back to indexMath Meme Review with Grant Sanderson (3Blue1Brown)
00:00:00.000 |
And now for a bit of fun, here's Math Meme Review with Grant Sanderson, aka 3Blue1Brown, 00:00:06.880 |
that we did after the recently released podcast conversation that you should check out. And also, 00:00:13.280 |
thank you to our sponsors, DoorDash, Dollar Shave Club, and Cash App. Click the links in 00:00:18.560 |
the description to get a discount and to support this podcast. Here we go. 00:00:22.160 |
I don't know if I actually know what the goal of a meme review is, but I'll just give it to you. 00:00:30.400 |
Just what do you make of the absurd fact that when you divide by zero, that's not allowed, 00:00:36.080 |
that breaks the universe? And my review is that the devils in the upper right quadrant 00:00:41.600 |
aren't nearly appreciative enough of projective geometry. So that's my review of them. 00:00:47.920 |
It's been this. Oh, yeah. OK. This is a machine. 00:00:51.920 |
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, expecting different results. 00:00:56.480 |
Yeah. Well, machine learning is doing it over and over again, but bigger. 00:01:04.240 |
So sometimes, you know, quantity has a quality all of its own. 00:01:07.520 |
Yeah, scale. Just like with GPT-3, there's some magic that happens. 00:01:12.720 |
Yeah. Einstein didn't have 175 billion parameters. That's my review of that meme. 00:01:18.240 |
This one, whatever numbers you think, whenever you think you know numbers, 00:01:22.480 |
my review is it's not sufficiently mindful of diversity concerns and how the peodics are 00:01:28.240 |
consistently underrepresented in people's conception of what the different number systems 00:01:32.240 |
are. So I think it's, I'm going to say narrow-minded. That's my review of that one. 00:01:37.440 |
All right, you study college-level math. Yes, I am almost done with my bachelor's degree, 00:01:42.800 |
so you know a lot of math. This one is uncomfortably true. 00:01:47.760 |
This is to our point, is when you get your degree in math. 00:02:05.920 |
I think there's, so what is that? I think that's a fish eating a cat. 00:02:11.440 |
Yeah, no, so it's a cat eating a fish, and then the fish eating the cat. So 00:02:16.320 |
I just have to say A+. This should be in every algebra textbook. That's my meme review. 00:02:20.960 |
I poured root beer into a squared glass. Now I just have beer. 00:02:29.760 |
Not impressed. Engineering. Got Mythbusters and such. Physics. 00:02:35.520 |
Oh, this is a prior discussion. This is a prior discussion. 00:02:40.480 |
No one thinks that you could popularize math. 00:02:44.320 |
So it ends with, that is insightful. Poignant. 00:02:48.480 |
So do you think there could be a cosmos for mathematics? 00:02:53.520 |
Yeah, I actually, I think there's huge appetite for it. I think Numberphile proves this fact. 00:03:00.080 |
And your channel, I mean that's true, but there's not, for some reason, 00:03:03.680 |
do you think there'll be a Netflix show one day with theā¦ 00:03:06.080 |
Anyone at Netflix is watching this, I will host it for you. You just call me. 00:03:12.480 |
But do you think you could have a general public kind of show like Cosmos and do mathematics? 00:03:19.360 |
100%. I think it wouldn't be easy because you've got this tight line between are you 00:03:24.400 |
doing it substantively or are you just waving your hands? I think there's enough really 00:03:28.160 |
interesting math that you can substantively get across. And I do think there's a pretty 00:03:31.600 |
big appetite for it. The reason I say Numberphile isn't just that Numberphile is great, but that 00:03:36.560 |
Brady has like 10 projects of very similarly styled channels, and Numberphile is the biggest 00:03:41.280 |
among them by far. But they're all successful. They're all successful, but I would have guessed 00:03:45.200 |
if you were just pitching these products, you know, like 10 years ago, like, oh, the channel 00:03:48.240 |
on physics will be very popular, the chemistry one will be pretty popular, the numbers one, 00:03:51.920 |
I don't know, some people, that might be like third or something. But the idea that the one 00:03:55.600 |
about math is the most popular of his channels by far, even though they're similar styles, 00:04:00.880 |
it does, I do think speaks to the fact that there is a unsatiated appetite for real, 00:04:09.680 |
a real understanding of what gets mathematicians going. 00:04:12.000 |
And I think a Netflix type entity might recognize that. 00:04:22.240 |
Oh, it's getting shaved. It's every time it's shaving half of the remaining hair. 00:04:39.920 |
That's my review. No substantive descriptions, just I love it. 00:04:45.600 |
Yeah, "Cotechin, Seacant, and Kosyngin, you deserve to be quiet over there. Who needs you?" 00:04:49.840 |
Oh, you don't give them the love? You think sine, cosine, tangent, 00:04:52.720 |
So you make the calculus of like tangent look a little bit more compact, while kind of be confusing 00:04:57.280 |
to every single calculus student there that's like, wait, what was Seacant again? Just write 00:05:01.200 |
it as one over cosine squared. It's not that many more symbols. 00:05:03.440 |
Oh, you're contributing to the problem. Well, thank you for doing the most absurd 00:05:07.520 |
thing I probably have ever done. You probably have ever done. I appreciate it.