back to indexHow Can I Share Conflicts with My Spouse Without Gossiping?
Chapters
0:0 Intro
0:45 The issue of permission
3:0 Know yourself well
4:32 Biblical guideline
6:48 Scripture
8:20 Conclusion
00:00:04.000 |
Happy Friday and welcome back to the Ask Pastor John podcast. 00:00:08.000 |
Listener Rachel in Cameroon writes in to ask, "Pastor John, 00:00:12.000 |
we all have difficult experiences in life with respect to 00:00:16.000 |
interpersonal communication and conflict, both with fellow Christians and 00:00:20.000 |
non-Christians. Processing this with other people can lead to 00:00:24.000 |
gossip or slander, of course. Is there benefit to processing 00:00:28.000 |
these conflicts with our spouse or is this gossip and slander? 00:00:32.000 |
For example, Pastor John, if you had a difficult interpersonal interaction 00:00:36.000 |
or relationship with an elder in your church, is it okay to process through that at 00:00:40.000 |
home in confidence with Noel? Is such a practice 00:00:44.000 |
helpful?" Well, it certainly can be helpful and it's 00:00:52.000 |
first thing I should address is just the issue of 00:01:04.000 |
having difficulty with or in conflict with, permission, 00:01:12.000 |
with my spouse? Now that may seem awkward since 00:01:16.000 |
the whole issue is conflict and difficulty, and yet 00:01:24.000 |
feel respected because of the request instead of 00:01:28.000 |
you're just assuming that you're going to go talk about it with anybody you please. So 00:01:36.000 |
some healing. And if you have permission, then 00:01:40.000 |
I think you're free at least to consider the possibility 00:01:44.000 |
of speaking with your spouse about the situation. But 00:01:48.000 |
even then, it's not automatic, I don't think, whether 00:01:52.000 |
you should or not. There are other factors. And 00:01:56.000 |
the next thing I think of is there are two people that you need 00:02:00.000 |
to know really well in this process, and that is yourself 00:02:04.000 |
and your spouse, if you're going to discern what would be helpful 00:02:08.000 |
to talk about, what would be appropriate. And the reason I say 00:02:12.000 |
that you need to know yourself really well is 00:02:16.000 |
because even if you have a green light in every other regard 00:02:20.000 |
to share something with your spouse, your attitude 00:02:28.000 |
This is why it seems to me there are so many warnings 00:02:32.000 |
in the Bible about how we speak of other people, 00:02:36.000 |
especially other Christians. Like James 4.11, "Do not 00:02:40.000 |
speak evil against one another." And 2 Corinthians 00:02:44.000 |
12.20, Paul is afraid that he'll find slander 00:02:52.000 |
church. And I think part of the reason these texts are 00:03:12.000 |
so that we don't even share the things we have permission to share 00:03:28.000 |
the subtle pleasure—we all know this—the subtle pleasure 00:03:36.000 |
news or questionable news that nobody else knows about 00:03:40.000 |
but us, and we get to be the first one to talk about it. There's something 00:03:48.000 |
us. So the watchword here is test yourself, know yourself, 00:03:56.000 |
self before you talk about it with your spouse. And the 00:04:00.000 |
other person you need to know really well to make right decisions about when to 00:04:12.000 |
this person, I'm talking about Noelle here—will I be tempting her 00:04:20.000 |
What's the emotional makeup of our spouse? Do we know 00:04:24.000 |
her? Is our spouse vulnerable to certain kinds of 00:04:32.000 |
get sucked into in the relational conflict? Or is 00:04:40.000 |
give us good counsel without becoming embroiled in 00:04:48.000 |
knowing our spouses will have a significant effect 00:04:52.000 |
on whether we share and what we share and how we 00:04:56.000 |
share the difficult situations that we're walking 00:05:00.000 |
through. Here's another biblical guideline to think about, and I—when I 00:05:04.000 |
was thinking about this, I think I got the most helpful maxim 00:05:08.000 |
that might guide us. So I'm thinking about Matthew 18 here, where it says, "If your 00:05:12.000 |
brother sins against you, go privately to see if you can get it 00:05:16.000 |
worked out, and then if that doesn't work out, take two or three, and if that 00:05:20.000 |
doesn't work, go to the church." Now what's the overall drift? That's what I ask. 00:05:24.000 |
What's the overall thrust of that approach? And it 00:05:28.000 |
seems to me that the overall thrust of Matthew 18 00:05:40.000 |
helpful for maximum healing to all concerned. 00:05:44.000 |
That's my maxim. So the application would be, 00:05:56.000 |
healing, not only for the immediate conflict, but for any 00:06:00.000 |
others who might be drawn in? You don't want to multiply 00:06:04.000 |
the pain or the conflict by having it be known 00:06:08.000 |
by people that it's unnecessary to be known by if healing 00:06:12.000 |
can be achieved another way. So it seems to me that 00:06:16.000 |
that's one of the most significant principles we could express. 00:06:20.000 |
If there's a green light for sharing a concern in every other respect, 00:06:24.000 |
then the question is, am I truly motivated by 00:06:28.000 |
a desire for wisdom that leads to healing, or 00:06:32.000 |
am I merely caressing an injury? Am I picking at a 00:06:40.000 |
and looking for some kind of gratification and thus putting 00:06:48.000 |
sin? And there are, just recently in my life, 00:06:52.000 |
there are two scriptures that have been standing out, 00:07:04.000 |
Let me just mention them because they've been so powerful for me. One is 1 Peter 00:07:08.000 |
3.8, "Finally, all of you have," and listen to these words, 00:07:32.000 |
person, put it through this sieve, pass it through this 00:07:36.000 |
test. Do those words mark what you're about to do? 00:07:40.000 |
And the other one is James 3.17, "The wisdom from above is 00:07:44.000 |
first," and here they come again, "pure, then peaceable, 00:07:56.000 |
Another amazing collection of words that function as 00:08:00.000 |
amazing tests of whether what I'm about to say is 00:08:04.000 |
pure. Is it peaceable? Is it gentle? Is it open 00:08:08.000 |
to reason? Is it merciful? Is it impartial? This is simply 00:08:16.000 |
to check myself, and those are two verses that have functioned 00:08:20.000 |
as sieves for me in dealing with people recently that have been 00:08:28.000 |
to the question about Noel and me—I think part of the question was, "What did we do?"— 00:08:36.000 |
33-year pastoral ministry where I talked to Noel about 00:08:40.000 |
a church issue or about a personal issue, and 00:08:48.000 |
to use these criteria. Will I put her soul at risk? 00:08:52.000 |
Will I burden her in a way that simply would not 00:08:56.000 |
help her and probably wouldn't help me sufficiently to put her at risk? 00:09:08.000 |
that is contrary to 1 Peter 3:8 or contrary to James 3:17? 00:09:12.000 |
And from this perspective, Tony, I would just 00:09:16.000 |
say, "Lord, you know how many times I either succeeded or 00:09:24.000 |
Yes, great potential and great dangers here indeed. Thank you, Pastor John. 00:09:28.000 |
And we're not done talking about you and Noel just yet, Pastor John, because we have a listener 00:09:32.000 |
who wants you to describe what you think a simple and expensive wedding would look like. 00:09:36.000 |
And I know that you don't only advocate for such a thing, but you actually 00:09:40.000 |
pulled it off. That's next week, I think on Tuesday. But coming up on 00:09:44.000 |
Monday, a follow-up question to your article on cremation. Now 00:09:48.000 |
the question is, "Okay, so no to cremation, but can I gift my body 00:09:52.000 |
to science?" That's a really good question. That's on the table on Monday. 00:09:56.000 |
But we're going to break for the weekend now. Feel free to look back on the episodes from the week. Search our 00:10:00.000 |
archive of hundreds of episodes, download the podcast app, or subscribe to the podcast 00:10:04.000 |
or even send us a question of your own. Go to DesiringGod.org/AskPastorJohn. 00:10:10.000 |
I'm your host, Tony Granke, and we will see you on Monday.