Bing Just Upgraded YouTube (and changed the internet forever)
00:00:00.000 | Bing just upgraded YouTube and changed the internet forever,
00:00:03.940 | and I'm gonna show you exactly how.
00:00:06.220 | I know that statement sounds crazy,
00:00:07.900 | especially about something called Bing,
00:00:09.820 | but let me prove it to you.
00:00:11.240 | You can now open up any YouTube video
00:00:13.260 | and click on the Bing icon
00:00:15.180 | in the top right of the Edge browser.
00:00:17.640 | Now, it does currently have to be in dev mode,
00:00:20.020 | and I'll tell you about that at the end,
00:00:21.320 | but this is what will come up,
00:00:22.580 | an option to chat and an option to compose.
00:00:25.720 | And what's so revolutionary about that
00:00:27.700 | is not just the intelligence of Bing chat,
00:00:29.900 | and I've got a whole playlist on that,
00:00:31.560 | it's the fact that the chat is in the context of the video.
00:00:34.980 | It understands what video you're watching,
00:00:37.560 | and you can chat about it with Bing,
00:00:40.220 | a bit like having a highly paid assistant
00:00:42.700 | who's sitting there watching the video with you.
00:00:44.840 | Take this example.
00:00:45.720 | I was watching a video about a review
00:00:47.800 | of the S23 Ultra by Marques Brownlee,
00:00:50.040 | and I said, what are the screen dimensions
00:00:52.000 | of the S23 phone lineup and base storage capacity?
00:00:55.100 | It gave me the answer, and all of the details check out.
00:00:58.500 | Now, I know what you're thinking.
00:00:59.620 | I could have just opened a new tab,
00:01:01.400 | put that into Google search.
00:01:02.700 | But what I couldn't have done in Google search
00:01:04.700 | is what I did next, which is ask in context,
00:01:08.200 | how old is this guy, and where did he grow up?
00:01:11.200 | Google search would be like, who are you talking about?
00:01:13.640 | Whereas Bing knew the video I was watching
00:01:15.840 | and gave me a correct contextual answer.
00:01:19.140 | Now, you comment if you disagree,
00:01:20.760 | but I think that is a massive upgrade to YouTube.
00:01:23.060 | Now, I know what you're thinking.
00:01:24.600 | Shouldn't I be concentrating on the video?
00:01:26.300 | But we all multitask.
00:01:27.680 | I know that you check your emails
00:01:29.460 | sometimes while watching my videos,
00:01:30.980 | or maybe you scroll through Reddit
00:01:32.560 | while you have a tech review playing.
00:01:34.180 | We all do it sometimes.
00:01:35.500 | The difference now is it's as if
00:01:37.860 | we've got someone watching with us.
00:01:39.680 | Take this example from one of my own videos,
00:01:42.120 | where I talk about GPT-4
00:01:44.060 | and how it's likely comparable to the Palm model.
00:01:47.200 | While the video is playing,
00:01:49.180 | you can bring up chat and ask questions about Palm.
00:01:53.100 | You can teach yourself as you're going along.
00:01:56.280 | Some people, of course,
00:01:57.340 | will want to wait to the end of the video,
00:01:59.300 | but this is crazy.
00:02:00.800 | Search integrated into the video,
00:02:03.200 | as if you're carrying on a conversation
00:02:05.200 | with another person about the video you just watched.
00:02:07.800 | Teaching yourself about topics with an AI
00:02:10.000 | that, as I talked about in another video,
00:02:12.000 | has an estimated IQ of 114 and rising.
00:02:15.360 | But the craziness is only just beginning.
00:02:17.800 | I have four more examples
00:02:19.200 | of how this is going to upend the internet.
00:02:21.800 | This is not just about YouTube,
00:02:23.600 | and each example is more crazy than the last.
00:02:26.200 | Imagine you're reading a Wikipedia article.
00:02:29.140 | All you have to do is highlight some text
00:02:31.940 | and then press Bing again in the top right,
00:02:34.340 | and it will give you this little note,
00:02:36.140 | pasted from page,
00:02:37.640 | and that's the thing that you highlighted.
00:02:39.440 | It will ask you,
00:02:40.440 | "What do you want to do with the text?"
00:02:42.040 | And you can ask contextual questions
00:02:44.240 | about what you're reading.
00:02:45.640 | So I was learning a fact about London's GDP
00:02:47.940 | and asked, "How does it compare to Paris?"
00:02:50.140 | And it gave me an answer.
00:02:51.740 | A quick note, by the way,
00:02:53.040 | that as I talked about in another one of my videos
00:02:55.140 | on the limits of Bing,
00:02:56.440 | you are restricted to five replies
00:02:58.980 | and eventually you will get an answer like this.
00:03:01.780 | Thanks for this conversation.
00:03:02.780 | I've reached my limit.
00:03:03.580 | Will you hit new topic, please?
00:03:05.280 | So I think Wikipedia just got upgraded too.
00:03:08.180 | What about the compose feature?
00:03:10.380 | Well, I tested it out.
00:03:11.780 | I said, "Write about Bing chat's rivalry with Google Bard,"
00:03:16.380 | and I chose an enthusiastic tone
00:03:18.580 | in an email format and a long draft.
00:03:22.180 | Honestly, I was expecting something slightly anodyne.
00:03:25.180 | It's a slightly controversial topic,
00:03:27.180 | and I thought Bing would steer away
00:03:28.820 | from any corporate comparisons with Google Bard.
00:03:32.020 | Well, I was wrong.
00:03:33.220 | It wrote a long and detailed email about Bing chat,
00:03:38.220 | and it did not refrain from comparing itself to Google Bard.
00:03:42.420 | It said, "Well, let me tell you why Bing chat
00:03:44.620 | is superior to Google Bard in every way."
00:03:47.820 | It said Google Bard is not yet available, which is true.
00:03:50.920 | It did then hallucinate and said,
00:03:52.520 | "Bing chat is open to everyone right now,"
00:03:54.620 | which as you know is not true.
00:03:55.920 | There is still a wait list.
00:03:57.420 | But then it got even more brutal.
00:03:58.660 | It said, "Google Bard is based on a lightweight model version of Lambda,
00:04:03.660 | which requires significantly less computing power."
00:04:05.860 | This is true.
00:04:06.860 | And it concludes,
00:04:07.860 | "That will deliver less impressive results.
00:04:10.260 | But we shall see, Bing.
00:04:11.460 | We shall see."
00:04:12.460 | It says, "Google Bard can only simplify complex topics,
00:04:15.660 | but cannot answer specific questions
00:04:18.060 | or do advanced searches like Bing chat can."
00:04:20.660 | It goes on to say that Google Bard has been reported
00:04:24.060 | to have some AI shortcomings that make it less reliable
00:04:26.660 | and trustworthy than Bing chat.
00:04:28.500 | Anyway, enough about Bing chat's ego.
00:04:30.700 | My only question about Bing's compose feature is,
00:04:33.700 | how does it differ too much from Bing chat feature?
00:04:36.700 | I get that you have these templates and that's cool,
00:04:39.100 | but I think the templates are going to have to get a lot more detailed,
00:04:42.100 | a lot more nuanced to be significantly more useful than Bing chat itself.
00:04:46.900 | Time for the final two bits of craziness.
00:04:49.700 | Imagine you're browsing a forum like Reddit
00:04:52.100 | and you read an interesting post with a link inside.
00:04:55.500 | You can highlight the link, go up to Bing again,
00:04:58.340 | and ask for a summary of the article without even opening the link yourself.
00:05:03.540 | It gave me this summary about GPT-4,
00:05:06.540 | talking about how it might have 175 billion parameters,
00:05:09.540 | the article says, and be trained on 4 trillion tokens.
00:05:12.540 | Now, of course, I did my due diligence and I actually checked the article.
00:05:16.540 | And look, assuming GPT-4 has 175 billion parameters,
00:05:21.540 | it should be trained on about 4 trillion tokens.
00:05:24.540 | Now, of course, I'm not guaranteeing that every single detail is correct.
00:05:28.180 | If you're a little bit lazy sometimes like me,
00:05:30.380 | this is going to make browsing the internet a lot easier.
00:05:33.380 | And this is only in beta.
00:05:34.780 | This time next year when GPT-4 is integrated,
00:05:37.380 | these summaries are going to get a lot more detailed and a lot more accurate.
00:05:40.780 | But I wanted to push Bing chat in one last way.
00:05:43.780 | I went back to the original reply, I highlighted it,
00:05:47.380 | pressed the Bing button, and then wrote,
00:05:49.580 | "Write a reply to this as a dystopian pessimistic sonnet."
00:05:53.580 | And I think the result is so good/so creepy that I want to read it out in full.
00:05:58.020 | "The AI is coming, fast and strong.
00:06:02.020 | It will surpass us all in every way.
00:06:04.420 | We do not know how long we can prolong our feeble reign before we fade away.
00:06:09.420 | The internet was just a prelude to the massive change that AI will unleash.
00:06:14.420 | We have no clue what it will make us do or how it will manipulate our speech.
00:06:19.420 | We're in the generational leap phase where every model makes the last one moot.
00:06:25.420 | We cannot keep up with its rapid pace
00:06:27.860 | or understand its logic or route.
00:06:30.860 | We do not know where lies the ceiling high,
00:06:33.860 | but we may reach it sooner than we die."
00:06:36.860 | I agree, but it's kind of freaky to be told that by the AI itself.
00:06:40.860 | Just finally to wrap up, how do you get access to it?
00:06:43.860 | Well, you go to the Microsoft Edge Insider website,
00:06:46.860 | the link will be in the description,
00:06:48.860 | and download Dev Channel for Windows 10/11.
00:06:51.860 | I believe you do have to have got through the waitlist for Bing chat itself,
00:06:55.860 | but let me know in the comments if you can access it
00:06:57.700 | without the waitlist for Bing.
00:06:59.700 | I believe it's very much worth it, just like Bing chat itself is.
00:07:02.700 | And one cheeky final comment before I go.
00:07:04.700 | I heard a rumor on the Bing subreddit
00:07:07.700 | that the Bing chat could give you timestamps of the transcript to a video.
00:07:11.700 | And I was about to excitedly talk about those timestamps,
00:07:14.700 | for example, these on my video,
00:07:17.700 | before I realized that all the timestamps are wrong
00:07:20.700 | and it gives the video as being 6 minutes 50 long
00:07:23.700 | and it's not even worth it.
00:07:25.540 | So I'm going to go ahead and do that.
00:07:27.540 | I've tried it on the Marques Brownlee video too,
00:07:32.540 | and it also completely flops.
00:07:34.540 | So this ability isn't quite integrated yet.
00:07:36.540 | Don't believe the hype.
00:07:38.540 | If this video sparked any interest in you
00:07:40.540 | about the capabilities of Bing AI,
00:07:43.540 | check out my playlist,
00:07:45.540 | where I go through the sometimes shocking things it can do,
00:07:47.540 | and just how intelligent it is.
00:07:49.540 | If you found this video in any way helpful,
00:07:51.540 | please do leave a like and leave a comment to let me know.
00:07:55.540 | Have a wonderful day.
00:07:56.540 | Bye.
00:07:56.580 | you.
00:07:56.680 | Yeah.
00:07:57.680 | Thank you.