back to indexDoes Justification-Centered Sanctification Lead to Antinomianism?
00:00:05.680 |
Steve writes in to ask this, "Pastor John, can our emphasis on gospel-centered 00:00:10.400 |
sanctification, rooted in our justification, lead to antinomianism?" 00:00:15.440 |
In the sinfulness and finiteness and fallibility and cultural limitations of the human heart, 00:00:24.720 |
any way of thinking can lead to any other way of thinking. 00:00:31.920 |
In my sin, in our sin, we are not rational. Sin is not rational. It's insane. It's irrational. 00:00:41.920 |
It's suicidal. So if it looks like there's no possible path from God-centeredness and 00:00:49.360 |
justification to a lawless life, that's a mirage. There is a path from anywhere to anywhere in the 00:00:58.000 |
mind of the flesh. In the darkness of sin, two plus two is five. And gospel plus justification 00:01:06.560 |
is antinomianism. But that's not probably what Steve is asking. He probably knows this. He wants 00:01:16.720 |
to know, well, how might it lead there? I mean, how might it lead there? So let me just think 00:01:23.680 |
out loud for a minute. Let's start with a robust affirmation for gospel-centered life. Yes, 00:01:29.200 |
absolutely. What else would you want your life to be centered on but the gospel? And let's start 00:01:34.640 |
with a robust affirmation of justification-rooted sanctification. Where else would you want to root 00:01:41.360 |
your justification than in the fact that God has declared you righteous before him already? 00:01:47.440 |
There certainly is no sanctification for the unjustified. So yes, yes, yes. Gospel-centered 00:01:54.080 |
life, justification-rooted life. But the question is, how does the gospel work at the center? How 00:02:02.960 |
does calling it central give it effectiveness in our lives? There's the question. Until we explain 00:02:10.080 |
how the gospel centrality brings about justification or brings about sanctification, 00:02:17.120 |
we're just sloganeering, probably. And how does justification work as the root of sanctification? 00:02:27.840 |
How does the declaration of righteousness bring about the fruit of righteousness? Paul says, 00:02:36.240 |
Paul prays in Philippians 1, "Believers should be filled, that believers would be filled with 00:02:42.720 |
the fruit of righteousness." How does justification help that happen? That's where we can go off the 00:02:48.800 |
rails. And what I have found is that when we start talking about this, the devil is in the 00:02:55.920 |
definitions or the absence of the definitions. There's a common saying, "The devil is in the 00:03:01.920 |
details." Well, right. Broad-sweeping generalizations are hard to disagree with 00:03:08.720 |
because they don't say anything clear and specific. The devil is in the detailed definitions, 00:03:16.160 |
and the truth is in the detailed definitions, and we can't recognize the one from the other 00:03:20.640 |
until we get to those detailed definitions. So on this issue of justification and sanctification, 00:03:27.280 |
the term antinomianism is often, it's not defined enough for me to know what to say. I'm not sure 00:03:35.280 |
what people are referring to when they talk about it. It contains the word law, nomian, and anti, 00:03:43.200 |
which means against or in the place of, so it can mean a person is against the law as a way of 00:03:50.640 |
salvation. But what's in mind with the word law here? All imperatives, Mosaic law, whole Old 00:03:59.760 |
Testament, ceremonial law, ethnic Jewish markers, and what is meant by the word way, in way of 00:04:06.960 |
salvation. Do they mean law-keeping as a way of earning salvation, or do they mean way in the 00:04:14.560 |
sense of path, so that they are saying we don't even walk in the path of love, which is a fulfillment 00:04:21.200 |
of all the law? So I just want to scream sometimes, say, "Oh, for definitions, please, definitions." 00:04:28.560 |
Does antinomian mean anti-godliness, anti-holiness of life, anti-fruit of the Holy Spirit, 00:04:34.800 |
anti-obedience of faith? It would be a lot clearer if people said what they precisely 00:04:43.440 |
mean if they're going to accuse somebody of being antinomian or if they're going to distance 00:04:48.800 |
themselves from antinomianism. I'm just constantly crying out for definitions and for the freedom 00:04:56.720 |
from ambiguities in the absence of these kinds of failed or absent definitions. So here's what I 00:05:08.560 |
would ask a person who exalts in God-centeredness and justification in relation to sanctification. 00:05:15.040 |
Does your view mean the obedience of faith or the work of faith, as it's called in 2 Thessalonians 00:05:24.560 |
111, or the fruit of the Spirit or the fruit of righteousness, as it's called in Philippians 111, 00:05:30.400 |
or practical holiness and purity of life? Does your view mean any of these are unimportant 00:05:38.240 |
or unessential in the Christian life? And then I would say, "How important or how essential are 00:05:44.320 |
they?" And then I would say, "How does the gospel at the center and justification at the root bring 00:05:51.600 |
these about?" And the answer to those questions will reveal whether gospel-centeredness and 00:05:58.880 |
justification-rootedness have begun to undermine a life of holiness or not. 00:06:06.160 |
Thank you, Pastor John. So you left us hanging on how exactly gospel-centeredness and 00:06:11.120 |
justification work. And so we'll go there tomorrow. Thanks for listening to this episode of the Ask 00:06:16.000 |
Pastor John podcast, featuring longtime pastor and bestselling author, John Piper. Please visit us 00:06:21.520 |
online at DesiringGod.org to find thousands of books, articles, sermons, and other resources, 00:06:26.000 |
all free of charge from John Piper, and all intended to help explain why God is most glorified 00:06:30.880 |
in us when we are most satisfied in Him. I'm your host Tony Renke. We'll see you tomorrow.