back to indexSPAC talk with Chamath Palihapitiya, David Friedberg, David Sacks & Jason Calacanis | from Episode 7
00:00:00.000 |
I think Chamath's point is right, though. There is so much more liquidity available through access 00:00:07.360 |
to retail and international market participants in a public setting than there is in a private 00:00:13.840 |
setting. And it is because of this liquidity premium and the easy access to putting capital in. 00:00:18.240 |
It's just extraordinary how much, as I've watched close friends and companies and companies I've 00:00:23.760 |
invested in, and I'm sure you guys have done the same, transition from private to public, 00:00:28.320 |
the valuation jump is extraordinary on a metrics basis. So whatever the metric might be, 00:00:34.240 |
you get public, there is this flurry of market participation. And as a result, 00:00:38.960 |
it drives up. There's a multiple expansion. Wait, wait. I thought... 00:00:41.200 |
Your BSPR, sorry, can I just say something? That's such an important, 00:00:44.960 |
smart thing that Friedberg said. So Jason, for example, all of us, 00:00:48.720 |
we're all still in the private markets. And I'm not trying to take away from the private markets, 00:00:53.040 |
but what David said is so important. If you used to look at a SaaS deal, 00:00:56.640 |
you'd price that SaaS deal 10 times ARR. Then there's a little bit of inflation, 00:01:01.360 |
the rates go up, the prices that people pay go up. Now all of a sudden we're paying 12 times, 00:01:07.840 |
15 times. Now it's 20 times if you're growing 100% rate over year. So what's happened? 00:01:11.840 |
The market has become more efficient and the excess return is getting eaten up. 00:01:16.240 |
And so you're like, "Okay, well, that's still really good." And you wait four, five, 00:01:20.560 |
six years and you think you're going to get paid. The crazy thing is once that company transitions to 00:01:26.160 |
the public markets, I mean, all of a sudden, if you actually turn the investor base over and you 00:01:31.200 |
actually create a float so that public market guys can buy it, they'll pay 30 times. 00:01:37.040 |
35 times, 40 times. So there's a massive multiple expansion. So 00:01:43.280 |
If you think about this, if I'm trying to raise money for one of my companies, 00:01:46.720 |
I'm going to call on my 10, 20, 30 friends that I know that are investors in private markets and 00:01:52.000 |
say, "Hey guys, do you want to look at this company?" And maybe I'll get two or three 00:01:55.280 |
interested parties and maybe we'll kind of agree on what a fair valuation would be. 00:01:58.960 |
If I could take that same company and instantly make it available to a million investors, 00:02:03.200 |
and all I need to do, by the way, is raise $10 million. All I need is some small number of them 00:02:07.920 |
to write a couple of hundred dollar check. And I'm able to fill that round out. The valuation 00:02:13.200 |
as a result of the liquidity available in that market is so much higher because everyone's going 00:02:17.680 |
to... There's going to be much more participation in bidding. And so, you know, what I think Chamath 00:02:21.520 |
has tapped into with the SPAC vehicle and what Robinhood is realizing, and I don't think that we 00:02:28.160 |
all talk about this enough, but there's this massive, massive, massive market of international 00:02:33.360 |
investors, of small, of international retail investors who are now rushing into US equities. 00:02:38.960 |
Freeberg, didn't we see that in the ICO craze as well? I think if we took anything from the ICO 00:02:45.520 |
craze, it was the global appetite for risk and the dot-com boom before that. And I think we have to 00:02:51.040 |
see that in the market. And I think that's the thing that's really important. And I think that's 00:02:53.600 |
the thing that's really important. And I think that's the thing that's really important. 00:02:54.560 |
Everybody's copying you down the SPAC path, Chamath. At this point, 00:02:58.000 |
I had Desktop Metal as an early angel investment that just SPACed. 00:03:04.000 |
Thank you. Yeah. And then they told me that. Thank you for the markup. And I've been hearing, 00:03:07.920 |
if I'm getting inbound as an angel investor from... I literally got a cold email from some 00:03:13.360 |
high-profile people and they're like, "Hey, do you have anything for us to SPAC?" I mean, 00:03:17.520 |
this is like the third or fourth time people are coming down to my dipshit level of, "Hey, 00:03:20.560 |
do you have anything for us to SPAC?" I'm like, "No, we don't." And they're like, "No, we don't." 00:03:21.200 |
And I'm like, "No, we don't." And they're like, "No, we don't." And I'm like, "No, we don't." And 00:03:21.680 |
they're like, "No, we don't." And I'm like, "No, we don't." And I'm like, "No, we don't." And I'm like, 00:03:21.760 |
"Can you introduce us to the calm guys? Can you introduce them to Robinhood?" And I'm like, 00:03:24.560 |
"I think you can go direct to them." But what is your take on how many SPACs have been created since 00:03:30.640 |
you literally single-handedly restarted the SPAC movement, Chamath? I don't think you've ever gone 00:03:35.680 |
on record about this. I'm really proud of what we did. When we created this thing two years ago, 00:03:41.200 |
I said I want to basically create a new way of doing IPOs. I called it IPO 2.0. I reserved IPO A 00:03:47.200 |
through Z on the NYSE. I hope to fulfill that, and I think I will. But taking a step back for a 00:03:56.480 |
second, in the year 2000, there were 8,000 public companies in America on the American stock 00:04:03.040 |
exchanges. And in the year 2020, there are 4,000. So we've shrunk in half the number of public 00:04:10.560 |
companies while we're still doing IPOs. And that's a huge step forward. And I think that's 00:04:10.720 |
a huge step forward. And I think that's a huge step forward. And I think that's a huge step forward. 00:04:10.960 |
Well, at the same time, we've 10x the amount of capital and the number of people. So we don't 00:04:19.440 |
have a large enough surface area in the public markets. That's why companies are better off going 00:04:24.560 |
public because they're going to have a much more receptive audience of people that are dying to own 00:04:30.480 |
growth of any kind. What's the earliest and the median that people should go public? 00:04:34.480 |
So here's the thing. So if you're one of 30 companies in a venture portfolio that's 00:04:40.240 |
growing at 50 plus percent, you're one of 30. But when you go public, you're one of one. 00:04:47.040 |
When you're growing 50, 60%, you become very unique all of a sudden. You're a 1% kind of a 00:04:53.920 |
company. You're an outlier. And so you get treated incredibly well. So that's the backdrop. I think a 00:05:01.040 |
company should be going public around year five, year six. 00:05:06.080 |
About 50 million. At 50 million, when they're doubling, I think that's a huge step forward. 00:05:09.760 |
And then when they're doubling, I think that they should be going up. And it allows them to build 00:05:13.520 |
capital slowly. It allows them to basically contain control. It minimizes dilution. I think 00:05:19.600 |
it's a really powerful model. And then on the number of SPACs, what I would say is I think it's 00:05:24.000 |
really good that the market is getting diversified. I think what's going to happen is the thing with 00:05:29.520 |
SPACs is it's going to be no different than in some ways the banks that preceded us, 00:05:35.200 |
which is that there's going to be a distribution. You can go to Goldman Sachs, and that'll 00:05:39.280 |
mean one thing. You can go to Merrill Lynch or B of A or UBS or Jefferies. It'll mean other things. 00:05:45.920 |
You can go to Allen and Company. It'll mean yet another different set of things. And I'm sure 00:05:50.000 |
there's going to be an organization that is all about cost. Some is going to be all about 00:05:56.400 |
relationships. So I just think that's going to be the distribution. My personal perspective, it's 00:06:02.080 |
probably us and maybe one or two other people who really dominate the space. And I'll tell you the 00:06:07.760 |
only reason why I say that. I think it's going to be a distribution. I think it's going to be a 00:06:08.800 |
distribution. I think it's going to be a distribution. I think it's going to be a 00:06:10.640 |
really important when these people try to get these SPACs done, what they're going to realize 00:06:14.240 |
is it's really hard. And it's hard for a couple of reasons. Number one is you have to marry 00:06:18.640 |
operational insight and public market sophistication. And the founder will get 00:06:25.200 |
really smart about being able to figure out whether this person is just a financial arbitrage 00:06:29.680 |
or if the person has enough operational experience to deeply understand the business. Why? 00:06:34.320 |
You have to translate it to the public markets well. That's one huge, huge, huge, huge, huge, 00:06:38.320 |
I think that's one huge thing that I think that people will 00:06:41.500 |
will start, we'll start to hone in on. Anyways, there's a bunch 00:06:46.300 |
of other things. But are you now competing with the sacks the 00:06:50.940 |
sacks agree with the 50 million? Yeah, sure. Um, I'm cool with 00:06:54.700 |
that. You know, I invest well before that. So I'd be I'd be 00:06:57.140 |
happy for you probably have a bigger portfolio $50 million 00:07:01.060 |
investments. Yeah, it is. It's great for for for me and Jason, 00:07:04.460 |
and I you know, I think Jumauf deserves a ton of credit one on 00:07:07.440 |
one. It is I don't know if all the listeners are aware of this, 00:07:10.500 |
but the SPAC things become a huge wave. There's a ton of 00:07:13.920 |
people creating them. Kevin Hart says a new one Reid Hoffman 00:07:17.100 |
has a new one. There you're the East Coast hedge fund guys, 00:07:20.100 |
pink us and and then the East Coast hedge funds like Bill 00:07:23.580 |
Ackman, wherever they're all creating them. So Jumauf has 00:07:26.080 |
really started a wave here. And I think the appeal of a SPAC to 00:07:30.000 |
a founder, I'll put in a plug of why I think it's a good idea for 00:07:32.760 |
a founder consider this is because you essentially what 00:07:36.560 |
founders are used to is doing, you know, private rounds, right? 00:07:40.340 |
You agree on a on an amount raised and evaluation, and it's a 00:07:44.300 |
percent dilution and you're done. That's it. And that's 00:07:47.840 |
simple, right? And when you IPO and need to raise money, it's 00:07:51.140 |
not like that you have to then work with an investment bank, 00:07:53.600 |
they'll put together a book you do like a roadshow, you do this 00:07:56.880 |
whole dog and pony thing, you don't know how much money you're 00:07:59.600 |
gonna get at the end of that process or what the valuations 00:08:01.760 |
gonna be. And then on top of that, we know statistically Bill 00:08:05.260 |
Gurley's published all the stats. And then you have a lot of people 00:08:05.620 |
who are going to be like, Oh, Bill Gurley's published all the 00:08:07.360 |
stats, the investment banks are going to rip you off. So you 00:08:10.780 |
know, so that what a SPAC does is it prices like a late stage 00:08:14.800 |
private round, you disagree with a SPAC promoter on evaluation and 00:08:19.420 |
amount raised. And then on top of it, you get kind of a direct 00:08:22.840 |
listing along with it. Now all of a sudden, you start trading 00:08:26.200 |
as a public company. And so a SPAC is like a combination 00:08:29.800 |
direct listing plus private round. And I think that's going 00:08:32.980 |
to be appealing to a lot of founders, as they start to 00:08:35.180 |
It's going to feel more like doing a Series D than it does a 00:08:40.060 |
roadshow. And I think that comfort level for somebody like 00:08:44.300 |
Robinhood or Calm or DataStax or Thumbtack or any of these 00:08:51.380 |
I'm just, listen, I got two IPOs in two years. This is I think 00:08:57.140 |
this is going to be the new thing for early stage investors 00:08:59.780 |
is we're not going to count unicorns anymore. We're going to 00:09:01.500 |
count SPACs. We're going to count public listings, right? And, and 00:09:06.020 |
By the way, the other the other thing that I'll say to founders 00:09:08.560 |
is one is I think you need to you need to think about do these 00:09:12.780 |
people have the combination of operational and financial acumen 00:09:17.900 |
in the public markets and investing experience in the 00:09:22.460 |
public markets and the operational credibility to 00:09:26.460 |
describe the business and I think you can trade off one for 00:09:29.140 |
the other if one is so deep, meaning if Warren Buffett was 00:09:32.720 |
doing his back, you'd say, well, he has no operational 00:09:34.820 |
experience, but he's so credible in the public markets, then, you 00:09:38.540 |
know, that's all that matters. But you need to be super, super 00:09:41.700 |
deep in one or have a really brilliant and thoughtful level 00:09:44.780 |
of credibility in the public's meaning an early stage investor 00:09:48.020 |
who isn't married to somebody who can basically say, I know 00:09:51.260 |
how hedge funds work, I've made them money, and I'm going to 00:09:53.620 |
make them more money, and mutual funds, etc, is troublesome. The 00:09:57.580 |
second thing is for founders, you have to really make sure you 00:10:00.680 |
understand what is in it for the person that's doing this back. I 00:10:04.780 |
in every deal i write a minimum of 100 million dollars personally and that's a lot and so i 00:10:11.660 |
get in the game i feel very much at risk and so i take a lot of time to make sure these things go 00:10:16.380 |
well and then the third is that for the spac person what i'll tell them is they are going to find 00:10:22.060 |
that there's a bunch of landmines and i'm not going to you know say it up front because i 00:10:27.340 |
think it'll be fun for them to find out themselves along the way but these things are hard the first