back to indexHow Facebook and Twitter Change Us
00:00:05.000 |
How is Facebook and Twitter and our online habits changing us? 00:00:09.000 |
This continues to be an unresolved question that presses for clarity, 00:00:13.000 |
and it's a question I've been meaning to ask Dr. Bruce Hindmarsh. 00:00:17.000 |
Bruce is a historian and the James M. Houston Professor of Spiritual Theology 00:00:24.000 |
In my research on the life and theology of John Newton, 00:00:27.000 |
I depended on his groundbreaking research, which was published in his landmark book, 00:00:32.000 |
John Newton and the English Evangelical Tradition. 00:00:37.000 |
Bruce, you're a historian focused on the spiritual life, 00:00:40.000 |
and you are willing to address how technology influences the Christian life today. 00:00:45.000 |
For the next three days, I want to focus on this and bring your very unique perspective to it all. 00:00:50.000 |
So we, of course, live in this age of technological advance 00:00:55.000 |
with all of its glory and all of its conveniences and all of its consequences. 00:01:01.000 |
Digital communications technology like email and texting and social media, 00:01:06.000 |
Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, all of it is relentless, it seems. 00:01:11.000 |
So how do you think this culture of digital technology harms or hinders 00:01:19.000 |
Yeah, that's a really, really important question. 00:01:21.000 |
In many ways, it's an important question of our time, 00:01:25.000 |
and I wish there was more writing being done and more thinking being done about this. 00:01:30.000 |
My colleague Craig Gay is working on a book on this subject, 00:01:33.000 |
and I'm really looking forward to what he's going to say about it. 00:01:36.000 |
But I think one of the things we have to do, first of all, 00:01:43.000 |
And there's a lot of good, intelligent books about this kind of thing, 00:01:51.000 |
It's not just an envelope, and you can just throw the same content 00:01:54.000 |
in any old envelope, and it's the same thing. 00:01:57.000 |
So I think part of that is reframing and how we're thinking 00:02:03.000 |
And the benefits are obvious, and you mentioned some of them, 00:02:07.000 |
the conveniences, the accessibility, the flexibility, 00:02:10.000 |
the unbelievable resourcefulness, the instant nature of the communication 00:02:18.000 |
I think I want to, because those are so obvious, 00:02:21.000 |
I would rather sound the note of some of the dangers 00:02:24.000 |
to the spiritual life of screen communication, 00:02:28.000 |
and communicating through screens and through the digital envelope. 00:02:32.000 |
And people will be all too familiar with these, 00:02:42.000 |
We are all already, just our spiritual condition 00:02:45.000 |
is one of having spiritual ADD, and we are all easily distracted 00:02:49.000 |
from the important issues of our lives moment by moment. 00:02:54.000 |
But the nature of digital communication is that we are endlessly distracted. 00:02:59.000 |
And if that was true already sort of prior to the advent of social media, 00:03:06.000 |
there was enough in the digital world to be distracting. 00:03:10.000 |
It's all the more true in terms of notices and updates. 00:03:13.000 |
Apple Watch has just been released, so that on your very wrist 00:03:16.000 |
you can have all your notifications and so on. 00:03:18.000 |
So one risk to think about is distraction, having a dispersed consciousness. 00:03:24.000 |
I remember one of my teachers saying there are some things in the spiritual life 00:03:28.000 |
you need to be reminded of every six minutes. 00:03:31.000 |
And to be recollected is the old word for this, 00:03:34.000 |
to be recollected that we are in the presence of God, 00:03:38.000 |
and we are living intentionally, living out of a calm center spiritually. 00:03:45.000 |
Another one is trivialization of communication. 00:03:47.000 |
And I think that there is a lot of communication 00:03:57.000 |
And it's not that there aren't very serious things done. 00:04:01.000 |
But if we think, it's hard to imagine the Oxford book of emails, 00:04:06.000 |
There's just something about the media that does allow a trivialization. 00:04:13.000 |
And it's not that profound things can't be written in the digital age. 00:04:17.000 |
I think there's an atomization, I alluded to this, of knowledge 00:04:21.000 |
where in the digital world things are literally like at the level of a code, 00:04:29.000 |
And it means it's harder and harder to see how things are connected to holes, 00:04:33.000 |
to see how things are integrated, how this is a part of, 00:04:38.000 |
this particular insight is a part of God's world, 00:04:41.000 |
is connected to a whole way of seeing the world. 00:04:47.000 |
and we don't understand how this has to do with everything else. 00:04:54.000 |
And in many ways today that hierarchy seems like a bad word. 00:04:57.000 |
But it used to be, like if I wanted to publish something, 00:04:59.000 |
just the expense of publishing means that my proposal goes through a peer review process. 00:05:05.000 |
It goes through rigorous scrutiny, and there's many people who are examining 00:05:09.000 |
what I have to say prior to it being released. 00:05:13.000 |
And there's all sorts of good things about being able to directly get one's message out. 00:05:19.000 |
But the loss of hierarchies is potentially a loss of filtering. 00:05:25.000 |
It means that knowledge is not a part of a system of apprenticeship, 00:05:29.000 |
where there's an apprenticeship, there's a learning from those who have experience 00:05:35.000 |
and wisdom, who've been entrusted and authorized. 00:05:38.000 |
And so there's a way that we've lost that ability to see things in terms of how they relate 00:05:49.000 |
There's a danger of posturing and image posturing in the digital world. 00:05:59.000 |
Everybody seems to have a better life than I do. 00:06:02.000 |
And a long, long time ago at the beginning of the modern period, 00:06:06.000 |
there was a fellow named Jürgen Habermas who just wrote about even with the beginnings 00:06:10.000 |
of periodical press, periodical literature, and the expansion of print media, 00:06:15.000 |
there was a new kind of way of understanding oneself. 00:06:18.000 |
And that is that we have an audience-oriented sense of self. 00:06:21.000 |
We understand ourselves as communicating to an audience. 00:06:25.000 |
And anybody who's been on Facebook understands all of a sudden you're just constantly 00:06:34.000 |
And there's something about that that can be very damaging to realism. 00:06:38.000 |
And thin rather than thick communication is like you're communicating through a pipeline. 00:06:44.000 |
The first kind of committee meetings I've been a part of are the ones that are by conference call. 00:06:50.000 |
You don't get three-dimensional feedback and all the richness of communication 00:06:55.000 |
of being face-to-face, all the nuances and so on. 00:06:59.000 |
And most important, and you can forget all the rest of those as if that isn't the long enough list, 00:07:05.000 |
but is the disembodied relationships, the disembodiment. 00:07:10.000 |
And I think that's the most significant thing. 00:07:14.000 |
For all of the friends we have on Facebook, this is a lonely world. 00:07:21.000 |
Bodies, being present bodily to each other is so important. 00:07:25.000 |
Bodies are not what define the limits of my autonomy. 00:07:28.000 |
My body defines the extent of my availability. 00:07:33.000 |
It's my body that allows me to be present to give and receive love. 00:07:38.000 |
My body is what makes me available to others and makes them available to me. 00:07:43.000 |
And this digital world of not now, not you, and not here is disembodied. 00:07:49.000 |
So I think one of the most radical things we can do as Christians right now in this world 00:07:54.000 |
is face-to-face communication, and preferably around a dinner table, around a meal. 00:08:04.000 |
I think that's a bit of a coax, and I think that Christ left us with a meal in the upper room. 00:08:08.000 |
But being face-to-face around a meal is actually a radical context for discipleship, I think. 00:08:15.000 |
I think those are formal dangers, and I think the dangers in terms of content 00:08:21.000 |
is most of the dangers I'm most concerned about are formal. 00:08:27.000 |
The dangers in terms of content, I think the principal danger, there's many, 00:08:31.000 |
is pornography. It is unprecedented pornographic world, 00:08:37.000 |
and the combination of pornography and privacy and no cost is, I think, 00:08:43.000 |
we have yet to see the impact of that on a whole generation worldwide. 00:08:49.000 |
So I think there's a certain kind of ebullience for many evangelicals, 00:08:57.000 |
We always want to use the latest tools to communicate the gospel, and that's fantastic. 00:09:03.000 |
But I think we have to be very intelligent and thoughtful about discipleship 00:09:10.000 |
in this environment, and what it means for people to be formed in this environment. 00:09:15.000 |
And I think these are early days. As a historian, I have to say, 00:09:20.000 |
these are pretty early days. And I think I'm optimistic that the wisdom of the Church, 00:09:26.000 |
the wisdom of Christian people, that we will find ways to live. 00:09:30.000 |
This is God's world, and the Internet, nothing about this surprised God. 00:09:36.000 |
And God is present in the digital world, and He will redeem this world. 00:09:40.000 |
And people will be able to act redemptively in this context. 00:09:44.000 |
But I think these are early days for discovering what wisdom looks like. 00:09:48.000 |
Yeah, those are wise words of counsel as we navigate these uncharted waters. 00:09:53.000 |
Thank you, Dr. Hyde and Marsh. And of course, all of this raises the question 00:09:57.000 |
over how we strategically get away from the distractions, 00:10:00.000 |
what we could call technology fasting from our iPhones. 00:10:04.000 |
Bruce, I want to ask you for your thoughts on this on Monday. 00:10:07.000 |
I'm your host, Tony Reinke. Have a wonderful weekend.