:46:01.680 |
We can't help ourselves. And we'll use the scarcity of 00:46:05.720 |
commodities as a boogeyman to basically incentivize us to go 00:46:10.360 |
in these foreign misadventures. And it really has to stop, by 00:46:13.680 |
the way, just two quick points on that on Taiwan, there's an 00:46:16.160 |
election next year. And it looks like right now that the pro 00:46:19.840 |
China party might actually take power right now the party that's 00:46:23.800 |
in power is more of a pro Western Party. And the reason I 00:46:27.640 |
think is that the Taiwanese are looking at what's going on in 00:46:30.960 |
Ukraine. And they're looking at the corpses of the Ukrainian 00:46:34.520 |
youth pile up. And they're thinking maybe it's not such a 00:46:37.240 |
great idea to be an American proxy state. Or in the words of 00:46:41.240 |
Henry Kissinger, he wants quip that it's dangerous to be an 00:46:45.240 |
American enemy, but it's absolutely fatal to be an 00:46:47.040 |
American friend. I think that this war may be backfiring in 00:46:51.520 |
terms of the incentives is creating around Taiwan. 00:46:54.760 |
Remember, Biden said that this war would basically help protect 00:46:57.640 |
Taiwan by deterring China, it might actually deter Taiwan from 00:47:01.960 |
opposing China. So we'll have to see how that plays out. 00:47:04.480 |
All an able bodied person in Taiwan, a voting age needs to 00:47:07.400 |
do is read the newspaper and understand it in the last two 00:47:11.080 |
and a half years, we've essentially started a 00:47:13.200 |
multitrillion dollar program to deliver ourselves from all the 00:47:16.040 |
critical resources that China and Taiwan gives us. And so if 00:47:19.200 |
you're a Taiwanese citizen, the writing is unfortunately on the 00:47:22.560 |
wall, which is that we are giving ourselves the 00:47:24.440 |
optionality to not have to do anything. So to your point, 00:47:27.760 |
David, if you're a rational, thinking Taiwanese person, 00:47:30.920 |
unfortunately, you're forced to be in a position where you may 00:47:33.440 |
have to head your bets. And if the United States can basically 00:47:37.080 |
have chip supply that comes from Europe and Mexico, now all of a 00:47:41.640 |
sudden, the criticality of TSMC goes away. To wit, I publish this 00:47:45.960 |
tweet yesterday about Buffett and his trades in Japan, right, 00:47:51.840 |
he bought these five trading companies. And so just a really 00:47:55.000 |
novel carry trade that I've really fallen in love with just 00:47:57.320 |
understanding it. But the kodak to that is that when he did 00:48:01.240 |
this, and going long Japan, what he actually also did was he 00:48:04.840 |
delivered himself from China, he had a long position in TSMC. And 00:48:08.280 |
he said, I'm out. And when they asked him why he sold TSMC, he 00:48:12.520 |
said, this is a very complicated thing. And he basically said 00:48:16.760 |
that it's not a bet that's worth making. And I think underneath 00:48:20.600 |
that, if I had to guess what he's trying to say about Taiwan 00:48:23.440 |
indirectly, through his sale of TSMC is the odds are that we are 00:48:28.680 |
not going to get into a land war over there, which means that 00:48:32.280 |
that asset and its equity value is in danger, and I don't want 00:48:36.920 |
to own it. And I think that that's a very clinical summation 00:48:44.240 |
well, here's what Blinken said speak with their dog. I think 00:48:46.360 |
this is very important. You know, the one China policy says 00:48:48.600 |
Taiwan is part of China. It's not an independent country. But 00:48:51.280 |
we've had a very ambiguous and tolerance for this ambiguity of 00:48:55.440 |
Taiwan acting as its own nation, while saying we support the one 00:48:58.920 |
China policy. And that ambiguity has served us very well in the 00:49:03.640 |
China relationship. Here's a blanket set at the press 00:49:05.960 |
conference, quote, we do not support Taiwan independence, we 00:49:09.560 |
remain opposed to any unilateral changes to the status quo by 00:49:12.960 |
either side. The status quo he's referring to here, Brad is that 00:49:16.560 |
they get to be independent in Taiwan. But we don't say they're 00:49:20.320 |
independent. They are obviously acting in an independent manner. 00:49:23.360 |
But it is not our business to tell the Taiwanese people that 00:49:27.600 |
they're independent or not. It's their decision to determine if 00:49:30.960 |
they're independent or not. Any thoughts on the trade by Buffett 00:49:36.680 |
and Blinken? I think that last comment at the press conference 00:49:40.840 |
I think we want to maintain the ambiguity, I think we're 00:49:44.200 |
basically saying to China, don't change the status quo, at least 00:49:49.920 |
for now. Right? While we rebuild these chip fabs in Arizona and 00:49:55.680 |
other parts of the world, I think most of the wealthy 00:49:58.600 |
families I've talked to, from Taiwan believe that five or six 00:50:02.560 |
years from now, the US will no longer be in the position where 00:50:06.160 |
they will need Taiwan and Taipei as much as they do today. And 00:50:11.200 |
you think it will take to be independent, say it one more 00:50:13.640 |
Well, it's not about being independent. It's how much 00:50:17.840 |
longer will Taiwan have what they believe to be de facto 00:50:21.960 |
protection from the United States. And I was told by one 00:50:26.320 |
very influential Taiwanese family that they believe when 00:50:30.120 |
the fifth chip fab comes online in Arizona, which I think is 00:50:34.600 |
scheduled for 25 or 26, they intended to have most of their 00:50:38.880 |
family members out of Taiwan at that period in time. Now, I 00:50:43.040 |
think most Taiwanese don't envision this being, you know, a 00:50:46.760 |
violent invasion of Taiwan, it's more of a take under in the same 00:50:51.160 |
way that Hong Kong was. And so I don't see an American president 00:50:56.840 |
frankly going to war, nor would I want them to go to war over 00:51:00.520 |
Taiwan. But I think it's in all of our interest to maintain that 00:51:04.080 |
status quo, which is why taunting the Chinese over the 00:51:07.400 |
course of the past few years over Taiwan has seemed like a 00:51:15.040 |
Right? Well, if you look at skin in the game, the fact that the 00:51:18.440 |
chips act went through so quickly, the fact that Warren 00:51:21.240 |
Buffett, as you pointed out, Schmott made his bet. And this 00:51:23.760 |
family that has obviously, you know, skin in the game, quite 00:51:27.360 |
literally, are making these decisions. I think we know where 00:51:30.000 |
this is headed, you can just follow the bets. And if you look 00:51:32.680 |
at the bets in five years, dollars, follow the dollars, I 00:51:35.640 |
mean, and also where people put themselves, geographically, 00:51:39.200 |
everybody left Hong Kong, when the turnover happened or before 00:51:42.520 |
it, they went to Singapore, they went to UAE, they voted with 00:51:45.880 |
their feet and their dollars. And that's obviously what's 00:51:48.200 |
going to happen here. This is a good pivot. Because this 00:51:52.160 |
criticism of the Ukraine policy by Matt, that sacks pointed out 00:51:57.880 |
came because there is a belief on his part and others, that the 00:52:03.800 |
pod here, all in, is putting its unilateral support behind RFK. 00:52:09.320 |
And that is not true. There are two people on the pod, who 00:52:12.360 |
hosted a fundraiser last week. And here is what Matt 00:52:18.080 |
incorrectly said, because I have not put my support behind RFK. I 00:52:22.400 |
think he's very interesting, and I'm glad he's in the race. And 00:52:25.880 |
neither has Friedberg, but Schmock and sacks did host one 00:52:29.880 |
and I'll hand it over to them. But here's what Matt said in his 00:52:32.200 |
sub stack. And even though it's not the subject of this post, I 00:52:36.760 |
do want to say that I think it's really sleazy and gross for the 00:52:41.160 |
hosts of the all in podcast to be engaging in this Kennedy 00:52:43.920 |
booster ism as a bang shot way of harming Joe Biden's 00:52:48.120 |
reelection prospects, notwithstanding the recent 00:52:50.440 |
convergence around Russia policy, Kennedy represents 00:52:53.520 |
precisely the strand of progressive thought that right 00:52:56.560 |
of center business people have highly have rightly spent the 00:52:59.480 |
better part of the century bemoaning his is an anti 00:53:02.400 |
progress anti technology, ultimately anti human worldview 00:53:06.040 |
that stands against biomedical progress, against progress and 00:53:09.840 |
the guy who wants to blow up as many Ukrainians as possible as 00:53:13.200 |
an old lead. Yeah, exactly. This is anti human. Listen, I don't 00:53:17.440 |
even think we should be giving him this much time. 00:53:19.080 |
Well, no, but I think it is important that because people 00:53:21.200 |
now have connected this pod with the rise of RFK. This was the 00:53:25.000 |
major either. What a glacey Iglesias is accusing us somehow 00:53:28.920 |
of do of supporting RFK not because of issues, but somehow 00:53:33.480 |
because it's a bang shot for Donald Trump, which is 00:53:35.920 |
ridiculous. None of us support Donald Trump. He's not even my 00:53:41.320 |
Well, what he said was a bang shot against Biden, just to be 00:53:44.360 |
I would prefer I prefer your against. I prefer RFK to Biden. 00:53:50.080 |
It's that simple. What's what's wrong with that? He's not even 00:53:52.760 |
making any arguments here. Look, we've explained in a lot of 00:53:55.360 |
detail. And I explained in my response, all the issues where I 00:53:59.040 |
support RFK supports free speech over censorship, he supports 00:54:03.160 |
civil liberties over the surveillance state. He supports 00:54:05.440 |
peace instead of war. He supports sealing the southern 00:54:07.920 |
border virtually alone among Democrats and talking sense on 00:54:11.800 |
that issue. And I believe that he's completely correctly 00:54:15.320 |
diagnosed what we're doing in Ukraine. So on the 00:54:18.440 |
issue, disagree with him on some issues, right? You disagree with 00:54:21.440 |
him on nuclear, and you may disagree with him and his 00:54:28.320 |
I think he was right about COVID lockdowns. And I think he was 00:54:30.600 |
right about right COVID, the so called COVID shot that wasn't 00:54:34.160 |
even a vaccine that that should not have been required. 00:54:36.840 |
But what about those two issues? You obviously disagree with him 00:54:39.320 |
on some things. Do you disagree with him on his anti-vax stuff 00:54:43.480 |
I don't know enough about those issues to have like a firm 00:54:47.640 |
stance. What I would say is that every candidate represents a 00:54:50.720 |
bundle of issues. And you support the ones who are aligned 00:54:57.120 |
with you on the issues that are most important to you, on the 00:55:00.520 |
issues that are most important to me, which are these 00:55:03.160 |
questions, the great questions of war and peace, and the 00:55:06.440 |
questions of free speech and censorship. And even I would say 00:55:09.800 |
the question of the economy and who do we prioritize, because he 00:55:13.880 |
wants to prioritize the middle class. On those big questions, I 00:55:17.840 |
feel like I'm aligned with RFK. Perfect. So that's why I support 00:55:21.560 |
him. Let me go to China. By the way, do you think Jack Dorsey is 00:55:24.760 |
is supporting RFK as a bank shot something or other? No, he's 00:55:28.960 |
supporting it because he agrees to RFK on these questions of war 00:55:34.240 |
Great. I'm just letting everybody be very clear about 00:55:37.680 |
their position since this is becoming the support of RFK by 00:55:41.320 |
this podcast, or two of the four people in the podcast is now 00:55:45.200 |
Iglesias is even making any arguments here. He's just 00:55:47.680 |
applying derogatory labels to us. Yeah, what this is, this is 00:55:51.640 |
a disciplinary tactic or a shaming tactic. Yes, by the 00:55:55.920 |
sort of enforcers for the establishment, right? Want to 00:56:00.200 |
prevent independent thinkers from stepping out a line. I 00:56:04.640 |
It looks like this outsider went to the Dalton School, University. 00:56:09.480 |
Yeah, you got a $2 million education doesn't know what a 00:56:22.320 |
Chamath, you are pro nuclear. You've been very clear about 00:56:25.120 |
that. Although you're pro renewables. Mostly, you've been 00:56:27.920 |
clear about that on this podcast, and many conversations 00:56:30.400 |
I've had with you. You are also pro vaccine, but you're anti 00:56:33.400 |
what happened with the lockdown. So maybe you could expand upon 00:56:36.920 |
your support of RFK, why you held a fundraiser for him and 00:56:40.880 |
what things you agree with him on and maybe what things you 00:56:44.960 |
Well, first, I actually did what I think a lot of people haven't 00:56:51.240 |
done, which is just listen to him just stop talking. zip the 00:56:56.760 |
old yapper. And there is an enormous amount of long form 00:57:01.600 |
content where you can really understand where he stands on 00:57:06.880 |
some of these topics. He's right about the war on Ukraine, we 00:57:11.800 |
shouldn't be in. He's right about free speech, which is we 00:57:17.040 |
should have it. He's right that the COVID vaccine was not a 00:57:25.200 |
vaccine. And really what it's done is actually discredit the 00:57:30.320 |
word vaccine, unfortunately, in a lot of people's minds. He 00:57:35.280 |
actually is a person that is pro vaccine for all these other 00:57:38.920 |
vaccines. He himself is vaccinated, his children are 00:57:41.720 |
vaccinated. You would all know this stuff. If you just took two 00:57:45.060 |
minutes to just listen to it. He is against the COVID vaccine. 00:57:48.760 |
And what I would say is, I'm very sympathetic to that. I'm 00:57:53.340 |
very sympathetic to the job the FDA had to do. And I think they 00:57:56.240 |
generally did do a great job. But we ran something through and 00:58:01.920 |
we allowed it to be labeled a word that misappropriates what 00:58:06.760 |
it is. It's not a vaccine. And the problem with that is that it 00:58:11.280 |
now makes people mistrust the measles, mumps and rubella 00:58:15.000 |
vaccine. That's crazy. You shouldn't mistrust the MMR 00:58:18.720 |
vaccine or DTAP. But because those things are lumped in with 00:58:22.680 |
the same thing as a COVID vaccine that is at best 30 or 40% 00:58:26.240 |
efficacious. We have these problems. He calls that out 00:58:29.420 |
pretty honestly. So I like the fact that he actually speaks in 00:58:34.460 |
nuance. I like the fact that when I listened to him, I find 00:58:39.740 |
that the talking head think police are generally lying. It 00:58:45.380 |
confirms what I believe about them. Because he just says 00:58:49.220 |
things in a very plain spoken, intelligent way. And I think 00:58:54.440 |
that there are a lot of folks who don't want to think who want 00:58:57.380 |
to be given the simple answer, who want to just reject what he 00:59:02.660 |
stands for and just take the establishment view in the hopes 00:59:05.480 |
that they'll get, I don't know, maybe accepted by the 00:59:08.780 |
establishment, the establishment just wants to curate power. And 00:59:13.300 |
I just think that people should be thinking for themselves. If 00:59:15.800 |
you listen to the Rogan podcast, if you listen to the Jordan 00:59:18.320 |
Peterson podcast, there are millions and millions and 00:59:22.940 |
millions of links and page views and discussions and thoughts. 00:59:26.580 |
And there's probably 1000s of minutes of RFK explaining what 00:59:30.180 |
he thinks on basically any topic you can imagine, you can get to 00:59:33.180 |
your own conclusion. And I think what I think you'll find and 00:59:37.740 |
this is true for me is there's 10% of stuff you are just the 00:59:42.580 |
he immensely supportive of 70% of stuff that's like quite 00:59:47.260 |
reasonable and fair. And then there's the rest, which is a 00:59:51.980 |
spectrum of things I disagree with. But then you're left with 00:59:55.100 |
a blended expected value where you're like, man, this guy is 00:59:57.980 |
really better than all the other alternatives. Brad, I'll let you 01:00:03.460 |
What I find most insidious about the opposition to this 01:00:08.380 |
discussion is people are upset that you're not swearing an 01:00:13.140 |
allegiance to a dogmatism. Right? The truth of the matter 01:00:17.700 |
is this group has hosted dinners for Ro Khanna. For Senator 01:00:22.620 |
Manchin. We've hosted dinners for DeSantis. Right? Had I been 01:00:27.580 |
here, I would have put my name on the dinner for Kennedy 01:00:31.660 |
because I want to gather information. I'm an analyst, I 01:00:35.260 |
want to think for myself, how can we spend trillions and put 01:00:40.340 |
ourselves into potentially harm's way without having a 01:00:44.980 |
real conversation in Congress and on these pods about the risk 01:00:49.580 |
of war? Why can't we have an authentic postmortem about the 01:00:55.060 |
efficacy of the COVID vaccine without being shame? The 01:00:58.820 |
revolution going on in this country, which is fantastic, from 01:01:01.940 |
my perspective, is that there is no longer a monopolistic control 01:01:06.660 |
over the discussion. And that's why this podcast and this 01:01:10.980 |
friendship, and the conversation we all had here is resonating 01:01:15.460 |
with people because they also want to hear all the different 01:01:19.020 |
sides because most people are capable are way smarter than the 01:01:22.940 |
elites on the coast thing. You know, I'm from Indiana, lots of 01:01:27.140 |
smart folks who think for themselves in Indiana, but 01:01:30.100 |
they're told told by coastal elites what to think. And they 01:01:33.620 |
reject this. And that's what you're seeing in this discussion 01:01:36.580 |
and so many of these others. It's not about that. It's not 01:01:39.020 |
about vaccines. It's not about a war. It's about their control 01:01:43.020 |
over how you think and them wanting to force you to swear to 01:01:50.300 |
Yeah, yeah, that is well said. But the way they try to control 01:01:53.140 |
what you think is by labeling candidates so as to exclude 01:01:58.500 |
them or make them sound crazy. So J Cal, I mean, you kind of 01:02:01.820 |
introduced RFK as an anti Vaxxer. I don't think that is 01:02:06.380 |
the correct way to describe his position, or the singular way 01:02:11.900 |
No, I don't. I don't believe that I said, Here are the things 01:02:14.100 |
he believes that we agree with. And then I gave the things that 01:02:16.620 |
the media is saying, you know, so I was trying to present the 01:02:19.740 |
totality of it. And I said, he is obviously in favor of the 01:02:23.420 |
middle class and all this stuff. So I want to be clear on my 01:02:27.260 |
position here. So I am in support of vibrant, long form 01:02:31.500 |
debate like we have here. And I'm in support of anybody who 01:02:34.980 |
takes on the establishment, because there are crazy 01:02:37.780 |
incentives as we talk about here, incentives matter. And we 01:02:41.140 |
are long overdue for discussion on vaccines. But it's very 01:02:44.820 |
important that everybody understand here that everybody 01:02:46.860 |
on this podcast took the COVID vaccine. And everybody here, our 01:02:51.020 |
kids have been vaccinated. It's not a vaccine. Exactly. So they 01:02:54.740 |
experimental mRNA treatment because we got hoodwinked by the 01:02:59.980 |
media into thinking it would prevent us from ever getting 01:03:05.780 |
vaccines are good. And the COVID thing was not very good. 01:03:12.740 |
And it reduced death in older people and probably was the only 01:03:15.740 |
group of people and we'll we'll know when we do a postmortem. 01:03:20.860 |
have this mRNA like flowing through our bodies, who knows, 01:03:25.580 |
Well, and then for people who are wondering, like if we 01:03:29.420 |
should even be having these discussions, the hypocrisy of 01:03:32.580 |
the media, I think is very important to look at here 01:03:36.300 |
because the media is gonna be attacking this podcast over and 01:03:38.460 |
over again, not that it matters. But when we moved into the top 01:03:42.020 |
100 top 50 top 10. That's when the knives came out. And I would 01:03:46.340 |
like to remind the media of the long history of investigative 01:03:51.140 |
journalism and debates what was once a conspiracy theory often 01:03:55.860 |
goes on to win a Pulitzer Prize. And, you know, the hypocrisy 01:04:00.260 |
here is crazy. Because if you look at some of the greatest 01:04:03.420 |
stories and investigative journalists pieces, they started 01:04:06.460 |
with these debates, rumors, etc. Abu grab. That was the New 01:04:10.060 |
Yorker. Ralph Nader reporting that was supporting and he can't 01:04:15.340 |
now they're right, they can't get the time of day for his 01:04:18.620 |
report on who really destroyed Nordstrom, the Catholic Church 01:04:22.300 |
sex scandal, the Boston Globe, the mainstream media does not 01:04:25.300 |
perform the function that you're describing anymore. They act as 01:04:28.460 |
the bodyguard for the elite for the establishment. They 01:04:31.860 |
actually have even a layer of stenographers for the people in 01:04:35.220 |
power. Not exactly true. They have actually done incredible 01:04:38.700 |
reporting, but there is a group of them which is towing the 01:04:41.980 |
party line because you have the New York Times in their expose 01:04:44.540 |
on the taxi commission that won a Pulitzer in 2020. And then you 01:04:49.500 |
look at apps. I know you don't follow Pulitzers or 01:04:51.940 |
investigative journalism in 2020. Brian Rosenthal at the New 01:04:55.220 |
York Times did a massive expose on the predatory New York City 01:05:00.660 |
there's a few other issues that might be more important to the 01:05:05.580 |
nation. It was an example of protectionism and rent seeking 01:05:10.060 |
the Enron scandal, big tobacco 60 minutes. What about the 01:05:13.860 |
pretzel monopoly in the south part of the Bronx? What about 01:05:17.540 |
that hot dog vendor on? You guys are uninformed. didn't have all 01:05:21.860 |
those licenses up to date. I thought there was a whole lot 01:05:24.500 |
about the big expose on that. You guys are the fact is at the 01:05:28.980 |
same time that the New York Times CNN were attacking what 01:05:33.300 |
Uber was doing. The New York Times won a fucking Pulitzer for 01:05:38.580 |
their coverage of predatory loans by rich, powerful people 01:05:43.060 |
I bet they also did a great story on the guy selling 01:05:45.500 |
trinkets outside Penn Station without a license. He was a man 01:05:49.220 |
of the people like yourselves actually should actually be more 01:05:51.300 |
informed. Okay, well, what they should be reporting on, for 01:05:54.060 |
example, but if they really, if the Pulitzers work the way they 01:05:58.340 |
should, is where patient zero came from on COVID. 01:06:02.460 |
Because Michael Schoenberg just reported this over the last 01:06:05.740 |
weekend, it got picked up by the Wall Street Journal, that 01:06:08.020 |
patient zero, it turns out, was a researcher at the lab, who was 01:06:13.900 |
performing gain of function research. Yeah, shocker. Another 01:06:23.780 |
He does. And the crazy thing about this quote unquote 01:06:26.460 |
conspiracy theory turned out to be true is like it brought 01:06:28.820 |
together the most odd bedfellows Rand Paul and john Stewart, when 01:06:35.220 |
rank Paul and john Stewart can be in a room and agree on 01:06:38.300 |
basically the totality of a topic, we should all just pay 01:06:41.660 |
attention because it's not it's not a normal world in which 01:06:44.580 |
these guys would otherwise get along. Right. And both of them 01:06:50.820 |
right to have the same name. But now connect the dots further. 01:06:53.980 |
Okay, why was the truth suppressed? Why did it not come 01:06:57.820 |
out? Because Fauci had funded gain of function research at the 01:07:02.100 |
Wuhan lab via EcoHealth Alliance. So he knew that if at 01:07:07.820 |
the beginning of this pandemic, it turned out that he had been 01:07:11.620 |
partially responsible for the creation of this virus that had 01:07:15.460 |
now turned into a pandemic around the world, his career 01:07:19.220 |
and it's worse. It's even worse than that. 46% of the 01:07:24.060 |
advertising on TV news comes from farm and we did not always 01:07:28.860 |
allow pharma spending. And this is may not be one to one, it may 01:07:33.020 |
not be that a specific person doing a report at CNN or Fox or 01:07:37.940 |
any of the networks is saying, Oh, I'm going to lose my job if 01:07:41.060 |
I write something critical of pharma, but they're not doing 01:07:44.300 |
the investigative pieces on I can tell you this on the people 01:07:47.460 |
who have 46% of their advertising revenue, unless it 01:07:51.020 |
really, you know, gets to the final inning on something and 01:07:55.100 |
right and that is something that we need to question, right? The 01:07:59.260 |
media is funded 46% by pharma companies, and pharma companies 01:08:05.980 |
were given a pass. And if you criticize any of the pharma 01:08:09.580 |
companies, the media is going to come for you. And so listen, I'm 01:08:15.420 |
lot of oil. Listen, the media is funded by big pharma and its 01:08:19.620 |
primary sources are these high level government employees who 01:08:23.260 |
have been there forever, who leak them information. That is 01:08:26.460 |
why the New York Times was carrying water for Fauci and big 01:08:29.580 |
pharma. This is the marriage of state power and corporate greed 01:08:36.820 |
Well, there you have it, folks. So and he believes he could be 01:08:43.860 |
He didn't say it like that. He was asked what what is his 01:08:47.340 |
strategy on campaigning and all of that stuff? And he said, 01:08:51.740 |
Look, I'm going to do as much as possible. But one thing that 01:08:55.100 |
I'm going to avoid are like these open air parades just 01:08:59.180 |
because there's just a lot of folks that we can't control 01:09:05.660 |
Yeah, I mean, the conversation on Rogan went something like 01:09:08.180 |
this. Rogan was asking questions about the Kennedy assassinations 01:09:11.820 |
and RFK believes like something like 60% of the American public 01:09:16.700 |
believes that Lee Harvey Oswald did not act alone. Then Rogan 01:09:20.700 |
asked him, well, do you ever feel afraid? Running for office? 01:09:24.580 |
And his answer was basically no, not really. It's not something 01:09:28.100 |
that I'm preoccupied with. But yeah, I'll take precautions. 01:09:31.540 |
Does that mean he thinks the CIA is going to assassinate him? No, 01:09:34.220 |
that's not what he said. But that is how the media reported 01:09:36.820 |
it, including Fox News that became the soundbite. 01:09:39.980 |
Well, the soundbite from this podcast was that he believes his 01:09:42.820 |
uncle was and his father were that the CIA was involved. 01:09:48.940 |
I am not giving my opinion. I'm giving his opinion on it. He said 01:09:52.300 |
it on this podcast, and the CIA won't release all the 01:09:54.700 |
information to this day, even though they've been commanded to 01:09:57.340 |
do so. So make your own decision, folks. According to 01:10:00.500 |
Bloomberg, there is a ton of action for startup shares in 01:10:03.060 |
secondary markets. If you don't know what a secondary market is. 01:10:05.340 |
That's when one investor buys shares in a company that's not 01:10:09.060 |
yet public directly from another investors on the cap table. So 01:10:12.380 |
if stripe which is not yet public or Reddit, there are 01:10:15.740 |
shares floating around in those companies, either previous 01:10:18.140 |
employees or previous investors, one firm might see an 01:10:21.060 |
opportunity there and buy them. As this process of bottoming out 01:10:24.420 |
has occurred, pitch book reported, Tiger Global told 01:10:28.140 |
secondary investors and that's a class of people who like to buy 01:10:30.540 |
these, that they could bid on any individual private company 01:10:34.020 |
in its portfolio. They tried to sell a bundle of these shares, 01:10:37.860 |
about 30 startups at a time. But they couldn't find buyers 01:10:41.300 |
according to the reports. So now they're allowing people to bid 01:10:44.180 |
on per company on a per company basis. Some of these are being 01:10:47.660 |
marked down a third 50%, etc. Here's the quote from 01:10:52.740 |
Bloomberg, as of May 31 shares of startups were trading at a 01:10:57.060 |
median discount of 61% compared to valuations at their latest 01:11:00.300 |
funding rounds, according to report by forge global holdings. 01:11:03.580 |
A 16, according to the report is actively buying shares in 01:11:06.860 |
secondary Excel Bain Bessemer Kleiner are also using secondary 01:11:10.500 |
to grow stakes in their existing investments doubling down. As it 01:11:14.300 |
were crossover firms like cotu Tiger grow global. And even 01:11:18.660 |
Brad's altimeter are actively searching for deals. So Brad, 01:11:22.100 |
your thoughts on this is this sign of a bottom? And why are 01:11:26.380 |
Yeah, it is. It is true. I mean, our job is to look at all these 01:11:30.980 |
companies understand their value. Okay, you know, I'm 01:11:32.940 |
sitting here looking at a list that I was given this morning 01:11:35.340 |
125 companies secondary, you know, the Goldman Sachs 01:11:39.620 |
unprofitable tech index in the public markets is down 64% as of 01:11:47.540 |
they put together a basket, they track unprofitable public 01:11:50.900 |
companies down 64% off of its peak as as of this morning. So 01:11:55.860 |
you just quoted the Bloomberg article saying, yeah, these 01:11:58.060 |
unprofitable tech companies in the private markets are down 01:12:00.940 |
about 60 61%. That smells right to me. The repricing have to 01:12:06.580 |
occur. These have to occur. Right? There are 1400 unicorns 01:12:12.060 |
at the end of 2022. And 100% of them will likely do a down run. 01:12:16.820 |
And if you said what is the average that they're going to be 01:12:19.980 |
down? It's over 50%. You saw the repricing out of some of the 01:12:24.580 |
best ones, like a canva or a stripe where it was down, let's 01:12:28.340 |
call it 30 4050%. But you know, they're going to be companies 01:12:32.220 |
like in the public markets that are down 80 or 90% and 01:12:35.300 |
disappear altogether. So we didn't see the repricings. Okay. 01:12:40.020 |
And by the way, when we say, you know, that article quotes, 01:12:44.700 |
forge, that is what the sellers are offering to sell shares for. 01:12:50.140 |
That is not where transactions are clearing. Right? So why has 01:12:55.780 |
an altimeter purchased any of this because the prices aren't 01:12:58.740 |
low enough to induce me to get off the sidelines to purchase 01:13:02.820 |
the shares, but we're within kind of, you know, we're 01:13:05.620 |
starting to get in the zone where we can underwrite to a 01:13:09.900 |
margin of safety competitive or better than the public markets 01:13:13.500 |
for companies that we think are great companies. Now out of 01:13:16.020 |
those 414 100 unicorns at the end of 22, there are probably 01:13:20.820 |
less than 5% of those companies I would even want to own at the 01:13:25.060 |
right price. Right? So it's a small subset of companies, the 01:13:29.380 |
price has to get to this clearing point. But you know, I 01:13:32.900 |
think over the course of the next 18 months, we're going to 01:13:36.060 |
see an acceleration of market clearing events as these 01:13:39.940 |
companies need to raise capital as their employees want to get 01:13:43.140 |
liquid on shares. And it's probably see some great 01:13:47.460 |
opportunities. But most of these things that get put on sale 01:13:51.140 |
should not be purchased, right? Most of them, even you know, the 01:13:55.460 |
first sale price is never the last sale price, the markdown 01:14:00.500 |
Tomatha sacks, any thoughts? Are you buying in secondary? Are 01:14:05.220 |
we'll look at secondary deals. It's not primarily what we do, 01:14:07.900 |
but we're open to it. But Brad, if you were to categorize the 01:14:10.820 |
1400 unicorns into one of three categories, what do you think 01:14:14.420 |
the percentages would be those three categories being zombie 01:14:18.060 |
corns, like unicorn companies that just don't deserve to 01:14:22.580 |
exist in our product market fit, they're going to go away. 01:14:24.620 |
Category two would be viable companies that are just over 01:14:28.620 |
pricing are headed for a down round. And the number three 01:14:31.220 |
would be the ones that are actually headed for an up round. 01:14:34.500 |
Yeah, I'd say 30 to 40% are these companies that were valued 01:14:40.300 |
over a billion dollars that don't have product market fit, 01:14:46.100 |
Right. And listen, just just to be fair, let's explain. Most of 01:14:50.860 |
these companies, right have less than 200 million of preference, 01:14:55.980 |
preferred shares that venture capitalists invest into the 01:14:59.820 |
company. And many of those companies in that 30 40%. There's 01:15:03.980 |
a team, there's some asset of value, they may be able to, you 01:15:07.900 |
know, sell the talent of the team and recoup, David, let's 01:15:11.020 |
call it 30 40% of the prep stack, right in that 01:15:15.420 |
transaction, we're starting to see some of those occur. Then I 01:15:18.900 |
think the lion's share of the companies that are left, let's 01:15:22.700 |
call it, you know, another 40%. These are companies that should 01:15:27.660 |
never have been marked at these prices, right, but they do have 01:15:30.860 |
a business, and they're going to be marked down, you know, 50 to 01:15:34.260 |
80%. But all of the like, none of those have been able to grow 01:15:39.300 |
through it, then there's less than 10% of the companies, 01:15:42.220 |
right, whose growth has been so robust through this period, that 01:15:46.820 |
they've actually grown into or within 10 15% of those prior 01:15:51.300 |
prices. And if you do all of that work, it puts us back on 01:15:55.900 |
trendline. Right. The only thing unusual here is how far off 01:15:59.820 |
trendline we had 1400 unicorns, right in 2020. We had I think 01:16:05.980 |
145 IPOs. In the last two years, we've had four. Okay, so there 01:16:12.820 |
is a huge backlog. These companies aren't getting public 01:16:15.780 |
why because public market buyers, like ourselves, we're 01:16:18.420 |
not willing to pay the prices that were in the private 01:16:20.940 |
market. So the first step is to just have these clearing events. 01:16:24.540 |
And it's David, you and I heard sober talk over the course of 01:16:28.260 |
the last couple of days, I think they, you know, said to the 01:16:31.060 |
founders very clearly, you need to sell your businesses or you 01:16:34.020 |
need to get profitable. There is no middle ground. 01:16:36.500 |
In other news, Ford has been issued a conditional $9.2 01:16:39.860 |
billion loan from the US Department of Energy to build 01:16:42.860 |
out 3123 EV battery factories specific alone is coming through 01:16:47.780 |
the Department of Energy's LPO. That's the loan programs office 01:16:51.900 |
got about 400 billion to lend out. You might remember this 01:16:55.780 |
from 2010 when they gave cylindra a 123 batteries, which 01:17:01.820 |
eventually went bankrupt and got bought by a Chinese company, I 01:17:04.340 |
believe, and Tesla, a $465 million loan, Tesla paid it 01:17:08.260 |
back. The other two didn't test payback with interest. Jigar 01:17:11.620 |
Shah, the director of the loan program office described the 01:17:14.900 |
lending moves as a way to onshore and reshore 01:17:17.700 |
manufacturing. The goal of the program is not innovation, but 01:17:22.340 |
to get more of the supply chain to be manufactured in the US 01:17:26.900 |
guests. Some people are criticizing this just out of the 01:17:31.740 |
gate with why should we be giving these loans to companies 01:17:36.100 |
shouldn't this be the private sector doing it? What are your 01:17:38.380 |
thoughts here? Is this a good idea? A great idea? Neutral 01:17:45.420 |
Spline, it's us using our balance sheet to make sure that 01:17:48.820 |
we get to energy independence. So this is actually a perfect 01:17:52.180 |
role for government. It's shaping incentives so that 01:17:57.020 |
capitalism can do its job. What this does for Ford is Ford has a 01:18:01.420 |
partnership with SK. And so SK has a lot of capability in Korea, 01:18:07.220 |
but they can bring that know how now, domestically on short of 01:18:10.500 |
the United States, you'll be hiring 1000s of people, you'll 01:18:13.140 |
be building battery factories, or it needs batteries, their 01:18:15.940 |
forecast is they'll be selling two and a half million electric 01:18:18.660 |
vehicles by 2026 2027. So whatever Ford does, you can 01:18:23.340 |
expect GM will also do you can expect all of the other big 01:18:27.460 |
companies to do so this is all just great. And at the end of 01:18:29.860 |
the day, for people to not over this is 9.8 billion, I guess it 01:18:35.340 |
sounds like a lot, but we're probably spending $9.8 billion 01:18:38.380 |
a day fighting wars. So this is a day of just taking a pause 01:18:43.100 |
on all these dumb wars, and actually becoming energy 01:18:46.380 |
reliant, carbon neutral, fixing the climate. It's great jobs, 01:18:53.460 |
energy independence and less dependency on autocratic 01:18:58.900 |
Everything should be how about instead of thinking about it in 01:19:01.980 |
terms of wars, let's think about it in terms of so if the the DOD 01:19:06.260 |
budget is $800 billion, okay, per year, what is that 2.6 01:19:13.220 |
billion a day 2.7 billion a day. Okay, so we're talking about 01:19:18.660 |
three days, four days, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, 01:19:23.180 |
private should be doing I agree with your mouth about the wars. 01:19:30.180 |
But this is all money we don't have. I mean, we shouldn't be 01:19:32.980 |
spending the money on wars. And we shouldn't be spending it, I 01:19:35.420 |
think, on industrial policy. So first of all, one of our friends 01:19:39.220 |
who's an energy investor, we should keep his name, but was 01:19:42.500 |
telling me that the energy subsidies that were in the, you 01:19:46.740 |
know, misnamed inflation reduction act, it is like the 01:19:49.980 |
biggest bonanza of all time. He said that the energy sector is 01:19:54.980 |
going crazy now trying to figure out how to exploit these 01:19:59.420 |
incentives. And his view is that although I think it was supposed 01:20:02.900 |
to cost about $350 billion, he thought that it would ultimately 01:20:06.500 |
cost the government somewhere around a trillion, because the 01:20:09.620 |
way these subsidies work is that you just qualify for them. And 01:20:12.900 |
then you get the subsidy. It's not like the credits run out. So 01:20:16.060 |
if you qualify, you get it. So this could end up costing the 01:20:18.460 |
government way more than what was originally projected. And so 01:20:22.140 |
the question is, what are you going to get for all this money? 01:20:24.580 |
And in this article on Ford, they were talking about these 01:20:28.300 |
7000 jobs are being created at a cost of $440,000 per job. So 01:20:34.780 |
it's great that the jobs are being created. But if you look 01:20:38.020 |
at the efficiency of that, that spend per job doesn't really 01:20:42.820 |
I don't understand how you get that number. You take the 01:20:45.860 |
article said it, the article said for 440,000. Do you take 01:20:50.060 |
9.8 billion and divided by 7,000? What do you do? 01:20:53.540 |
I'm just quoting that paragraph of the article. So yeah, so the 01:20:56.860 |
job creation is good. But you got to look at the efficiency of 01:20:59.060 |
the job creation. The other thing is, the question I would 01:21:02.540 |
ask you guys actually is, who wants one of these Ford EVs? Do 01:21:08.340 |
I think there are a lot of people that drive a Ford pickup 01:21:11.740 |
truck. We talked about this before. So that's one 50s coming. 01:21:15.700 |
Yeah. Very popular. There was a an article in the Wall Street 01:21:19.340 |
Journal a few months ago, which talked about the brand 01:21:21.940 |
consideration cycle that has been going on. And there was a 01:21:25.140 |
large look, we're friends with Elon, but we should acknowledge 01:21:27.980 |
there's a large number of people that are frankly a little bit 01:21:31.180 |
turned off by him. And they've been very clear that they want 01:21:34.100 |
an alternative to Tesla because they don't want to buy Tesla 01:21:36.220 |
because they don't necessarily prefer him as a brand ambassador 01:21:38.820 |
for their car. And the reality of life is that even if you're 01:21:45.180 |
like maximally incredible, unless you find some clever way 01:21:48.380 |
of creating a monopoly, in which case you can be a douche or 01:21:51.980 |
evil, you're only ever going to capture 30 plus 40% maybe have a 01:21:56.860 |
market Coke, Pepsi is a good example. And so there's always 01:22:00.020 |
going to be long tail alternatives. And, you know, I 01:22:03.260 |
had a chance, for example, in Vegas to drive a Rivian, I was 01:22:06.140 |
surprised at the quality or drive in a Rivian, I was 01:22:08.860 |
surprised at the quality of Rivian only because I've been so 01:22:11.420 |
focused on Tesla my whole life. So yeah, I think there are a lot 01:22:15.340 |
of people that will buy Ford's doesn't well take anything away 01:22:17.860 |
from what he wants doing. But I do think there are a lot of 01:22:20.420 |
My problem with industrial policy is this, you think about 01:22:23.020 |
that EV summit that the White House did, they didn't even 01:22:25.260 |
invite Elon. And that that was for political reasons, union 01:22:28.660 |
reasons. Yeah, partly because of his views on speech, but I think 01:22:32.140 |
mostly because he's not a union shop. And so that's the real 01:22:36.380 |
reason why Ford is being doled out this sort of nine point 01:22:40.940 |
something billion dollar loan is because they're politically 01:22:44.900 |
connected with the right people in this current administration. 01:22:47.620 |
And that's the problem with industrial policy is that the 01:22:50.140 |
money gets handed out by government to the politically 01:22:53.020 |
connected in this case, as opposed to the companies that 01:22:57.740 |
The fact is Tesla did get one of these loans in 2010 when it was 01:23:00.300 |
a very nascent company. So you got to give them some credit. 01:23:04.500 |
But let's think about that for a second. Okay, because I know 01:23:09.780 |
Yeah. So Elon was basically a fluke. I mean, you get like a 01:23:13.700 |
once in a generation entrepreneur who happened to be 01:23:15.900 |
working on this EV problem, and he got that loan. If you're to 01:23:19.700 |
take Elon out of that government portfolio, it all looks like 01:23:23.460 |
Solyndra. Yep. So the question is, like, what is this 01:23:27.460 |
portfolio going to look like? Is there really gonna be another 01:23:29.540 |
Elon in there? Because if not, there's gonna be a lot of 01:23:34.700 |
there's gonna be a lot of subsidies to companies like 01:23:36.380 |
Ford, which are politically connected. And I think a point 01:23:39.620 |
freeberg would make if he were here, is that at some point, 01:23:43.580 |
you're gonna have to turn off the subsidies because we can't 01:23:45.300 |
afford it. And then at that point, is that factory gonna be 01:23:48.660 |
self sufficient? Brad, you want to you've heard the two sides of 01:23:53.500 |
And listen, while generally against industrial policy, I 01:23:58.260 |
come down on Chema side, I think this is a once in a generation 01:24:01.380 |
opportunity to reduce our national security, risk profile 01:24:07.260 |
and to achieve what is really a national security imperative, 01:24:11.300 |
which is energy independence. It's not going to happen just 01:24:14.580 |
according to the invisible hand of the market. We see our 01:24:18.740 |
you know, great power competitors who are using this 01:24:21.980 |
against us, frankly, and have robust industrial policies. So 01:24:26.140 |
I'm willing to stipulate that there will be those 01:24:28.620 |
inefficiencies in this system. But I was lucky, lucky enough 01:24:32.060 |
last night, I was having dinner with the Deputy Secretary of the 01:24:34.900 |
Treasury while the Adi Amo who was out here meeting with 01:24:38.140 |
founders, including battery founders in Silicon Valley, on 01:24:42.220 |
this very subject. And I know some of the companies who are 01:24:45.260 |
getting checks from the US government to scale up, right, 01:24:48.540 |
innovative battery technologies in innovative chip 01:24:53.180 |
manufacturing. And I have to say this is the best of America, I 01:24:57.540 |
see some really great public private partnerships that are 01:25:01.820 |
on shoring vital national interest in chips and batteries. 01:25:06.100 |
And so I'm happy to see it happening. But I also know there 01:25:09.140 |
will be grift and there will be waste along the way. But compare 01:25:12.580 |
that David to the 8 trillion we've spent over the last 20 01:25:15.780 |
years on war policy, and what we've gotten from that. So you 01:25:19.620 |
know, you'd rather see us take chances here on innovative 01:25:24.660 |
battery technologies, there's still potential waste, but not 01:25:28.180 |
Well, of course, I mean, the first thing we got to do is 01:25:30.300 |
turn off all these crazy wars, but that can't be the bar 01:25:32.860 |
because that's a very low bar. Anything's more productive than 01:25:36.140 |
war wasting the money blowing up other countries that we don't 01:25:39.500 |
need to be involved in. I mean, remember, we do have a $32 01:25:43.100 |
trillion debt, I think a great thing to do here is what they 01:25:46.220 |
should have done with Tesla, which is when they give that 01:25:48.740 |
$500 million loan to Tesla, they should have gotten 10% of that 01:25:52.420 |
in warrants to buy Tesla shares at the IPO 50 million at that 01:25:55.460 |
IPO would have gone what 200 x. And that would have been an 01:25:59.300 |
incredible payday. So if they give this 9.2 billion to Ford, 01:26:07.620 |
No, I want them to get a little participation in the upside of 01:26:12.100 |
the company. I don't want them to own it. I want to be 01:26:14.060 |
potential participation. Well, I'm giving a modest number here. 01:26:21.260 |
right now they're alone, that gets paid back with interest. 01:26:24.220 |
And I'm saying give them some upside in the equity, even if 01:26:26.740 |
it's a small piece. Would you object to that sex? 01:26:28.540 |
You basically want to make them a venture debt provider? Like 01:26:31.460 |
SVB? Basically, yeah, like venture debt. Give them a pot 01:26:33.820 |
sweetener. Yes. Yes. Give them a pot sweetener. Why not 01:26:36.900 |
work out so good for SVB? You may not remember that, but 01:26:39.620 |
it would have worked out incredibly well with their 01:26:42.260 |
My problem, you might drive a better deal for the US 01:26:45.620 |
government in that case, which is fine with me. But it doesn't 01:26:49.100 |
solve my objection, which at the end of the day, these decisions 01:26:51.900 |
are gonna be made based on political criteria. Got it. 01:26:54.820 |
Okay, and we're gonna end up with crony capitalism and state 01:26:57.300 |
capitalism, as opposed to entrepreneurial capitalism. 01:26:59.740 |
But this is in support of that, because this is a deal where 01:27:02.820 |
that 9.8 billion does come over. But these are basically like 01:27:05.900 |
loans and loan guarantees, and you still have to put up the 01:27:08.020 |
equity yourself. That doesn't solve anybody's problem, meaning 01:27:10.820 |
you need to still be entrepreneurial. And there needs 01:27:13.300 |
to be risk capital. In this case, the risk capital is coming 01:27:15.380 |
from Ford and SK. And I think that that's my understanding of 01:27:19.380 |
percent of the cost or 95% of the cost. So there's not much risk 01:27:24.540 |
capital here from Ford, or SK. I mean, it might be opportunity 01:27:27.860 |
costs, but it's not the full cost of these three factories, 01:27:31.100 |
almost $13 billion. So there's still a non trivial amount of 01:27:35.620 |
risk, risk capital that has to get put to work here, man, I 01:27:38.100 |
would love to only have to put up 20% on the dollar. 30 cents on 01:27:43.500 |
I think Brad does make a good point about the security of our 01:27:46.340 |
supply chain. I'm more willing to use this sort of industrial 01:27:50.140 |
policy. We're talking about something that is vital to the 01:27:52.500 |
security of the United States. I think you can make your you 01:27:54.740 |
can make that argument with chips. I don't think electric 01:28:01.620 |
I wouldn't say batteries do. But I think obtaining a secure 01:28:04.260 |
supply of the rare earths that are needed to make batteries, 01:28:10.060 |
The reason batteries must is because the only way to wean 01:28:15.380 |
ourself off of the dependence we have on fossil fuels around the 01:28:19.900 |
world, and even though we produce, and we're now a net 01:28:23.340 |
exporter of oil, the reality is we're still in entanglements 01:28:27.820 |
around the world, because the world is dependent upon those 01:28:31.460 |
fossil fuels. And so I do think that that is a national security 01:28:36.260 |
interest having, you know, energy independence, not only 01:28:39.620 |
if Germany was energy independent and kept their 01:28:41.700 |
nuclear running and didn't have Nord Stream, we'd have a 01:28:43.420 |
different situation here. And we'd have a much different 01:28:48.420 |
All right, everybody. There you have it from the architect 01:28:51.020 |
drill. Trigger warning. I like to read a Thunberg tweet. 01:28:56.100 |
Some off. That was a really good tweet. Shout out. Oh my god, 01:28:59.460 |
the number of number of people I mean, did the mids like it or 01:29:03.260 |
the mids hated it? What happened? Can I just address 01:29:05.380 |
what this means? So when I think of somebody as a mid, it's 01:29:08.580 |
somebody that is just a hapless, impotent cuck that can't think 01:29:16.940 |
And so what I what I mean is that, you know, you become a 01:29:22.380 |
billionaire every week. You know what this is? It's the all in 01:29:25.300 |
podcast for clicks. If you 10 people have started, can I 01:29:29.020 |
finish? Yes, good. It has nothing to do with your 01:29:31.740 |
financial status. It's just everything to do with your open 01:29:36.060 |
mindedness. And there are these people that are just so reactive 01:29:39.780 |
on Twitter. I feel a little bit sad because I can a few years 01:29:42.900 |
they'll still be very unaccomplished and yet still be 01:29:45.780 |
wondering who they can blame now. And it'll just be them 01:29:50.340 |
blame themselves. So I would just encourage these people to 01:29:53.180 |
just fucking do some work. Put your head down, do the work. My 01:29:57.420 |
God, build something, make something. So anyways, most most 01:30:00.660 |
of the comments were really great and interesting. And then 01:30:03.020 |
there's a couple of people who are like, Oh my god, how dare 01:30:05.100 |
you? You know? And it's like, how dare I what? How dare I what 01:30:10.220 |
you can tell that this podcast has truly become successful when 01:30:14.220 |
the mainstream media fights up and punches up to try to get us 01:30:17.780 |
to respond to them to get more people to subscribe to their 01:30:21.140 |
I'll play the funniest thing. The funniest thing was I did 01:30:24.180 |
this tweet about Buffett. And then people are like, Oh, but I 01:30:28.060 |
thought you compared yourself to Buffett. And I was like, No, no 01:30:31.420 |
comparison, just benchmarks. And the thing I tweaked about the 01:30:34.220 |
word comparison versus benchmark. And then Carson 01:30:38.660 |
block jumps in and I texted Carson on the side. I was like, 01:30:41.620 |
bro, I'm just trolling the mids. Just don't worry. This is all 01:30:45.620 |
bullshit. It's all just for shits and giggles. I do it. I do 01:30:49.100 |
it when I'm either pooing or I haven't jet lagged. 01:30:52.380 |
One of the it's on ambient or while taking a dump or both. No 01:30:56.860 |
ambient, no, or the dictator, the architect, and bestie Brad, 01:31:03.100 |
the fifth bestie, and our mass our new mascot, Matt, the 01:31:06.680 |
mascot, who will be writing three more sub stacks about us. 01:31:09.980 |
I am the world's greatest moderator. Can we make that 01:31:13.460 |
shit bread logo our logo? Yes. To co choose. austerity measure 01:31:21.140 |
lunch. We salute you. The all in lunch will not be a standard 01:31:25.700 |
way. Did you guys touch it? Do you know what it was? Was it 01:31:27.740 |
bread? Did you touch it? I didn't touch it. No. What was 01:31:31.460 |
it? I abandoned it immediately. Is a vegan pretzel. I don't know. 01:31:35.580 |
Is that what they call dog poop now a vegan pretzel? 01:31:45.140 |
the WTF wants us eating insects. So this is I think that's 01:31:50.300 |
probably what it looks like a vegan donut slash a doo doo. 01:31:54.500 |
It's like a face when he opened that box. He just dropped it 01:32:03.540 |
I thought my seven year old had played a trick on me because 01:32:18.300 |
The fake doodoo is great. I'm gonna buy some fake doodoo. 01:32:21.380 |
Actually, you know what they should do? They should put that 01:32:23.460 |
co2 should make fake doodoo and put it in the gift bag for all 01:32:25.860 |
in summit. That would be a great little merch item. Alright, 01:32:37.100 |
we open source it to the fans and they've just gone crazy with 01:32:58.020 |
we should all just get a room and just have one big huge orgy 01:33:06.420 |
because they're all just useless. It's like this like 01:33:08.300 |
sexual tension that they just need to release somehow