back to indexCan I Live a Deep Life When Only Focusing on My Local Community?
Chapters
0:0
0:30 Question for Cal about living a Deep Life if only focused on local community
1:0 Cal explains how community is a bucket of the Deep Life
1:40 Cal talks about the different layers of community
3:11 Cal suggests to move in order from narrow to broad
4:10 Cal talks about how the internet now allows for people to skip steps
00:00:07.440 |
This one comes from Ezra. Ezra says, "Is it really a deep life if it's entirely focused on my 00:00:15.120 |
local community?" As Ezra then elaborates, "When you talk about the deep life, it sounds to me 00:00:22.400 |
often utilitaristic"—I think you might mean utilitarianistic—"in the sense that all the 00:00:28.880 |
buckets you mentioned have the purpose of making me feel good, satisfied, connected, etc. But what 00:00:33.760 |
about the people we do not get in direct contact with? Shouldn't that be part of a deep life ethic, 00:00:40.880 |
one that urges us to care about all of humanity? Of course, it makes no sense to talk about social 00:00:46.160 |
injustice and then ignore the needs of the people in our immediate neighborhood, but shouldn't 00:00:49.280 |
that be a step after looking further?" So Ezra, when we're thinking about the different buckets 00:00:57.680 |
of the deep life, it sounds like we're honing in here on the community bucket. 00:01:01.120 |
I do often talk about, when I give examples about overhauling that area of your life, 00:01:07.600 |
getting involved and giving back to people in your immediate community, but I think you're 00:01:14.880 |
absolutely right that there are broad interpretations of community as well 00:01:19.120 |
that are important. So at the most narrow interpretation, community is going to be your 00:01:24.480 |
family. All right? These are my kids, my wife, my siblings. This is a really big priority. I want to 00:01:32.640 |
make sure that I am serving them, I am there for them. Then we move out to a slightly broader scope 00:01:37.280 |
and you get to your friends. These are people I know and like and spend time with. These are my 00:01:42.480 |
friends. I want to be there. I want to serve them. Someone has a kid. I'm going to go over there. I'm 00:01:46.720 |
going to help them. I'm going to cook them dinner. Someone gets sick. I'm going to be there to make 00:01:50.080 |
sure that the errands get done, that their car oil still gets changed. Broaden out further and you get 00:01:57.440 |
to your geographically proximate neighborhood and community. Okay, here's the town I live in. 00:02:03.200 |
Here's the suburb I live in. I want to be involved, right? This is where you might also have 00:02:09.120 |
community group involvements. My church, a volunteer effort that I do. So now you're dealing 00:02:15.840 |
with, these aren't maybe your close friends, but people who have some sort of geographical proximity 00:02:21.280 |
to you. Beyond that, relevant to your question, the scope will broaden to serving people in the 00:02:29.120 |
broader human community. And this is where you might be involved in causes or issues that have 00:02:35.200 |
no real relevant geographic proximity to you. I'm working on climate change issues. I'm working on 00:02:44.800 |
issues with injustice in prisons or something where now you are outside of, these are people 00:02:49.520 |
that are actually related to me or around me all the time. And I think that could be really 00:02:53.360 |
important as well. And when you're doing an overhaul of the community aspect of your deep life, 00:02:59.120 |
that needs to be in the mix. The one thing I will say though, and I'm far from the first person to 00:03:07.120 |
note this, is that moving in order from the narrowest scopes towards the largest scopes 00:03:14.960 |
is almost always the recipe for making the most sustainable long-term impact. If you jump past 00:03:24.400 |
your family, past your friends, past local organizations and your geographically proximate 00:03:29.280 |
neighborhood straight to global issues that you want to be involved in, that's a risky move. 00:03:36.480 |
Because you don't have this foundation. You don't have this foundation of what it feels like to 00:03:41.920 |
sacrifice on behalf of others. You don't have the empathy. You don't have the patience born of this 00:03:47.040 |
actual, much more, let's call it human-compatible type community service. I say human-compatible 00:03:52.480 |
just because it's what we're wired to expect, to actually see eye to eye and spend time with 00:03:56.160 |
the people that we are serving. You want to build that foundation, then you can better serve the 00:04:00.640 |
larger causes. You get your local house in order and then you can go build houses for others as 00:04:06.160 |
well. This tends to be the right way to do it. Now the internet, because it has erased, obviously, 00:04:12.160 |
the obstacles of distance with low friction digital communication, has created a moment 00:04:17.440 |
in which we can skip those early steps. Up until about 30 years ago, I mean, this was what community 00:04:24.240 |
was going to be because it wasn't easy to be involved with a cause halfway across the country 00:04:29.280 |
because you couldn't talk to the people over there. You couldn't find out about it. But now 00:04:32.080 |
you can be on Twitter opining on anything, anywhere. You can be right in the mix on national 00:04:39.840 |
political issues, national causes, international causes. This is really new. 30 years ago, 00:04:45.520 |
you might be upset with the president, but you didn't really have a lot of time in your life 00:04:51.200 |
spent talking publicly about the president or what you don't like about the president because who was 00:04:55.840 |
going to listen? Your neighbors and your wife at some point would say, "Okay, I get it. This isn't 00:05:01.040 |
interesting. But today you could be on Facebook, you could be on Twitter, you could be on Instagram. 00:05:03.680 |
Everyone's involved at all these different levels." That opens up a lot of opportunities for a lot of 00:05:09.360 |
good. It opens up a lot of opportunities for a lot more people to get involved in advocacy. That's 00:05:13.600 |
all great. But as with all things that are new, there are dangers. And I think this is the danger 00:05:19.600 |
here is that if you're 23 and you jump past all those lower scopes of community so that you can 00:05:25.040 |
weigh in on Putin, that is going to be an unstable foundation for trying to give back and trying to 00:05:32.640 |
serve. On the other hand, if you have the patience and empathy and experience of serving your family, 00:05:37.600 |
serving your friends, serving your local community, and then on top of that, can really get involved 00:05:42.320 |
in something that's larger scale, something that you would have had a hard time being involved in 00:05:46.320 |
in a pre-internet world, that involvement is going to be, I think, not only much more successful, 00:05:50.160 |
but also more meaningful for you. You're going to be able to extract more out of it. You're going 00:05:54.400 |
to be able to approach it with more of a moral maturity. So I don't mean to turn my answer here 00:06:00.400 |
into a rant, because basically all of this stuff is good. No one is going to be upset at anyone for 00:06:05.840 |
doing giving back to the community at any scale. And it's better to be doing some of that than 00:06:09.680 |
none of that like so many do. But that tends to be my advice. Don't forget the old fashioned human 00:06:14.640 |
compatible, I can see you, look you in the eye. I am servicing and serving you, even though 00:06:20.480 |
sometimes you say things that annoy me and we don't belong to exactly the same tight ideological, 00:06:26.480 |
geographically sorted tribe. Like, yeah, my neighbor down the street is odd as far as I'm 00:06:31.840 |
concerned in this way, but you know what, I'm still helping them because they're going through 00:06:35.360 |
a hard time. I think it's really, really important. And we should not allow the easy access we have 00:06:40.720 |
to the sort of low friction advocacy that's on unlimited scale. Don't let that get in the way 00:06:47.200 |
of the harder local eye to eye community service. Do them both start with the local, 00:06:52.880 |
but then also move on to the global. That would be the recipe I'd recommend.