back to indexSimplify Decision Making, Reduce Stress and Improve Your Life
Chapters
0:0 Introduction
3:5 All About (Philosophical) Razors
3:50 Occam's Razor
5:25 The Optimist Razor
7:23 Overcoming Unconscious Bias to Find the Right People to Work With
9:5 Surrounding Yourself With Smart Friends
11:10 The ChatGPT Growth Curve
12:48 Separating Investments from The Hype Cycle
13:59 Deconstructing Crazy Ideas
19:34 Being Interested vs. Being Interesting
21:17 Effective Conversation Starters
24:41 Power Moves To Make a Lasting Impression
26:13 Hanlon's Razor
26:26 Making Decisions With Optimal Outcomes
28:45 Putting Yourself In The Arena
30:39 Responding To Negative Feedback
32:22 Choosing Between Two Career Paths
36:1 Why Cheap Is Not Always Cheaper
39:4 Seizing Rare Opportunities
42:0 The Regret Minimizing Framework
47:35 Performance Coach for Decision Making
50:47 Expanding Your Luck Surface Area
51:23 Picking The Right Room For Growth
56:34 The Time Billionaire Razor
61:31 Fighting The Urge To Keep Up With The Joneses
00:00:00.000 |
if you have enough smart friends talking about something, you should take it seriously. 00:00:03.840 |
And again, a lot of these were for me, derived from bad experiences, where I didn't listen to 00:00:11.200 |
this, and then I came to regret it. And so smart friends for me, I mean, again, going back to early 00:00:16.080 |
COVID, all of these smart friends of mine were talking about board API club as a silly example, 00:00:21.760 |
which maybe now it's not as much of a thing. But at the time, it was like this, 00:00:26.240 |
whatever, you know, NFT project, I didn't understand what NFTs were, but I had all these 00:00:29.760 |
friends that were talking about it. And I was like, dude, that sounds stupid. I'm just going 00:00:33.120 |
to ignore this. Like, that sounds super dumb. But I had multiple friends saying it over and 00:00:36.320 |
over again. And then like, you know, if I had listened to them, and done something about it, 00:00:41.200 |
12 months after that, I probably would have made like a million dollars off of just putting in a 00:00:45.920 |
little bit of money into this thing. And so I developed a rule, basically, that was if three 00:00:49.920 |
smart friends, like three friends that I consider intelligent, tell me about the same thing, 00:00:54.000 |
I'm going to put like a little bit of skin into the game, no matter what, even if I'm not going 00:00:57.520 |
to go deeper on it, it just like gives me kind of a hedge against looking like an idiot later 00:01:02.000 |
on, like I did with that one. Zile, thanks for being here. I'm so happy to be doing this in 00:01:11.520 |
person. I know. I don't do a lot of these in person. We're here in New York City at Podstream, 00:01:16.480 |
which I've never been to, but right in the center of Times Square, but we are in a dark room between 00:01:21.120 |
two ferns, as it were. Yeah, we are. So, so much of what you've written online for the past few 00:01:27.120 |
years has had a big impact on me. And every time I come into a conversation, I'm like, oh, there's 00:01:31.520 |
so much, but I got this advice from someone recently about travel. They said, whenever you 00:01:35.920 |
go to travel, pretend like you're going to that city a million times for the rest of your life. 00:01:40.400 |
Just don't, don't feel like this is your last trip. So I'm gonna treat this conversation like 00:01:43.680 |
it's not our last conversation on the show, so I don't have to cover everything. So I thought back 00:01:48.480 |
to kind of the first content of yours that I'd read, and it was all about razors, which at the 00:01:52.640 |
time I was like, I don't even know what that is. And I felt like that would be a great place to 00:01:57.520 |
start for this conversation, but like everyone else listening, I'm sure people don't know what 00:02:02.960 |
razors are. So can you talk a little bit about what they even are and we can jump into why they're 00:02:07.120 |
important? Yeah, absolutely. So it's not for shaving. Yeah. Would be the first thing I would 00:02:12.160 |
start with, I suppose. No, I mean, a philosophical razor, the term is from philosophy and basically 00:02:18.640 |
the idea is that it's a rule of thumb or some sort of decision-making heuristic that allows you to 00:02:23.280 |
cut through available options and make a decision. So the whole idea was like in philosophy, you can 00:02:29.040 |
take a razor and it allows you to like strip away any of the unnecessary things in order to cut 00:02:33.680 |
through the noise and just make a decision. So Occam's razor is the one that if people know a 00:02:38.080 |
single razor, Occam's razor is the thing they've heard of. And that's like the whole idea that 00:02:42.000 |
basically simple is beautiful. It's like if you have a whole bunch of hypotheses, the one that 00:02:46.880 |
requires the fewest assumptions is generally the one that is right. If you're kind of like looking 00:02:52.480 |
to decide which path you believe is the driver of some situation. So I've written a bunch about 00:03:00.400 |
razors and basically like extending the concept into a whole bunch of different realms. I think 00:03:04.960 |
a lot about ways to simplify decision-making. It's always been something that I've liked. 00:03:08.800 |
You're sort of similar to that, like life hacks, right? Are all sort of razors in their own way, 00:03:12.960 |
shape or form, like ways to make a decision, cut through things, that'll just simplify your life, 00:03:18.640 |
hopefully, like tools in your toolkit. So that's been the kind of genesis of me writing about them 00:03:23.360 |
in the past. Yeah, I think when it comes to my whole scope in life is like, how do I optimize 00:03:27.840 |
everything? I think one of the challenges you get into is there's just too much and you get 00:03:32.000 |
overwhelmed. So for me, I love these idea of razors, rules of thumb to just make some of it 00:03:37.520 |
a little easier. Although the risk is that you then have like a million razors, which would be 00:03:41.840 |
the pushback against this, which is like, "Oh, I have a million razors. I can't remember a single 00:03:45.440 |
one of them." So the way I always think about these things is like tools in your toolkit. 00:03:49.600 |
You don't need to like know that you have all of those different wrenches or all those different 00:03:53.840 |
things at every single point in time. You just need to like have your toolkit and be able to 00:03:58.320 |
open it up and think about, "Okay, what applies to a situation at any point in time?" 00:04:02.480 |
Yeah, and I don't expect anyone listening to go home and be like, "I got 17 razors to use in my 00:04:06.880 |
life." I did try to bulk them into a couple of categories because I thought that might be helpful 00:04:11.920 |
for people to think, "Okay, I need to make a decision on this thing. Is there something that 00:04:16.240 |
might make this easier?" So the first one I thought about was related to people. There's people in 00:04:20.720 |
your life. First one I had was the optimist razor, which I consider myself an optimist, 00:04:24.640 |
so I like this one. Let's start there and kind of go through a few people one and see where we get. 00:04:29.280 |
Yeah. So the optimist razor is basically the idea that you should always default to trying to spend 00:04:35.440 |
time with optimists. And if you have a choice between spending time with optimists and pessimists, 00:04:39.440 |
you're always better off spending time with optimists. And the grounding of this, I mean, 00:04:43.520 |
I originally came up with this during like the period of COVID when there was a whole ton of 00:04:48.400 |
pessimism out there around like, "Oh, the markets are going to hell. The economy is going to hell." 00:04:52.720 |
And then there was like little shades of optimism and like kind of mid-2020 about, 00:04:58.000 |
"Okay, but a lot of these things are happening X, Y, and Z that might be positive actually for 00:05:02.800 |
the future." I mean, the Fed was printing trillions and trillions of dollars. And what I found was 00:05:08.000 |
my initial skew was to pessimism. And I was like, "Oh, short the market. Everything's going bad. 00:05:12.320 |
Everything's going bad." And really regretted that after a few months when I realized that 00:05:16.720 |
the optimists were actually the ones that were getting rich by betting on things going well in 00:05:21.520 |
that time period. And so, I started just thinking about, "Well, there's this little heuristic that 00:05:27.360 |
pessimists sound really smart, but optimists seem to be getting really rich." And it all of a sudden 00:05:35.200 |
cemented in my mind like, "Okay, there's something to this. And really, I want to be spending more 00:05:39.440 |
time around optimists in general." But it's not just about investing and making money. 00:05:44.080 |
It can be just who you want to hang out with on the weekend. 00:05:46.240 |
Totally. I mean, that's why it applies so broadly to life. And when I took it beyond that, 00:05:51.360 |
I just started thinking, "Who do you feel good when you're around?" Just as a general rule of 00:05:56.960 |
thumb. You're like, "Who do I get energy from? Who makes me happy and feel good to be around?" 00:06:02.480 |
And that tends to be optimists. Again, pessimists, they sound smart. They have a lot of things and 00:06:08.000 |
negativity, et cetera. But being around people that are positive and optimistic about the future, 00:06:12.160 |
about what it looks like in any arena, just tends to feel better. And what I find is that good 00:06:17.200 |
things happen when you spend time with optimists. They just have a better outlook on the future. 00:06:21.120 |
And if you believe that energy attracts energy, optimists tend to attract good outcomes. 00:06:26.480 |
Yeah. What about finding people to work with more than just hanging out? 00:06:31.440 |
Yeah. I mean, it applies to another kind of area that I've thought about, which is 00:06:35.600 |
originally from Nassim Taleb, the author of Black Swan, who I don't know if... I forget what book 00:06:43.600 |
it's in. It's either in... I don't think it's in Black Swan. It might be in Skin in the Game or 00:06:47.520 |
Anti-Fragile, where he talks about this whole thing of the surgeon and how you pick a surgeon. 00:06:52.960 |
And so he tells this story of you choosing between two surgeons who are of equal merit. Assume they 00:06:59.520 |
both have the same track record of successful surgery, say. And one of them looks like this 00:07:03.760 |
beautiful, polished Harvard Medical School credentialed surgeon. Perfect, clean cut, 00:07:09.120 |
everything's good. And then the other one looks like a butcher. He's got blood all over him. 00:07:13.120 |
He just doesn't look the part. He's big hands, whatever, big beard, scraggly. 00:07:18.480 |
And his whole thing is that most people pick the nice, clean cut surgeon when what you should 00:07:24.320 |
actually do is pick the one who doesn't look the part. And his logic is that the one who doesn't 00:07:29.440 |
look the part has had to overcome not looking the part in order to get to where they are. 00:07:33.920 |
And so if they have equal merit, that one is actually the better one because they've had to 00:07:37.920 |
overcome not looking like they should all along the way in order to get to that level. 00:07:42.960 |
And I've always thought that was like another interesting way of thinking about who to work 00:07:46.160 |
with, because we do have all of these little biases and prejudices that are in our head. 00:07:50.800 |
And people that have managed to overcome all of those all along the way to get to where they are 00:07:55.360 |
tend to be great, great people to work with. - Yeah, I don't know if you've ever done 00:07:58.880 |
unconscious bias training, but it just kind of like opens your eyes up to, "Oh, okay." 00:08:04.240 |
Like even someone who might not think you have bias, you have bias for sure. 00:08:07.520 |
- Yeah, I mean, the statistics on those things are insane. Like you can go on Google and just 00:08:11.680 |
like look one up and do one of the tests quickly and you can get like a score on it. It's usually 00:08:16.720 |
- What about smart friends? - Again, like with people, man, 00:08:21.120 |
the smart friends one is basically that if you have enough smart friends talking about something, 00:08:27.920 |
you should take it seriously. And again, like a lot of these were for me derived from bad 00:08:34.720 |
experiences, like where I didn't listen to this and then I came to regret it. And so like 00:08:38.640 |
smart friends for me, I mean, again, going back to early COVID, like all of these smart friends 00:08:43.120 |
of mine were talking about board API club as like a silly example, which maybe now it's like not as 00:08:48.560 |
much of a thing, but at the time it was like this, you know, whatever, you know, NFT project. 00:08:53.440 |
I didn't understand what NFTs were, but I had all these friends that were talking about it. 00:08:56.800 |
And I was like, dude, that sounds stupid. I'm just going to ignore this. Like, 00:08:59.280 |
that sounds super dumb, but I had multiple friends saying it over and over again. 00:09:02.400 |
And then like, you know, if I had listened to them and done something about it, 12 months after that, 00:09:08.240 |
I probably would have made like a million dollars off of just putting in a little bit of money into 00:09:12.240 |
this thing. And so I developed a rule basically that was if three smart friends, like three 00:09:16.560 |
friends that I consider intelligent, tell me about the same thing, I'm going to put like a little bit 00:09:20.720 |
of skin into the game no matter what, even if I'm not going to go deeper on it, it just like 00:09:24.640 |
gives me kind of a hedge against looking like an idiot later on, like I did with that one. 00:09:29.120 |
But again, it's just another way of thinking about, you know, drafting off of the intelligence 00:09:35.440 |
of your peer group. Like if you have smart people that are talking about things and you're in these 00:09:39.680 |
circles with intelligent people that have domain expertise that goes beyond yours, listening to 00:09:44.320 |
them and taking it seriously when there's enough density in a single idea is usually a good bet. 00:09:49.600 |
Presumably they have to be excited about it or just talking about it. I think excited about it, 00:09:54.080 |
you know, like, and again, and domain experts, right? Like not just like you don't want to have, 00:09:59.120 |
you know, your like coder and engineer friends, maybe like weighing in on like culture and 00:10:04.720 |
fashion and being like, oh, I'm going to listen to them. Like you want it to be people like if 00:10:08.800 |
they're in technology and they're weighing in on some new technology, like AI could be an example 00:10:12.720 |
today. If you have a certain domain within AI that a bunch of your smart friends are really 00:10:17.200 |
interested and excited about, it's worth taking seriously. It doesn't mean you have to invest in 00:10:20.720 |
it or do something, but it's worth at least digging into it and trying to understand more 00:10:24.320 |
because it might be like an asymmetric bet on the future. - Right now, I feel like this about AI, 00:10:29.920 |
except I just don't know how to make that asymmetric bet. Or maybe it's not even asymmetric 00:10:33.760 |
anymore because what is it like a hundred million people are using chat GPT at this point? 00:10:37.360 |
- Is it really a hundred million people? - The growth curve on chat GPT, you can search it, 00:10:40.960 |
or I'll find the link and put in the show notes. It's like, you know, Instagram grew to a hundred 00:10:45.280 |
million users this fast and all this, and you see these curves like this. And then chat GPT is just 00:10:49.360 |
like a straight line up. I think I've seen that. I still just wonder with technology stuff like 00:10:57.200 |
this, how much of it is that we're just in a bubble of sort of like semi-nerdy people on Twitter 00:11:01.760 |
versus true mass proliferation of an idea. I honestly just don't know. I think chat GPT 00:11:09.120 |
is probably across the chasm, but I used to wonder that like with web three stuff, 00:11:13.440 |
like if you go to like a normal person on the street, they're like, "What the hell is an NFT?" 00:11:16.640 |
Right? And so like there clearly wasn't a mass proliferation of the idea. 00:11:20.640 |
The utility of chat GPT makes me believe that it is actually mass proliferating. 00:11:25.280 |
- It's funny because I had this experience this morning. I flew to New York today and I'm waiting 00:11:29.600 |
for my bag to go through the metal detector. And I hear three TSA agents talking about AI. And 00:11:35.200 |
they're like, "Yo, I use this thing and it creates song lyrics, it creates art." And I was like, 00:11:40.400 |
"Okay." It's clearly crossed to the mainstream, but the use cases everyone's excited about are 00:11:46.240 |
not necessarily use cases that I think will drive business. The challenge I have is it's something 00:11:51.520 |
that I feel really passionate about being big and have no clue how to bet on. And there was a pretty 00:11:56.640 |
good episode of the All In podcast where they were debating how to invest in this space. 00:12:01.360 |
And these are some of the smartest investors in the world. And I can't remember which one said, 00:12:05.760 |
"I still haven't invested." Because if you look at the early days of so many of these industries, 00:12:10.640 |
even look at social, the first few social networks actually didn't work out. And so I'm frustrated 00:12:16.720 |
because I feel like there's a there there, but I don't actually know what to do about it. 00:12:21.200 |
You also have to separate it. If you're going to invest, you also have to separate it from 00:12:24.320 |
hype cycle. Normally, TSA agents talking about it, I would say is really peak hype cycle of 00:12:28.800 |
something. And so hype cycle drives valuations. And so if you're looking... I have this fund where 00:12:33.760 |
I invest in early stage companies. And if you were to look at the average deal that says they're an 00:12:39.360 |
AI company right now, the valuation at pre-seed or seed is like $25, $30 million, which is very, 00:12:45.120 |
very hard to drive a return in the aggregate across an asset class. And so that's what I 00:12:51.040 |
struggle with. They're benefiting from hype cycle on their early valuation, which hurts investors on 00:12:56.080 |
the margin. And so it's tough. It's tough to discern, "Okay, what's there? What's actually 00:13:00.880 |
just going to get eaten by whatever big company decides to do this?" It's tricky. And most of them, 00:13:05.520 |
by the way, are just doing an open AI API call. They don't actually have anything internally or 00:13:10.800 |
proprietary about it. And so again, it's like, "Okay, you're just linking to another person's 00:13:15.200 |
platform." Yeah. The number of companies that have pitched me a thing that's like, "Hey, 00:13:19.200 |
we take a document and we give you answers on it." And I'm like, "There's literally... You're 00:13:22.480 |
just monetizing this other API." With your own UI/UX. Although a lot of companies have been 00:13:27.280 |
built in that general way in different areas where it's just like, "Oh, we link to whatever 00:13:32.000 |
platform we're using their backend." So I'm not saying that company can't make money. I'm just 00:13:36.080 |
skeptical in investing in anything at these valuations. Totally. Totally. 00:13:38.720 |
But to come back to Razors, what do you do when someone comes to you with a crazy idea? 00:13:43.360 |
Oh, man. So my favorite thing around crazy ideas is... I think it was Paul Graham. Yes. Paul Graham, 00:13:52.000 |
the famous investor, he didn't actually frame it as a Razor. I turned it into a Razor, 00:13:57.280 |
but he wrote this piece on what to do if someone comes to you with a crazy idea. 00:14:01.600 |
And basically, his thing boiled down to two questions to ask yourself, "Are they a domain 00:14:06.080 |
expert? And do I know them to be a reasonable person?" And if the answer to both of those 00:14:10.480 |
things is yes, then you should probably take the idea seriously because it might be an asymmetric 00:14:15.280 |
bet on the future. And I thought that was such an elegant way to think about this because 00:14:19.040 |
it's very easy to write off crazy ideas. You hear something and you're like, "You don't understand 00:14:23.520 |
this." You're just like, "That sounds ridiculous. That seems ludicrous that that would ever happen 00:14:27.920 |
or that the future would look like that." But if you slow down and you ask yourself those two 00:14:31.360 |
questions, you can actually totally deconstruct the entire problem. You're asking, "Are they a 00:14:36.160 |
domain expert? So do they understand this thing that they're talking about, the area around this 00:14:40.720 |
thing very, very well?" If the answer is yes, move on to the next question, which is, "Are they a 00:14:44.160 |
reasonable person or are they completely ridiculous?" And if you know they're completely 00:14:47.360 |
ridiculous, you're like, "Okay, maybe I'm going to hesitate a little bit." But if they're not, 00:14:51.760 |
if you know that they're a reasonable person and that they do reasonable things, 00:14:55.520 |
now you start to take the whole thing seriously a little bit based on those two. 00:14:58.960 |
So I've always thought that that was a really, really good way to cut through the noise on it. 00:15:02.800 |
Yeah. I find that my instinct is often to be like, "That's not right." 00:15:07.840 |
I think that's most of our common instinct when we hear anything. 00:15:10.400 |
Especially because I don't understand it. I'm not technical enough to know on most of these things. 00:15:14.720 |
And so when someone says something that sounds crazy to me about the future, 00:15:18.000 |
what the future is going to look like, what people are going to be doing, my default is like, 00:15:21.600 |
"That's stupid. No, no way." And generally, on five or 10-year time horizons, anything I thought 00:15:27.440 |
was stupid, I've been completely wrong about. If there were enough people talking about eSports, 00:15:31.600 |
people filling... Someone said this to me in, I don't know, it's probably 2009. When I got to 00:15:37.360 |
college, someone was like, "Dude, eSports is going to be the next big thing. People are going to fill 00:15:40.640 |
stadiums watching people play video games." And I was like, "You are an idiot. I'm not listening 00:15:45.200 |
to you anymore. That was dumb." And again, if I had bet on that in some way, that would have turned 00:15:49.920 |
out pretty well for me at the time. And so now my new default is like, I take anything any smart 00:15:55.360 |
person says, at least remotely seriously. It's like I had one of my razors was around listening. 00:16:01.040 |
And the whole idea was like, if someone says something that is very different from your 00:16:06.480 |
beliefs, you should listen twice as much as you speak. And that applies to this type of thing 00:16:13.040 |
with new investment ideas or ideas on what the future of technology looks like, just as much 00:16:17.440 |
as political debates or anything that you're trying to educate yourself on. Because generally, 00:16:22.720 |
our bias when we hear something that we don't agree with becomes, "Okay, I'm just going to 00:16:28.560 |
talk over them and I'm going to tell them why they're wrong about this thing." But if you flip 00:16:32.160 |
the script on that and you say, "I'm actually just going to listen to a whole bunch and at least hear 00:16:36.640 |
them out," usually you end up learning something. Even if you don't agree with them at the end, 00:16:40.240 |
that's fine, but you end up learning something from how they're thinking about it. 00:16:43.840 |
Well, also, I think one of your life hacks, so Silas' great PDF of 50 life hacks, 00:16:49.200 |
if I remember right, is trying to be interested, not interesting. 00:16:53.200 |
Yeah. Yeah. I mean, this is like a simple reframe. Especially when you're young, 00:16:58.880 |
I definitely fell into this trap when I first started my career. My whole thing was like, 00:17:03.440 |
"Okay, if I'm going to go to an event and I'm going to talk to people, I really want to be 00:17:06.640 |
interesting. I want to talk about all the interesting things I'm doing or the interesting 00:17:10.240 |
things." The challenge is you're actually just not that interesting at age 22. I mean, on the margin, 00:17:14.880 |
most people are not that interesting at 22. At 25, frankly, most people aren't interesting for 00:17:19.760 |
the first 10 years of their career because you just haven't done enough. There's not enough 00:17:22.960 |
experiences in your life. My whole reframe around it is focus on being interested rather than 00:17:29.520 |
interesting. Being interested means you're listening to people. It means you're asking 00:17:33.680 |
follow-up questions. You're diving down the rabbit hole with them to learn more about why they think 00:17:38.160 |
certain things or why they're interested in certain things. When you do that, people want you around 00:17:43.760 |
because interested people are really fun to be around because they're actually listening to you 00:17:47.680 |
and they're actually asking follow-up questions. Most people at a cocktail event or at a party or 00:17:52.240 |
whatever are just waiting for their turn to speak. You're talking to someone, having a conversation, 00:17:57.600 |
and you see them sitting there and they're just like, "Mm-hmm, mm-hmm, mm-hmm." Then as soon as 00:18:01.200 |
you get done, they're like, "Ah," they jump in with their thing. That's not a particularly fun 00:18:05.040 |
conversation part. I just think it's a great way to stand out in conversations and to actually 00:18:09.920 |
learn things when you're in them. It doesn't even have to be if you don't have anything 00:18:13.280 |
interesting. It could just be to build more relationships. Totally. I just think it's a 00:18:16.240 |
good way to live life in general. You end up learning so much interesting stuff by just 00:18:20.720 |
being interested. Paradoxically, being interested is how you become interesting because then you end 00:18:26.960 |
up getting into those cool situations. You end up learning interesting things. That's what you end 00:18:31.280 |
up going and capitalizing on, working on, etc. How do you start that conversation? I think there 00:18:35.280 |
was another life hack by just how to start the conversation to build it. I just found meetings 00:18:41.360 |
or situations where I was way over my skis early in my career. I've always just been great about 00:18:48.560 |
finding my way into weird situations that I don't belong in. Even this last weekend, I was at the 00:18:53.360 |
Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting and I had a chance to talk to Bill Gates. In a situation like 00:18:59.280 |
that, you're like, "What am I possibly going to have to offer or talk to Bill Gates about? I don't 00:19:02.960 |
have anything possibly interesting that he would find interesting, given who he has access to." 00:19:08.480 |
What I found is that the best way to get someone like that talking in what would otherwise be a 00:19:13.200 |
weird, clumsy, awkward situation is to ask them what they are most excited about in their life 00:19:17.920 |
right now. That can be personal or professional. They can take it however they want it. 00:19:21.520 |
Normally, really successful people have something that they're fired up about at any point in time. 00:19:27.600 |
If you can get them talking about that, then it becomes really easy. The pressure's off you. 00:19:31.520 |
They're excited. They're energetic about whatever it is that they're telling you about. 00:19:35.280 |
Then you can just ask follow-up questions. You can just dig deeper on stuff, again, 00:19:38.720 |
to being interested. That becomes a much, much easier conversation with anyone. 00:19:43.280 |
So, what was Bill Gates interested in? What was Bill Gates excited about? 00:19:46.640 |
I actually don't know that I'm allowed to talk about the thing that he was excited about 00:19:51.200 |
in public because it was in a private setting. I actually don't want to share it. 00:19:55.040 |
Okay, but it was a fun conversation. I mean, short, fun conversation. You get someone that 00:20:00.080 |
otherwise you would be like, "Hi," to talk for five minutes. That's an amazing experience and 00:20:05.120 |
opportunity. It was generally around climate technology, something that he's working on. 00:20:08.880 |
I think it'll be public. I think it is public, maybe, but I just don't want to. 00:20:11.840 |
It's funny. I talked to Catherine Minchu, who runs this company called The Muse, 00:20:14.800 |
based in New York. Her power move in situations like this, also, when you're talking to someone 00:20:19.280 |
that's more senior than you, chances are that person is like, "When is this going to end?" 00:20:24.160 |
Yes, you can make them excited. She tries to be the one that always ends it first. 00:20:28.000 |
She's like, "Oh, I'm going to remember that person. I could talk to them again 00:20:31.040 |
because they didn't just sit here and dominate my time." 00:20:33.920 |
She brought up a time where she was at some conference, and she was talking to Elon, 00:20:37.840 |
and in the middle of it, she's like, "Hey, you know what? I got to go. 00:20:40.240 |
It was really great to talk to you," and just walked away. 00:20:43.040 |
And she said it's made people that otherwise would be like, "When is this person going to 00:20:47.760 |
leave this conference?" It just made it so much better. 00:20:50.080 |
Yeah, and it makes it less awkward for them to have to end it, too, when you just do it. 00:20:53.520 |
I also find, by the way, that following up and sending someone a book is one of the best life 00:20:58.080 |
hacks in the world because all of these hyper, hyper successful people get sent so many fancy 00:21:04.880 |
bottles of wine, expensive champagnes, expensive bottles of alcohol, super nice gifts that you 00:21:10.800 |
couldn't possibly spend enough money to send them something that would stand out. 00:21:14.160 |
But if you send someone a book that really mattered to you with a handwritten note on 00:21:18.800 |
personalized stationery of why you think it'll resonate with them and something from the 00:21:24.320 |
conversation that you enjoyed, you'll always stand out in their mind forever. They'll remember that 00:21:29.200 |
because no one really does that. It's just an old-fashioned thing. So, it's a great, 00:21:35.840 |
Yeah, One Breath Becomes Air, by far. Probably 95% of the time, 00:21:40.560 |
that's the book I share with people. If you've never read it, it's unbelievable. 00:21:43.200 |
I know. I haven't read it. I'm like, "Oh, man." 00:21:45.840 |
Oh, my God. Well, it'll knock you out. I read it on a plane for the first time, 00:21:50.560 |
and the last piece of it, I was full-on crying on this flight, and the woman next to me had 00:21:57.120 |
to ask if I was okay. So, don't read it in a situation where you're not comfortable crying. 00:22:03.920 |
So, to wrap up all of these people-related razors, I want to talk briefly about Henlon's Razor. 00:22:12.320 |
Never attribute to malice what could otherwise be attributed to stupidity, 00:22:16.800 |
is the way that that is typically put. So, basically, the idea is if someone does something, 00:22:22.960 |
we have this tendency to say, "Wow, they're acting maliciously. They're acting negatively 00:22:28.000 |
towards me or towards other people, whatever." And we should never do that if stupidity is a 00:22:32.800 |
potential argument. So, it's like the whole idea that we give people too much credit for being 00:22:37.280 |
malicious actors, when in reality, they might just be ignorant or dumb or unintelligent, etc. 00:22:42.800 |
This is a great one for Twitter. In general, you read people sending mean comments or saying things, 00:22:50.640 |
and you're like, "Oh, they're acting so maliciously, and they're acting in such a 00:22:53.680 |
bad-faith way," when sometimes you can just chalk it up to them being ignorant or stupid. 00:22:58.720 |
Is this similar to assume best intent or in the ballpark? Because I feel like that's one I use a 00:23:05.120 |
lot. Yeah. I'd say it's similar. Maybe, yeah. Assume best intent is probably a nicer way of 00:23:12.240 |
saying this. I just always found Hanlon's razor to be really funny because it's just like, 00:23:15.760 |
if you are finding that you're thinking someone is acting in some 00:23:20.240 |
bad, nefarious, calculating way, sometimes it's just that they're just not intelligent. 00:23:24.400 |
Okay. So, I think we covered a bunch of... You've written multiple posts with lots of 00:23:31.040 |
razors in lots of forms. I tried to pull some from the old posts, some from the new posts, 00:23:35.040 |
and that was a lot of things related to interactions with people. I'll link to those 00:23:39.440 |
posts in the show notes. What I like is that, in a lot of those posts, you say, "Hey, use this when 00:23:44.000 |
you're deciding who to hang out with. Use this when." We can link there if you want to recap 00:23:48.720 |
from this conversation. The other area that you alluded to at the beginning is making decisions, 00:23:53.200 |
which I think is something that, when optimized, can really save you time because I know myself 00:23:59.120 |
and a lot of people listening spend a lot of time making decisions, trying to get to the optimal 00:24:02.800 |
outcome. So, let's talk about a few of these decision-making ones. Let's start with the arena. 00:24:09.440 |
The arena. This all comes from the man in the arena, Teddy Roosevelt's speech of, 00:24:14.880 |
"It's the person in the arena that really counts." And my whole operating principle around this is 00:24:22.800 |
that you should always try to put yourself in the arena. And that takes on different forms 00:24:28.720 |
in different areas of life, but basically, don't sit on the sidelines and sling rocks at people 00:24:33.680 |
that are out there doing things. And so, if you have a choice of two paths of how to operate, 00:24:38.960 |
you should put yourself in the vulnerable position in the arena because that's where 00:24:42.720 |
you end up having the high upside things happen. That's where real growth occurs and where you end 00:24:47.360 |
up having those wins, et cetera. You can't really win long-term by sitting on the sidelines, 00:24:52.720 |
especially not sitting on the sidelines throwing rocks at people that are out there. 00:24:55.760 |
And you said this is the one you feel the most strong about in one of these posts. 00:25:00.260 |
Have you seen a lot of personal wins from playing this? 00:25:03.600 |
Yeah. I mean, I think that it's the most wins, but it's also the most, 00:25:09.440 |
I don't know, emotionally draining and trying sometimes because by putting yourself in the 00:25:14.720 |
arena, you're exposing yourself to the whole lot of people out there that do just want to sling 00:25:18.720 |
rocks from the sidelines. I mean, you've seen it, right? We're sitting here, you're producing this 00:25:22.640 |
podcast. You've been creating this for a long time. You share everything publicly. It's out 00:25:26.400 |
and about. There are going to be people that don't like it, that criticize it, et cetera. 00:25:30.080 |
That's not fun because you're like me. You're a very positive, optimistic person. You're happy. 00:25:34.800 |
You generally are just a good, positive guy. And when there's random people out there that 00:25:40.240 |
are reading your stuff or engaging with your stuff and are like, "I hate Chris. He's awful. 00:25:44.720 |
What a bad person," et cetera, it's a weird feeling where someone doesn't know you and 00:25:48.560 |
they're engaging that way, but you've gotten so much upside from putting yourself in the arena 00:25:52.880 |
and just consistently putting things out there. So I think it's like you have to be able to have 00:25:58.160 |
thick skin and take it when you're going to be putting yourself in the arena, but that's where 00:26:03.120 |
the real wins actually end up happening. So for me, with my platform, with anything I'm 00:26:07.040 |
putting out there, you're constantly putting your neck on the line and exposing yourself to it. 00:26:10.960 |
And when you're sharing ideas publicly, that's a very vulnerable state to put yourself in. 00:26:16.080 |
The same thing applies to working in a corporate job. If you're going to put your ideas on the line 00:26:22.400 |
with your boss or with your team or however you're going to do it, again, it's very easy to just sit 00:26:28.000 |
back and let other people do that, but that's not how you're going to end up progressing and making 00:26:32.560 |
it to the next level of whatever you want to do. Any tips for how you take that negative feedback? 00:26:37.600 |
I feel like I'm fortunate because I don't love that podcasts are such a one-way medium 00:26:43.440 |
that I don't hear. It's so much more effort to be like, "Oh, I was listening to something cool. 00:26:47.680 |
Now I'm going to go find that person's contacts, send them a note." So I tend to get pretty 00:26:51.440 |
positive feedback because it's people that were pretty excited about what happened and sent an 00:26:55.280 |
email and I replied to them. I know you replied to a lot of, if not all the emails you get. 00:26:59.280 |
But a friend of mine posted on the close Instagram thing this morning. She posted 00:27:03.600 |
something online. She's like, "I'm just having a bad day." And she posted a picture of Ben and 00:27:06.560 |
Jerry's. "I'm having ice cream." And she posted photos on her close friends of all the DMs she 00:27:12.000 |
got. And people are like, "I can't believe you would promote a brand like that." Or like, "Can't 00:27:15.920 |
you eat healthier ice cream?" And I was just like, the internet can be a mean place, especially 00:27:22.320 |
social media, which I don't spend a lot of time on as much as I do recording. But I know a lot 00:27:27.760 |
of people have probably faced this, whether it's at work, throwing out a bad idea. How do you take 00:27:31.120 |
that? Because I'm sure you've gotten a lot. I think defaulting to empathy is the single 00:27:36.160 |
healthiest and best way that I've found to combat negativity. Basically, when someone says something 00:27:42.800 |
super negative on the internet to someone that they don't know, it's pretty fair to assume that 00:27:47.760 |
that person is not in a happy place in their life. Like happy people... Have you seen Legally Blonde? 00:27:52.720 |
This is going to be an embarrassing reference. In the movie Legally Blonde, she's like, "Happy 00:27:56.880 |
people just don't kill their husbands. They just don't." And I think about that with happy people 00:28:01.920 |
on the internet. Happy people just don't comment mean things to other people's posts on the internet. 00:28:06.480 |
They just don't. It's just not a thing that you would think to do. You're a happy guy. I don't 00:28:09.840 |
think you would think to go and attack someone that you don't know on the internet. It's just 00:28:13.600 |
not a thing you would do. And so, I tend to think that when someone attacks you with negativity, 00:28:17.440 |
there's usually something that's going on in their life that's tough. And we don't know what that is, 00:28:23.120 |
and we're not behind that person's eyes. And so, I try to default to empathy when I read something 00:28:27.120 |
like that, of just like, "Oh, that person's having a tough day." Or the person is in a tough spot for 00:28:32.000 |
whatever reason, and not get all wound up about it. I never engage or fight back on that kind 00:28:37.440 |
of stuff. Because again, it's like, I'm not going to convince them they're wrong. I'm not going to 00:28:40.720 |
make their life better or change it. And so, there's no point. Back to some of the career 00:28:46.080 |
stuff. What about when you're faced with trying to decide between two paths you could take at work? 00:28:52.320 |
So, this is one from Naval that I really like, where he talks about making uphill decisions, 00:28:58.240 |
I think is the way that he phrases it. Which is basically when you choose between two paths, 00:29:02.640 |
you should choose the path that is harder in the short term, because those tend to be the 00:29:07.040 |
paths that work out better in the long term. So, it's like the whole short phrase of hard 00:29:12.320 |
choices now, easy choices later, easy choices now, hard choices later. And I think it's an 00:29:17.360 |
interesting, although nuanced one, to be totally honest, as I've thought more about this one over 00:29:21.200 |
time, because sometimes choosing the hard path means that you're not allowing yourself the time 00:29:29.440 |
to think about whether there's an easier way to do it. Like Tim Ferriss, who I know we both really 00:29:33.520 |
like his work, talks about often, what if this were easy? What would this look like if this 00:29:37.920 |
were easy? And I think it's a really important question to constantly ask yourself, is there 00:29:42.560 |
actually an easy mode that I can play this game on that I'm just ignoring because I'm taking pride 00:29:47.520 |
in doing it the hard way? And as someone who's sort of a recovering hustle culture bro from back 00:29:53.360 |
in the day in finance, I often missed the easy mode way of playing the game because I was so 00:30:00.080 |
prideful about playing the hard way. And so, I think this uphill decision one is actually a 00:30:05.440 |
nuanced one I need to think about more and that people should think about more of anytime you're 00:30:10.560 |
doing something and it feels hard and difficult, you should pause and ask yourself, is there 00:30:15.040 |
actually an easy mode? Is there an easy way that I can do this that I'm just missing out on because 00:30:20.720 |
I'm grinding away in the way that I am? - Yeah, and I sometimes think there's both 00:30:25.200 |
easy and I sometimes think that gets caught up in cheaper, especially in a world of trying to 00:30:32.240 |
optimize your life and your money and you're like, oh, well, this is the cheapest way, 00:30:34.960 |
so I should do it this way. - Give me an example of that. 00:30:38.080 |
- So my wife and I, I've just talked about this on another episode, I don't know if it will have 00:30:42.240 |
aired at this point, but my wife and I are talking about our children and we have a daughter who's 00:30:47.200 |
about to be three, you'll learn this in a couple of years and she had this stint where she would 00:30:53.680 |
just get out of bed after going to bed. She'd say, run out the door, open the door and say, 00:30:57.520 |
I have to go to the bathroom. Okay, I need a stuffed animal. She would just get out of bed 00:31:02.000 |
constantly and my wife and I are like, okay, what do you do? You go on the internet and there's 00:31:06.400 |
a bajillion people who have an opinion about what to do and it's hard to figure out what the right 00:31:10.560 |
thing is. So it's like, what's your manifesto? Who do I trust? And when it came to a lot of 00:31:16.400 |
early decision stuff, we just went to Emily Oster, who's written a few books about parenting and 00:31:20.880 |
she's like, this is what you need to know about the expecting phase, the baby phase, but I didn't 00:31:25.040 |
have something from her for this. And my wife was like, well, I really like the content that this 00:31:28.880 |
company called Big Little Feelings puts out. And I believe we use their course for potty training. 00:31:34.480 |
And it was like, instead of reading 10 books, my wife's just like, I really like how they teach 00:31:39.120 |
what they believe in. So she took their course, it was 30 bucks or something. She's like, we have 00:31:43.200 |
this other course, it's $100. And she was like, do you think it's worth spending $100 to get a 00:31:49.040 |
source I really trust database of how to handle every toddler scenario? And I was like, well, 00:31:54.800 |
what's the alternative? So what we did was we were like, well, one alternative. So I just asked 00:31:58.240 |
ChatGPT, I was like, what should I do? Answer was like, okay, it's surprisingly good. But it's like, 00:32:03.520 |
do we want to go do a bunch of research or just trust this thing? And so a part of my mind was 00:32:07.600 |
spinning saying, well, I could go find the answer. The answer exists on the internet, it's all this 00:32:12.640 |
work and it's the cheaper one. So I was both taking this uphill battle of the hard work of me 00:32:18.160 |
deciding what the right answer is, but also the cheaper answer. But my wife asked me, and this 00:32:22.400 |
time she was in this situation I usually am, which is like, she's saying I want to do all the work. 00:32:25.840 |
And what I learned is it was really easy for me to make a different decision when it wasn't 00:32:30.720 |
for me. And when I put a little bit of emotion in it, I was like, just buy the thing. No problem. 00:32:35.360 |
It was an easy decision for me, but for her, it felt so hard because she was like, well, 00:32:39.680 |
I could do this research, could do it. Maybe I'd learn more. 00:32:42.320 |
So cheap is not always cheap. The thing I've always found is that the thing I think is cheaper 00:32:47.520 |
is generally more expensive. And I find this with everything. I've always been a big, this is me not 00:32:53.760 |
being frugal too, but I've always been big on just like, my wife would ask, we were getting our new 00:32:59.680 |
house here in New York and she's like, what furniture? There's this furniture or there's 00:33:04.640 |
this furniture. And I was like, just get the nice one because you're going to have it. 00:33:08.480 |
And getting the cheap furniture sounds good when you get it and it's 50% cheaper, but when it 00:33:13.680 |
breaks and you need to get new, we got cheap outdoor furniture and really nice indoor furniture. 00:33:18.480 |
Well, the outdoor furniture after one winter in New York now looks like crap and I'm going to 00:33:22.080 |
have to buy new outdoor furniture. Now I'm going to have to get the nice outdoor furniture so this 00:33:25.680 |
doesn't happen again because I don't want to replace it every year. Would have been better 00:33:28.080 |
off just getting the nice one and taking care of it and doing that. And so I've generally found 00:33:32.080 |
that the thing that is like the cheap way of doing it, like spending tons of time on chat, 00:33:36.240 |
GPT, researching all this stuff. Well, now I have the headache of having to like synthesize 00:33:40.160 |
all of this stuff that I've found and convince my wife. Cause it's like what I found and she 00:33:44.080 |
didn't find it. And I just would have been better off buying the course and spending whatever it 00:33:48.480 |
costs because it would have saved me so much time and so much stress. Yeah. So nothing makes me 00:33:52.240 |
happier. And you are an example of this, of finding someone who's done all the research 00:33:56.080 |
to come up with a bunch of, I'm not going to go research what my razors should be. 00:33:59.280 |
I'm just going to take your list of razors and be like, I'm going to use this. 00:34:01.920 |
That's how I feel about hacks with you. Yeah. So that's my, my, my gift is, uh, 00:34:06.880 |
optimizing life. Yours is synthesizing. I guess it's kind of a similar thing. It's, 00:34:11.680 |
you know, you've got business advice, personal advice. It's a different advice, just maybe not 00:34:16.240 |
as focused on deals and travel and optimization. But when it comes to decisions, there was another 00:34:22.000 |
one about rare opportunity. So I learned this one, this is an interesting one. Cause I heard 00:34:27.600 |
this for the first time from the founders. Let's see the two of the three partners at the first 00:34:33.440 |
firm that I worked at. And basically they were two younger guys who spun out from their prior 00:34:40.800 |
firm with one of the founders of that prior firm to start a new one. And they were like 30 when 00:34:45.360 |
they spun out and got to be co-founders of this new private equity fund. And I asked them how 00:34:49.280 |
they thought about that decision. And the way that he said it was there are certain 00:34:54.960 |
opportunities in life that you get on average zero to one time 00:35:00.000 |
in your life. Like the average person gets zero to one. And so if you get, if you're one of the 00:35:06.480 |
lucky people that gets that one chance, that one opportunity for this really rare opportunity, 00:35:11.040 |
you have to jump at it. And he was like, starting your own private equity fund is an opportunity 00:35:16.320 |
that you get zero to one times in your life. And so the fact that he was getting it, he was like, 00:35:19.840 |
I have to go do this. Even though he was on the safe track doing really well at his prior firm. 00:35:24.080 |
And I remember registering that as very, very interesting. And then when I was thinking about 00:35:28.080 |
my own opportunity to go and kind of build this ecosystem and the thing that I was working on, 00:35:33.120 |
it was a really key factor in me deciding to kind of go all in and do it because I felt like, 00:35:37.520 |
okay, I might get one chance to do this unique thing while I'm on a growth curve and things are 00:35:42.400 |
going well. And there's all this stuff happening in the world. Like this might be my one chance 00:35:46.640 |
to go do the interesting thing. Because if I don't, then I'm going to have like all this gravity 00:35:50.560 |
around what I've been doing and it's going to have built and we're going to have kids and it's 00:35:53.920 |
going to be much more challenging. And so here's my like rare opportunity that has popped up 00:35:57.760 |
and I need to just jump at it. And I think it is like a really good framework for thinking about 00:36:02.640 |
those unique moments in life. Just like being able to pause, recognize when you're in that, 00:36:07.600 |
like you're having that unique chance and to just sort of throw caution to the wind and jump at it. 00:36:12.960 |
Yeah. And I think not overthinking the reasons not to do it. So I look back, 00:36:17.200 |
I was in college and I won't go into the whole life story, but I didn't know what I wanted to do. 00:36:21.760 |
I didn't even really realize that you were supposed to plan your job so far in advance. 00:36:25.840 |
So I was like springing at the end, like I got to go get a job. I got to do this quickly. 00:36:29.520 |
And I got an opportunity to work at an investment bank in New York called Allen & Company. Kind of 00:36:33.680 |
like weird, small boutique bank. I knew it. But the only job they offered was an internship. 00:36:39.520 |
And I was talking to friends that actually knew, like at the time I was like one month 00:36:43.360 |
into even knowing what investment bank was. And I only went down that path because I asked my 00:36:47.520 |
friends who were well more prepared and said, "What's the best job you can get out of college 00:36:50.800 |
in American investment banking?" I was like, "Well, I guess I should do that. I don't know 00:36:53.120 |
what I want to do." And they were like, "Allen & Company is like a very, it's not like one of 00:36:57.680 |
the places you could just get a job." It was like, kind of had this mystique and allure. 00:37:01.520 |
And I was like, "Do I take an internship at a company?" Not a full-time job, just an internship 00:37:06.720 |
and see where it goes. But everyone was telling me like, "This is a rare opportunity. You don't 00:37:11.120 |
usually get an offer from a company that's so secretive and cool." 00:37:14.320 |
Especially when you don't know what investment banking is. 00:37:16.240 |
Yeah. I mean, I had read my vault guide. I don't know if the vault guide still exists, 00:37:21.120 |
but back then it was like, there was this book. It's like, "Read this and you understand the 00:37:24.080 |
industry." So I took that. That was one. I feel like starting a podcast was one. 00:37:27.760 |
There've been a handful of times where I've quit a job to go do a thing, or I don't know, 00:37:33.680 |
we traveled around the world because we were like, "This is a window to do it." So I love that one. 00:37:40.240 |
There was a Razor you had about regret minimization, 00:37:44.160 |
and I'm curious, it didn't make it to your new list related to Bezos, not Gates, so sorry. But 00:37:51.520 |
I'm curious if that's still something you think about. 00:37:53.280 |
Yeah. I mean, the regret minimization framework, I think the first time Bezos talked about this 00:37:58.720 |
was in an interview with Walter Isaacson. It might be like 1996, way, way back interview. 00:38:06.560 |
Basically, we're super nerdy Bezos, not jacked out of his mind Bezos that we have today. 00:38:12.560 |
Really nerdy Bezos is talking about how he made the decision to leave D.E. Shaw. 00:38:16.640 |
This relates directly to the rare opportunity, by the way. Leave D.E. Shaw, which is this famous 00:38:21.840 |
quant hedge fund where he was making tons of money, and on a very certain path to make tens 00:38:27.440 |
of millions of dollars in his life. Amazing, amazing outcome in career, top 0.01% life. 00:38:33.920 |
Leave that to go start a bookstore on the internet, which makes no sense. Again, 00:38:37.760 |
crazy ideas going back to connect it to other Razors. His whole thing was zoom forward to the 00:38:44.160 |
future. Think about your 80-year-old self looking back on this decision. Will you regret not doing 00:38:50.160 |
it? If the answer is yes, then you should do it. That's what he did. He thought, "Well, I regret 00:38:56.080 |
not taking this opportunity and going after this." The answer was yes, and so he left and started 00:39:01.440 |
an Amazon, and now we all get packages in 24 hours from drones that are dropping them off. 00:39:05.680 |
I think it's a brilliant general way of thinking about this. I've often thought about it as in 00:39:11.600 |
both directions. You're like, "Okay, what would your 80-year-old self say about this decision? 00:39:16.800 |
Also, what would your 10-year-old self say about this decision?" The reason I think that one's 00:39:20.880 |
good is because your 80-year-old self really cares about the compounding of the decisions 00:39:25.920 |
you make today and how any decision you're making today is going to compound into the future, 00:39:30.320 |
but your 10-year-old self also reminds you to not take shit too seriously along the way. 00:39:34.560 |
You're probably like this too. You're an optimizer. You're thinking through every 00:39:39.920 |
decision. You're really thoughtful. You're constantly trying to get little bits of ROI 00:39:44.240 |
out of everything you're doing. That's great. I think there's a lot of value that can be gleaned 00:39:47.840 |
from that. At the same time, sometimes you just need to have some fun and not think about razors 00:39:53.040 |
and not think about hacks and just go have a beer and sit on the couch and not take advantage of 00:39:58.000 |
whatever time you're wasting by doing that. I think that that always helps. I call it the 00:40:04.160 |
young and old test. It's like you think about the decision as a 10-year-old and as an 80-year-old 00:40:09.200 |
and then meet in the middle. The Bezos thing, it ties directly to the rare opportunity. 00:40:15.280 |
You have this one potential opportunity in your whole life to go do this thing and you should 00:40:20.880 |
capitalize on it. To your point on making these decisions without thinking too much about them, 00:40:26.480 |
I've often thought about that as a concept, which is big decisions, paradoxically, I find are better 00:40:34.000 |
made quickly versus slowly. There's this desire when you have a big, big decision, you're like, 00:40:38.960 |
"Okay, I'm going to sit down and make this big chart of pros and cons and spend all this time 00:40:42.720 |
thinking through them." What I tend to find is that your instinct actually is usually pretty good. 00:40:47.120 |
Sometimes you just need to open the door, jump out and hope you packed your parachute really well. 00:40:55.200 |
I think it ends up making for much better outcomes. You don't waste so much time. 00:40:59.200 |
I did an episode recently, I haven't aired it yet, where I had a performance coach come in and we 00:41:06.640 |
picked a topic and we just recorded the session. The topic was I struggle so often of over 00:41:15.200 |
optimizations. I have all these decisions to make. What he actually broke down through this 00:41:20.240 |
interesting conversation using tactics that we later in the episode talked about the tactics 00:41:24.560 |
he was using, was that a lot of times most decisions are made emotionally, but you don't 00:41:30.000 |
think that in the moment. You might be talking about big decisions, you want to make your pro 00:41:35.520 |
and con list, analyze everything. He's like, "You need to stop and not just reflect, but maybe get 00:41:42.160 |
outside and force yourself into a different state because the emotional decision might actually be 00:41:46.800 |
the easy way." He was basically trying to teach me that this thing that we often think of as our gut 00:41:52.320 |
decision might actually be more of an emotional decision. We talked about this exact example I 00:41:57.280 |
used about my wife in this course. He was like, "It was so easy for you to make that decision 00:42:01.280 |
because you were thinking about it emotionally. You weren't in the middle of doing the research." 00:42:04.400 |
My new thing is whenever I'm in the middle of trying to make a decision, big or small, 00:42:09.280 |
I try to pause and then get myself out of the research phase. Not pause and look at my options, 00:42:16.320 |
pause and look at my spreadsheet, but pause and go outside for 10 minutes and just think about 00:42:21.120 |
what's the right decision here. Sometimes it just comes to you. It doesn't come to you when you're 00:42:26.160 |
looking at the data. It comes to you when you think, "What would the right decision here be?" 00:42:30.000 |
It's interesting. My reflection is just I've never made a single pro-con list that actually 00:42:36.320 |
swayed my decision. I've never drawn... In a movie, they make the pro-con list and then they 00:42:41.680 |
look at the list and the pros are like, "There's 30 of them," and the cons, there's three. You're 00:42:45.600 |
like, "Oh, okay. It's clearly a pro," but that's never happened to me in real life. 00:42:49.840 |
What ends up happening is I just sit there and stare at something that looks relatively balanced, 00:42:54.400 |
and then you just end up making the decision anyway. It's not like it actually helped me 00:42:57.520 |
think it through. I don't know. I go back and forth. I'm like you. I have all these frameworks 00:43:03.920 |
and mental models and razors, but it's not like I'm sitting going through a checklist of them 00:43:08.160 |
when I'm going and making decisions. It's again, things that are in your mental toolkit that you're 00:43:13.280 |
generally thinking about. To go back to one, the optimist razor, it's not like I'm thinking like, 00:43:18.480 |
"Okay, well, Chris invited me to do a podcast and Chris is an optimist, so I should... Okay, 00:43:23.280 |
by this decision-making, I'm going to go spend time with Chris." It's just ways to live your 00:43:27.440 |
life that you just generally are trying to be around optimists or whatever it is. 00:43:31.120 |
I try to avoid being mechanical about how all this stuff gets implemented. It's just general 00:43:38.240 |
rules and ideas that you have floating around your brain that you're applying to how you live 00:43:42.480 |
life on a daily basis. Yeah, I really like that. I was thinking maybe you had the contacts sorted 00:43:48.320 |
by optimist score. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Optimist score, Chris, 7.2. Okay, we're doing the podcast. 00:43:54.160 |
Okay, so we're not going to spend all of our time optimizing every decision we make, 00:43:59.760 |
going through these rubrics every time we do anything. Let's talk a little bit about how we 00:44:03.840 |
spend our time and how we choose what to do with our time. One of the things I know you value is 00:44:10.240 |
serendipity. Yeah, I have this concept of luck surface area that I've probably adapted from 00:44:18.880 |
people that have talked about it over a period of time. The first time I ever heard serendipity, 00:44:25.280 |
I think it was serendipity, I forget what he called it, was this guy, Tim Brown, who was the 00:44:31.120 |
CEO of IDEO, the big design firm. He talked about the whole idea of engineered serendipity, that you 00:44:38.560 |
could create luck. It was the first time I had ever heard of it. This was probably back in 2010 00:44:44.320 |
or something like that. I was in college. It always stuck with me. I've recently been thinking 00:44:48.960 |
about luck surface area, the whole idea that you can actually expand your surface area for having 00:44:54.000 |
lucky things happen to you. How you do that is by, again, putting yourself out there. It's like, 00:45:01.040 |
you don't get lucky sitting on the couch watching Netflix at home. You get lucky by being out, 00:45:06.080 |
engaging with people, meeting new people, publishing your work, putting things out there 00:45:10.480 |
into the world and seeing what can bounce off of it and the connections that can be made. 00:45:14.640 |
My whole idea with the luck razor or with the serendipity razor is you should always try to 00:45:21.600 |
expand your luck surface area. If you're going to choose two paths, a decision to make between 00:45:26.320 |
staying in and watching Netflix on a given evening or going to that opportunity, the dinner, the 00:45:33.360 |
meeting, the people, whatever it is, or to publish something publicly rather than to just have it 00:45:39.040 |
sit in your journal, you should take the path that has the larger luck surface area. I think 00:45:43.360 |
this applies mostly when you're trying to expand your luck surface area earlier in your life and 00:45:48.240 |
in your career. Once you've done that, you've figured out where the ripest opportunities are, 00:45:52.800 |
then you can start going deep and you can narrow it. For instance, today, I would probably choose 00:45:57.600 |
to sit at home and relax and spend time with my wife and son rather than going out and about to 00:46:02.480 |
some big event because I don't really feel like I'm trying to get lucky on things anymore. I've 00:46:06.240 |
sort of figured out where my luck has come from, and now I'm just going down and digging deeper 00:46:10.800 |
into that area, into that hole. Early on, expanding your luck surface area in any way, shape, or form 00:46:17.360 |
early in your life and career, I think is important. I want to come back to how we do spend 00:46:22.240 |
our time. Let's say you are going out and I'm going to tee up one other razor, which is there's 00:46:28.160 |
two rooms. How do you pick which one to go to? The one where you're going to be the dumbest one 00:46:32.400 |
in the room. Always, always. This is a common thing that people say. If you're the smartest 00:46:37.120 |
person in the room, you're in the wrong room. I really do believe that. Putting yourself in 00:46:42.640 |
uncomfortable positions where everyone is smarter than you tends to lead to really interesting 00:46:47.680 |
things, especially when you pair it with some of the stuff we talked about earlier, like good ways 00:46:51.680 |
to get those kind of people talking, good ways to think about how you can be valuable to them, 00:46:56.160 |
how you can stick out in their minds, walking away from the conversation. Like you said, 00:47:00.000 |
I like that one a lot. I'm going to steal that. Sending people books, etc. Just getting into 00:47:04.960 |
rooms where you feel a little bit uncomfortable, that's where you end up having the most growth 00:47:09.200 |
come. Yeah. I love just walking up to a table of people. I'm like, "I have no idea what you're 00:47:15.200 |
talking about. Let me just listen." It's super uncomfortable. Yeah, it is super uncomfortable. 00:47:20.400 |
And you could do it in a weird way. But in the right environment, I think it's wildly interesting. 00:47:26.800 |
Yeah. I'm going to this event in Santa Barbara in a couple of weeks. And there's a lot of wildly 00:47:32.960 |
successful people that it looks like are going to be there. And I literally don't know a single 00:47:36.960 |
person. And today, I was like, "Man, it's going to be really hard to go and do this." Because I 00:47:43.520 |
don't even have a wingman. I don't have a friend who's my guy that I can go around with or girl 00:47:48.080 |
that I can go around with. I literally don't know anyone. And I feel like a total imposter going to 00:47:53.200 |
this event. Because everyone is... CEOs are really, really impressive people. And I had to snap 00:48:00.960 |
myself out of it and just say, "Oh, what a cool opportunity to just be in this room." You can 00:48:04.480 |
just go listen to people and add value in some other way other than talking. So I'm excited for 00:48:10.320 |
it now. What's your networking move when you're at an event like this? And you're like, "I don't 00:48:15.440 |
know about you." Even though I love being around people, I get energy from people. I think my 00:48:19.200 |
default is like, "Well, should I just go stand around here and check an email?" Even for someone 00:48:24.960 |
who loves people, it can be a lot to just walk up to random people all day. Yeah. I try to find 00:48:31.600 |
circles of people. I think I tend to just walk and push myself into a circle and listen a little 00:48:40.720 |
bit to what people are saying. And then I honestly use that question a lot. "What's getting you 00:48:44.640 |
excited these days?" I've been asking people, "What lights you up?" Because oftentimes, people 00:48:49.680 |
will talk about their kids. They'll talk about their family. You end up getting to a more personal 00:48:53.120 |
level than the same questions they constantly get asked. Like the CEO of United or something, 00:48:58.960 |
an airline is going to be there. They probably constantly get asked about things about their 00:49:02.720 |
business. Analysts are asking them those questions. Earnings are... All this random stuff. 00:49:06.880 |
But if you ask them about their family or like, "Do you have any kids? What are you getting 00:49:11.280 |
excited about?" It just opens the door to a much more interesting connection that you can make with 00:49:16.080 |
those kinds of people. And then you become interesting to the whole circle of people 00:49:20.640 |
because you're the one that's driving those things forward. Because at the end of the day, 00:49:24.400 |
everyone feels awkward in those things. I don't know a single person that goes to a big networking 00:49:29.200 |
gala dinner or whatever and walks in and is like, "Oh, I feel great. This is amazing. This is my 00:49:35.040 |
favorite thing in the world." Those things suck. Nobody likes that. And it's the reason most people 00:49:39.040 |
end up drinking at those things is to loosen up a little bit. So I just think having a go-to move 00:49:45.040 |
of how you insert yourself and talk to people. And honestly, just not caring if you feel a little 00:49:50.880 |
embarrassed. Yeah. Earlier in my career, I learned something. I wish I remembered who it was from. 00:49:55.760 |
But most of these events, especially when not everyone's the CEO and it's obvious what they do, 00:50:00.400 |
the opener question is always like, "Oh, what do you do?" And I picked up from someone the 00:50:06.080 |
idea of just opening with, "What's your story?" I don't know if I like it more than asking what 00:50:13.120 |
someone's excited about right now, because then you get more energy. But if you're sitting at an 00:50:17.920 |
event, you're trying to figure out, "Well, who are these people?" Because maybe you are trying 00:50:20.800 |
to do some networking. You're trying to figure out who you need to spend your time with. What's 00:50:25.040 |
your story is just a much better opener, especially when you're around people that maybe are in 00:50:30.960 |
between jobs and it's super awkward to be like, "What do you do?" It's like, "Well, I don't have 00:50:34.320 |
a job right now." Yeah. And if you know them, if they are someone that everybody knows, 00:50:38.720 |
and you know what their story is, and they know that everybody knows them, 00:50:41.920 |
I've always found that just telling someone that you admire something that they've done 00:50:46.320 |
is a great, great opener. No one is immune to flattery. And people love to know that people 00:50:51.040 |
have recognized things that they've done. Bill Gates, when I first said hello to him, 00:50:54.640 |
I just told him I admired his philanthropic work in the developing world, because I really do. 00:50:58.800 |
I've seen a lot of impact from it. My family's from India, and they do a lot of work there. 00:51:04.080 |
And that's not something that he typically gets told, probably. It's all about Microsoft, 00:51:08.560 |
or all about being a mega billionaire, or whatever it is. And so, it jumps out immediately. And no 00:51:13.520 |
one will look at you and be like, "Shut up," when you say something nice to them about things that 00:51:18.560 |
they've done. So, I also just find that that's a nice little way to get an entry point to a 00:51:24.880 |
conversation. And while I don't think that the best thing to do is try to be the person who's 00:51:29.440 |
jumping in and talking all the time, we already covered that. I will say, if you can find a 00:51:33.360 |
question to ask someone about what they're excited about in that realm, but that ties 00:51:37.360 |
into something that you have some unique expertise in, or I think we all probably know the topic that 00:51:43.840 |
maybe lights up the room when you talk about, I wouldn't try to just jump in and have that. 00:51:48.400 |
But if you could steer the conversation towards a place where something that you're uniquely 00:51:53.200 |
knowledgeable about. So, it just made me- Hey, were you guys talking about Twitter threads? 00:51:56.480 |
Were you guys just talking about Twitter threads? Well, for me, this idea came to me when you're 00:52:02.560 |
like, "What are you excited about?" I was like, "Oh, are you taking any exciting trips this year?" 00:52:05.840 |
Almost everyone has a trip in the next 12 months. It's like, I could steer the conversation towards 00:52:11.280 |
something related to travel. That would be something where I'd be like, "I probably have 00:52:15.040 |
some interesting hacks or tips to the average audience." But in a way that gets them to take 00:52:20.960 |
it there in a way that they're excited about. That's a very good idea. It's like shepherding 00:52:24.800 |
them. You're like the river god guiding them. I like that a lot. That's smart. 00:52:29.520 |
But I want to come back finally to where we spend our time. And you have a Time Billionaire Razor, 00:52:34.240 |
but you actually did a really great post about this and looked at some data on how we spend time. 00:52:38.640 |
So, maybe let's end talking about how we spend our time and how that's evolved for you. 00:52:42.480 |
Yeah. I mean, this is a topic that's very near and dear to my heart. You have young kids. 00:52:46.320 |
I guess by the time this comes out, he will be one. And I have thought about time more in the 00:52:55.600 |
last year than I had in my entire life. Part of that is because when you have a young kid, 00:53:02.400 |
you all of a sudden start measuring time in weeks and months, which you never really do 00:53:08.800 |
otherwise. People ask you how old the kid is and you say like six weeks or nine weeks or 12 weeks, 00:53:12.960 |
whatever. I've never thought about the passage of weeks as a passage of time. In the past, 00:53:17.360 |
it's just like another week. A lot of people have now seen that life calendar, 00:53:21.840 |
like Memento Mori calendar, where it's 52 rows across and it's 80 rows down. So, 00:53:26.960 |
it represents your entire life. Every row is a year and the 80 rows is your life and you fill 00:53:32.720 |
in black every week that goes by. So, you can literally see the passage of your life, passage 00:53:36.720 |
of time. So, I've been thinking about this stuff more and more over the course of the last year. 00:53:41.840 |
And I came across this American Time Use Survey data set that I think it was Our World and Data 00:53:49.120 |
kind of crunched together to look at how we spend time over the course of our lives and specifically 00:53:53.840 |
who we spend it with. And I saw it, they had kind of combined it into a single chart of all these 00:54:00.960 |
lines, like how much time you spend with your children, how much time you spend with your 00:54:04.480 |
parents, how much time you spend with friends, coworkers, alone, etc. I went in and downloaded 00:54:10.240 |
the data and split it out into individual charts that you could really see like each line and kind 00:54:14.640 |
of the curvature of each line. And it was an unbelievably powerful image when you look at 00:54:20.800 |
them individually because you really get a feel for like, especially with kids, how you basically 00:54:26.160 |
spend all of your time with them during this very short window of their life and then it falls off 00:54:31.760 |
a cliff. And the reverse of that is with your parents, you spend almost all of your time with 00:54:36.880 |
them over the first 18 years of your life and then it just goes like this and you're not spending time 00:54:41.520 |
for the rest of your life. And so it just brought to the fore all of these really difficult 00:54:47.760 |
conversations, but also sort of empowering ones for who you spend your time with, who you want 00:54:53.200 |
to be spending your time with and how you want to sort of change the curves as it were over the 00:54:58.400 |
course of your life. And so have you made changes in the last year as a result of thinking about 00:55:04.080 |
this? Yeah. I mean, the biggest change we made was in May 2021 where we picked up our life and 00:55:09.280 |
sold our house in California, bought a house in New York and moved to be closer to my parents and 00:55:14.640 |
to my wife's parents. And that was based on the initial realization of how little time we had 00:55:19.840 |
left with our parents. Not because they're particularly old or sick, knock on wood, 00:55:23.920 |
but just based on math and their age, our age, how often we were seeing them about once a year. 00:55:29.920 |
And now I see my parents at least a few times a month. They're like a big, big part of my son's 00:55:35.360 |
life, similar with my wife's parents. They're constantly around. And it makes a huge difference. 00:55:40.960 |
And it makes them so happy too, to be a part of our lives, to be a part of our son's life. 00:55:45.040 |
So that was a huge, a huge life change. And then the kids one is the biggest for me in terms of 00:55:50.320 |
what it's done in the last year. I mean, I think it's this friend of mine, Kay, he, who has talked 00:55:56.800 |
about the magic, the magic window, I think he calls it, or the magic years, which is like this 00:56:00.960 |
10 year period of time where you are your kid's favorite person in the world. 00:56:05.360 |
And once they're older than 10, there are other people that fill that role. They have best 00:56:10.240 |
friends. They have girlfriends, boyfriends, they get married. They're going to have kids, 00:56:13.760 |
like they're going to go on and live their entire life where you as their parent are not really the, 00:56:18.320 |
like the central figure and actor. But during this 10 year window, you are, and they love you more 00:56:24.400 |
than anyone else in the world. Yet we live in a culture where traditionally those are the years 00:56:28.800 |
where you're also working the most and like trying to make the most of your life and of your career. 00:56:32.400 |
We were talking about this earlier, like your life is really good, but you also want more, 00:56:36.800 |
you know, from your career, from businesses you're building. How do you balance those two? 00:56:40.800 |
Because anything you decide to do or take on is a direct trade-off of time with your kids. 00:56:46.000 |
You're going to be like, if you're going to be grinding on some business or project or working, 00:56:50.160 |
that's just time away that you could be spending with them. And so how do you figure out and find 00:56:54.400 |
the balance of that? I've been thinking about that more and more and more. And being home during 00:57:00.720 |
this, like first year of my kid's life and getting to spend tons of time with him and really build a 00:57:04.720 |
bond with him is meaningful to me. And so does that mean saying no to a lot more professional 00:57:10.960 |
things? I mean, like I say no to 99% of opportunities that come my way. And now, 00:57:15.440 |
I mean, by virtue of the scale of my platform and how it's been growing, it's a lot, like it's a lot 00:57:21.840 |
of stuff and a lot of financial things that I'm just turning down, you know, out of hand. 00:57:25.840 |
And for me, that's been a conscious decision of, I don't actually particularly find myself 00:57:30.640 |
motivated by money all that much. So I actually don't feel like I need much more money than I 00:57:34.320 |
have today. And we have a great house and we like our life a lot and we're happy and we have, you 00:57:39.760 |
know, like I have tons of time at home and free time with my son. And I actually wouldn't change 00:57:44.800 |
that much. Like if you offered to pay me today, you know, $50 million to work 80 hours a week 00:57:50.240 |
this year, I would not do it. Full stop, like wouldn't even consider it. And that's a pretty 00:57:54.880 |
empowering feeling when you realize priorities and the trade-offs. But that, I mean, to me, 00:58:01.200 |
just like really being ruthless about what my North Star is and what I want to focus on has been 00:58:08.160 |
a pretty liberating thing and a really meaningful thing for me. 00:58:13.280 |
What do you think has helped you not want to play Keeping Up With The Joneses, which I feel like 00:58:18.560 |
many of our peers are still feeling that? I think the biggest thing is avoiding the like 00:58:25.680 |
when then psychology around this stuff. I saw a great clip of Dax Shepard recently talking about 00:58:31.040 |
this and how he had all of the trappings that he thought were going to make him happy and successful. 00:58:36.000 |
And he had convinced himself all on the way that like, well, when that thing happened, 00:58:39.200 |
then I'm going to be happy and this'll be great. And then he got that and he realized he was like 00:58:43.840 |
suicidal and not happy at all. And so it was really liberating that on the back end of getting 00:58:48.480 |
healed and treated for all of that to realize, "Oh, those external things aren't actually going 00:58:52.880 |
to ever make me happy." He saw it really viscerally. Most people never have that. 00:58:56.400 |
You don't realize that all of those games you're playing in your mind, like, "Well, 00:59:00.240 |
when I get to vice president or whatever, then I'll be happy because I'm going to be 00:59:03.920 |
making all this more money." Or, "When I get a million followers on whatever platform, 00:59:08.560 |
then I'm going to be really happy. I'm going to have made it. Things are going to be good." 00:59:11.440 |
The reality is if you're looking for something external to be what creates your internal 00:59:16.240 |
happiness, it's never going to work out. Happiness is full-on inside job. You have to be finding 00:59:21.840 |
happiness from something that is a deeper meaning, deeper purpose, something internal. It can't be 00:59:27.040 |
some external achievement because it just doesn't last. You just revert to whatever the next when is 00:59:32.080 |
that you're going to create. For me personally, I've realized that. I stepped off the treadmill 00:59:38.480 |
around all those things. That doesn't mean that I don't want more because I am motivated by growth, 00:59:43.360 |
but the growth is an internal thing versus an external thing. 00:59:47.120 |
It's not, "Hey, I want to make X dollars or do this or that." It's like, "I want to feel like 00:59:53.360 |
I'm getting better at things. If that's getting better at being a dad, that's great. If that's 00:59:57.040 |
getting better at running because I'm really into running right now, then that's great." 01:00:00.960 |
But it's not, "I want to get a better house. I want to get a better car. That guy got this, 01:00:07.200 |
so I want to do that." It's just turned everything internal in a much deeper way. 01:00:12.880 |
Yeah. The way I describe it for me is I want to feel pulled into things instead of pushed 01:00:16.720 |
into things now. I had a friend who was like, "I want to start a company." I was like, "Why do 01:00:20.400 |
you want to start a company? You started a company. You've done this. You've been successful." 01:00:23.840 |
The more he thought about it, he was like, "Well, I feel like I don't know what I want to do." I was 01:00:28.400 |
like, "Just wait until there's a thing that's pulling you towards it instead of trying to push 01:00:33.040 |
yourself into it." That's what I try to look for, which is ultimately why I left. I was like, 01:00:37.840 |
"I just feel that I have to go do this full-time." Yeah. 01:00:41.280 |
The other way to think about it is, again, I think this is from Tim Ferriss. 01:00:45.840 |
He has this question of, "What am I saying no to by saying yes to this?" I think about that 01:00:50.880 |
constantly in the context of family and in the context of what my priorities are. If my son is 01:00:56.960 |
my number one priority in the world right now and building a deep relationship with him over this 01:01:02.800 |
next 10 years and really, really having that closeness and that bond, anytime some new 01:01:09.840 |
opportunity comes along, I have to think that question through and think about, "Okay, what am 01:01:13.440 |
I saying no to with him by saying yes to this?" If some new travel comes up, someone wants me to go 01:01:18.960 |
and speak at something and it's going to require me being gone for a few weeks, what am I going to 01:01:22.400 |
miss? What am I going to be saying no to? It might be $50,000 that someone wants me to come speak at 01:01:28.240 |
something and they're going to pay and it's going to be this cool trip and I'm going to get to go 01:01:31.040 |
to this cool place, but if I'm missing his birthday party, hell no. There's no amount of money you 01:01:37.920 |
could pay me, right? Really thinking that through and it might not be kids. Maybe it's something 01:01:42.480 |
else. Maybe it's time with your family. Maybe it's some hobby that you really enjoy or a trip 01:01:47.760 |
with friends that you really wanted to take that you're going to have to say no to because of some 01:01:52.000 |
new work thing that you're going to really have to dive into if you get the opportunity. Thinking 01:01:56.240 |
through those trade-offs I think is a really healthy thing to do, but it requires you to sit 01:02:01.520 |
back and figure out what your priorities are. What are the core ways that you're going to measure 01:02:06.400 |
success of your life at the end of the day? Yeah, I mean that could be a whole other episode, 01:02:10.080 |
so we're not going to go down that path, but I will say that my hack here is I took a lot of 01:02:14.480 |
time to craft what I thought was like my perfect no email and then I made it a snippet so that I 01:02:20.800 |
could just fire it off anytime and someone's like, "Hey, I really want to talk about this thing," 01:02:24.240 |
and I'm like, "I'm heads down. I should probably just publish it because people could steal it." 01:02:28.960 |
It's like I'm really heads down focusing on stuff that's important. Feel free to shoot me an email, 01:02:33.680 |
but not going to have time to meet. Really appreciate you reaching out. It means a lot. 01:02:37.360 |
Yeah, I do the same. By making it easy, I use it so much more. Honestly, the difference between 01:02:45.440 |
thinking about it and having it as a keyboard shortcut level ease makes me send it so often 01:02:51.760 |
and feel okay about it. I got this, I think it was from Cal Newport. No, it was from Derek Sivers, 01:02:57.840 |
who was like, "If you're always busy and you can never meet with anyone, you're kind of projecting 01:03:02.560 |
that you can't prioritize your own time. And if you leave free time in your calendar, you're able 01:03:08.160 |
to take advantage of things when they happen that are really interesting." And so I'm trying to live 01:03:13.280 |
by that. It's hard because especially when you're younger, it's like every opportunity could be more 01:03:17.920 |
serendipity, more serendipity. But I feel like as we have families and we kind of understand our 01:03:23.120 |
areas, you've got to really do it. So I appreciate you saying yes to this because there's always so 01:03:29.200 |
much knowledge that gets dropped doing it. Where do you want to send people today who are listening 01:03:36.720 |
and want to stay on top of what you're doing and learn more? I guess my newsletter is probably the 01:03:40.880 |
best. You can find it at sahilbloom.com, just my name. I guess sahilbloom.com/newsletter takes 01:03:46.800 |
you straight to the newsletter. But everything's on my website. And then I'm on all social platforms 01:03:53.040 |
at Sahil Bloom. The virtue of having a weird name is you get your own handle. 01:03:59.200 |
Kind messages only if you send me the mean ones. I won't reply, but I will feel empathy for you.