back to indexConsistent Spiritual Discipline Is Not Legalism
00:00:00.000 |
Old Testament Saint Daniel prayed three times a day. It was his daily spiritual pattern. 00:00:11.600 |
We see this in Daniel 6.10. And apparently everyone knew it was his daily pattern according 00:00:17.200 |
to Daniel 6.13. John Piper picks up this point in the 1991 sermon and addresses whether consistent 00:00:23.960 |
spiritual discipline is legalism. Here's a listen to what he said. 00:00:29.600 |
Daniel's prayer was a testimony not just to the glory of the Lord, but to the fact that 00:00:33.600 |
his life was built on prayer. He was making a statement, not just about God, but about 00:00:39.280 |
his relationship to God. Had he not prayed, God would be the same, probably his relationship 00:00:44.880 |
would have been the same, but one thing would have been different. What the satraps thought 00:00:50.200 |
about Daniel's relationship to God. Oh, I see, when it's dangerous, he doesn't do it 00:00:56.240 |
anymore. Daniel knew that his testimony was at stake and therefore he got down on his 00:01:05.360 |
knees on the second floor before the open window three times a day and he prayed. He 00:01:11.600 |
lived by prayer. He consulted what God thought and he asked God to act. 00:01:18.320 |
Daniel's prayer was disciplined and regular. When the time for a demonstration came, he 00:01:23.920 |
didn't have to do anything different than he was already doing. He had disciplined himself 00:01:28.480 |
for years probably at that window three times a day and he simply said, "Will I maintain 00:01:34.080 |
my discipline or will I forsake my God-given discipline?" And he said, "I will not forsake 00:01:40.960 |
it at the cost of my life. I will not forsake it." 00:01:44.800 |
I wonder if it strikes you as strange, like it does me, that very few Christians in the 00:01:48.800 |
American Evangelical Church pray like this, statedly disciplined three times a day. Does 00:01:55.800 |
it strike you as strange that nobody prays that way these days? And I think there are 00:01:59.920 |
a lot of people who would say, "That's real good because it shows that we have discovered 00:02:05.960 |
freedom from legalism." Now, I might believe that. I might believe that if I saw people 00:02:15.880 |
who did not have Daniel's discipline as powerful in prayer as Daniel was. But I don't believe 00:02:24.320 |
it. In fact, as I analyze the American Evangelical Church today, the creeping legalism that I 00:02:32.120 |
see is not Daniel's disciplined prayer three times a day. I do not think spiritual discipline 00:02:40.600 |
is the Trojan horse in which legalism is making its way into Troy the church. No way, Jose. 00:02:49.320 |
We are not in a thousand years in danger of becoming legalists through spiritual discipline 00:02:56.800 |
in the American Evangelical meet-my-need, cushy Christianity. In fact, I think that 00:03:05.240 |
the kind of legalism that is creeping in today is virtually the opposite of spiritual discipline. 00:03:13.000 |
It has two sides to its coin. On one side is fear. The fear of anything that comes close 00:03:23.240 |
to sounding or looking like biblical discipline, expressed in sentences like, "Train yourself 00:03:32.640 |
in godliness. Strive to enter by the narrow gate. Take up your cross daily. Work out your 00:03:40.840 |
salvation with fear and trembling. I pommel my body and subdue it. If you're right, I 00:03:48.200 |
offend you. Gouge it out. Strive together with me in prayer." Anything that comes remotely 00:03:55.520 |
close to sounding like such discipline is feared in the new legalism. For centuries, 00:04:03.520 |
the disciplines of the Spirit have marked the great saints, and today they are feared. 00:04:10.880 |
The other side of the coin of the new legalism is a demand for psychologically correct speech. 00:04:20.040 |
Not politically correct speech. We all know what that is. Psychologically correct speech. 00:04:25.960 |
If you don't use certain language to describe morality, ethics, duty, and the commandments 00:04:32.520 |
of God that are psychologically correct, you are a defective people helper and do more 00:04:38.520 |
harm than good. Taboo. A new list of taboos in the legalism that I'm talking about. And 00:04:45.160 |
the new list of taboos is "Thou shalt not use must. Thou shalt not use should. Thou 00:04:50.280 |
shalt not use ought. Thou shalt not use warnings like 'Those who do such things shall not 00:04:56.560 |
enter the kingdom.'" This is the new legalism and the new list of taboos. You must not say 00:05:03.480 |
must. They are simply not psychologically correct ways of talking about reality. The 00:05:12.760 |
creeping legalism in the American evangelicalism today, I believe, is not the spiritual discipline 00:05:19.760 |
of Daniel, who prayed three times a day. I urge you to consider whether some of our 00:05:27.040 |
weakness rather in cushy, self-indulgent, so-called spontaneous "meet my need" American 00:05:35.440 |
Christianity is owing not mainly to bondage to legalistic lists of do's and don'ts, 00:05:42.600 |
but rather to the fact that we have forsaken biblical discipline. 00:05:49.480 |
To write. That's a short point worth thinking about. 24 years after this sermon was delivered, 00:05:55.040 |
the audio quality is a little bodgy, but that is a classic clip from John Piper's 1991 00:06:00.400 |
sermon, "Daniel's Defiance of Darius in Prayer." And it was sent in to us by Jessica 00:06:05.360 |
Cole in Sydney, Australia. Good on ya. Okay, enough of the Australian slang for today. 00:06:12.600 |
If God is most glorified in me when I am most satisfied in him, does this mean that God 00:06:17.480 |
is never glorified by those who don't love him? John Piper joins us tomorrow to answer 00:06:22.960 |
a really important question. I hope you join us. I'm your host Tony Reinke. We'll see you 00:06:29.640 |
John Piper's "Daniel's Defiance of Darius in Prayer" is available on our website www.johnpiper.org. 00:06:31.640 |
www.johnpiper.org/daniel-darius-in-prayer.html