back to indexWould You Do Work If It Couldn't Be Shared?
Chapters
0:0
0:13 Cal reads the question about doing his work
0:25 Cal's views on impact
1:0 Cal talks about a satisfying career
1:48 Cal does a case study on sports
00:00:04.700 |
Alright, we got another question here from TreeFallingInAForest 00:00:09.700 |
who asks, "Would you do your CS researcher writing if you could not share it?" 00:00:16.700 |
Probably not. I mean, I think impact is an important property of satisfying a meaningful career. 00:00:25.700 |
Knowing that your writing is being read by people, I think, is really valuable and it's fine to prioritize that. 00:00:31.700 |
Knowing that your computer science paper is cited and other people are building on it 00:00:36.700 |
is a real source of satisfaction and is important. 00:00:39.700 |
So I'm not a big believer in this fortune cookie wisdom around careers 00:00:46.700 |
that it should just be the thing you would do if no one was watching. 00:00:50.700 |
Well, I don't think that actually really holds, right? Because it's way too narrow of a view of what a satisfying career is. 00:00:58.700 |
It narrows down to the actual activity that you're doing. 00:01:03.700 |
You know, it's, okay, is the activity you're doing in the moment something that feels good or something like this? 00:01:10.700 |
And career satisfaction is a much more complicated and rich tapestry. 00:01:14.700 |
That's why I talk about it so good they can't ignore you. 00:01:16.700 |
Things like connection to other people, impact on the world, mastery, 00:01:21.700 |
so having an objective measure of you getting better at something, 00:01:24.700 |
these are all part of the tapestry that all weaves together to build a satisfying career. 00:01:28.700 |
So I don't think it's useful to try to separate work from all of that and become obsessively activity-focused. 00:01:34.700 |
Is the actual activity you're doing, you just enjoy doing the activity and that's the only measure? 00:01:39.700 |
I think that's going to be probably way too myopic. 00:01:41.700 |
It's why, for example, sports stars obsess so much about their contract size. 00:01:48.700 |
Again and again, the casual fan will say, "I don't understand. This player likes it here. 00:01:58.700 |
They're being offered more money than they'll ever know what to do with in their life. 00:02:03.700 |
So why throw that all away to go somewhere completely new and to get all of the ire of their fans 00:02:09.700 |
for a little bit more money on top of an amount of money that they would never know how to spend in all of their life?" 00:02:15.700 |
I mean, in other words, what I'm saying is, why, Bryce Harper, why? Come on. 00:02:21.700 |
But if you talk to the more serious sports fan, to the athletes themselves, mastery is important. 00:02:27.700 |
I mean, what else was going to get someone to that top level in something as competitive as sports 00:02:33.700 |
than a real desire to get better and better, to push themselves, to revel in the unambiguous mastery that they have developed? 00:02:43.700 |
One of the ways you measure that mastery is the contract size. 00:02:50.700 |
Bryce Harper cared about the $330 million that the Phillies were offering versus the $300 million that the Nationals were offering. 00:03:01.700 |
And this is exactly the type of conversation with similar numbers I have with my publisher, very similar numbers. 00:03:07.700 |
He cared about that difference because $330 million would have been, it was at that point, I believe, 00:03:13.700 |
the largest contract that had been given to an individual ballplayer. 00:03:18.700 |
Like, that really matters, right? When you're really, the epsilons of mastery, when you're at that level of the game, 00:03:26.700 |
If you just think about it the way we do, it's like, "$300 million seems good to me. It doesn't make sense." 00:03:32.700 |
So this whole divergence, me excising my baseball demons, is really about getting back to this main point, 00:03:39.700 |
which is there's a lot of different attributes that come into making work satisfying, 00:03:42.700 |
and some of those attributes include other people, other people recognizing you, 00:03:46.700 |
you getting unambiguous indicators of mastery, you make an impact on the world. 00:03:50.700 |
That all matters. We can't just think about work in a myopic, activity-focused manner. 00:03:57.700 |
We can't just say, "If you would do this when no one's watching, then that's what you're meant to do." 00:04:01.700 |
Nonsense. Professional life is complicated, and it's social, and there's community aspects to it, 00:04:07.700 |
and there's a lot of interesting, complicated stuff in it. 00:04:10.700 |
So that is why Bryce Harper left, and it's why we should care about how many people actually read what we write.