back to indexHow to Give & Get Constructive Feedback | Dr. Adam Grant & Dr. Andrew Huberman
00:00:00.000 |
So how should we filter positive versus negative feedback? 00:00:08.080 |
This is Kluger and Dinesi looking at 100 years of feedback research, and they found that 00:00:12.880 |
what drives the utility of feedback is not whether it's positive or negative. 00:00:17.000 |
It's whether it focuses on the task or on the self. 00:00:21.600 |
So if I tell you that your work is terrible, you're going to get defensive. 00:00:27.380 |
If I tell you that your work is great, you're going to get complacent. 00:00:31.540 |
If I tell you, here's the specific thing that I liked about your work, you're going to try 00:00:36.880 |
And if I tell you, here's the thing I didn't like, you're going to try to see if you can 00:00:41.560 |
So I actually think we should worry less about whether the feedback is encouraging or discouraging, 00:00:46.860 |
and more about how do I make sure that I get input that's going to allow me to learn from 00:00:51.120 |
my strengths and also overcome my weaknesses. 00:00:54.660 |
And actually, one of the things I've learned recently is there's some, I would say, a growing 00:00:59.340 |
body of evidence at this point that asking for feedback is not the best way to get people 00:01:05.220 |
Because when you ask for feedback, you end up getting two groups of people. 00:01:10.180 |
And cheerleaders are basically applauding your best self. 00:01:14.620 |
What you want is a coach, which is somebody who helps you become a better version of yourself. 00:01:19.020 |
And the way you get people to coach you is not to say, "Give me feedback," because they 00:01:22.220 |
will then look at the past and tell you what you screwed up or what you did right. 00:01:26.820 |
What you want is to say, "Can you give me advice for next time?" 00:01:30.340 |
And then they look at the future and they'll give you either a note on something to repeat 00:01:35.380 |
And this is such a subtle shift, but it can make a big difference. 00:01:37.700 |
Andrew, one of the things I've, I guess I found myself applying this to a lot is after 00:01:44.300 |
I used to get off stage and say, "I'd love some feedback." 00:01:48.020 |
And you get back a bunch of, "Oh, you know, I really enjoyed that. 00:01:55.700 |
And when I shift the question to say, "What's the one thing I could do better next time?" 00:02:02.020 |
Frequently, it's, "Give me a little bit more of a through line. 00:02:08.300 |
You focused a lot on, you know, a bunch of interesting points, but I lost the connective 00:02:13.420 |
And, you know, those actionable suggestions are much more likely to come when you just 00:02:21.140 |
I mean, I'm going to just pause for a second. 00:02:26.780 |
I've taken occasional pause, to be honest, but they're very rare, as the audience knows. 00:02:33.460 |
Oh, that's just gazillion dollar advice because I think that everyone has an ego. 00:02:45.100 |
We'd like to perform better over time, and negative feedback hurts. 00:02:49.340 |
And it can hurt a little or a lot depending on how defensive we are, but a tool like you 00:02:54.260 |
just described to remove some of that defensive armor that we all have and actually let the 00:03:01.320 |
information in in a way that's constructive is really great. 00:03:04.500 |
What you described, I think, is a way to create constructive criticism, but the constructive 00:03:10.460 |
part is really coming from within as opposed to saying, "I'd like some constructive criticism," 00:03:15.580 |
and then hoping that the criticism is actually constructive. 00:03:18.380 |
So you're taking control over the process in a healthy way, in a benevolent way. 00:03:23.900 |
And I think the big question that comes up for a lot of people at this point is, "Okay, 00:03:27.480 |
so I get somebody to give me advice, but it might still sting. 00:03:30.940 |
How do I get better at taking it constructively?" 00:03:33.940 |
And I think probably my favorite technique on this I learned from Sheila Heen. 00:03:40.100 |
And the idea is that when somebody gives you a piece of criticism, that's your first score. 00:03:44.780 |
So let's say in my world they gave me a three and a half, and I want to know how I can do 00:03:53.780 |
What I do is say, "I want to get a 10 for how well I took the three and a half." 00:03:59.140 |
I want to evaluate myself on how well I took the first score. 00:04:08.980 |
So when I was right out of my doctorate, I got asked to teach a motivation class for 00:04:29.940 |
They've got-- well, you know this community well. 00:04:37.460 |
So I walked in there, and I thought I had to impress them. 00:04:39.940 |
And I started talking about my credentials and all my research experience. 00:04:44.540 |
And the feedback at the end of the four-hour session was brutal. 00:04:48.460 |
I remember reading the feedback forms, and one person had written, "More knowledge in 00:04:58.820 |
And then another wrote, "I gained nothing from this session, but I trust the instructor 00:05:06.940 |
I was like, "Can I-- I would really like to transform into an actual bear and hibernate 00:05:12.380 |
for the next four months, and then maybe I'll come out of a hole ready to hear this." 00:05:17.900 |
I had committed to teach a second session a week later. 00:05:21.700 |
So all I could do was figure out, how am I going to hear this feedback and really take 00:05:26.780 |
And I guess I applied a version of the second score, and I said, "All right, you know, there's 00:05:30.620 |
some generals that are going to come back and see me again, and I've got to prove to 00:05:38.140 |
And one of the things I heard loud and clear was that they valued humility, and I had led 00:05:43.720 |
with too much confidence, which was just insecurity masked. 00:05:48.180 |
And so I thought, "Okay, how do I-- how do I change the equation?" 00:05:52.140 |
And walked in, looked at the room, and I said, "I know what you're all thinking right now. 00:05:56.900 |
What could I possibly learn from a professor who's 12 years old?" 00:06:06.940 |
And then one of the guys in the audience jumps in, and he's like, "Oh, that's ridiculous. 00:06:15.780 |
And I think what I was trying to do was to take myself off the pedestal and say, "Look, 00:06:21.360 |
You told me that you didn't think I had anything to teach you, and I've got to acknowledge 00:06:25.460 |
that right up front and be open to the fact that that's true. 00:06:28.420 |
And so I want to come in here and learn from you, and I want to see if I can curate a conversation 00:06:34.400 |
And the feedback was night and day different. 00:06:36.180 |
Afterward, one person wrote, "Although junior in experience, the professor dealt with the 00:06:43.900 |
And there was something really powerful about saying, "Look, you know, I can't change the 00:06:49.660 |
What I can do is convince them that I was motivated to learn from their criticism." 00:06:54.220 |
I love this concept of the second score, and thank you for sharing that story. 00:06:59.460 |
I think, you know, very often we hear about people like you who, if people didn't catch 00:07:09.780 |
And as far as I know, the youngest tenured professor at Penn at 28. 00:07:13.460 |
So these are outrageously impressive metrics of accomplishment. 00:07:18.840 |
And for you to share a story about, you know, less than optimal performance and how you 00:07:24.420 |
adjusted to it and the incorporation of the second score that you're referring to, I think 00:07:32.500 |
Because I think that as much as we hear, you know, "Oh, you know, Jordan, you know, took 00:07:37.420 |
many more, you know, free throws, and everyone just thinks about all the ones he made." 00:07:41.340 |
You know, people think about all the ones he made. 00:07:46.660 |
So it's, I appreciate that you've fleshed it out with a personal example. 00:07:50.180 |
I too would want to turn into a bear and disappear. 00:07:52.780 |
But I would, but I think that it's really impressive what you did. 00:07:56.180 |
And it makes me think that the second score of getting a 10 at bringing the three and 00:08:00.460 |
a half up, right, as it were, is really about turning a score into a verb process. 00:08:10.020 |
You know, over and over again, as I do this podcast, and as I've taught in the classroom, 00:08:14.060 |
what I keep coming back to is this idea that we should be focusing more on verbs and less 00:08:18.620 |
We love to name things and categorize them, but when we start living life through a lot 00:08:23.800 |
of verb processes, so instead of getting, being fit, we think about that, you know, 00:08:28.860 |
or running as a thing, we really think about, like, just running, right, it becomes less 00:08:35.420 |
But the idea that, you know, and this has, there are mathematical models of this, I'm 00:08:39.300 |
sure, but where you're basically talking about, you know, like an integral, right, as opposed 00:08:43.240 |
You're talking about the slope of the line, right, so you're a three and a half, how are 00:08:48.380 |
Gosh, that's a huge gap, and you're dealing with being back on your heels psychologically 00:08:52.180 |
from getting all this, you know, battering feedback from these, you know, these highly 00:08:56.500 |
accomplished individuals, all these accoutrements and, you know, literally wearing them presumably 00:09:03.340 |
And it's really about creating, it's about taking control of the slope of that line from 00:09:09.220 |
And it's really a forward-looking perspective. 00:09:11.520 |
So I don't think we're being unduly psychological here or analytic. 00:09:15.600 |
I mean, I think it's really about taking a moment state and a noun and turning it into 00:09:23.100 |
I'm reminded of the great philosopher Homer Simpson, who said that verbing weirds language. 00:09:29.220 |
So it's harder to talk about this stuff in verbs. 00:09:31.820 |
I swear I didn't steal it from the Simpsons, but if it came from Homer Simpson, like, I'm 00:09:35.140 |
You have to, I mean, that's incredibly credible. 00:09:37.220 |
Small brain, but, you know, given the size of his brain and people have seen the image, 00:09:45.680 |
I think verbs are active and we're drawn to them. 00:09:49.220 |
I think, yeah, a lot of times people review their past work and they just like, they end 00:09:53.680 |
up shaming an earlier version of themselves and they wallow in rumination. 00:09:58.040 |
And what we want to try to do in that situation, which is easier said than done, is to say, 00:10:02.480 |
all right, like the purpose of, you know, of getting feedback or advice is not to shame 00:10:07.000 |
my past self, it's to educate my future self. 00:10:10.040 |
Which I think is very connected to a lot of the work on growth mindset that you've been 00:10:14.140 |
And there's been a firestorm of controversy around, can we teach growth mindset in schools 00:10:19.860 |
And I think what that has underscored for me is, look, you can't expect someone to listen 00:10:25.880 |
to one podcast episode or go through one workshop and magically believe that they're capable 00:10:33.200 |
This is something we have to actively work on on a daily basis. 00:10:35.800 |
And part of doing that, exactly as you said, is thinking about this loop and saying, all 00:10:40.240 |
right, the person that I'm, you know, I'm competing with is my past self and I want 00:10:44.360 |
to get a little bit better today than I was yesterday.