back to indexWhat Authors Counter Your Career Capital Theory? | Deep Questions Podcast with Cal Newport
Chapters
0:0 Cal's intro
1:21 Cal listens to a question about authors countering career capital theory
2:20 Cal talks about nuanced understanding of topics
2:32 Definition of Career Capital
3:36 Building a good life that meshes with your values
4:45 Cal lists some books to read
00:00:06.560 |
All right. That was a great bit there. Our next call is about 00:00:11.920 |
basically talking about those Conor arguments, but in this 00:00:15.840 |
case, it's authors that run counter to your career capital 00:00:22.280 |
Hey, Cal, my name is Donald and I'm thinking about transitioning 00:00:28.240 |
my career as we move cities, my fiance and I. And so my question 00:00:32.760 |
today is actually about how to have two conflicting ideas about 00:00:36.880 |
something. How do we hold those? I know you talk a lot about the 00:00:41.240 |
making sure we're reading different authors and different 00:00:44.120 |
perspectives on a theory, or whatever that might be to make 00:00:47.600 |
sure that you're getting both sides and letting those sit with 00:00:50.720 |
with you and kind of battle it out, so to speak. And I read so 00:00:56.280 |
good, they can't ignore you pretty early on in my career. And 00:00:58.200 |
I am a big believer in it. And I'm 10 or 12 years into my 00:01:01.880 |
career now. And I've gained this capital, but I have this other 00:01:05.720 |
passion that's kind of nagging at me. And from the career 00:01:10.200 |
capital side, I know I shouldn't necessarily follow that passion 00:01:13.800 |
right now. But I'm curious if you know of any authors, books 00:01:17.360 |
or other people on this topic that might run counter to your 00:01:22.000 |
career capital theory. I firmly believe in it. But I'm also 00:01:25.520 |
trying to practice what we preach around here about making 00:01:27.760 |
sure to have different opinions to, to allow to help me kind of 00:01:33.080 |
make this decision. Would love any thoughts you have. And 00:01:35.520 |
again, just really appreciate what you do. Thanks, Cal. 00:01:37.840 |
All right, well, now I'm wishing he had told us what the passion 00:01:42.280 |
was. Because that could be actually be pretty relevant for 00:01:46.080 |
thinking about this. But I like your approach here, because what 00:01:49.600 |
I preach, which is having differing, smart opinions about 00:01:54.160 |
things in your head at the same time gives you a more nuanced 00:01:57.720 |
understanding of the world. And we were just joking in the last 00:01:59.960 |
caller, but we were talking about Alan Jacobs essay, and he 00:02:03.320 |
had a different take on productivity than mine, and 00:02:05.000 |
we're kind of joking about it. But actually, that collision. So 00:02:08.360 |
my sort of dorkish New York article, versus like, Alan 00:02:11.760 |
Jacobs, Hedgehog Review article, crash those together. And what 00:02:16.120 |
you come away with is not a one exploded. And this one is right, 00:02:19.400 |
you have a more nuanced understanding of the topic, 00:02:21.600 |
which I think is excellent. So if we're thinking about career 00:02:23.400 |
capital theory, what are good things to push up against that? 00:02:27.920 |
Well, again, let's clarify exactly what career capital 00:02:30.800 |
theory is saying. What it's saying is that typically, the 00:02:33.800 |
things that make a good job good are rare and valuable. So you 00:02:37.760 |
have to have something rare and valuable to offer in return. And 00:02:41.440 |
in the professional context, it'll be rare and valuable 00:02:43.560 |
skills. So get better at things that are valuable, then use 00:02:45.880 |
those things as leverage to shape your career in ways that 00:02:48.120 |
resonate. That's a pretty repeatable path towards feeling 00:02:52.440 |
really good about your career. There's other takes on this, 00:02:55.680 |
obviously, like the straw man take, which is popular in 00:02:59.640 |
culture, but is rarely I think, articulated in good books. So 00:03:04.360 |
simplicitly, the straw man alternative is just no, no, 00:03:06.800 |
follow your passion, you're inborn to do one thing. If you 00:03:09.080 |
do that thing, you'll love it. If you don't, you won't. But 00:03:10.880 |
that's a bit of a straw man, because I would say that the 00:03:13.760 |
more important counterpoints to career capital theory would be a 00:03:16.960 |
little bit more subtle. So one of the counterpoints you should 00:03:19.440 |
try to encounter, and I think Wendell Berry, who we talked 00:03:21.800 |
about at the beginning of the show is a good example of this, 00:03:24.120 |
is, and the Jacobs essay we just read, is the whole strain of 00:03:28.840 |
thought that says, shaping your career shouldn't be the most 00:03:31.920 |
important thing anyways. What matters is building a good life 00:03:36.000 |
based on values that is important, and you might need 00:03:39.320 |
some money in there. So you have a job, but stop thinking so 00:03:41.320 |
much about your job anyways, except for to the degree to 00:03:43.560 |
that, which it steps on other things that are important to 00:03:46.800 |
you. This is like Barry leaving his teaching job in New York to 00:03:50.360 |
go, you know, live in Kentucky. But there's any numbers of 00:03:54.120 |
examples of books where you see people building a life of 00:03:59.760 |
meaning off of focusing on values that maybe have very 00:04:04.280 |
little to do with their work. So I mean, I can give you some 00:04:07.080 |
specific suggestions here. Go back and read a classic, like 00:04:11.400 |
Thomas Merton, with the Seven Story Mountain, I believe it's 00:04:15.640 |
called, which is about him. It's a memoir. I'm actually reading 00:04:18.560 |
it right now, it's one of my March books. But a memoir about 00:04:21.800 |
how he also, like Barry, left life in New York as a writer, 00:04:25.760 |
and eventually becoming a monk, and writing about the 00:04:29.320 |
experience. And it was very inspirational to a lot of 00:04:32.320 |
people. But he just downgraded the professional aspect of his 00:04:36.440 |
life. Richard Rohr's book, R-O-H-R, I want to get this 00:04:41.880 |
right, falling...can you look this up, Jesse? Richard Rohr, 00:04:44.800 |
Falling Up? Falling...it's falling something, Jesse's 00:04:53.960 |
Falling Upward. That's a book I read, Richard Rohr, R-O-H-R. 00:04:58.040 |
He's also a Catholic, in a Catholic order. I think he 00:05:03.720 |
might be a Franciscan. It's about how in the second half of 00:05:08.760 |
life, building your life around service to others is the source 00:05:11.920 |
of the deepest meaning. David Brooks read Richard Rohr, and 00:05:16.240 |
then wrote basically his own version of Falling Upward. It's 00:05:18.800 |
called The Second Mountain, which is again, I would read The 00:05:21.080 |
Second Mountain, I would throw that right against So Good They 00:05:23.360 |
Can't Ignore You. They'll hit together, and sparks will fly 00:05:26.760 |
and something even better will emerge. So The Second Mountain 00:05:29.800 |
is about how maybe the first half of your adult life is aimed 00:05:34.080 |
towards what he calls resume values, building up your career, 00:05:37.600 |
making it the way you like. But then the second half of your 00:05:39.800 |
adult life is where you really focus on eulogy values. And it's 00:05:43.240 |
again, service to others, connection to other people. You 00:05:45.560 |
see David Brooks struggling with building meaning beyond just his 00:05:49.960 |
otherwise very successful career. So you read those type 00:05:52.360 |
of books, and you get this counterpoint that says, "Yeah, 00:05:54.320 |
whatever." Right? Like your work is what it is, but it's not 00:05:58.560 |
going to be at the core of a life well lived. So I think 00:06:01.360 |
that's what you might want to read. Because my concern here, 00:06:05.440 |
and again, I don't know what the passion is you're talking about, 00:06:07.560 |
but if it's a professional passion, my concern here is that 00:06:11.800 |
it's possible that you're heading towards this second 00:06:15.360 |
mountain in life, this Richard Rohr falling upwards. And you're 00:06:19.160 |
feeling that dissatisfaction, that hunger, a soul ache, so 00:06:23.960 |
it's something quite deep. And you're saying, you're looking 00:06:26.640 |
just within the professional lane. So maybe I need to change 00:06:30.200 |
my job. And if my job was something that was more 00:06:33.120 |
passionate about, I would get that back. That's possible. I 00:06:35.280 |
think it changes everything else in your life. 00:06:37.760 |
So I think those books are going to find useful. I think also 00:06:40.400 |
just my deep life philosophy in general, it's not contrary to 00:06:45.120 |
So Good They Can't Ignore You, but it generalizes it and 00:06:47.640 |
contains it. Because my deep life philosophy, which again, 00:06:51.240 |
there's a recorded a core idea video on this. So go to 00:06:54.360 |
youtube.com/calnewportmedia, go to the core ideas playlist, go 00:06:59.040 |
to the deep life, the deep life core idea video, is it 00:07:03.040 |
constrains that professional part to just one of four or five 00:07:06.120 |
different areas that we call buckets that you focus on. And 00:07:09.560 |
when you see the four or five different buckets of your life, 00:07:11.880 |
you're then caring about how they interact and connect with 00:07:14.840 |
each other, you're not just prioritizing one over the other. 00:07:17.080 |
So you might find those exercises useful too. And again, 00:07:20.440 |
they don't repudiate So Good They Can't Ignore You, but they 00:07:23.920 |
constrain it and put into a larger context. That's a good 00:07:27.240 |
question. And that is what I'd recommend. I think you're going 00:07:31.760 |
to get some good feedback there, get some good pushback. 00:07:36.040 |
And I'm glad you're seeking that. All right, do we have a 00:07:39.600 |
caller now, Jesse, where they're like, I just wanted to tell you, 00:07:42.400 |
you're brilliant. And your work is 100% right. And they like 00:07:47.880 |
your part. And I like the part in your hair and you don't look 00:07:50.400 |
dorky. And I think you're cool. Like Che Guevara, we just get 00:07:52.840 |
one caller that says that. Jesse is shaking his head no.