back to indexBrian Muraresku: The Secret History of Psychedelics | Lex Fridman Podcast #211
Chapters
0:0 Introduction
0:33 Who or what is God?
16:2 Terence McKenna's DMT Trips
20:44 Psychedelics were the source of collective intelligence
31:16 Psychedelics in ancient alcohol
34:17 The Immortality Key
37:3 Jesus and psychedelic wine
49:42 Role of rituals in human society
53:24 Human confrontation with death
56:1 The future of the human experience
67:54 The role of religion in society
73:41 The future of psychedelics research
76:52 Fasting and meditation as religious experiences
80:31 Neuralink and BCIs
87:28 Is LSD a crutch or an aid in creative work
90:8 Nietzsche said God is dead
92:35 Creatures people meet while on psychedelics
98:4 Consciousness
104:27 Books or movies that made an impact
108:26 Meaning of life
00:00:00.000 |
The following is a conversation with Brian Murevescu, author of The Immortality Key, 00:00:05.520 |
The Secret History of the Religion with No Name, a book that reconstructs the forgotten 00:00:10.400 |
history of psychedelics in the development of Western civilization. To support this podcast, 00:00:16.400 |
please check out our sponsors, Insight Tracker, GiveWell, NI, Indeed, and Masterclass. Their 00:00:24.160 |
links are in the description. This is the Lex Friedman Podcast, and here's my conversation 00:00:30.480 |
with Brian Murevescu. Who or what do you think God is? How has our conception maybe put another 00:00:39.440 |
way of God changed throughout history? We're starting with an easy one, Lex. Yep. 00:00:46.720 |
So what is God? Well, God is a thought. God is an idea, but its reference is to that which is 00:00:55.120 |
beyond thinking, beyond our ability to even conceive, beyond the categories of being and 00:01:02.320 |
non-being. So how do we talk about that? To talk about it is almost to get it wrong, right? So 00:01:07.760 |
Joe Campbell famously said that any God that is not transparent to transcendence is like an 00:01:14.160 |
idolatry because it's just a mental construct, and it can't possibly speak to the incomprehensible. 00:01:20.320 |
So we use poetic language. We say the being of beings, the infinite life energy of the universe, 00:01:28.240 |
the mystery of transcendence, boundless life, unqualified isness. But it doesn't quite get 00:01:34.960 |
to the point. I think that if there's any great insight from mysticism, it's that you and I 00:01:41.520 |
participate with God in a very real way, Lex Friedman, here in Austin, Texas. That in the here 00:01:48.240 |
and now, to touch that eternal principle, another way to refer to God, to touch that eternal principle 00:01:54.160 |
within ourselves is to participate with divinity in some way. So not an external force, but that 00:02:02.400 |
divine sense within. So there's some aspect in which God is a part of us. So one, it's a thing 00:02:07.600 |
we can't describe. It represents all of the mystery around us. It's outside our ability 00:02:13.440 |
to comprehend. And at the same time, it's somehow the thing that's inside of us also. 00:02:18.640 |
The ultimate paradox. MacThiel of Magdeburg, 13th century German mystic, maybe the first German 00:02:24.000 |
mystic, says that the day of her spiritual awakening was the day that she saw and knew 00:02:30.960 |
that she saw God in all things, and all things in God. And so we can say this, by the way, 00:02:36.160 |
without apology or lightweight theology or vapid speculation or even heresy, we can talk about this, 00:02:45.040 |
including within the Abrahamic faiths. The mystical core of these faiths all talk about 00:02:49.520 |
the encounter of divinity within. That's what I explore in the immortality key, this notion 00:02:55.840 |
of techniques, archaic techniques in some cases, of ecstasy that allow that experience of the 00:03:03.200 |
eternal principle to actually rise up in our consciousness when we're still here as flesh 00:03:08.080 |
and blood beings. There's some sense in which our conception of God, though, is conjured up by 00:03:16.640 |
our own mind. And so aren't we creating God? Like, aren't we the gods that are creating the idea of 00:03:26.880 |
God? Like, if we are, like when we talk about God, aren't we playing with ideas that are created by 00:03:34.880 |
our mind, and thereby we are the creator, not God? This is a very kind of cyclical question, but 00:03:44.880 |
in some sense I mean that if God is the thing that represents the mystery all around us, 00:03:54.720 |
contrast that with our conception of God, the way we talk about him, is more a creation of our 00:04:00.960 |
minds. It's not the mystery, it's our struggle to comprehend the mystery. And therefore we're 00:04:06.800 |
creating the God in terms of the God that we're talking about in this conversation or in general, 00:04:11.600 |
if that makes any sense. - It makes no sense whatsoever. 00:04:14.880 |
- Great, this is wonderful. - But this is the eternal mystery. 00:04:22.400 |
This is why it's so difficult to talk about, and yet it could be the very center of our beings. 00:04:27.600 |
You know, the Upanishads speak about us as the creators, about us as gods. It's a very 00:04:34.960 |
different creation myth, but the god of the Upanishads in this great verse talks about 00:04:40.160 |
pouring themselves into creation. "Indeed, I have become this creation," says God. And there's a 00:04:48.400 |
great line, "Verily, he or she who knows this becomes in this creation a creator." So yeah, 00:04:57.040 |
I mean just our ability to engage in mentation, our ability to think about this stuff is partly 00:05:03.760 |
our divine nature. This is what the humanists were talking about in the Renaissance, by the way. 00:05:08.480 |
And that it's not so much learning, putting dots together, having arguments with each other over 00:05:16.320 |
learned books. It's a process of unlearning, is what some of the mystical traditions talk about. 00:05:21.680 |
Unlearning all these thoughts, emotions, traumas, and experiences that have gone into the false 00:05:28.000 |
construction of our false self, that behind all these layers, like peeling back the onion, 00:05:32.800 |
is a part of us that once you can identify that, begins to look a little bit different. 00:05:40.800 |
In other words, it's one thing to foster a relationship with God. It's a very different 00:05:46.880 |
thing to identify as God. And I mean that quite literally, without being heretical. You can find 00:05:53.920 |
this in the mystery traditions. - Can you expand on this? You mean a human being can embody God? 00:06:01.760 |
- That is textbook incarnational theology that you can find in any Christian mystic. 00:06:11.120 |
But you can find it in the mystical tradition of Islam and Judaism as well. So Rumi, for example, 00:06:18.000 |
the great Sufi mystic, talks about if you could get rid of yourself, just get rid of yourself just 00:06:26.400 |
once, the secret of secrets would open to you. That the face of the unknown would appear on the 00:06:32.480 |
perception of your consciousness. Rabbi Lawrence Kushner, a modern-day contemporary mystic, 00:06:38.800 |
talks about, because this stuff does continue, there's a continuity to it. - The poetry here 00:06:42.800 |
is incredible. - So well, listen to Rabbi Kushner. He says that the emptying of selfhood 00:06:49.120 |
allows the soul to attach to true reality. And in Kabbalism, the true reality is what's called 00:06:56.400 |
the divine nothingness, ayin. And so I like the adage that atheists and mystics both essentially 00:07:03.680 |
believe in nothing, except that the mystics spell it with a capital N, the divine nothing. 00:07:10.240 |
And then I'll give you Meister Eckhart, another medieval Christian mystic. He says that 00:07:15.760 |
if you could not yourself, right? The same concept, if you could not yourself for just an instant, 00:07:22.400 |
indeed, I say less than an instant, you would possess all. So again, you're seeing the same 00:07:27.440 |
thing in Sufism, Kabbalism, Christian mysticism. The way to identify with the divine is to peel 00:07:33.600 |
back these layers and attempt to discover pure awareness. - If we look at the universe from a 00:07:39.600 |
physics perspective, or, you know, I'm a computer science person, so if the universe is a computer, 00:07:46.800 |
there's some sense that God, the creator of the universe, or just the computer itself, 00:07:55.600 |
doesn't know what the heck is gonna happen. He just kind of creates some basic rules and runs 00:08:01.120 |
the thing. So there is some element in which you can conceive of humans or conscious beings or 00:08:08.400 |
intelligent beings as a tool that the creator uses to understand itself, himself. Do you think that's 00:08:19.360 |
a perspective that we could, or is useful to take on God, that is basically the universe created 00:08:28.960 |
humans to understand itself? He doesn't actually know the full thing. He needs the human brains 00:08:36.160 |
to figure out the puzzle. So that's in contrasting to the unlearning, to the getting out of the way 00:08:41.360 |
that we've talked about. It's more like, no, we need the humans to figure out this puzzle. 00:08:45.760 |
- Well, we have no answers to this, which is why philosophers still have jobs, 00:08:50.560 |
if they have jobs at all. But I mean, so the physicists take a look at this. 00:08:54.960 |
Have you seen the article that came out, I think it was this month, in the Journal of Cosmology and 00:08:59.280 |
Astroparticle Physics, Robert Lanza, the biocentrism theory, the idea that the universe comes 00:09:05.440 |
into being through our observation, right? The whole, the God equation. So not just in quantum 00:09:10.480 |
mechanics, but in general relativity, the idea that we make the universe moment by moment, which 00:09:15.920 |
is kind of mind-blowing, gets into ideas of simulation. Okay, so that's how the physicists, 00:09:21.600 |
at least some of them, might look at it. You could also look back to the medieval Christian mystics. 00:09:26.080 |
Meister Eckhart, once again, says that the eye with which I see God is the same eye that sees me, 00:09:34.400 |
right? So one sight, one knowledge, one love. Another mind-blowing concept. But this is why 00:09:42.320 |
the arts and poetry and music are so important, because although I love astroparticle physics, 00:09:47.280 |
it's another to kind of hear this, the same message across time. 00:09:51.840 |
Yeah, the simulation thing. I was actually looking this morning at video games, just the statistics 00:09:58.800 |
on video games, and I saw that the two top video games in terms of hours played is Fortnite and 00:10:05.920 |
World of Warcraft. And I saw that it's 140 billion hours, billion hours have been played at those 00:10:17.760 |
- Yeah, but that's very sophisticated worlds being created, especially in the World of Warcraft. 00:10:24.080 |
It's a massive online role-playing game. So you have these characters that are together, 00:10:29.600 |
sort of creating a world, but they in themselves are also developing. They have all these items 00:10:34.640 |
and they're growing, like they're little humans. Like there's complicated societies that are 00:10:38.560 |
formed, they have goals, they're striving and so on. And we're creating a universe within our 00:10:43.520 |
universe. And for now, it's a basic sort of constraint version of our more richer earth-like 00:10:52.320 |
civilization. But it's conceivable that we are this thing on earth is a kind of video game that 00:11:00.880 |
somebody else is playing. You can see sort of video games upon video games being created. 00:11:07.920 |
And this is something I think a lot about, not from a philosophical perspective, but practically 00:11:13.040 |
how fun does this video game have to be for us to let go of the silly pursuits in this 00:11:20.080 |
meat space that we live in and fully just stay in WoW, stay in World of Warcraft, 00:11:26.240 |
stay in the video game for full time. So I think about that from an engineering perspective, 00:11:31.440 |
like is there going to be a time when this video game is actual real life for us? And then the 00:11:38.800 |
creatures inside the video game, they'll be just borrowing our consciousness sort of to ground 00:11:45.440 |
themselves, will refer to us as the gods, right? Like, won't we become the gods? This conversation 00:11:54.880 |
is not going how I expected, but I think about this a lot from, you know, cause I love video games 00:12:00.400 |
and I wonder more and more of us, especially in COVID times are living in the digital world. 00:12:05.280 |
You could think about Twitter and all those kinds of things. You could think about clubhouse people 00:12:09.520 |
using just voices to communicate little icons sort of in a digital space. You could see more and more 00:12:15.040 |
will be moving in the digital space and let go of this physical space. And then the remnants 00:12:21.840 |
of the ancients that created the video games that nobody centuries from now will even remember, 00:12:29.200 |
those will be the gods and then there'll be gods upon gods being created. This is the kind of stuff 00:12:34.560 |
I think about, but is that any at all useful to you to this thought experiment of a simulation, 00:12:40.880 |
basically the fabric of our reality, how did it come to be, what is running this thing? Is that 00:12:46.000 |
useful or is it ultimately the project of understanding God of understanding myth is 00:12:53.760 |
the project that centers on the human, on the human mind for you? We seem to be at the center 00:13:01.520 |
of this divine dance, which sounds awfully anthropocentric, but the ancients thought 00:13:07.200 |
about this too. I mean, the concept in Sanskrit of Leela, that the point behind existence is this 00:13:13.200 |
play, right? It's ultimately playful, this divine dance. It gets awfully complicated in the Gnostic 00:13:19.920 |
and Neoplatonic schools, these chains of being from Godhead down to us, right? Some invisible, 00:13:28.320 |
right? And we're going to get into Terence McKenna territory later on, but we can start now 00:13:33.440 |
by talking about discarded entities and archons and aliens and archetypes. I mean, 00:13:38.560 |
there is a world where Terence McKenna does meet Plato and Gnosticism quite kindly, and that's in 00:13:46.080 |
this invisible college, right? The invisible world with which we seem to have some kind of symbiosis 00:13:53.360 |
that has a higher intent, maybe even a purpose or a plan in mind for us. So, I mean, these ideas 00:14:00.640 |
come across when you've had a heroic dose of mushrooms. They also pop up in the ancient 00:14:05.120 |
philosophical literature, this idea of archons who, you know, the puppet masters controlling 00:14:10.880 |
us flesh and blood beings. It's all a cosmic dance, and there are no answers to this. 00:14:17.200 |
- First, who are the archons? And second, what is this world where Terence McKenna meets Plato? 00:14:21.440 |
Do you mean in the space of ideas, or are we talking about some kind of world that connects 00:14:26.400 |
all of consciousness to all of human history? - I think through different techniques, it is, 00:14:30.560 |
you know, I think a lot about, I think Gordon Wasson is the meeting point of the two. So, 00:14:34.400 |
Gordon Wasson, who I do talk about in the book, was this JP Morgan banker turned ethnomycologist, 00:14:41.120 |
and he's largely credited with the rediscovery of psilocybin-containing mushrooms, which kind 00:14:47.120 |
of gave rise to the pop psychedelic revolution of the 1960s. He visited Maria Sabina down in Mexico. 00:14:53.920 |
In his wake went Bob Dylan, Led Zeppelin, The Stones, and everybody else. 00:14:57.440 |
And the way he describes his psilocybin experience is a bit strange because he thinks of Plato, 00:15:03.920 |
right? And he says that, you know, whereas our ordinary reality is kind of this imperfect 00:15:09.840 |
view of things, Gordon Wasson felt that on mushrooms, he was spying the archetypes. 00:15:15.440 |
And he talks about Plato, and he writes about the archetypes in this famous article that's 00:15:19.680 |
released in 1957 in Life magazine. And so, a well-read individual from the mid-20th century 00:15:26.400 |
has his premier psychedelic experience, and out comes Plato because what he was witnessing was 00:15:32.640 |
so sharp, so brilliant, so detailed, in some sense more real than real, this noetic sense 00:15:39.440 |
that William James talks about. That when you confront something more real than real, 00:15:44.400 |
these discarnate entities, these images, these visionary motifs, you're tempted to believe that 00:15:51.520 |
you've tapped into the truest nature and the underlying structure of the cosmos. And that's 00:15:56.720 |
difficult to escape from, whether you're Plato or Terence McKenna or Gordon Wasson caught in between. 00:16:02.160 |
Can we talk about this, being in touch with something that is more real than real? 00:16:06.720 |
And let's just go straight there to McKenna before we return to the bigger picture. 00:16:11.520 |
So, he's talked about the, what is it, self-healing machine elves? 00:16:17.120 |
Self-transforming machine elves during his DMT travels. And I just talked to Rick Doblin, 00:16:25.120 |
who also had different travels through this hyperspace. 00:16:30.560 |
But they all seem to be traveling on the same spaceship, just to different locations. 00:16:34.880 |
And there is a sense in which they seem to be traveling through whatever, I don't know if it's 00:16:40.720 |
through space-time or something else, to meet something that is more real than real. 00:16:45.600 |
What can you say about this DMT experience, about Terence McKenna, about the poetry he used, 00:16:51.680 |
but maybe more specifically about this place that they seem to all travel to? 00:16:57.040 |
So, the big question is, is it real? Is it really more real than real? The ancient philosophers 00:17:01.760 |
were asking the same question, and their means of attempting to answer that was by dying. 00:17:06.960 |
So, if you ask Plato the definition of philosophy, he will say that 00:17:10.960 |
to practice it in the right way is to practice dying and being dead. And many people describe 00:17:18.720 |
the psychedelic experience in sort of near-death experience terms. And the encountering of all 00:17:24.240 |
this visual imagery tends to be something that is often described as more real than real. 00:17:29.920 |
So, how does Terence talk about this? So, I was just listening to the trilogues, which folks 00:17:34.640 |
should look up. Somewhere between 1989 and 1990, Terence sits down with his friends, 00:17:41.440 |
Ralph Abraham and Rupert Sheldrake at Esalen, and they're trying to figure out the meaning of these 00:17:48.080 |
discarnate entities and these non-human intelligences. And Terence develops a taxonomy 00:17:53.920 |
for how to analyze this. And he says that number one, they're either 00:17:58.240 |
semi-physical but kind of elusive. So, think of the Bigfoot or the Yeti or things like this, 00:18:05.760 |
beings that exist somewhere between mythology and zoology, which isn't really appropriate here. 00:18:13.120 |
So, option number two, he says is the mental... You're dropping so many good lines. It's so good. 00:18:21.040 |
Okay, I apologize. Somewhere between mythology and zoology. 00:18:26.000 |
This is all Terence McKenna. I take no credit for this. 00:18:28.960 |
But you're combining, you're like, Jimi Hendrix only used the blue scale, but he still created 00:18:36.320 |
something new in the music he played. Anyway, go ahead. 00:18:39.200 |
Well, we're going into Mixolydian right now. So, option number two, and this is what Terence calls 00:18:48.080 |
sort of the mentalist reductionist approach. And this is pure McKenna poetry. He says that 00:18:54.480 |
these beings could be autonomous fragments of psychic energy that have temporarily escaped 00:19:01.760 |
the controlling power of the ego. So, in Jungian senses, these would just be pure projections. 00:19:08.720 |
The projections of schizophrenics in some cases. So, they're essentially unreal. 00:19:12.720 |
And the third option, the most tantalizing, is that they're both non-physical, but autonomous. 00:19:18.960 |
In other words, they actually exist in some kind of real place, in some kind of real space, 00:19:24.800 |
and that we can have Congress with them. There is communication. He talks about the whisperings of 00:19:30.320 |
the demon artificers, and that it's just possible that our meetings with these beings have coaxed 00:19:36.960 |
the human species into self-expression in a very real way. That at different times in history, 00:19:43.520 |
our relationships with these semi-autonomous beings may actually guide the species. 00:19:49.360 |
Now, this is high speculation, and Terence and Ralph and Rupert wind up talking about the early 00:19:57.360 |
modern period and the scientific enlightenment, and that even someone like Descartes reports a 00:20:02.800 |
dream in which he came face to face with an angel who said that the conquest of nature 00:20:08.160 |
is to be achieved through measure and number. So, even the hard-minded materialist like Descartes 00:20:16.560 |
is confronting these discarnate entities. John Dee in the 16th century, the high magician 00:20:22.320 |
of the Elizabethan court, he reports decades worth of what we would say is extraterrestrial 00:20:29.440 |
communication or interdimensional communication. And you can find instances of this throughout 00:20:36.400 |
history, including among the pre-Socratics. And Peter Kingsley writes quite a bit about this, 00:20:41.680 |
but I'll save that until your next question. - Well, first of all, we don't seem to understand 00:20:46.880 |
from where intelligence came from. We don't understand from where life came from on Earth, 00:20:51.520 |
but that we can kind of intuit, 'cause it's in the space of chemistry and biology, 00:20:55.840 |
you have good theories about the origins of life on Earth, but the origins of intelligent life, 00:21:00.240 |
that is a giant mystery. And there's some sense in which, I mean, I don't know if you know the 00:21:07.680 |
movie "2001 Space Odyssey," but it does seem that there's like important, throughout human history, 00:21:15.680 |
throughout life on Earth, there's important phase shifts of, it feels like something happened 00:21:23.200 |
where there's big leaps. It could be something coincidental like fire and learning how to cook 00:21:29.760 |
meat and all those kinds of things, but it feels like there could be other things. And I think 00:21:35.520 |
that's at the core of your work is exploring what those things could be. Is it possible? 00:21:41.600 |
Talked about Joe Rogan off-line. Is it, I mean, it's entirely possible. Is it possible that 00:21:49.120 |
psychedelics have in fact contributed of being an important source of those phase shift throughout 00:21:56.560 |
human history, of the intellect, basically steering the intellectual development and growth 00:22:02.640 |
of human civilization? - It's a hypothesis worth 00:22:08.480 |
- And maybe not psychedelics in and of themselves, but I think our whole conversation is kind of 00:22:13.840 |
wrapped up in these non-ordinary states of awareness. We start by talking about God, 00:22:19.840 |
which is something unordinary and expansive. And I think that as you trace the intervention 00:22:29.040 |
of divinity, if that's the case, throughout human history, you have to bump up against the irrational. 00:22:34.080 |
Mircea Eliade, the great scholar of religions and fellow Romanian, said that the history of 00:22:41.760 |
religions essentially constitutes the point of intersection between metaphysics and biology, 00:22:46.640 |
right? So that we are biological beings who do interact with our planet, with the natural kingdom. 00:22:53.760 |
And you would think that as early archaic ecologists, we would have figured out what 00:22:59.840 |
plants work, which fungi don't, and developed maybe language around that. And so, this is another one 00:23:06.480 |
of McKenna's speculative but very interesting hypotheses, the stone ape theory. Is it possible 00:23:14.640 |
that psychedelics were involved in one of the several leaps forward? You mentioned the word 00:23:19.920 |
leap. Jared Diamond talks about the great leap forward 60,000 years ago. The species had been 00:23:25.760 |
around for a couple hundred thousand years. All of a sudden, the cave painting appears. 00:23:29.760 |
All of a sudden, there's a phase shift. Did something like that happen millions of years ago? 00:23:35.360 |
And I love the way Paul Stamets talks about this. It would be the ingestion 00:23:38.640 |
of perhaps psilocybin-containing fungi millions and millions of times over millions and millions 00:23:47.040 |
of years. So, it's not just a one-time event that cascades, but it's the accumulation 00:23:52.400 |
of psychedelic experience. It's really difficult to test that hypothesis. But I've been talking 00:23:59.920 |
with a paleoanthropologist in South Africa, my friend Lee Berger, about ways that we might test 00:24:06.160 |
for this. And so, Lee, amongst many things, is this National Geographic explorer. He's the 00:24:12.400 |
paleoanthropologist's paleoanthropologist at the University of Whitwater-Shrind. He's famous amongst 00:24:18.400 |
other things for the discovery of previously undiscovered hominids like Homo naledi. 00:24:24.240 |
And there's an interesting point. So, naledi is this archaic hominid, morphologically 00:24:33.280 |
archaic, but it dates to about 300,000 years ago, which is very strange. What's even more 00:24:39.920 |
strange about Homo naledi at the Rising Star Cave System there in South Africa is that Lee 00:24:44.800 |
believes he's discovered the first bipedal ape deliberately disposing of its dead. So, 00:24:51.920 |
there is a recognition of self-mortality and the practicing of rituals around death. We're 00:24:58.400 |
talking about burials. And if you have burials, says Lee, in an archaic hominid 300,000 years ago, 00:25:05.840 |
maybe you have language. And I mention that because Terence McKenna was obsessed 00:25:10.320 |
with language in the stoned ape theory that the ingestion of psilocybin in addition to enhancing 00:25:16.720 |
visual acuity, perhaps facilitating sexual arousal, leads to proto-language. Now, isn't it 00:25:24.240 |
interesting, this could be entirely a coincidence, that the largest sound inventory of any language 00:25:31.280 |
is the Khoisan of Botswana and Namibia. They have something like 164 consonants and 44 vowels. 00:25:38.880 |
English, by comparison, has about 45. So, I don't know what to make of this, but what you find in 00:25:44.000 |
that part of the world is very, very complex language. Language that could be an inheritance, 00:25:51.040 |
language that could be incredibly archaic, together with this recognition of self-mortality. 00:25:57.520 |
And when I talk to Lee Berger, we say, when you're looking at universals like that, 00:26:01.440 |
language around all human populations, the recognition of self-mortality, the contemplation 00:26:07.440 |
of death, just maybe you have pharmacology. And so, maybe we can go out and test for this 00:26:13.120 |
using gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, proteomics, technology that doesn't even exist, 00:26:18.560 |
but maybe we can actually test the stoned ape theory to figure out once and for all 00:26:23.600 |
if there's any merit there. - Can you just linger a little bit 00:26:26.240 |
on the pharmacology tools? How would it be possible to say something about what was being ingested 00:26:33.200 |
so, so long ago? - That's what I asked Dr. Berger. 00:26:37.680 |
So, Lee has discovered in the dental calculus of archaic hominids-- 00:26:46.160 |
- Evidence of their diet. And you might not believe how old this was, but in Sadiba, 00:26:52.800 |
Australopithecus Sadiba, they found evidence of Sadiba's diet going back 2 million years. 00:26:59.520 |
So, through things like phytoliths, which are essentially fossilized plant tissue, 00:27:06.000 |
they found evidence that Sadiba was eating bark and leaves and grasses and fruits and palm. 00:27:12.560 |
So, no psychedelics to speak of, but it just goes to show that through things like 00:27:17.680 |
dental microware analysis and other techniques that we're still developing, 00:27:21.680 |
we can actually figure out what the diet was at the time. I'll fast forward to 50,000 years ago. 00:27:26.880 |
There was another study out of El Cidron Cave in 2012, which found that Neanderthals, 00:27:33.040 |
again, preceding our species, 50,000 years ago, were ingesting yarrow and chamomile, 00:27:40.080 |
which had been identified as medicinal. So, again, not psychedelic or psychoactive, but 00:27:45.040 |
we kind of have the beginnings of the technology, and that was nine years ago, 00:27:49.280 |
to begin figuring out the ancestral diet of these hominids. 00:27:53.360 |
- Presumably, there could be a way to figure out, it's not just diet, but which have 00:27:58.480 |
psychoactive elements to them. So, whether you're chewing it, whether you're smoking it, 00:28:02.560 |
whether, I mean, I don't know what, licking it. I don't know if there's any kind of ways 00:28:06.960 |
through the dental calculus to figure out what exact substances were being consumed. 00:28:11.840 |
Is it possible to figure out whether psychedelic substances are being 00:28:16.160 |
consumed by looking at human behavior, like you said, organized burials or cave paintings? 00:28:24.160 |
No, but so that's a little bit of a stretch to say, like, where did this leap come from? 00:28:28.880 |
- But it's not. It's not. So, just last fall, as a matter of fact, so that notion's been out 00:28:34.480 |
there for a while, the idea that hallucinogens and the ritual consumption of hallucinogens 00:28:39.440 |
were somehow related to the Great Leap Forward, were somehow related to the initial cave painting. 00:28:44.160 |
Graham Hancock wrote a beautiful book about this called Supernatural, which in many ways, like, 00:28:48.720 |
sent me down this rabbit hole back in 2007. But even at the time when he was writing that, 00:28:54.000 |
and the years subsequent, it was still kind of seen as a kooky idea. Last fall, 00:28:59.360 |
interestingly enough, the first archaeochemical data for the ritual consumption of psychedelics 00:29:07.920 |
associated with cave art was finally published. It's not that ancient. It's only about 400 or 00:29:12.960 |
500 years ago, but it came from the Pinwheel Cave, a chumash site in California. And what they found 00:29:19.440 |
were datura quids, like these chewed up, you mentioned how they ingested, these chewed up quids, 00:29:24.720 |
like these bunches of datura, which contain these very powerful tropane 00:29:30.240 |
alkaloids, in what was believed to be some kind of chumash initiation site. So, we can say that 00:29:35.840 |
there is initial, you know, archaeochemical data for the consumption of psychedelics and cave art. 00:29:41.280 |
And so, where else might we find this? - Are there a lot of archaeochemists in the world? 00:29:47.120 |
- Like, 'cause this is fascinating, is through chemistry, through biology, through physics, 00:29:53.040 |
whatever, like all the disciplines we, perhaps in one day computer science, we apply those tools 00:30:01.120 |
to study not the data of today, but the data of the past. Are we talking about dozens here? 00:30:07.040 |
Like, how hard is this problem relative to how many people are taking it on, 00:30:10.880 |
just as a side little tangent? - We're probably talking 00:30:14.720 |
more dozens than hundreds. I spent many years trying to track down an archaeochemist who would 00:30:21.280 |
talk to me, there were a couple, Pat McGovern at the University of Pennsylvania, and then my friend 00:30:27.360 |
Andrew Koh at MIT, which you might know something about. Andrew really, you know, on his own time, 00:30:33.680 |
on his own dime, has been gathering the data for this organic residue analysis. He has what's 00:30:41.680 |
called the OpenArcheM project, which is this online open source repository for this data. 00:30:47.120 |
But there's never been a center for this. No university has stood up a dedicated center, 00:30:52.320 |
a team, really, which is what you need of archaeochemists looking at this stuff. But, 00:30:56.800 |
I mean, even despite that, there have been some remarkable discoveries over the past 10, 00:31:00.960 |
20 years. It's still a discipline very much in its infancy, maybe it's becoming a toddler, but 00:31:05.760 |
as the technology gets better and cheaper, I hope you'll see more and more archaeochemists 00:31:12.000 |
joining the fight. - Yeah, and Andrew's fascinating, 00:31:15.440 |
his work is fascinating. But also, I just, because of your work, I came across and exchanged a few 00:31:21.920 |
emails with Patrick McGovern, who's basically, what would you call him? So he has a center, 00:31:27.280 |
I guess, that does biomolecular archaeology at UPenn. And he's the author of a bunch of books, 00:31:34.720 |
one of which is ancient brews. So he's a scholar of beer and wine, and like ancient alcohol, 00:31:41.200 |
which is fascinating. The influence, even just alcohol, but he has like alcohol with 00:31:46.080 |
hallucinogenic properties as well. But it's fascinating, as a Russian, it's fascinating 00:31:52.800 |
to think about the influence of alcohol on the development of human civilization throughout 00:32:00.720 |
its history. Is there something you can comment on alcohol, or in general, 00:32:06.560 |
Patrick's work that was informative to you, inspiring, or kind of added to your conception 00:32:15.120 |
of human history? - His work was some of the first 00:32:18.480 |
hard scientific data that I saw for the ritual consumption of these intoxicants. I don't think 00:32:24.880 |
he's ever found the hard and fast data for psychedelics, but what he turned me on to was 00:32:30.000 |
this idea that alcohol, or beer and wine specifically, could have been used as vehicles 00:32:36.480 |
for the administration of psychedelics. That's where it all started for me. Just the notion that 00:32:42.080 |
ancient beer and ancient wine is very, very different from what we drink today, that typically, 00:32:47.520 |
they were cocktails. They were often fortified and mixed with different fruits, berries, herbs, 00:32:54.160 |
plants, maybe even fungi over time because this was all in the absence of distilled liquor. There 00:32:59.760 |
is no hard alcohol, even in Russia, before maybe the 12th century it was in Europe, 00:33:06.240 |
maybe a bit earlier. But the concept of distillation just didn't exist. And so, 00:33:11.520 |
to pack a punch, rather than just drink a kind of watered-down Budweiser, these people were 00:33:19.280 |
interested in fortifying these beverages with whatever they could find in nature. And Pat, 00:33:24.960 |
to his credit, found some of the initial data for these, you could say, spiked wines and spiked 00:33:30.720 |
beers. Not with anything overtly psychedelic, but just the fact that in the 16th century BC, 00:33:36.560 |
at Grave Circle A in Mycenae, there's this Minoan ritual cocktail of beer mixed with wine, 00:33:42.880 |
mixed with mead, is very interesting. It's even more interesting that you find that 00:33:47.040 |
across the Aegean in Gordium at King Midas' tomb, right? The same kind of ritual cocktail, which 00:33:54.640 |
Pat and Sam at the Dogfish Head Brewery resurrected as the Midas touch. So, I mean, 00:33:59.680 |
the notion that we can go back, find this data, resurrect it, in some cases, 2,800 years later, 00:34:06.160 |
I found pretty exciting 10 years ago. - Yeah, bring it back for research. 00:34:12.960 |
people were playing with these ideas. And we'll return to ideas of psychedelic-confused wine, 00:34:20.240 |
which is pretty fascinating. But can we step back and just kind of look at your work with 00:34:24.560 |
the book "Immortality Key"? What is the story that you tell in this book? 00:34:28.880 |
- I knew it would get there eventually, Alex. (laughs) 00:34:31.720 |
- It's a nonlinear path. Somehow, we were talking about simulation and the universe is a computer 00:34:39.760 |
that's creating video games and wow and Fortnite, but we got there. And we'll return, always, 00:34:46.640 |
to the insane philosophical. But your book "Immortality Key," what's the story that you 00:34:52.400 |
tell in this book? Which part of human history are you studying? 00:34:55.680 |
- Right, so that's the way to phrase it. So, it's my 12-year search for the hard scientific data 00:35:02.800 |
for the ritual use of psychedelics in classical antiquity. So, we're talking about amongst the 00:35:08.240 |
ancient Greeks and Romans and the paleo-Christians. So, the generations that would give birth to the 00:35:14.800 |
largest religion the world's ever known. Christianity today was two and a half billion 00:35:18.800 |
people. The big question for me is, were psychedelics actually involved? There was a 00:35:23.440 |
lot written about this in the '60s, John Marco Allegro. The book that I follow was published 00:35:28.480 |
in 1978 before I was born, "The Road to Eleusis" by Gordon Wasson, who we talked about already, 00:35:34.960 |
Albert Hoffman, who famously discovers LSD or synthesizes it from ergot, and Karl Ruck, 00:35:40.880 |
who is still a professor of classics at Boston University, the only surviving member of that 00:35:47.920 |
renegade trio and now 85 years old. So, this all predates us. But what was lacking in the '60s, 00:35:55.120 |
'70s, '80s, '90s, I think was some of this technology and the hard scientific data. 00:36:00.960 |
Now, for years and years, I went out to the archaeobotanists and the archaeochemists around 00:36:05.760 |
the world, and I asked a very basic question, "Is there any evidence for psychedelics in 00:36:11.040 |
classical antiquity?" And the answer would almost invariably come back, "No." I'm talking to, 00:36:16.160 |
in addition to Pat, he put me in touch with Hans-Peter Stieke in Germany, Tania Valamotti 00:36:21.280 |
in Greece, Assunta Florenzano in Italy. I went all over the place asking one question and getting 00:36:26.480 |
the same answer back time and again. And so, the book is essentially my search for that data and 00:36:32.960 |
the eventual uncovering of two, what I think are key pieces of data. One data point shows the 00:36:41.280 |
ritual use of a psychedelic beer in classical antiquity in Iberia, what today is Spain. 00:36:48.080 |
And the other shows what looks like a kind of psychedelic wine just outside Pompeii from the 00:36:53.680 |
first century AD, at the right place, at the right time, when the earliest Christians were 00:36:59.360 |
showing up in Italy. - Again, these are early steps in the search for evidence in the space, 00:37:05.600 |
but speaking of early Christians, what role do you think psychedelic-infused wine could have played 00:37:16.320 |
in the life of the... I won't be clever, in the life of Jesus Christ? 00:37:24.400 |
- I've been saying recently that, and I hope this doesn't sound obscurantist, but I think it's 00:37:31.840 |
impossible to understand Jesus and the birth of Christianity in the absence of ancient Greek. 00:37:38.240 |
And I'll give you a very specific example of why I think that's the case. 00:37:41.760 |
- Interesting. - You can read the entire New Testament 00:37:46.160 |
in ancient Greek, and not once will you ever find a reference to alcohol, because there was no word 00:37:53.360 |
in ancient Greek for alcohol. The way the word sounds, alkol, it's Semitic, it comes from the 00:37:58.400 |
Arabic. Kahla means to enliven or refresh, it probably comes from kohl, sort of these powdered 00:38:06.000 |
metallics that were used in alchemical experiments and cosmetics. So again, that's much later in time 00:38:12.320 |
when we're using alchemy, distillation, etc. In the 1st century AD, the power of wine wasn't 00:38:19.440 |
necessarily tied to alcohol, fermented grapes, the way we think about wine today. So Pat McGovern 00:38:26.000 |
found some of that early organic data for wine being mixed with beer and with mead. But if you 00:38:33.360 |
look at the literature from the 1st century AD, Dioscorides, for example, he writes this massive 00:38:38.720 |
treatise at the exact same time the Gospels are being written. And Dioscorides, in just one of 00:38:44.480 |
his books, talks about 56 detailed recipes for spiking wine with all kinds of things, like 00:38:51.600 |
salvia and hellebore and frankincense and myrrh, these spiced perfumes, but also more dangerous 00:38:56.960 |
things like henbane and mandrake, which he says in Greek can be fatal with just one cupful. 00:39:03.360 |
And in Book 474 of his Materia Medica, he talks about black nightshade producing fantasias 00:39:10.960 |
ou aedes, not unpleasant visions, what today we would say is psychedelic. So just looking at the 00:39:18.880 |
literature and the kind of literature that even most classicists--I didn't really learn it in 00:39:23.920 |
undergrad, I came across Dioscorides later--but just a basic look at the literature supports 00:39:31.120 |
what McGovern has been testing, which is the fact that wine was routinely mixed 00:39:36.160 |
with different compounds. - It's fascinating, by the way, 00:39:38.880 |
that language affects our conception of the tools we use to understand the world. So like, 00:39:44.960 |
you can see wine, you can see psychedelics, if they're not called drugs, you can maybe reframe 00:39:57.840 |
how you see them in terms of their role in us thinking about the world, understanding the world. 00:40:02.400 |
That's really interesting that language has that power. But what language was used to understand 00:40:06.800 |
wine at the time? - So we're talking about a Greek-speaking world, right? So Jesus is born 00:40:13.680 |
and does his public ministry in the Holy Land, but think about the early Church. Think about where 00:40:17.520 |
the Church takes root. Paul, the greatest evangelist of the time, writes basically half 00:40:22.320 |
the New Testament. He's writing letters in Greek to Greek speakers in places like Corinth in Greece, 00:40:29.040 |
or Philippi, a defunct city just north of the island of Thassos. Or he's writing to 00:40:35.120 |
folks in what today is Turkey, the Colossians, the Galatians. He writes letters to the Romans. 00:40:40.560 |
These are Greek speakers in these pockets, these Hellenic pockets all around the ancient 00:40:46.000 |
Mediterranean. And for them, again, ignore Dioscorides, ignore Pat McGovern's work. 00:40:51.680 |
To them, to think about wine was to think about a mixed potion. And so the word oinos in ancient 00:40:58.240 |
Greek does show up in the New Testament, but there was another word to describe wine. And it exists 00:41:03.520 |
for like a thousand years, before, during, and after the life of Jesus. The word used for wine 00:41:09.840 |
is pharmakon, which obviously gives us the word pharmacy. It means drug. So in Greek, a Greek 00:41:15.680 |
speaker would actually use the word drug to refer to wine. Ruth Skodal, the classicist, talks about 00:41:21.680 |
this as a ritualistic formula. They understood wine as this compound beverage, a drug against 00:41:29.680 |
grief, a medicinal elixir that could either harm or heal, or just maybe a sacrament to put you in 00:41:37.520 |
touch with wine gods old and new. - Clearly, religion, and myth, but religion very much so has 00:41:46.720 |
sort of a, much like dreams, has like an imagery component. Like, you're kind of going outside the 00:41:57.680 |
visual constraints of physical space where you kind of have very specific conceptions of what 00:42:05.680 |
things look like, and you kind of use your imagination to stretch beyond the world as 00:42:11.680 |
we know it. Things that are, try to get in touch with things that are more real than real. 00:42:16.720 |
What role do these tools, do these pharmakons have in trying to stimulate the imagery of religion? 00:42:27.040 |
Do you have a sense that they have a critical role here, or is this just a bunch of different 00:42:32.480 |
factors that are utilized, a bunch of different tools that are utilized to construct this imagery? 00:42:37.440 |
Or is this not even, or is imagery the wrong terminology? Is it more like a space of ideas 00:42:42.560 |
that's core to religion? - No, I think the wine is absolutely essential. And so if it's impossible 00:42:48.960 |
to understand paleo-Christianity in the absence of ancient Greek, I think it's equally difficult 00:42:54.480 |
in the absence of the sacred pharmacopeia, or wine itself, right? Just think about wine 00:43:01.200 |
at the time. I think that the ancient Greek audience would have heard that in a very different 00:43:06.160 |
way from us. And so they're referring to it maybe as a pharmakon, but the followers of Dionysus, 00:43:12.320 |
which precedes Jesus. And in some cases, the story of Jesus is kind of a recapitulation of the 00:43:18.640 |
mysteries of Dionysus. But when you think about Dionysus, maybe from your high school mythology, 00:43:24.000 |
you think about him as the god of theater, or the god of wine, which is typically what it is, 00:43:28.880 |
or the god of ecstasy. Again, Dionysus is not the god of alcohol. There's no concept 00:43:36.400 |
of fermented grapes. The power of Dionysus and the ability to commune with Dionysus through his blood, 00:43:42.880 |
and before Christianity, the blood of Dionysus is equated to his wine. The sacramental drinking of 00:43:49.920 |
the wine was interpreted, and classicists write about this, including Walter Burkert, 00:43:55.120 |
it was interpreted as consuming the god himself in order to become one with the god. This is where 00:44:00.640 |
we get the idea of enthusiasm because the language matters, enthusiasm to be filled 00:44:05.680 |
with the spirit of the god so that you became identified with Dionysus and acquired his divine 00:44:11.360 |
powers. Now, how does that happen? Again, he's not the god of alcohol. He is the god of wine, 00:44:16.240 |
but he's really the god of madness and delirium and frenzy. And his principal followers are women. 00:44:22.960 |
They're called the minads. And the way they get in touch with him is through the consumption of 00:44:27.680 |
this sacramental wine. Even at the theater of Dionysus, separate from his outdoor churches, 00:44:34.960 |
there was a wine served there called drima. And this is the wine that gives birth to Hollywood. 00:44:40.480 |
I mean, the ancient Hollywood was there at the theater of Dionysus. This is where comedy and 00:44:44.800 |
tragedy and poetry and music come from. But rather than a hot dog and a beer, what they drink at the 00:44:49.840 |
theater of Dionysus was this wine called drima, which means pounded or rubbed. And Professor Ruck 00:44:56.400 |
talks about maybe it was the drugs that were rubbed into this theatrical beverage to help the 00:45:02.960 |
play come alive. So madness is seen as a positive thing, as like a creative journey. 00:45:08.400 |
It's not, it's not, it's the, what is it, the unlearning, getting out of the way kind of thing. 00:45:18.480 |
entertaining escape from life that is suffering? 00:45:24.640 |
I gotta inject a little modern Dostoevsky into the old. 00:45:30.000 |
Existential despair. Maybe it's a bit of that. We can't say that there wasn't 00:45:38.240 |
recreational drinking happening. The Greeks also had the symposium, right? And they also were just 00:45:46.080 |
getting hammered in some cases. But when it comes to the rites of Dionysus, what you see there is 00:45:53.280 |
the creation of these states of awareness in which again, you identify with the God to become the 00:46:01.120 |
God. There's theophagy, there's the consumption of divinity in order to become divinity. Right back 00:46:06.800 |
to how we started the conversation, right? So if we stop conceiving of God as something exterior to 00:46:13.280 |
us, but that the mystery of being itself is the mystery of your being and the mystery of my being, 00:46:19.600 |
that the way to encounter that is through the sacramental theology, that you drink the actual 00:46:26.480 |
blood of this Greek God to become that God. And there was a place for this in ancient Greek society. 00:46:32.800 |
So drinking the wine is drinking the blood of Dionysus. Do you think Jesus is 00:46:40.640 |
an actual physical person that existed in history or is he an idea that came to life 00:46:50.400 |
through the consumption of wine and those kinds of rituals? 00:46:54.000 |
So this is where I face my excommunication, depending how I answer this. 00:47:06.240 |
Yeah. So I shy away from that controversy in the book. I'm perfectly willing to accept Jesus 00:47:14.400 |
as a historical personage. We have the multiplicity of sources, although it's a 00:47:19.440 |
generation after his death, but we have the Eucharist being described in the four gospels, 00:47:25.280 |
we have it being described by Paul in 1 Corinthians. But when you read John, it does 00:47:31.520 |
read a bit differently than the other gospels. And in my book, I rely a lot on the scholarship 00:47:35.840 |
of Dennis MacDonald, who writes a fabulous book called The Dionysian Gospel. And this is, again, 00:47:41.520 |
why the Greek matters, because once you start to analyze the Greek of John's gospel, 00:47:45.680 |
it seems to be a presentation of Jesus very much in the guise of Dionysus. The most obvious example 00:47:52.480 |
is the wedding at Cana, right? That only occurs in John's gospel, the famous transformation of 00:47:58.160 |
water into wine. Now, again, to any Greek speaker of the first century, they would have known about 00:48:03.280 |
the Greek district of Elis on the Peloponnese. And in Elis, around the Epiphany, every January, 00:48:10.320 |
the priests of Dionysus would deposit these water basins, empty basins, in the temple of Dionysus. 00:48:16.720 |
They'd return the next morning and find them magically filled with wine. Now, on the island 00:48:22.400 |
of Andros, it's even more interesting. Around the same Epiphany date, the God's gift day, 00:48:27.840 |
Dies Theodosia, the wine would emanate from the temple and run like a river for a week. And you 00:48:33.840 |
can Google the Bacchanal of the Andrians, a wonderful painting by Titian, which hangs in 00:48:39.040 |
the Prado, and you'll see a river of wine behind these people having a great time. This exists for 00:48:43.920 |
centuries and centuries before the wedding at Cana and before Jesus begins his public ministry 00:48:50.560 |
with what these scholars call the signature miracle of Dionysus. It would not have been lost 00:48:56.800 |
on the Greek audience that something very specific is being communicated here. 00:49:01.040 |
What's being communicated? That you just might find in early Christianity what you hold strong 00:49:07.520 |
to in these mysteries of Dionysus that you may have inherited from your parents, your grandparents, 00:49:12.400 |
your great-grandparents for centuries. There was a perfectly good religion. There were perfectly 00:49:17.280 |
good mystery cults in the ancient Greek and Roman worlds. And here comes this new, untested, 00:49:22.960 |
illegal cult, illegal, of a dozen or so illiterate day laborers that go on to convert the empire 00:49:29.680 |
in a few hundred years. The answer to that extraordinary growth is not psychedelics, 00:49:36.160 |
but I do think it's visionary experiences, and I do think it's this continuity from the pagan 00:49:40.720 |
world into early Christianity. - So what part, you mentioned this idea, 00:49:44.640 |
that's really interesting, I think you said Paul Stamets, of, I guess, millions of people over 00:49:51.760 |
millions of years kind of consuming, really practicing a ritual or a habit of some sort. 00:49:59.680 |
This idea of rituals is kind of interesting. Again, you mentioned cult. What's the role of 00:50:05.280 |
ritual consumption of some of these substances or just ritual practice of anything in the 00:50:12.640 |
intellectual growth of particular groups of people or societies? 00:50:16.800 |
- So again, I would say it is the centerpiece of ancient life, not just the mysteries of Dionysus, 00:50:23.360 |
which we've only talked a bit about, but the mysteries of Eleusis were probably the most 00:50:27.760 |
famous and longest-lasting of these Greek mystery rites. And I mean, just to put it in simple terms, 00:50:33.200 |
the best definition for a mystery religion, as the name implies, is something secret. Right, 00:50:38.880 |
muo from the Greek means to shut the eyes or to shut the mouth, to keep quiet about this stuff. 00:50:45.360 |
We're always teasing details from the archaeological and the literary record, 00:50:50.640 |
and we're kind of just grabbing at these secrets. But Eleusis, which survives for like 2000 years 00:50:57.600 |
into the Christian period from about 1500 BC to the 4th century AD, it's kind of this centerpiece 00:51:05.840 |
of Greek life. Cicero, the great Roman statesman, calls what was happening at Eleusis the most 00:51:11.440 |
exceptional and divine thing that Athens ever produced. So not democracy, the arts and sciences, 00:51:17.920 |
or philosophy, but the vision that was encountered at Eleusis, perhaps through the ritual consumption 00:51:25.200 |
of a potent psychedelic over hundreds and hundreds of years, thousands and thousands, 00:51:30.480 |
if not millions of initiates, pilgrims who would walk from Athens to Eleusis to encounter this 00:51:35.680 |
vision. It seems to have been not just an important part of Greek life, but the thing that 00:51:42.080 |
made life livable, such that as these mysteries are about to be exterminated by the newly 00:51:48.480 |
Christianized Roman Empire, there's this passage in the ancient literature that talks about these, 00:51:54.080 |
in the absence of these mysteries, life becomes unlivable. Abiotos. 00:51:58.000 |
Is there ways you can, I mean, you write about the mysteries of Eleusis, and is there ways you 00:52:03.440 |
can convert that into words? Why those are so important to them, more important than any other 00:52:11.520 |
invention to them? Why is it such a source of meaning to life? So from what we can reconstruct, 00:52:19.520 |
they would make that pilgrimage 13 miles northwest of Athens to confront their mortality. 00:52:25.280 |
Remember we were talking about homo naledi, and in South Africa, this recognition of self-mortality, 00:52:31.760 |
the deliberate disposal of the dead. Plato talks about the real practice of philosophy being the 00:52:38.640 |
death and dying process. So in some senses, you went to Eleusis to die and to experience a death 00:52:45.760 |
before your death. We talked about this with Terence McKenna as well, how the psychedelic state 00:52:51.520 |
seems to share something in common with the near-death or out-of-body experiences or these 00:52:56.640 |
ecstatic experiences, whether through wine or beer or otherwise, you went to Eleusis to die. 00:53:02.160 |
And it was said that only those who had witnessed this vision, whatever vision was to be witnessed 00:53:08.320 |
in Demeter's sanctuary, it essentially vouchsafed you the afterlife, that only those who went there 00:53:15.040 |
became immortal. And Cicero says that at that point, you essentially live with more joy and 00:53:21.920 |
die with a better hope. Can I ask you a question about this human contention with death, this 00:53:28.320 |
confrontation of death that seems to be at the core of things. I don't know how deep to the core, 00:53:34.800 |
but it seems to be a central element of the human condition. What do you think about Ernest Becker 00:53:43.840 |
and those guys that put death at the, what is it, the warm of the core, which as the main thing, 00:53:52.560 |
the main, like this confrontation of our own mortality, first of all, being understand that 00:53:59.040 |
we're mortal and then confronting the terror of it, the fear of it as the creative, like trying 00:54:06.800 |
to escape the fear of death as the creative force of human society. It's like the reason we do 00:54:13.760 |
anything is because we're just running away from our death scared. Do you find some of that to be 00:54:22.240 |
true? First of all, as somebody who looks in the mirror, looks at yourself and your own as a human 00:54:27.680 |
being to just looking at society today and three at this whole big spread of human history and all 00:54:34.800 |
the cool stuff we've created, including the mysteries of elusives. I wonder what life would 00:54:40.320 |
look like in the absence of the fear of our mortality. I wonder how we'd interact with one 00:54:47.280 |
another if there was relatively little or no fear of death. I really do when it comes to Becker's 00:54:52.800 |
work and others. If the ancients were known for anything, it was running to death. It was the 00:54:58.880 |
opposite. In fact, dying before dying, which is the immortality key, by the way, it's not psychedelics 00:55:03.600 |
but when I refer to this key, I'm referring to this notion that's preserved in Greek. 00:55:08.160 |
"An pethanis, brin pethanis, dentha pethanis, ot an pethanis." If you die before you die, 00:55:14.560 |
you won't die when you die. For some reason, the ancients prized that experience. And we talked 00:55:22.560 |
about the mystics of Sufism and Kabbalism and Christian mysticism where you have this same 00:55:29.200 |
self-nodding, this death before death, the divine nothingness. For some reason, the mystics, saints, 00:55:35.200 |
visionaries, and ancient philosophers, they ran to death. And the one message I wanted to try 00:55:40.560 |
and communicate with this book is how they viewed life, that it can only be fully experienced, 00:55:46.960 |
fully embodied in the wake of a really intense, perhaps terrifying, but utterly transformational 00:55:55.680 |
encounter with death. - So running to death, not running away from death. You talk about Aldous 00:56:03.200 |
Huxley and mind changers. So if we look at the history where the ancients were running to death 00:56:14.080 |
and maybe using some performance enhancing permacons to run more effectively towards death. 00:56:23.760 |
And now we're using tools of modern society, whether they're psychological, sociological, 00:56:31.680 |
or in case pharmaceutical, to run away from this conception. So what do you see as a hopeful future 00:56:39.600 |
for human civilization? If all of these kinds of societies are ice cream flavors, how do you 00:56:48.800 |
create the perfect ice cream flavor? What is the future of religious experience, of psychedelic 00:56:54.400 |
experience, of intellectual journeys, of facing death, running away from death? What do you hope 00:57:01.200 |
that looks like and what kind of idea should we look to? - My next book will be entitled 00:57:07.040 |
"Performance Enhancing Farmaca." (laughs) You get full copyright. - Yeah, I like it. 00:57:17.520 |
But that's a historical view. I mean, what in that book would you suggest in one of the last 00:57:23.120 |
chapters about the future of this process? - Well, Huxley has to stop you. He stopped me 00:57:30.880 |
in my tracks, Aldous Huxley. So in 1958, he pens this op-ed of sorts. And it reads incredibly 00:57:40.880 |
prescient because I really do think in many ways as the fog of the war drug is ending 00:57:46.640 |
and finally lifting that we've kind of come full circle back to the late 1950s, 00:57:54.000 |
which might sound strange. It'll make more sense when you hear what Huxley said about psychedelics. 00:57:58.560 |
And so he was looking forward to a revival of religion, which is why I subtitled the book 00:58:04.640 |
"The Religion with No Name." And to him, to Huxley, this revival wouldn't come about through 00:58:12.720 |
televangelistic mass meetings or photogenic clergymen, as he says. But he points to the 00:58:19.280 |
biochemical discoveries such as we have today that would allow for large numbers of men and women to 00:58:26.080 |
achieve a radical self-transcendence and a deeper understanding of the nature of things. In other 00:58:32.000 |
words, that this revival of religion, he says, would be a revolution. And Alan Watts comes along 00:58:36.880 |
and says that there's nothing more dangerous to authority than a popular outbreak of mysticism. 00:58:44.320 |
But I think this is what Huxley was pointing to. And he talks about religion in these terms, 00:58:49.760 |
about being less about symbols and returning to a sense of experience and intuition. And Huxley 00:58:56.560 |
says that he envisions a religion which gives rise to everyday mysticism. And he talks about 00:59:04.160 |
something that would undergird everyday rationality, everyday tasks and duties, 00:59:09.360 |
and everyday human relationships. In other words, religion has to mean something. And these altered 00:59:17.040 |
states of awareness that we seem to be able to produce quite easily inside the lab at Hopkins, 00:59:23.040 |
NYU, and elsewhere with psilocybin, I think this is kind of part of Huxley's prediction about a 00:59:30.240 |
time when we would have legal access, safe access, efficacious access to this material that would 00:59:37.520 |
allow for insight in an afternoon. And what do you do when millions of people can become mystics 00:59:44.560 |
in an afternoon? - So psychedelics, psilocybin 00:59:51.040 |
might be the practical way of having these kinds of, maybe could be termed religious experiences. 00:59:57.920 |
And then many people partake in those experiences and then like evolving this collective 01:00:03.840 |
intelligence thing we got going on, that's sort of the practice of religion that we should be 01:00:09.280 |
looking at striving for, as opposed to kind of operating in the space of ideas, actually 01:00:15.040 |
practicing it. You mentioned, and that's the religion with no name, the use of these tools. 01:00:24.560 |
Is there a simple way to summarize religion for our previous discussion about God, basically 01:00:31.360 |
discovering the God inside? - What if I give you a very complicated 01:00:35.200 |
definition of religion, and then we talk about a more simplified? 01:00:37.840 |
- Let's do it. - So the most complicated we can get on this 01:00:42.880 |
is the anthropologist, Clifford Geertz. But I think it's worth defining our terms 01:00:46.720 |
when we're talking about God and religion. So religion, religio from the Latin means to bind 01:00:52.560 |
back. So to bind us back to some meaningful tradition, to bind us back to the source. 01:00:56.880 |
Here's a mouthful from Clifford Geertz. Religion, he defines as a set of symbols, 01:01:03.520 |
which acts to establish powerful, pervasive, and long-lasting moods and motivations 01:01:09.920 |
by formulating conceptions of a general order of existence and clothing those conceptions in such 01:01:14.960 |
an aura of factuality that those moods and motivations seem uniquely realistic, which is 01:01:22.880 |
complex. What does that mean? That religion has to make you feel something, these moods and 01:01:28.800 |
motivations. But it can't just do that in the way that sex does that for us, or sports, or ultimate 01:01:35.040 |
fighting, or the World Cup, or going to a concert. So we get all that emotion in these experiences 01:01:42.000 |
like that. But that emotion has to be concomitant to a deep existential insight that answers this 01:01:48.240 |
question for you in the morning. I know why I'm here. I know why humans are here. I think I know 01:01:53.760 |
what the meaning of life is. That's what religion is. And if you find that meaning in science, 01:01:59.600 |
then that's your religion and that's fine. But we need to be more honest about that. 01:02:04.000 |
If your epistemological model is weighing facts and figures and you think that's why you're here 01:02:09.840 |
on this planet and you find deep meaning, that's okay. Religion is the thing that makes you feel, 01:02:14.880 |
right? It has the aura of factuality. It just makes you feel like you know the point behind 01:02:20.880 |
existence. In other words, I think it comes down to experience like Joe Campbell was talking about, 01:02:25.680 |
like Aldous Huxley mentions about experience and intuition. I think this is how we connect to God. 01:02:30.480 |
- Make you feel like you understand the world. I mean, so that's kind of bigger than science. 01:02:38.800 |
That includes science, but it's bigger. Do you think, what is real? Like, do you think there's 01:02:47.040 |
an absolute reality that we're kind of striving towards understanding or is it all just conjured 01:02:53.360 |
up in our minds? And that's the whole kind of point. We together create these realities and 01:03:00.400 |
play with them and dance to somehow derive meaning from those realities. And it's ultimately not 01:03:07.840 |
like very deeply integrated into what's like into atoms of space-time. 01:03:18.320 |
- Well, I mean, you have to kind of, when you're thinking about emotion and making it concrete 01:03:27.920 |
into something that feels real, you have to start asking like, what is real? It's something that, 01:03:36.080 |
you know, Ben Shapiro has this saying of facts don't care about your feelings. 01:03:41.040 |
I was always uncomfortable with this. I mean, he's just being spiffy or whatever, but 01:03:47.680 |
I was always uncomfortable with somehow, first that the hubris of thinking that humans can 01:03:54.080 |
have like arrive at absolute truth, which is what I assume he means by facts, 01:04:02.480 |
like things that are controvertible. And then somehow deriding feelings, like feelings are 01:04:09.040 |
not important. To me, like the whole thing is reality. The facts don't even like facts is reality, 01:04:18.400 |
feelings are reality. Like the entirety of human experience is reality. All these consciousnesses 01:04:25.040 |
somehow interacting together, making up random crap and together agreeing, they're all going 01:04:30.240 |
to wear the same colors, rooting for one football team or the other football team or countries, 01:04:35.680 |
all those things, that's real because we've agreed that it's real. And in the same way, 01:04:41.520 |
it gives us meaning. In that same way, religion is a set of ideas that gives us meaning. But, 01:04:48.000 |
you know, real, it's really a difficult, for me as a scientist, that finds comfort 01:04:57.680 |
in the physical understanding of the universe, of physics. You know, I love physics. I love 01:05:04.240 |
computer science. It makes me feel like everything is perfectly understandable. 01:05:09.760 |
And then I look at humans, they're totally not understandable. It's like a giant mess, 01:05:16.320 |
but that's part of the beauty. Like what is love? Like what the hell is love? It's certainly not 01:05:22.560 |
like a weird hack to convince me to procreate because it feels something bigger than that. 01:05:30.160 |
So like taking a purely evolutionary biologist perspective, it's missing the, it's not missing, 01:05:35.600 |
it's only capturing a part of the picture. So it just keeps making me ask, what is real? Because 01:05:42.240 |
as a human, it's very human centric. It does certainly feel like 01:05:46.320 |
a part, a big part of what is real is all the fake stuff my mind makes up. 01:05:58.320 |
I mean, okay, I guess, is there something you could say 01:06:01.760 |
from our discussions about the tools of psychedelics, about our discussion about religion, 01:06:17.600 |
But we should nevertheless strive to answer them. That's the whole point of the human experience. 01:06:22.720 |
And I think science is one way and religion is another. And I think there's actually a sphere 01:06:26.880 |
where they intersect. There's a way for religion to be observable, testable, repeatable, falsifiable. 01:06:33.920 |
When I look at the ancient mysteries, that's what I find. I think I find people exploring alternate 01:06:39.840 |
states of consciousness and arriving at conclusions based on that exploration and deriving 01:06:45.360 |
deep meaning from that, which yes, are feelings and emotions and very hard to quantify. But 01:06:50.080 |
nonetheless, these are the things that govern our lives. I mean, I don't know a parent who isn't 01:06:54.400 |
motivated by the love of their children. Everything I do at 40 years old now is pretty much inspired 01:07:02.240 |
by my love for my two daughters. And I can't prove to you that I love them. I can say it, 01:07:07.200 |
I can show you behavior, but it's very hard for me to weigh and measure that. So not everything 01:07:12.640 |
is so reducible to this quantifiable reality. And yet, I also love science. And I love the 01:07:21.280 |
historical process of weighing this data. I love the chemistry. I love the biology. 01:07:25.440 |
And for me, I think this was the message of the ancient Greeks. And I think this is the world in 01:07:32.080 |
which paleo-Christianity was born. I think there is this meeting ground between science and religion 01:07:37.600 |
which allow for the, if not the discovery, then at least the near-identification of the 01:07:47.600 |
ultimate reality, which is another way to describe God, right? This being of beings, 01:07:52.400 |
the transcendent mystery. - So speaking of God, 01:07:55.280 |
you mentioned to me offline you're wearing the most sophisticated clothing choice 01:08:01.280 |
of the elite intellectuals. Like you mentioned, Sam Harris was wearing a hoodie. 01:08:06.960 |
- This is the Sam Harris hoodie. He's starting a trend. 01:08:09.200 |
- He's starting a trend. (laughs) This is a new religion, you could even say. It's a ritual. 01:08:14.640 |
It's a ritual practice of intellectuals of searching for meaning. So there's quite a 01:08:22.320 |
fascinating debate. He was for a time still known as one of the sort of new age atheists. 01:08:29.760 |
So he was kind of trying to explore the role of religion in society and the role of science. 01:08:35.520 |
And then on the other side, another kind of powerhouse intellectual is Jordan Peterson, 01:08:41.680 |
who in sometimes for my taste, a bit too poetic of ways is exploring the ideas of religion. 01:08:49.200 |
And they had these interesting debates that I think will continue about the role of religion 01:08:55.440 |
in society. For Jordan, there's all these flaws with religion, but there is a lot of value to be 01:09:06.880 |
discovered amidst the rituals, the traditions, the practice, the way we conceive of each other 01:09:13.920 |
because of the ideas that religion propagates. And then for Sam, it says that everything about 01:09:21.120 |
religion basically gets in the way of us fully realizing our human potential, which is deeply 01:09:30.320 |
scientific and rational and sort of like we're surrounded by mystery. Calling that mystery God 01:09:40.800 |
is getting in the way of us understanding that mystery. What do you think about this debate 01:09:46.400 |
about the role of religion in society? We should continue having this debate. I talked to Jordan 01:09:52.240 |
a couple of weeks ago, as a matter of fact. Excellent. On his podcast? Yes. Excellent. 01:09:56.240 |
It'll be out soon. And so, he and I- How did that go, by the way? 01:10:01.120 |
It was incredible. Karl Ruck, the professor, joined us, as a matter of fact, for one of his 01:10:08.400 |
We went deep. And Jordan is very well-read, obviously, on the psychedelic literature. He 01:10:13.840 |
had just had Roland Griffiths from Hopkins on the podcast. And it's one of Roland's figures 01:10:19.360 |
that Jordan and I, again, just like the language of Aldous Huxley, it's hard to move past the 01:10:24.880 |
following statistic. Over the past 20 years of the modern study of psilocybin, Roland will tell 01:10:31.120 |
you that about three in four of their volunteers walk away from their single dose of psilocybin, 01:10:37.520 |
high dose, saying it was among the most meaningful experiences of their entire lives, 01:10:43.040 |
if not the most meaningful. And Jordan says, "What do you do with that? How do we synthesize that?" 01:10:54.240 |
You know, here we are quantifying the qualifiable, the unqualifiable, and yet these compounds have 01:11:02.640 |
dramatic effects on people's lives, and they walk away feeling like they're more loving, 01:11:08.880 |
more compassionate. The Science of All talks about the welling up of cooperation and resource 01:11:16.320 |
sharing and kindness and all these strange things from this single chemical intervention, 01:11:21.360 |
which seems to reduce us to automata as if enlightenment can be flipped on like a switch. 01:11:28.080 |
And yet there it is, there's the data. And I don't see how you walk away from that. I mean, 01:11:31.520 |
I completely understand Sam's position, but I think there's a reading of religion, 01:11:37.920 |
particularly the mystical core of the big faiths and especially these ancient mystery cults, 01:11:43.440 |
which do speak again to those moods and motivations creating this aura of factuality 01:11:50.240 |
that these volunteers never walk away from, permanently transformed just like the ancient 01:11:55.600 |
mysteries. And part of that is perhaps language, that we need to continue to evolve language in 01:12:01.200 |
how we conceive of these processes. Maybe religion has a bunch of baggage associated with it that 01:12:11.040 |
is good to let go of, or perhaps not. I don't know. This is connected to our previous 01:12:18.560 |
part of our conversation is the importance of language in this whole thing. 01:12:21.680 |
Well, that's how I start my book with one of these volunteers from the NYU psilocybin experiments, 01:12:26.320 |
this woman, Dinah Dinah Baser, who's an atheist, and she still describes herself as an atheist. 01:12:32.480 |
And yet as one of these three and four people who walked away from this experiment transformed, 01:12:38.080 |
she says that her experience of psilocybin was like being bathed in God's love from an atheist. 01:12:44.080 |
And I asked her why she uses the word God, why not the love of the cosmos or the universe or 01:12:49.840 |
mother nature? And she says, "Well, frankly, we don't know about any of this stuff and that 01:12:54.560 |
God makes sense to me." She's still an atheist, but it's the way she describes that as kind of like 01:13:01.120 |
the way your mother's love must've felt when you were a baby. 01:13:05.040 |
Yeah, I like the way Einstein uses God, God doesn't play dice. There's a poetry, 01:13:10.720 |
there's a humility that you don't know what the hell is going on. There's a humor to it. 01:13:15.600 |
I'm a huge fan, especially like more and more of just kind of having a big old laugh at the 01:13:21.840 |
absurdity of this world and this life as represented nicely by memes on Twitter kind of thing. 01:13:29.360 |
I mean, there's a sense in which we want to be playing with these words and not take them so 01:13:36.720 |
seriously and being a little bit lighthearted and explore. Let me ask you about, because you 01:13:42.560 |
mentioned NYU, what I find fascinating is how much amazing research, speaking of science, right? 01:13:51.120 |
Studying the effects of psilocybin, studying the effects of various psychedelics, MDMA 01:13:58.240 |
on the human mind. Right now for helping people, but I'm hoping there'll be studies soon at Hopkins 01:14:05.600 |
and elsewhere that allow people that are kind of more quote unquote creatives or regular people 01:14:12.400 |
that don't have a particular demon they're trying to work through, a problem they're trying to work 01:14:18.160 |
through, but more like to see what can I find if I utilize psychedelics to explore? Is there something 01:14:25.760 |
you could say that is exciting to you, that's promising about the future, what currently is 01:14:31.760 |
going on, but also the future of psychedelics research at Hopkins and elsewhere? Yeah, the 01:14:35.760 |
healthy normals, the healthy normals. I was looking for the right words because normal doesn't feel, 01:14:41.120 |
healthy doesn't feel like a good term and normal doesn't feel like a good term because we're all 01:14:45.280 |
pretty messed up and we're all weird. Well, those with ontological angst in that case. 01:14:50.240 |
Great. Maybe there'll be a future DSM qualification. There's no doubt that things 01:14:56.000 |
like psilocybin, MDMA are useful for things like anxiety, depression, end of life distress, PTSD, 01:15:02.800 |
alcoholism, you name it. And it's largely because of the clinical research that MDMA and psilocybin 01:15:09.280 |
will probably be legal in some FDA regulated way in the next five years. But I mean, again, 01:15:15.520 |
I start the first page of my book with this question, why do psychedelics work across all 01:15:21.280 |
these different conditions? And the best that I could find is the meaning, right? Tony Boss at NYU 01:15:29.520 |
talks about psilocybin, for example, as meaning making medicine, which is interesting because 01:15:35.040 |
it puts it somewhere between a therapeutic and again, this ontological instigator. What is it 01:15:42.080 |
about psychedelics that creates these mystical experiences or mystical like experiences? You 01:15:48.000 |
can call them emotional breakthroughs, you can call them moments of awe. I do think we get locked 01:15:53.680 |
up in the language and we're somewhere between science and religion here, including legally. 01:15:58.640 |
So the FDA is one route to this. What excites me about psychedelics is the first amendment. 01:16:03.920 |
What is this going to mean for religion? The freedom of religion being the first thing that's 01:16:08.080 |
mentioned in the first amendment before freedom of speech, freedom of assembly. If America is known 01:16:13.440 |
for anything, it's a refuge for religious pioneers. And so we already have the Native American church, 01:16:19.920 |
Brazilian spawn churches that are using psychedelics, but what would happen if Judaism 01:16:25.520 |
or Christianity or Islam were to begin incorporating the very ritual, very sacred 01:16:32.480 |
and discreet use of psychedelics as part of their liturgy? So not replacing the Sunday Eucharist in 01:16:39.120 |
the case of Christianity, but part of the extra credit dimension of the faith. 01:16:45.520 |
Credit. And then we can, through practice, figure out how essential it is. It could be a minor 01:16:50.400 |
thing, it could be a major thing. That's another thing I wanted to kind of ask you is I recently, 01:16:55.680 |
despite the fact that I'm eating a huge amount of meat and I'm getting fat, I'm loving it. 01:17:00.000 |
This is actually, as of two days ago, I started this long road to training for David Goggins, 01:17:08.160 |
to training back to getting back to competing in jiu-jitsu. So the fun is over, but I also 01:17:14.560 |
partook in fasting and there was a very strong, there's an almost like a hallucinogenic aspect 01:17:22.400 |
of fasting, especially because it was a 72 hour fast versus a more common fast that I do, 01:17:28.320 |
which is 24 hours. And a bunch of people talk about throughout history about the value of fasting 01:17:36.240 |
in having these kind of visual, these kind of intellectual experiences. Also there's meditation, 01:17:43.760 |
Sam Harris with the hoodie. Do you have a sense that those other rituals of fasting, of meditation, 01:17:54.000 |
and maybe other things could be as essential or more essential to the religious experience 01:18:00.800 |
as psychedelics? - Yes, if not, and this is gonna sound weird, but maybe not if more so. 01:18:06.560 |
I look at psychedelics as a catalyst for spiritual investigation, not as the superficial means to an 01:18:14.480 |
end. I think their value is in kind of serving as a Google Maps for the kingdom of heaven. 01:18:23.360 |
- All right, I like this. - Well, so Ram Dass' teacher said that when he was offered psychedelics 01:18:31.600 |
that it'll get you in the room with Jesus, but it won't keep you there. 01:18:36.000 |
- Yeah. - And I think that's all well and good, 01:18:39.600 |
but what if you don't know where the house is in the first place? What if you've never had 01:18:43.120 |
a mystical experience? What if religion is anathema to you? What if you hate God? What 01:18:48.960 |
if all these words mean nothing to you? And they probably do for many, many people, 01:18:52.720 |
and it's perfectly understandable. I think that we've lost the coordinates to these irrational 01:18:58.160 |
states, again, that were prized throughout antiquity and that continue to be prized by 01:19:03.440 |
the mystical communities even in big organized religion. It just doesn't filter out that much. 01:19:08.240 |
And so, psychedelics, in my mind, help orient our minds, bodies, and souls towards the irrational, 01:19:17.440 |
right? We talked about McKenna's invisible world that seems to have this symbiosis with our own 01:19:23.920 |
and perhaps has this higher intent for us. You could very well just take catalog of your dreams, 01:19:31.120 |
right? And that would do it too. But psychedelics seem to be particularly fast-acting, 01:19:35.920 |
particularly potent, and very reliable, especially in the clinical studies. And so, 01:19:41.920 |
I looked at them as biochemical discoveries, like Huxley did. Maybe it's once in your life 01:19:47.760 |
or infrequently, right? But maybe that's the beginning of a genuine introspection 01:19:53.680 |
and a life well-examined, as the ancients always instructed us. 01:19:57.360 |
- Yeah, it does seem in the research that the effectiveness of psychedelics always comes with 01:20:02.640 |
the integration where you use it, just like you said, as a catalyst for thinking through stuff. 01:20:10.480 |
It's not going to be... I don't even know if Google Maps... Oh, maybe Google Maps is the right 01:20:17.120 |
analogy, but it doesn't do the driving for you. You still have to do the driving. It just kind of 01:20:23.600 |
gives you the directions. So, after you come down from the trip or whatever, you still have to drive. 01:20:30.320 |
There's other tools that are kind of interesting. We've been talking about this 01:20:34.160 |
at the psychological level, but there's also a neuroscience perspective of it. If we kind of like 01:20:40.160 |
go past the skull into the brain with the neurons firing, there's ideas of brain-computer interfaces. 01:20:46.160 |
First of all, there's a whole field of neuroscience that's kind of zooming in and 01:20:49.280 |
studying the firing of the brain, the firing of the neurons in the brain, of how from those 01:20:54.960 |
neurons emerges all the things that we think that make us human. That's a fascinating exploration 01:21:01.280 |
of the human mind. That's, of course, where the psychedelics have the chemical, the biochemical 01:21:07.040 |
effects on those neurons. There's ideas of brain-computer interfaces, which, 01:21:13.520 |
you know, if you look at, especially what Neuralink is doing with this long-term vision 01:21:18.240 |
with Elon Musk and Neuralink, they hope to expand... He calls it a wizard hat. 01:21:32.160 |
This is back to the humor on the internet thing. The wizard hat that expands the 01:21:38.080 |
capabilities, the capacity of the human mind. Do you think there's something there, or 01:21:44.880 |
is the human mind so infinitely complex that we're quite a long way away from 01:21:55.360 |
expanding the capabilities of the human mind through technology versus something like psychedelics? 01:22:02.240 |
I wonder how Terence McKenna would answer that question. He looked to shamans as kind of the 01:22:08.720 |
scientists, the high magicians of the high archaic past and the far-flung future. 01:22:15.280 |
I'm not going to discount... You know more about AI than I do, so I'm not going to discount it, 01:22:20.960 |
but I do think that AI paired with the sacred recovery, right? The archaeology of consciousness 01:22:32.880 |
and these states, these archaic techniques of ecstasy that were practiced across time, 01:22:38.400 |
I think that's a winning combination. You know, part of what I do in the book is just 01:22:43.520 |
I try and lay out the set and setting. That's often talked about with psychedelics. I mean, 01:22:47.920 |
so maybe psychedelics in the right AI environment is going to work. I think it'd probably work a lot 01:22:53.360 |
better with that myth and ritual incorporated. So, the reason elusives worked for 2000 years, 01:22:59.760 |
and let's assume the psychedelic hypothesis has some merit to it, but I think the reason it worked 01:23:06.160 |
is because you were born into a mythology. You were born into a story about Demeter and Persephone, 01:23:12.160 |
and you waited your entire life to meet them in the flesh. So, you weren't just preparing 01:23:17.680 |
for a few months. It was a lifetime of expectation, anticipation, ritual preparation. 01:23:23.840 |
In fact, some of the early church fathers made fun of the Greeks for essentially just piquing 01:23:29.360 |
people's curiosity and revving up the anticipation, which has something to do with the outcome, 01:23:34.080 |
by the way. But in other words, I think we need to create a new mythology around this. I don't 01:23:38.640 |
think you pop into a laboratory. I don't think you pop into a retreat center from one day to 01:23:44.720 |
the next. I think that in my own case, I feel like I've been preparing 12 years for psychedelics, 01:23:49.680 |
and I'm still preparing, including in today's conversation. I'm learning new things, 01:23:53.680 |
and I'm willing to explore it together with the computer interface. But I do think ritual 01:24:02.000 |
is a gigantic part of this, and even McKenna would say that. I'll paraphrase him by saying that 01:24:08.880 |
if you'd met someone who didn't know where they were between the years 1995 and 2005, 01:24:14.960 |
you would describe them as a fairly damaged person. And yet, who among us knows what was 01:24:20.080 |
happening in Western civilization between 900 and 1300, let alone 2,500 years ago? So, this is, 01:24:26.160 |
in many ways, the prophet of the psychedelic Renaissance saying that history has lessons. 01:24:31.120 |
And I don't think they're superficial lessons. I think it cuts to the very core of how and why 01:24:37.280 |
Western civilization came to be born. - Yeah, but that history can be loaded 01:24:43.280 |
into AI systems, and I do love the idea of whether it's to bring computer interfaces or without 01:24:50.560 |
intrusive, sort of, without direct reading of the neurons and more sort of interactive 01:24:57.360 |
experience with a robot, that you can have an AI system that steers your psychedelic experience, 01:25:04.160 |
that helps you sort of, when you take a heroic dose of psilocybin, for example, 01:25:11.200 |
helps steer you, steer your mind, say just the right things. I mean, you could say that kind 01:25:16.880 |
of thing with, it's a totally open problem, I would say. You talk about set and setting. 01:25:25.200 |
This is the interesting thing about Johns Hopkins is, you know, you create a comfortable environment, 01:25:31.200 |
a safe environment for allowing, then if you take a heroic, like a large dose of psilocybin, 01:25:38.480 |
that you could trust that everything would be safe and you can really allow the exploration 01:25:43.520 |
of your mind, but then you don't know from a psychotherapy perspective of like, during that trip, 01:25:50.320 |
what a human should say to steer that trip. Like, that's a totally open set of problems. 01:25:55.440 |
And in some sense, probably throughout history, those rituals, you've figured out what are the 01:26:00.960 |
right things to say to each other. - Exactly. 01:26:02.720 |
- How to collaborate. And maybe if you can turn that into an optimization problem, 01:26:07.200 |
AI could figure that out much, much quicker. - I'm with you. So, elusus was known for three 01:26:13.200 |
things, the legomena, the dromena, and the deignumena, the things said, the things done, 01:26:18.880 |
the things shown. If you can pack that all into your AI interface, I'm in, Lex Friedman. 01:26:23.600 |
- I'm gonna write a proposal and then try to get it through the IRB at MIT. 01:26:30.240 |
I mean, there's a certain sense in which I definitely wanted to explore psychedelics, 01:26:37.600 |
I mean, in my personal life, but also more rigorously as a scientist, 01:26:41.600 |
and to push that forward. And especially in the AI space, and it is difficult how to do that dance 01:26:52.080 |
when there's gray areas of legality and all those kinds of things. And we're dancing around them, 01:26:58.560 |
and some of that is language, and some of that is what we socially conceive of as drugs or not. And 01:27:06.640 |
you're right that perhaps we can reframe it as religious experiences, all those kinds of things. 01:27:12.320 |
I mean, it's fascinating because it feels like there's a bunch of tools before us that were 01:27:16.880 |
used by the ancients that we're not utilizing for exploring the human mind, that we very well could 01:27:24.080 |
be in a rigorous scientific way, in a safe way. And that's fascinating. There's this interesting 01:27:30.240 |
period in the 20th century of LSD use that many of the people doing research on psychedelics now 01:27:41.200 |
kind of have their roots in that history. I mentioned that Dr. Rick Doblin, he is one of 01:27:47.200 |
those people. And there's this interesting story of a bunch of creatives that used LSD or other 01:27:54.000 |
drugs to help them. What do you make of the idea of somebody like Ken Kesey who wrote "One 01:28:00.080 |
Flover's the Cuckoo's Nest" in part under the influence of LSD? Like, what do you make of the 01:28:08.960 |
use of psychedelics to maximize the creative potential of the human mind? Is this a crutch 01:28:21.600 |
or is this actually an effective tool that we should explore? - One person's crutch might be 01:28:30.400 |
another's bungee cord. It depends on that mind. Think about Paul McCartney. I mean, we might not 01:28:40.960 |
have some of the better Beatles music in the absence of LSD. And what did Sir Paul say in 1967 01:28:47.520 |
when he was asked about his use of LSD? He said that he recognized the dangers inherent in it, 01:28:53.360 |
but that he did it with a very specific, very deliberate purpose in mind. He wanted to find 01:28:59.280 |
the answer to what life is all about. And I'm not sure what Sir Paul is doing this week, but he's 01:29:05.440 |
probably not doing LSD. Speaking back to my theory about these substances being catalyzers of 01:29:12.720 |
spiritual introspection, it came along at a time in their life when I think they were ripe for it, 01:29:19.280 |
especially George Harrison. I highly recommend the Martin Scorsese documentary about George 01:29:26.000 |
Harrison. For them, I think it was exactly the way we ought to investigate it, which is, 01:29:32.640 |
well, mind expanders. This is what psychedelics do, right? That which makes manifest the contents 01:29:39.040 |
of the mind. In the absence of an experience like that, and it can be in a three-day fast, 01:29:44.560 |
it can be laying down in a cave, it can be in ritual chanting, it can be in a sun dance, 01:29:50.560 |
but in the absence of that kind of experience at the right time in your life, it may otherwise be 01:29:55.360 |
very difficult to find entrance to that kingdom of heaven, which I do think is here and now, 01:30:00.720 |
getting right back to the very beginning. If we are actually to participate in that 01:30:05.280 |
eternal principle, how and when? - What do you think Nietzsche meant when he said that God is 01:30:11.440 |
dead? So there's a sense that religion is fading from society. And there's a cranky German that 01:30:21.040 |
kind of wrote about it. What do you think he meant? - He was a cranky German who knew a lot 01:30:25.920 |
about Dionysus, by the way, which is why I like him. So certainly there's some truth 01:30:32.000 |
to the mortality of God. I think Gallup put out a study only a couple of months ago where church 01:30:39.360 |
membership is now officially in the minority in the United States at 47%, according to the most 01:30:45.760 |
recent poll. That number was closer to 70% only 20 years ago. So we're living through something, 01:30:52.000 |
and we're living through the unchurching of America, and it's the rise of the spiritual 01:30:56.320 |
but not religious, the inheritor of all traditions but the slave to none. There's a rise in the 01:31:03.040 |
unaffiliated, the nuns. I think it was like one-third of millennials, it's probably much 01:31:07.600 |
higher now, that don't affiliate with any religion. So in that sense, God is absolutely dead, 01:31:14.240 |
but maybe not the God that we were trying to define at the very beginning. So Nietzsche also 01:31:19.360 |
looked forward to the Übermensch, which would be a fully realized human being that despite the death 01:31:25.600 |
of God did not fall into nihilism and amorality, existential despair, all that great German stuff. 01:31:34.000 |
And there are some commentators who talk about this eternal recurrence that just maybe by 01:31:40.160 |
incorporating some of these techniques, not necessarily doctrine and dogma, but I would say 01:31:45.200 |
the techniques of antiquity. And again, Nietzsche writes a lot about the rationality of Dionysus 01:31:51.520 |
having its place in society. If anything, these biochemical discoveries, I think, point us back. 01:31:57.200 |
They point us back to Dionysus and their responsible incorporation of the irrational 01:32:04.080 |
into our otherwise society of rational people and our kazooistry. 01:32:10.960 |
I have a sense that there will be kind of, just kind of as you've implied, that there will be 01:32:17.600 |
maybe the God of old is dying and there'll be a rebirth of different kind of God and it'll just 01:32:24.160 |
keep happening throughout history. I do think there will be a time where AI will be the gods 01:32:29.840 |
we'll look to, the other, the super intelligent, those kinds of things. There's a little bit of an 01:32:36.480 |
inkling of religious longing for meaning in the way people conceive of aliens currently. 01:32:44.640 |
I mean, I talked to a bunch of people about UFOs, EOPs, and aliens. And so to me, it's very 01:32:51.600 |
interesting for perhaps different reasons, because I'm just, I look up to the stars and 01:32:56.640 |
it's incredibly humbling to me to think that there's trillions of intelligent alien civilizations 01:33:02.960 |
out there, which to me seems likely, or perhaps not intelligent, perhaps just alien life. And 01:33:09.600 |
actually also that we don't even understand what it means to be intelligent or do we understand 01:33:14.800 |
what it means to be alive. The time scale, the spatial scale, which patterns of atoms can form 01:33:23.520 |
in a way that you can call life, it's just could be way weirder than we can imagine. And certainly 01:33:31.920 |
way different than human life. Anyway, that to me is humbling. And so it's almost like the 01:33:38.480 |
simulation, conceiving of the world of simulation, thinking of aliens to me is a useful thought 01:33:44.400 |
experiment of like, what would aliens look like if they visited? How would we know? How would we 01:33:49.440 |
communicate with them? How would we send signals to them if they're already here and we don't see 01:33:57.520 |
them? How's that possible? That seems to me actually likely that we would just be too self-centered 01:34:03.440 |
and too dumb to see them if they're already here. Anyway, so that's kind of the, almost the 01:34:11.440 |
pragmatic, the engineering, the physics sense of aliens, but there's also kind of a longing 01:34:18.160 |
to connect with other intelligent beings out there, both the fear and the excitement of that, 01:34:24.240 |
that has kind of a religious aspect to it. And I find fascinating. And in the right context, 01:34:30.560 |
when you remove the skepticism of government from that, it's actually a hopeful longing. 01:34:36.560 |
Do you have a, do you see this kind of interest in aliens as at all connected to your study of 01:34:43.600 |
religion? - So you're the first person to ask me about aliens in eight months. So it looks like 01:34:49.920 |
- I'll drop some J. Allen Hynek on you. So Hynek, involved in Project Blue Book, famously says in 01:35:00.640 |
1966, when the long-awaited solution to the UFO problem comes, and we're assuming that UFOs have 01:35:07.280 |
something to do with aliens, but when the long-awaited solution comes, I believe it will 01:35:13.280 |
prove to be not merely the next small step in the march of science, but a mighty and unexpected 01:35:19.520 |
quantum leap. In other words, I do not think that we're dealing with flesh and blood beings 01:35:26.560 |
in nuts and bolts crafts. I think it's way, way more complicated than that. And if anything, 01:35:32.800 |
it takes me back to the ancient world. It takes me back to this invisible college of beings of 01:35:38.080 |
apparent higher intent. It takes me to the geniuses and the muses. So the first document 01:35:44.080 |
in Western civilization, Homer's Epics, they begin by invoking an alien. They invoke a muse. 01:35:54.400 |
Tell me, oh muse, about the man. So Homer isn't inventing poetry, he's channeling poetry, 01:36:02.000 |
epic poetry from an alien intelligence. Maybe that intelligence has felt a little 01:36:08.240 |
unrecognized in recent years. - Trying to show up in human 01:36:14.480 |
recognizable forms, the muse is trying to give a little hint of its existence. Yeah, I mean, 01:36:20.640 |
I have a, I've been saying, I honestly sort of, I don't believe this, but I think about this, 01:36:28.000 |
whether alien, like muse is a great example, whether aliens could be thoughts. 01:36:34.720 |
Ideas we have are the aliens, or consciousness itself is the methods by which aliens communicate 01:36:43.520 |
with us. I find this very kind of liberating to expand our conception of what intelligent 01:36:54.960 |
Julian Jaynes writes a great book, The Origins of Consciousness and the Breakdown of the Bicameral 01:37:00.400 |
Mind. It's this theory that the ancient Greek mind was very different from ours, and that when 01:37:07.520 |
they heard the muses, or the gods and goddesses for that matter, they would hear them as voices 01:37:12.240 |
in the head, and hear it as an internal god figure offering commands, which they couldn't ignore. So, 01:37:20.160 |
were they walking schizophrenics? It might be one way to talk about it before the breakdown 01:37:24.320 |
of the bicameral mind. But it's a provocative theory, largely untestable. But when you're 01:37:29.920 |
reading ancient Greek, and Latin for that matter, you can't read it very long without bumping up 01:37:34.720 |
against these discarded entities. They're everywhere, and they survived. They persist 01:37:41.120 |
across time, which is even stranger. Not just in the form of all the things my daughters like, 01:37:45.680 |
like fairies, and gnomes, and elves, but, and McKenna loves this, the sylphs, and the boulder 01:37:51.360 |
grinders, and the sprites, and the djins, and elementals. Every society has them. It seems to 01:37:56.320 |
be fairly universal. And they largely exist in folklore, mythology. This is what Jacques Vallée 01:38:02.240 |
writes about so wonderfully. - We've kind of been sneaking around it, 01:38:07.120 |
but let me ask you, from yours, from everything we've been talking about, how do you think about 01:38:13.040 |
consciousness? Is it a fun little trick that the human mind does, or is it somehow fundamental to 01:38:21.760 |
this whole thing? - So, this three-pound lump of jelly 01:38:26.640 |
inside our craniums that can contemplate the vastness of interstellar space, it can contemplate 01:38:34.960 |
the meaning of infinity, and it can contemplate itself contemplating on the meaning of infinity, 01:38:41.120 |
that peculiar self-recursive quality that we call self-awareness. So, this is the hard problem, 01:38:46.880 |
right? This is the unknowable, the unknown, at least. I don't know. I have no good answer for 01:38:54.080 |
that. Aside from that-- - Do you think it's somehow 01:38:56.480 |
deeply fundamental to the human experience, or is it just a trick? So, you have like, 01:39:02.880 |
I mean, Sam Harris has really been making me think about this. So, calling free will an illusion, 01:39:08.720 |
the interesting thing about Sam is it's not just a philosophical little chatted with him about 01:39:17.520 |
free will. He really says he experiences the lack of free will. Like, he's able to, you know, 01:39:27.520 |
large parts of the day to feel like he has no free will. In that same way, now, he thinks that 01:39:35.040 |
consciousness is not an illusion. It is, you know, it's a real thing, but at the same, I'm more, 01:39:43.760 |
almost like, I'm almost more of like, consciousness seems to be a little bit of an illusion, 01:39:49.040 |
in the sense that, like, it feels like maybe this is a robotics AI perspective, but it feels like, 01:39:54.880 |
in that same way that Sam steps outside of feeling like he has an agency, feeling like he has a free 01:40:02.240 |
will, I feel like we should be able to step outside of having a consciousness. So, that, 01:40:10.400 |
from my perspective, maybe that's a hopeful perspective for trying to engineer consciousness, 01:40:14.960 |
but do you think consciousness is like, at the core of this, or is it just like, language, 01:40:21.760 |
or almost like a thing we build on top of a much deeper human, the things that makes us human? 01:40:30.000 |
I don't know. I am attracted to Lenz's notion of biocentrism. I mean, it's difficult to walk 01:40:35.040 |
away from the double-slit experiment not wondering why we seem capable of collapsing 01:40:41.280 |
that quantum wave function. It's very, very weird, giving rise to even weirder ideas about 01:40:47.360 |
superposition and spooky action at a distance, and things that MIT guys know a lot better than me. 01:40:52.400 |
But it seems to me fundamental. Maybe consciousness is the fundamental thing. I mean, weirdly, 01:40:59.600 |
some of these ancient incubatory practices--I talked about Peter Kingsley before. So, he's not 01:41:04.880 |
a proponent of ancient psychedelic use, but is a proponent of these ancient rites of incubation 01:41:10.000 |
that were practiced by Pythagoras, Parmenides, and Pedocles, other pre-Socratics. And so, 01:41:16.080 |
what were they doing? They were trying to get in touch with consciousness. They were 01:41:19.840 |
entering into suspended states of animation in these cave-like settings. Pythagoras had built 01:41:25.680 |
one in his basement and would lie down motionless, apparently, for long periods of time. And what I 01:41:31.120 |
think they were trying to do was tap into and try to answer this question in their own--you 01:41:37.360 |
could call it a scientific way, actually, less religion than science. And what they would 01:41:42.400 |
discover or try to discover was a state of awareness that is somehow beyond life and death, 01:41:47.520 |
beyond waking and dreaming, where you can be aware of the senses but also in touch 01:41:52.480 |
with another reality at the exact same time, what Kingsley calls sensation. 01:41:56.960 |
That, I think, is definitely worth exploring. 01:42:01.600 |
Well, and the way I hope to explore is by trying to build it. Everybody uses the tools they have. 01:42:09.680 |
Well, no, I do also hope psychedelics could help. 01:42:14.240 |
That's a whole other discussion. There's a lot of things I could say here, but let me put simply 01:42:20.560 |
is I believe that you can go a long way towards building consciousness by trying to fake 01:42:34.560 |
consciousness. So fake it till you make it, as an engineering approach, I think will work 01:42:46.560 |
I'm satisfied with that because I know how deeply unsatisfied others are, but just wait. 01:42:53.040 |
I mean, I don't know what to--so the topic of consciousness is mostly handled by 01:43:08.160 |
And their philosophers are wonderful and good at what they do. 01:43:16.560 |
And I think the approach there is quite different. 01:43:18.960 |
I think falling in love is different than trying to have a podcast conversation about what is love. 01:43:32.720 |
You know, I think the engineering effort is just fundamentally different than the philosophical 01:43:40.400 |
And I have a sense that consciousness can be engineered even before it is understood by 01:43:47.120 |
So I think there's a bunch of things like that in this world that could be engineered before 01:43:55.440 |
I think we'll be able to engineer super intelligent beings before we're able to understand 01:44:04.000 |
I mean, there's less--there's a lot of intuition to unpack there of why that is, but as it 01:44:13.200 |
stands, that's perhaps my engineering optimism and engineering ethic under which I operate. 01:44:19.680 |
Consciousness is easy to build, hard to understand. 01:44:27.600 |
Are there books or movies in your life long ago or recently that had a big impact on you? 01:44:34.240 |
You've--Immortality Key is exceptionally well researched. 01:44:39.680 |
The amount of books you read is--I cannot even imagine. 01:44:45.120 |
So is there something in those--in your travels through the land of language that stuck with 01:44:55.040 |
I mentioned a couple of them, but--so I knew nothing about psychedelics before 2007. 01:45:01.520 |
And it was in hearing about some of the first psilocybin experiments at Hopkins. 01:45:06.720 |
And then shortly thereafter, I went down this rabbit hole. 01:45:10.480 |
And so, the first set of recommendations all kind of fit in that time period in my life, 01:45:16.960 |
It started with Jeremy Narby, The Cosmic Serpent, DNA and the Origins of Knowledge. 01:45:22.960 |
It was a total impulse buy at the Barnes and Noble on 6th Avenue in New York, 01:45:27.680 |
and wound up introducing me to Supernatural by Graham Hancock. 01:45:32.720 |
That convinced me that there was a long story to psychedelics that he tried to prove in that book, 01:45:43.520 |
I mentioned the connection between ritual psychedelics and cave art. 01:45:49.680 |
This is the neuropsychological model that was first proposed by David Lewis Williams 01:45:54.400 |
at the University of Waterstrand, the same university where Lee Berger is, by the way, 01:46:00.640 |
But what Graham did in that book is just--it's well worth your time. 01:46:07.200 |
Because it was after that that I discovered Breaking Open the Head by Daniel Pinchbeck, 01:46:12.400 |
and a lot of other books that just kind of blew my mind. 01:46:19.840 |
So it's Daniel's romp through contemporary shamanism. 01:46:24.480 |
And it's his very well-told experiences with everything from psilocybin to iboga 01:46:33.920 |
And it was the first time I'd read any firsthand accounts, 01:46:38.880 |
aside from Jeremy Narby, any firsthand accounts by a New Yorker, by the way, 01:46:43.840 |
about the potential for these compounds that I'd been ignoring for far too long, obviously. 01:46:49.280 |
And so, that's when I started revisiting The Road to Eleusis and looking through the 01:46:55.280 |
anthropological literature, reading everything Gordon Wasson had ever written, that Karl Ruck 01:46:59.920 |
And it sent me down a pretty weird rabbit hole until I found Peter Kingsley, 01:47:06.960 |
So Peter, again, he's not a fan of the psychedelic hypothesis. 01:47:11.520 |
But what he does is I think expose the value of the irrational to the ancient Greeks, 01:47:19.200 |
Here we are talking about AI and God and these entangled philosophical questions. 01:47:26.000 |
The best I can read Kingsley is that Western civilization is a product of a gift from the 01:47:33.920 |
And this is not a hippie, this is a pretty gold standard classicist who went on to write 01:47:42.560 |
One is In the Dark Places of Wisdom, and the other is Reality, what better way to title 01:47:47.840 |
your book, where he talks about these ancient techniques for exploring the irrational. 01:47:55.040 |
After compiling all this data in The Road to Eleusis, Ruck says that the biggest challenge 01:48:00.800 |
is trying to convince his colleagues in the late 1970s that the ancient Greeks and indeed, 01:48:05.840 |
some of the most famous and intelligent among them could enter so fully into irrationality. 01:48:12.480 |
Same thing Nietzsche is talking about in his exploration of Dionysus. 01:48:16.160 |
And so I think Kingsley just stands apart as one of those books, Reality, that my life 01:48:24.880 |
- We talked about the three pound jelly that is able to conceive of the entirety of the 01:48:38.720 |
fabric of reality in the universe and everything, and also of its own mortality. 01:48:55.280 |
- Is the three pound jelly able to answer that one? 01:48:58.160 |
- (laughs) No, but I can plagiarize Joseph Campbell, which is good enough. 01:49:03.120 |
Joe Campbell says that, "I don't think what we're looking for is a meaning of life. 01:49:08.800 |
I think what we're looking for is an experience of being alive, so that the experiences we have 01:49:15.840 |
on the purely physical plane will have resonances within that are those of our innermost being 01:49:22.400 |
You talked about the true reality, absolute truth. 01:49:24.640 |
These are all constructs, and I think they're constructs that are made day by day and acquire 01:49:33.760 |
Remember in Clifford Geertz's definition of religion, we're all just faking it until we 01:49:39.680 |
And I think a lot of that has to do with moods and motivations and feelings and emotions, 01:49:47.840 |
But I think that meaning, meaning making, is a very subjective process that is not only 01:49:55.040 |
difficult to talk about, but difficult to quantify. 01:49:57.200 |
- And experience is a primary in that versus... 01:49:59.840 |
So like the actual subjective experience is primary to the meaning making process versus 01:50:07.520 |
like some kind of rigorous analysis of like having an algorithm that runs and computes 01:50:22.880 |
- Well, my wife and I fell in love and made babies. 01:50:25.040 |
We didn't type up an Excel sheet and figure out the best way to go about this. 01:50:29.120 |
- That's what I've been doing all these years. 01:50:43.280 |
You are surrendering to an intelligence that is beyond us. 01:50:51.200 |
Richard Rohr, the Franciscan friar I mentioned in the Universal Christ, he writes a lot about 01:50:56.000 |
how the divine for you is often encountered in the other. 01:51:03.120 |
This is bedrock sacramental theology that you find the God in the things in your life 01:51:10.080 |
That's the proving ground for identifying as God rather than creating a relationship 01:51:16.720 |
So I think that these irrational states play a big role in that. 01:51:21.440 |
Well, I don't think there's a better way to end it than on the topic of love. 01:51:24.960 |
Brian, thank you so much for a brilliant exposition of history and the poetry. 01:51:31.600 |
I really appreciate you talking with me today. 01:51:39.120 |
Thanks for listening to this conversation with Brian Muir-Escu and thank you to Inside 01:51:43.520 |
Tracker, GiveWell, NI, Indeed, and Masterclass. 01:51:48.480 |
Check them out in the description to support this podcast. 01:51:51.120 |
And now let me leave you with some words from Terrence McKenna about psychedelics. 01:51:56.480 |
Part of what psychedelics do is they decondition you from cultural values. 01:52:02.320 |
This is what makes it such a political hot potato. 01:52:05.840 |
Since all culture is a kind of con game, the most dangerous candy you can hand out is one 01:52:11.280 |
which causes people to start questioning the rules of the game. 01:52:20.000 |
Terrence McKenna - Inside Tracker, GiveWell, NI, Indeed, and Masterclass.