back to indexDOJ targets Nvidia, Meme stock comeback, Trump fundraiser in SF, Apple/OpenAI, Texas stock market
Chapters
0:0 Besties intros!
2:10 Responding to recent media coverage
17:58 DOJ/FTC strike deal to target Nvidia, OpenAI, and Microsoft
32:40 Meme stocks are back: Keith Gill aka Roaring Kitty resurfaces, disclosing nine figure position in GameStop
58:36 Citadel and BlackRock back TXSE to take on NYSE and Nasdaq
62:34 Apple to announce OpenAI iPhone deal at WWDC
69:7 Science Corner: Alarming ocean temps continue, what to expect for hurricane season
00:00:00.000 |
Hey, everybody, welcome to the world's greatest podcast. With 00:00:03.480 |
me again, the world's number one podcast. Yes, the world's 00:00:06.180 |
number one podcast. We came in eighth last week, I think for 00:00:08.880 |
those of you looking at the iTunes rankings, which is 00:00:12.040 |
absurd. We've only got to be number eight across all of 00:00:15.760 |
Apple. Something like that. Yeah, whatever their top 00:00:18.520 |
episodes are on the weekends. Well, that means we crushed on 00:00:20.880 |
Spotify, then. Probably Yeah, I would guess. I don't I don't 00:00:25.160 |
know all the rankings, but and and I guess on YouTube, we got 00:00:28.320 |
labeled with some COVID thing magic. I mean, it's what's going 00:00:32.400 |
on at YouTube a joke, like literally you're labeling COVID 00:00:36.080 |
at this point. I mean, what a joke. Oh, my lord. 00:00:39.240 |
So I guess we have to at the top of the show talk about the 00:00:46.920 |
fundraiser. And I guess this like Vinod Khosla came in hot 00:00:50.840 |
this week and attacked the besties. Let's play the clip. 00:00:55.680 |
What is your sense of the shifting winds in the valley 00:00:58.520 |
around politics? I think for a very long time, the valley was 00:01:01.520 |
seen as sort of a liberal bastion. But you know, if you 00:01:05.480 |
listen to Elon Musk, or you listen to all in podcast and 00:01:10.320 |
that gang and others, it seems to be shifting potentially 00:01:14.560 |
towards former President Trump. Is that just a small pocket? Or 00:01:18.120 |
do you think that that's a real shift in terms of the way the 00:01:24.000 |
The first thing I would say is all in podcast, and some of the 00:01:28.160 |
supporters there are not based in the valley. I would say 00:01:32.080 |
there's a bunch of MAGA extremists in every part of 00:01:35.640 |
society. And I hope we can prevent them from destroying 00:01:40.720 |
democracy, which is probably the most important issue we face. 00:01:44.160 |
All right, snacks. Why are you destroying democracy? 00:01:51.480 |
All right, David. If I know was at the conference, he got a 00:02:14.640 |
little chippy here. Maybe he got a little bit out of line. He's a 00:02:17.000 |
little bit out of line. What's your take? A little bit a little 00:02:19.640 |
bit? A little bit? Well, first of all, Vinod should realize 00:02:23.640 |
we're not MAGA extremists or extremists of any sort, because 00:02:26.600 |
he's at all in summit last year. He was great. Yeah, we like what 00:02:29.680 |
he had to say productive. I certainly don't dispute his 00:02:32.360 |
expertise and track record in tech. But in addition to that, 00:02:37.320 |
then he's saying that we're not based in Silicon Valley. We're 00:02:40.160 |
not from Silicon Valley. We've all been here for decades. And 00:02:42.080 |
then he doubled down on that in the tweet. So that's a bizarre 00:02:45.240 |
statement. Maybe he thinks he gets to define people in or out 00:02:49.120 |
of Silicon Valley. I don't really understand it. But to be 00:02:52.360 |
frank, this is one of a series of statements that he's made 00:02:56.640 |
recently that I can only call insulting and childish. First, 00:03:02.560 |
he had this tweet that he said that Trump supporters were 00:03:05.920 |
lacking in empathy and caring. Then he had another tweet where 00:03:09.640 |
he said that Trump supporters weren't teaching good values to 00:03:12.920 |
their kids. This cause Sean McGuire, who's a partner in 00:03:16.480 |
Sequoia to quote tweet him saying that I think that I'd 00:03:20.440 |
rather raise my kids to grow up to take after Ivanka Trump than 00:03:24.680 |
100 Biden. Yeah, and that got like something like 20,000 likes 00:03:28.800 |
and it was one of those brutal ratios I've ever seen on a 00:03:31.880 |
tweet. So in any event, I mean, this is just one in a series of 00:03:36.600 |
partisan tweets. And look, I think you can take whatever 00:03:38.960 |
position you want on a political candidate. I can understand. If 00:03:42.440 |
he doesn't like Trump, a lot of people don't. He's raising money 00:03:45.720 |
for Biden. That's fine. doesn't bother me at all. fundraiser like 00:03:49.320 |
two weeks ago or something. Exactly. That's not an issue at 00:03:52.120 |
all. But what I do take offense at is labeling millions and 00:03:56.920 |
millions of ordinary Americans as somehow lacking in empathy, 00:04:00.720 |
lacking in caring, not being good parents, because you don't 00:04:04.000 |
like their support for Trump. Yeah. And I think that that that 00:04:08.560 |
is a statement that frankly, reeks of being cocooned in an 00:04:15.040 |
elite bubble for way too long. And let me just explain, if you 00:04:19.040 |
look at where Trump support is strongest, it's really in Middle 00:04:24.320 |
America in sort of the heartland of America of what in between 00:04:27.440 |
the elite states, basically, the part of America that coastal 00:04:30.760 |
least dismissively refer to as flyover country. Sure. And it's 00:04:36.840 |
a lot of the industrial Midwest. And frankly, that part of the 00:04:41.600 |
country has not had the same type of economic experience that 00:04:44.960 |
we've had in Silicon Valley. Of course, they have not been 00:04:47.440 |
beneficiaries of globalization, or equities, you know, and 00:04:51.880 |
they're, they're in the working class and then working class in 00:04:54.640 |
the factories got gutted. Yeah, that's it. Well, yeah, look, if 00:04:57.240 |
you're in one of the handful of export industries in America, 00:05:01.320 |
and I'm talking about if you're in Hollywood, or you're in big 00:05:03.760 |
finance, or you're in software, then globalization has been 00:05:07.320 |
great for you. Because it has created huge global markets for 00:05:11.720 |
our products. However, if you're in an industry that has to 00:05:16.220 |
compete with global exports, then it's been very bad with 00:05:20.640 |
you. And blue collar workers have been hurt, labor has been 00:05:23.280 |
hurt, people who work with their hands have been hurt. They have 00:05:25.880 |
not benefited in the same way from the system that we've had 00:05:30.120 |
in this country for the last 30 years. So you can understand why 00:05:33.080 |
they would not be so enchanted with elite thinking. And I think 00:05:38.440 |
to then label those people as lacking and caring or empathy or 00:05:42.320 |
not being good parents, because they haven't had they haven't 00:05:44.680 |
had the same economic ride that you've had for the last 30 00:05:48.520 |
years. And then you it's a blind spot. You are the one who is 00:05:52.840 |
fighting a legal battle to kick some of those people the public 00:05:57.760 |
kick the public off of the public beach in front of your 00:06:02.680 |
beach house. And then you're saying they're the ones lacking 00:06:06.160 |
in empathy. Dude, look in the mirror. Yeah, I mean, listen, 00:06:09.560 |
the great irony of this is, as you know, the Democrats were 00:06:13.080 |
supposed to be the the party of the working people and Biden was 00:06:15.720 |
supposed to be the pinnacle of that, like fighting for unions 00:06:18.400 |
fighting for the working person. And so they've just lost that 00:06:22.200 |
I'll say like, it feels like a lot of people are tilted, 00:06:24.480 |
because they defeated Trump, and now he's back. And so that tilts 00:06:28.320 |
a lot of people like there was a lot of effort, a lot of energy, 00:06:31.280 |
and a feeling of success, that Trump was ousted. And the fact 00:06:36.080 |
that the guy is now the front runner to be president again, 00:06:38.360 |
can be very tilting after feeling like you've already won 00:06:41.440 |
the battle. And guess what, it's back. I will also defend Vinod 00:06:44.280 |
real quick. I'll say, having known Vinod for a long time, 00:06:47.360 |
he's an investor with me. He's a guy I've come to appreciate and 00:06:52.280 |
think highly of. We had him at the summit. He was great at the 00:06:56.080 |
summit. It was great. This was awesome. If you listen to his 00:06:58.320 |
thing, he said, the listeners of the pod, and then he said, 00:07:01.680 |
MAGA extremist, so they're not based in Silicon Valley. I think 00:07:04.840 |
he was referencing that the listeners of the pod are not 00:07:07.120 |
based in Silicon Valley, and they are mad. Yeah, I couldn't 00:07:10.280 |
hear. I think what he meant to say was, and some of the 00:07:12.440 |
supporters there are not based in Silicon Valley, meaning like 00:07:15.680 |
to mouth your thoughts on the notes comments. 00:07:18.280 |
Yeah, I think the notes comments are a microcosm of something 00:07:22.000 |
that's a little bit bigger than just him, and I think is roughly 00:07:26.920 |
emblematic of the mainstream media, which is, I think the 00:07:30.720 |
four of us have found over the course of these last four years 00:07:35.640 |
doing the podcast, a rhythm, where there's a whole diversity 00:07:39.800 |
of views. We've always respected each other, we've learned from 00:07:42.960 |
each other. And each of us have taken turns, expressing 00:07:47.440 |
something that the others have ended up converging on. That's 00:07:50.680 |
not a holistic statement on every issue, but it has it has 00:07:53.520 |
happened. And that's a an incredible example of how you 00:07:58.600 |
should figure things out from first principles, especially 00:08:01.240 |
things that matter. And I think this is the first time and you 00:08:05.320 |
know, look, David said this a few years ago, he said, sax did 00:08:08.320 |
that, the course of elections will be driven by podcasts. And 00:08:15.680 |
I didn't give that a full enough waiting at the moment when he 00:08:20.920 |
said it. But I think what I'm realizing is it's not 00:08:24.040 |
necessarily just that podcasts will frame elections, but it's 00:08:27.840 |
the counterfactual, which is that it fills a vacuum. And I 00:08:32.320 |
think what you're seeing right now are the reactions of people 00:08:35.400 |
that have thrived in what used to work, which was a traditional 00:08:40.080 |
media infrastructure that would shape how people were supposed 00:08:43.920 |
to think. But then all of a sudden, if you can have a 00:08:47.120 |
platform like this, where people just talk from first 00:08:50.160 |
principles, respectfully, and then the chips are going to be 00:08:54.880 |
what it is, you know, people will come to their own 00:08:57.120 |
conclusions. I think that that's what people are reacting to. So 00:09:01.040 |
I think what the note is reacting to is this sort of 00:09:03.720 |
discomfort where you see for reasonable, intelligent people 00:09:07.720 |
all of a sudden talk open mindedly about what's happening 00:09:12.080 |
in the presidential election. And what you leave out is the 00:09:16.320 |
planted orthodoxy of what you're supposed to think. And that's 00:09:20.800 |
disconcerting to him. It's just disconcerting and confusing 00:09:24.240 |
maybe to Sorkin, who I think is a wonderful reporter and a 00:09:26.800 |
thinker. It's disconcerting Jason to every single media 00:09:30.520 |
outlet over the last week that's breathlessly been trying to get 00:09:33.560 |
me or sacks to have an opinion on this. And the reason I've 00:09:36.440 |
deleted all of these emails is they don't get a chance to frame 00:09:39.880 |
what we think. You can listen to the podcast and know what we 00:09:43.880 |
think. This is the future of how smart, reasonable, moderate 00:09:47.920 |
people should make decisions. It is an example. Talking to 00:09:51.640 |
somebody you disagree with does not make your opinion 00:09:54.840 |
bastardized. It actually makes your opinion valuable. There are 00:09:59.320 |
these simple truths to living a productive life that if you want 00:10:02.840 |
to embrace, you need to find friends that you can trust even 00:10:06.160 |
on issues when you disagree, you can hear them out. So that's 00:10:10.800 |
what's happening right now. And I think that that's why we all 00:10:13.800 |
need to sort of stand together and lock in arms and just keep 00:10:17.040 |
moving forward. It is something really important here that's 00:10:19.720 |
happening. And I think that's why the media and these opinion 00:10:26.040 |
Freiburg, your thoughts on this. You're friends with Vinod, as 00:10:30.560 |
you mentioned, and you've always said to me and in our personal 00:10:34.800 |
discussions that the reason you do this pod is because you 00:10:37.440 |
really want to set an example of how to have great conversations 00:10:40.760 |
and learn from each other and, and the tone of what we do here. 00:10:45.480 |
the unfortunate reality in a voting system and election cycle 00:10:49.720 |
like we're in Vinod went and did a fundraiser, it's public, but he 00:10:52.440 |
did a fundraiser for Biden a few weeks ago. And he wants to win 00:10:55.560 |
the election, he wants to make his horse win. There's a lot of 00:10:59.360 |
reasons why I'm sure Vinod has chosen that person to be his 00:11:02.840 |
horse. And so when you get on the playing field, you got two 00:11:06.840 |
teams, only one team wins. So you know, everyone pulls out all 00:11:10.360 |
the stops to win. One of the things that is done is 00:11:13.080 |
unfortunate, and it over time causes an erosion and a 00:11:15.920 |
hardening into a kind of polarity between all people, 00:11:20.520 |
which is that you call the other side, wrong or bad or extreme, 00:11:24.960 |
the term that he used, which really, I think, personifies the 00:11:28.720 |
problem is he said their listeners are there are MAGA 00:11:33.520 |
extremist being the word, right? Magazine needs to make America 00:11:36.560 |
great again, which I think everybody wants to make America 00:11:38.680 |
great again, whatever the extremism phrase is used by both 00:11:42.560 |
parties to describe the points of view of the other side. And 00:11:47.480 |
what I think is lacking is a reshifting of the perspective to 00:11:51.440 |
say their views are valid. I acknowledge their views, I hear 00:11:55.080 |
them, I know why they feel that way. I'm understanding where 00:11:57.600 |
that group of people are coming from. And to have that 00:12:00.600 |
acknowledgement, unfortunately, softens and weakens your 00:12:03.240 |
position and ability to go out and win election. And so both 00:12:05.400 |
sides harden themselves and use terms like this, to try and 00:12:09.000 |
discredit the other side. So it's unfortunate to see, I think 00:12:13.000 |
we all understand where someone who's trying to win a battle on 00:12:15.920 |
the field is coming from when they're trying to do this. But I 00:12:18.480 |
do think that what is deeply lacking in the erosion that's 00:12:20.840 |
arisen is because we can't say, I hear you, I see the problems. 00:12:24.600 |
I recognize you as people just like us. You have kids, your 00:12:28.560 |
families. And you have a different point of view on the 00:12:32.440 |
policies that will work and the individual that will realize 00:12:35.560 |
I also think it's important to make sure that we reiterate 00:12:39.000 |
again, at the sake of being pedantic, the facts, which is 00:12:42.320 |
this is a nonpartisan show. And it is a platform that has 00:12:46.840 |
showcased and given time to Democrats, and Republicans and 00:12:51.320 |
independent independents. Yeah. And they've all taken us up on 00:12:55.120 |
it. So that thought by the note is, at best incomplete, and more 00:13:01.400 |
appropriately, just stupid and factually wrong. 00:13:04.160 |
This is a good point. Larry Summers spoke at the same 00:13:07.160 |
the note Larry Summers, Dean Phillips, Bobby Kennedy, Chris 00:13:11.360 |
Christie, I mean, this is a spectrum of people that we are 00:13:15.880 |
Cheryl, Sam, you can hear from Jared Kushner, Jared Kushner, 00:13:20.240 |
you can hear from them in an unfiltered way and come to your 00:13:24.200 |
own conclusion. That's why we were number eight last week. 00:13:27.280 |
That's the exact reason why. And I think that that's very scary. 00:13:31.200 |
Because instead of power brokers, being able to filter 00:13:34.680 |
an opinion, you now have an opportunity to just hear it for 00:13:38.120 |
yourself, discuss it amongst your friends and come to your 00:13:40.840 |
own conclusion. So we have always been bipartisan here. And 00:13:44.680 |
we will continue to be bipartisan. The second thing is, 00:13:46.920 |
and I just want to say this again, I have asked the White 00:13:50.080 |
House for President Biden to come on the show. 00:13:56.000 |
We are just we are just waiting. People really don't want me to 00:13:59.480 |
be friends with you guys. They want me to end my friendship 00:14:01.800 |
with you tomorrow. They want me to end my friendship with you 00:14:03.520 |
sacks like, like, and these are people who are our mutuals, I 00:14:06.440 |
just want to say, and I want to just tell them all equally to go 00:14:08.760 |
fuck themselves here. You can believe out the F word. Like I'm 00:14:12.080 |
not picking my friends based on their political parties or their 00:14:14.720 |
leanings or who they're supporting for president. The 00:14:16.920 |
way I look at this sacks is at this point, we're all Americans. 00:14:21.160 |
We're in this together. America survive survive Trump's 00:14:25.080 |
presidency, America is going to survive Biden's presidency, the 00:14:28.520 |
democratic process, it is very messy. Everybody gets to have a 00:14:32.040 |
voice. And let's just pause for a second here and open up the 00:14:34.760 |
aperture. Let's be thankful that everybody gets to have a say. 00:14:37.880 |
Let's keep it from getting personal. Half the humans on 00:14:41.240 |
this planet Earth do not have a voice. The one thing that's 00:14:44.480 |
trending in the wrong direction globally is people living in a 00:14:47.200 |
democracy. It's the one thing not getting better. We have a 00:14:50.360 |
lot of work to do in this country. We have to respect each 00:14:53.040 |
other like we try to do here on this podcast. And we have to 00:14:55.440 |
talk about the important issues. We all agree the budget's out of 00:14:58.080 |
control. We all agree the education system sucks. We live 00:15:01.000 |
in a multipolar world. We have to figure that out. When we 00:15:04.800 |
should go to war when we shouldn't, when we need to stay 00:15:07.240 |
out of things. These are complicated issues. And name 00:15:09.960 |
calling and this presidency is not as important as tackling 00:15:13.240 |
these issues together as Americans. I hope everybody can 00:15:15.480 |
keep that in mind. So let's debate this. May the best 00:15:19.200 |
candidate win. And then let's move on and solve some problems 00:15:22.880 |
here. Okay, and it's getting very personal. Yeah. Well said 00:15:26.840 |
really well said. I know I'm really hurt by this because I 00:15:29.440 |
tell you personally, it's very hurtful to me because I value 00:15:31.800 |
our friendships and they're picking on the wrong guy because 00:15:34.000 |
you're the most loyal guy. And so it's kind of like it's going 00:15:36.760 |
to be the least effective because you don't care what they 00:15:38.800 |
think Jake, that's the problem. So they can get to you. You can 00:15:41.560 |
ask me if I do that. Don't tell me what I think sex you can ask 00:15:44.240 |
me. Okay. I actually care about the two of you bigger like 00:15:48.520 |
brothers. No, we do. But I know I just have to retrain sacks that 00:15:51.120 |
he can't tell me what I think. Yeah, no, because you do that. 00:15:54.480 |
You put words in my mouth for all listeners. I just want you 00:15:56.640 |
to know they've been bickering like this for 20 years. So it's 00:15:58.720 |
yeah. No, here's the point. Here's the point. It happens 00:16:01.320 |
even worse offline. We're not offline. It's unbelievable. 00:16:03.800 |
Stop. You're ruining it. Jake out. You're just running right 00:16:06.280 |
now. Here's the thing. I respect, you know, all of my 00:16:10.680 |
friends and I like having a diversity of opinions that makes 00:16:13.240 |
life more interesting for me. And then to tell me I can't be 00:16:16.160 |
friends with this person, that person, the way I grew up, my 00:16:18.520 |
dad had a bar, Hells Angels, cops, firefighters, just 00:16:22.360 |
everybody was allowed to come and hang out at the bar. Like 00:16:25.080 |
we're here. We're having a discourse. Everybody's welcome 00:16:27.880 |
for a seat at the table. You don't LGBTQ, but they all of 00:16:32.160 |
What people haven't figured out yet is like cancel culture is 00:16:39.200 |
It's off trend, not on trend. And the people who are still 00:16:42.240 |
tweeting these blanket statements, and they're trying 00:16:44.720 |
to demonize the entire other side with unfactual, unfounded 00:16:49.920 |
potshots are just making fools of themselves. And you can see 00:16:53.840 |
that in there. You can see that in the reaction on x. 00:16:57.680 |
And we have some breaking news here. Oh, no, just to put things 00:17:01.840 |
What happened? Did Uber get bought by Tesla just launched 00:17:05.120 |
the Tesla mezcal? Oh, breaking news story. Hold on. 00:17:09.120 |
It's a breaking news story. Tesla has launched mezcal. 00:17:13.880 |
In that beautiful lightning bottle. I just ordered my bottle 00:17:17.640 |
of this like seconds ago while we're doing the show. Because 00:17:21.200 |
this sold out in like two hours before and now the the bottles 00:17:24.680 |
of the original Tesla tequila go for like $2,000. Now, okay, 00:17:28.380 |
breaking news. Get yours. Get yours. Now if it's still 00:17:31.480 |
smoking mezcal. There you go. Wait a second. Is this going to 00:17:37.440 |
Well, sold out by the time we launch our ball. Both can be 00:17:41.440 |
sold out. We're both going to be selling that everybody can see 00:17:43.920 |
that everybody can win. It's not a zero sum game. Everybody can 00:17:47.520 |
secure the bag. All right, let's get into the docket enough of 00:17:50.560 |
the self referential influencers. Now did you guys 00:17:53.200 |
see my deck this month? We're all influencers. We're all 00:17:55.640 |
influencers. Absolutely. Absolutely. There's a lot of 00:17:59.040 |
federal regulation going on around AI as we know, regulatory 00:18:03.680 |
capture. Shout out to our guy Bill Gurley, who did a great 00:18:05.800 |
talk last year about this. On Wednesday, the New York Times 00:18:08.920 |
reported that the DOJ and the FTC had struck a deal on how to 00:18:12.520 |
go after AI incumbents. Here's the terms of the deal. And 00:18:15.840 |
again, this is all breaking. The DOJ gets to investigate 00:18:18.640 |
whether NVIDIA violated antitrust laws, they didn't 00:18:21.640 |
specify what they're going after here. But it could include the 00:18:25.600 |
NVIDIA use of CUDA software to lock customers into using their 00:18:30.000 |
GPUs, or maybe how NVIDIA distributes their GPUs to 00:18:33.240 |
customers. There's a lot of regulation around that. And the 00:18:35.600 |
FTC takes the lead on looking into open AI's conduct and 00:18:38.560 |
Microsoft's AI deals. Obviously, there's been a ton of those, 00:18:41.520 |
including acquirers, etc. And then just this morning, the Wall 00:18:44.680 |
Street Journal reported that the FTC had opened a probe into 00:18:47.360 |
Microsoft's deal with inflection AI. That's the one if you 00:18:50.000 |
remember, where they bought the staff and then did some fakaka 00:18:53.960 |
crazy commerce deal where they give them a bunch of money, I 00:18:56.720 |
guess, to bail out the investors. And that one is as 00:18:59.640 |
conflicted up and down as you could possibly imagine. They 00:19:02.720 |
know Microsoft structured that deal in a way that could avoid 00:19:05.880 |
regulatory scrutiny. You heard that here first. Actually, we 00:19:08.880 |
talked about this concept of a shadow acquirer on this very 00:19:12.040 |
program when we saw it because we'd never seen a deal like 00:19:14.000 |
that. It had includes that $650 million licensing fee. All 00:19:18.880 |
right, there's tons of other angles here. But let's start 00:19:22.440 |
with you, Chamath, what are your thoughts on this regulatory 00:19:26.720 |
capture and NVIDIA's ascension? For those of you not watching, 00:19:31.200 |
it's almost become the largest market cap company in tech. 00:19:34.440 |
Actually, today, NVIDIA passed Apple for a moment in time. So 00:19:37.640 |
this is pretty crazy what we've seen with NVIDIA. And here we 00:19:41.640 |
got regulatory capture coming in hot. Chamath, your thoughts? 00:19:44.400 |
I have two thoughts. They're sort of mixed emotions. The 00:19:49.400 |
first is, I think the DOJ and the FTC are totally way out of 00:19:54.560 |
their ski tips on this. This is a totally nascent industry. We 00:19:58.920 |
don't have any good examples of end user use cases, either at 00:20:03.200 |
the enterprise or amongst consumers. We only have 18 00:20:07.960 |
months of spend history. It is true that we've spent probably 00:20:11.840 |
750 billion to a trillion dollars collectively now, yep, on 00:20:15.840 |
things with the AI label. But it is also true that that's 00:20:19.280 |
probably generated less than $10 billion in revenue. So I don't 00:20:24.480 |
see what they're exactly investigating in an extremely 00:20:29.000 |
immature market where we haven't yet seen one cycle of boom and 00:20:33.480 |
bust, so that we know what we're actually dealing with. So it's 00:20:36.680 |
way too premature. And it's just people afraid and tilting at 00:20:41.040 |
windmills. The second part, the part that's mixed, though, is we 00:20:45.600 |
are seeing a clever form of deal making that these huge 00:20:49.680 |
hyperscalers are doing to work around the traditional 00:20:53.480 |
constraints that you've had on businesses. Jason, you and I 00:20:56.800 |
worked at AOL in a moment where AOL paid a very dear cost for 00:21:01.920 |
essentially round tripping revenue. Yep. Microsoft had to 00:21:05.640 |
go through a huge DOJ inquiry and a settlement decree. And 00:21:10.800 |
they were in the penalty box for most of Steve Ballmer's tenure 00:21:13.480 |
as a CEO, a lost decade. And the handcuffs came off when Satya 00:21:17.440 |
took over that business. So I think what I'm trying to say is 00:21:21.960 |
folks have become extremely sophisticated at replacing round 00:21:26.840 |
tripping with these complicated tack 2.0, whatever you want to 00:21:31.600 |
call it credit oriented deals. They'll finance you to buy their 00:21:35.640 |
own chips. All of this stuff has to be scrutinized a little bit 00:21:40.480 |
more. So that part I support. But all of a sudden, launching 00:21:44.400 |
an antitrust investigation makes no sense. So I really think the 00:21:47.520 |
inquiry should be coming from the SEC about is this real 00:21:50.800 |
That's actually the key issue. And this goes to Chamath, what 00:21:53.920 |
we talked about, like, let's, if we're going to police something 00:21:56.400 |
tactics, make sense, not competition, which has been Lena 00:22:01.320 |
Khan's sort of approach to this, and she's only going to be in 00:22:04.600 |
the position for another couple months, but the election goes 00:22:07.400 |
the way it's going. So this might all be moot. Freeberg, I 00:22:10.760 |
want to get your thoughts on this. We had that great talk 00:22:12.520 |
2851 miles from from bill, and regulatory capture at the 00:22:16.600 |
summit, you can look, it would be in the show notes. If you 00:22:19.080 |
haven't seen it. It's great talk for your thoughts on this. 00:22:21.640 |
I don't know what regulatory capture Nvidia, are you talking 00:22:29.200 |
just regulatory capture in the framing of AI? Is it too early? 00:22:33.360 |
Hey, we're like, in the we're not even in the first ending 00:22:36.360 |
here. And already, we're going to start investigating 00:22:42.000 |
one of the silly aspects is they just passed this law in 00:22:46.160 |
California, Newsom warns against perils of over regulating AI. 00:22:52.400 |
Oh, good. Governor Newsom warned on Wednesday against stifling 00:22:56.360 |
the burgeoning AI sector. I mean, Newsom is well informed by 00:22:59.000 |
the tech community. So sure, I don't think he and he's also an 00:23:01.800 |
intelligent person. So I don't think he'd kind of, you know, 00:23:04.360 |
fall quickly in line on this one. But the way that the 00:23:07.360 |
statutes were written, is there's a definition on the size 00:23:10.320 |
of a model, which in and of itself is very quickly changing. 00:23:13.800 |
As we know, we've seen recently significant reductions in model 00:23:17.440 |
size, that actually improve performance overall of the model 00:23:21.600 |
for specific applications. And it's very likely we end up 00:23:23.920 |
seeing a lot of more smaller targeted models being used in 00:23:28.280 |
specific applications, instead of one massive general purpose 00:23:31.520 |
model being used, or networks of smaller models, which is what 00:23:35.240 |
really where I think the industry is going. And if that's 00:23:37.280 |
where things go, then this, this statute doesn't even matter, it 00:23:39.880 |
makes no sense anymore. And that shows you, I think, how quickly 00:23:42.600 |
things are changing. They go and they get a quote, experts 00:23:45.240 |
opinions. In a couple of months, those experts come back, they're 00:23:47.960 |
like, here's the size of a model that you need to be regulating. 00:23:50.960 |
And then the legislators run, and they write the code, they 00:23:54.760 |
pass the statute. And all of a sudden, it doesn't even make 00:23:57.560 |
sense anymore. So yes, I don't think we really know where this 00:24:00.440 |
technology is all falling out at this point. And I think it's 00:24:03.200 |
very difficult to have the government kind of reach in too 00:24:06.560 |
quickly to try and identify what they should and shouldn't be 00:24:10.280 |
allowing to happen from a free market perspective. 00:24:12.440 |
Your thoughts, David Sachs, especially in light of the fact 00:24:16.520 |
that looking like we're going to have some regime change in 00:24:20.000 |
Washington, and the FTC is going to going to going to turn over, 00:24:24.160 |
Well, look, I agree with you guys, this is just too soon to 00:24:27.360 |
be opening these investigations. It's true that 00:24:29.720 |
OpenAI and Nvidia have leads in their respective markets, but 00:24:34.520 |
that's all it is at this point. It's way too early in the 00:24:38.040 |
development of these markets to say that these are clearly 00:24:40.560 |
monopolists. There's still a lot of competition going on. If a 00:24:45.160 |
few years from now, Nvidia still has whatever 85 90% market share 00:24:49.520 |
and no one's even close to catching up, then maybe you 00:24:52.000 |
consider it a monopolist. Same thing with OpenAI. But it just 00:24:56.360 |
seems very early to be rushing into investigations of these 00:24:59.480 |
companies. I mean, the AI market is what 18 months old to two 00:25:05.040 |
I'd say two is a good way to look at it. Yeah. 00:25:07.400 |
So it's just very early to be doing this. Look, I think this 00:25:10.320 |
is of a piece with remember that executive order or whatever 00:25:14.520 |
that remember when the White House issued that 100 page plus 00:25:17.480 |
executive order on AI regulation, we covered it on the 00:25:21.440 |
show. And we also thought that was too soon. And we thought 00:25:25.600 |
that if the internet had been regulated in that way, in you 00:25:29.960 |
know, circuit 1995 or 1997, it never would have blossomed the 00:25:34.040 |
way that it did. You know, you want to give these markets some 00:25:37.040 |
time to play out before you bring that down the heavy hand 00:25:40.480 |
of regulation on them. So it just seems to me like the 00:25:44.160 |
administration is getting carried away here with this 00:25:46.920 |
desire to regulate this new space. And I mean, frankly, it's 00:25:51.520 |
of a piece with you, I would say an innovation, a hostile 00:25:55.920 |
agenda, you also have the attacks on crypto, you just had 00:26:00.000 |
buying veto a bill that would have finally given crypto 00:26:03.360 |
regulatory framework in the US, it passed with 60 votes in the 00:26:07.600 |
Senate, including Democrats like Chuck Schumer. And it still 00:26:11.600 |
wasn't good enough. And oh, and it was based on a framework. I 00:26:14.080 |
think that came from the SEC. Yeah. But Biden is basically in 00:26:17.320 |
the Elizabeth Warren camp that he's going to give no quarter to 00:26:20.120 |
crypto. So you've got hostility to AI, you've got hostility to 00:26:25.040 |
crypto, you've got hostility to M&A, no one can get an M&A deal 00:26:28.920 |
through right now, you put all these things together. Plus, 00:26:32.120 |
you've got hostility to options as compensation in terms of the 00:26:36.560 |
25% unrealized gains tax. You add up all these things. And 00:26:42.520 |
again, I think this is an agenda that does not benefit Silicon 00:26:46.800 |
Well, and if you want to understand why people are coming 00:26:49.600 |
to your fundraiser tonight, if you put all this together, it 00:26:52.240 |
doesn't take a genius to figure out that if you're a venture 00:26:54.560 |
capitalist or an entrepreneur, and you want to see M&A, and you 00:26:57.280 |
want to see entrepreneurship, and you want to see your 00:26:59.000 |
companies thrive, you want to see your employees get rich and 00:27:01.160 |
have options. Biden is basically handing the election to Trump. 00:27:05.320 |
It's like he's doing everything he can to basically alienate 00:27:08.600 |
Silicon Valley. So capitalism, you're exactly right. 00:27:11.760 |
And innovation. I wouldn't even say it's Silicon Valley. It's 00:27:14.040 |
like if you're going to go and build things that are at the 00:27:17.480 |
bleeding edge, you know, the government used to be the most 00:27:20.960 |
critical supporter of that. Right? If you think about space 00:27:24.440 |
or defense, these are areas, the internet itself, the government 00:27:28.720 |
was the partner of private industry to make sure that there 00:27:31.120 |
was no regulation. And that like really, really exact looking 00:27:34.880 |
innovation could happen. That's should be their role. 00:27:37.560 |
And this speaks to this decel versus acceleration movement 00:27:42.480 |
that we see here in Silicon Valley. And this is what we see 00:27:45.160 |
in Texas, Florida, UAE, Riyadh, Doha, there are places in the 00:27:50.280 |
world, Singapore, where people are accelerating innovation. And 00:27:54.240 |
this is what humans want, not just entrepreneurs, not just 00:27:57.760 |
venture capitals, all of us want to see an acceleration of 00:28:00.840 |
innovation. Everybody wants to see prosperity. And if you put 00:28:04.400 |
yourself up as the D cell candidate, we're not going to 00:28:07.520 |
allow M&A, we're going to screw with options, we're going to do 00:28:09.640 |
all this stuff, people just not going to vote for you. And 00:28:11.640 |
people want crypto legal. So take the memo. I mean, this, I 00:28:15.280 |
mean, the fact that Democrats can't feel the candidate that 00:28:18.240 |
aligns with the what humanity wants, is absolutely 00:28:24.000 |
mindboggling. This is why I think Biden's getting hot swap 00:28:26.600 |
this month. You heard it first. He's got I know, Gavin is going 00:28:30.880 |
to be running for president, it's going to be Trump and 00:28:33.240 |
Gavin, they're swapping Biden. After this first debate, Biden 00:28:36.880 |
is going to get demolished by Trump in the debate. It's going 00:28:39.600 |
to be elder abuse. He's getting wiped out and hot swapped. You 00:28:43.320 |
Well, there's a lot of a lot of conspiracy theorists online who 00:28:47.400 |
agree with you a lot of tit for tat speculation that I'm gonna 00:28:51.280 |
get switcheroo hot swap. But look, I mean, I think you make 00:28:54.640 |
the correct point, which is, you know, I don't really think about 00:28:57.480 |
it this way. But you're right, Biden is the D cell candidate. 00:28:59.960 |
And nobody wants that. Also, Trump has shown a learning curve 00:29:04.040 |
where he recently has been saying positive things about 00:29:07.160 |
crypto. Yeah. And he's always, I think, been more pro economic 00:29:10.600 |
growth. He was a real estate developer from the private 00:29:12.720 |
sector, he actually understands the economy. So there's no 00:29:16.240 |
question that he would be more pro innovation, much more pro 00:29:19.240 |
innovation than Biden. And to your point about this is one of 00:29:23.160 |
the reasons why people are coming to the fundraiser. I had 00:29:26.120 |
someone from the campaign said something very interesting to 00:29:27.760 |
me. She said that we've never seen this many new donors. Yeah, 00:29:32.200 |
at an event before. So we're turning out the new donors for 00:29:37.160 |
this reason. Yes. And you know, we're not going to be 00:29:39.680 |
intimidated by people calling us names. You know, it's like, 00:29:42.840 |
look, in any normal election, people in an industry would vote 00:29:48.400 |
for the candidate who they see as most aligned. Yes. With what 00:29:53.200 |
is good for them, their families, their industry made a 00:29:56.400 |
list. Let's just make the list here right now. Make the list of 00:29:59.880 |
things Trump is in support of, right. And Republicans are in 00:30:03.080 |
support of right now. They're going to be pro M&A, they're 00:30:05.920 |
going to be pro crypto, they're going to be pro less taxes, 00:30:08.920 |
they're going to be pro law and order. You know what, that's 00:30:11.440 |
where I align. Those are the things I want. So if you just 00:30:14.840 |
list the issues for me, despite how I might feel about Trump and 00:30:18.160 |
some of the things he's done, he checks off all my boxes, he 00:30:21.560 |
checks off all my boxes. And I think that's what's happening 00:30:24.120 |
here. And, you know, people were scared to come out and say this 00:30:27.200 |
person checks off all my boxes. The Democrats need to realize 00:30:30.320 |
they're out of sync with America. They're out of sync 00:30:32.520 |
with powerful people in America, especially the donor base. 00:30:35.200 |
They're the D cell candidate party now. And they just have to 00:30:39.120 |
flip this thinking they're going to get demolished. It is going 00:30:42.440 |
to be a landslide at this point. People want jobs and prosperity 00:30:51.360 |
I don't really have a lot more to say. Yeah, yeah. 00:30:55.760 |
Take the win. And crypto is such an obvious win. And you know 00:31:00.320 |
what, Trump's anti EV right now he's been wailing on EVs. I 00:31:04.080 |
guarantee you that's the next thing. I bet you next week he 00:31:06.440 |
comes out next week. Within the next two weeks. Here's my 00:31:10.000 |
prediction. Trump says you know what, EV is not so bad. Remember 00:31:13.560 |
he's been saying EVs nobody wants these things we're 00:31:15.680 |
subsidizing. I bet you next week or maybe in 30 days I'm making a 00:31:19.280 |
prediction here. You bank the prediction in 30 days Trump 00:31:25.000 |
Well, I think that his point is that people shouldn't be forced 00:31:27.840 |
to buy EVs. Right? I mean, I don't think he's against them 00:31:31.880 |
per se. I think he's against people being forced. I think 00:31:35.240 |
that what the new administration hopefully, or what Trump should 00:31:38.480 |
propose is effectively a modus vivendi with big tech, where the 00:31:43.560 |
point is that if you stop censoring our people, if you 00:31:46.600 |
stop censoring conservatives, if you restore the civil liberties 00:31:50.240 |
of the average American to say what they want online to 00:31:53.360 |
basically bank online, to stop essentially de platforming and 00:31:58.040 |
censoring people, then we will let you innovate, we'll let you 00:32:01.360 |
do M&A, we'll let you get back to business. That basically is 00:32:05.040 |
the basis for a peace agreement between big tech and the 00:32:10.000 |
Yeah. And by the way, I'd say in the next 30 to 60 days, you're 00:32:15.680 |
gonna see 10 incredibly high profile people come out and 00:32:18.400 |
support of Trump if Biden isn't swapped out. And when I say high 00:32:21.000 |
profile, I have the inside line on this extremely high profile 00:32:24.320 |
people, not just Doug Leonie, not just David Sachs, it's not 00:32:26.680 |
by up to you. It is going to be about 10 high profile people who 00:32:30.360 |
are much higher profile respectfully than Chamath and 00:32:32.880 |
Sachs, and Doug Leonie. So just wait for it, folks. You cannot 00:32:36.640 |
be a decelerous in, you know, this world. Let's keep moving. 00:32:40.560 |
Roaring Kitty, aka Keith Gill, just disclosed a nine figure 00:32:44.360 |
position in GameStop. Yes, we're back to where this podcast 00:32:47.600 |
started. We're talking about GameStop and as crazy as it is, 00:32:52.160 |
and a E trade is considering suspending his account. This is 00:32:55.680 |
going to take a little bit of background. I apologize here. 00:32:57.520 |
The D platforming him. Here we go again. Quick background. You 00:33:03.040 |
remember the first basically viral moment for this podcast is 00:33:07.160 |
AI moment. I remember I was in Tahoe skiing was the GameStop 00:33:10.520 |
saga back in 2021. 1000s of retail investors following this 00:33:14.720 |
individual Keith Gill. We're posting in this subreddit called 00:33:20.160 |
Wall Street bats if you're not familiar, and they created a 00:33:23.040 |
massive short squeeze and they sent the stock flying Robin Hood 00:33:26.040 |
halted the trading member flag came on that one all went crazy. 00:33:28.800 |
We covered that all. And then Keith Gill went silent for the 00:33:32.240 |
past three years on Twitter and Reddit. He said nothing. Then on 00:33:35.720 |
May 12, he posted this meme on x, which has been viewed 28 00:33:41.680 |
million times. Now, if you don't know this meme, this is the lean 00:33:46.200 |
forward mean when you've got a game controller in your hand, it 00:33:48.760 |
is a way to signal like, hey, we're getting to the boss level, 00:33:52.240 |
it's gonna get exciting. Here's your GameStop chart, folks. You 00:33:56.200 |
see that first peak, that's when we reported on it back in 2021. 00:33:59.280 |
And here we go again, it just had a slow ride down for three 00:34:02.440 |
years and bink popped up again. So GameStop stock tripled at the 00:34:08.360 |
posting of that meme. Why is this important? Well, he has a 00:34:12.960 |
huge position, he increased it from 200,000 shares, basically 00:34:16.720 |
to 5 million had 120,000 call options tomorrow. We'll comment 00:34:20.360 |
on all this in a moment. If he exercised all these calls, still 00:34:25.000 |
could own an additional 12 million shares. Here's Gary 00:34:27.800 |
Gensler, who was on CNBC Wednesday trying to like, calm 00:34:33.000 |
the markets down and or try to get control of this craziness. 00:34:36.520 |
Here's the clip. I say to you look, I want to put up a I want 00:34:40.040 |
to put up a cryptogram. And it's of a chair leaning up, which we 00:34:44.120 |
know from video game playing means come on, this is the ninth 00:34:47.880 |
inning, get ready. And we know that I'm a person who happens to 00:34:51.680 |
like the stock of GameStop. This is the single Come on, get 00:34:55.480 |
ready. Is this something hypothetically that is that the 00:35:00.080 |
Look, again, it's not so hypothetical, because you're 00:35:03.400 |
describing things that are in the public domain and in the 00:35:07.400 |
public is, is, you know, interested in. So but generally 00:35:12.720 |
speaking, you have to make sure that you don't mislead the 00:35:16.320 |
public, and that you don't in any way, do things in the 00:35:20.680 |
markets that may be manipulative or misleading. And so that's the 00:35:29.800 |
The key thing is, if you can cure it with disclosure, this is 00:35:32.840 |
Brandeis, you know, if they disclose that this is something 00:35:35.920 |
that they call action, then you can't go after them. 00:35:38.840 |
Disclosure is one really key part of our capital markets. 00:35:43.400 |
When you buy the stock of a company, you expect that they 00:35:46.520 |
give you full and fair disclosure. That's, by the way, 00:35:49.840 |
not what you're getting right now in this crypto field. So I 00:35:53.440 |
just, you know, cautionary tale there, that disclosure, but 00:35:58.240 |
disclosure doesn't necessarily protect a bad actor, if they're 00:36:04.680 |
Shama, you've been you've had a lot of comments on the markets 00:36:08.360 |
and specifically this one over the years. What are your 00:36:11.600 |
thoughts is posting this meme, stock manipulation or 00:36:21.000 |
He put a picture on the internet. Okay. I mean, that 00:36:25.560 |
again, this is like the problem that we have, which is that he 00:36:30.320 |
disclosed his position in a different way. Now, we don't 00:36:33.040 |
know whether that disclosure is accurate, because I think it was 00:36:36.280 |
just a screenshot of like some statement inside of a Reddit 00:36:39.880 |
thread, right? And then that got posted many times elsewhere. Is 00:36:44.280 |
this accurate? I don't know. Because he has no obligation as 00:36:48.480 |
an individual to do any of this stuff. Because he's not running 00:36:52.400 |
a hedge fund, and he's not running other people's money. 00:36:54.440 |
Now, if he was acting in concert with other people, you could say, 00:37:00.240 |
Hey, hold on a second, if you're repping not just your money, but 00:37:03.080 |
other people's money, and you did this, then there's probably a 00:37:05.880 |
disclosure obligation there. But at the end of the day, this is 00:37:09.000 |
a guy that acted and basically created hype. And right now, the 00:37:20.840 |
SEC does not have a framework to deal with that, because the 00:37:24.440 |
rules that existed didn't understand social media and 00:37:27.480 |
whatnot. And he's also not a regulated entity. He's just an 00:37:31.320 |
individual. Now, if it turns out that he was selling while he was 00:37:35.520 |
posting this stuff and trying to manipulate the market in some 00:37:39.120 |
way, obviously, they could find issue with that. But just for 00:37:44.120 |
him being a credible influencer, and creating momentum for an 00:37:51.680 |
underlying position, that in and of itself is not illegal. 00:37:54.840 |
Sacks, I think we have to go to judge sacks here. Judge sacks. 00:37:58.640 |
What is your verdict? Our meme stock manipulation? Judge sacks? 00:38:01.800 |
No, I don't see any manipulation there. Like Jamal studies is 00:38:05.320 |
posting a meme. What you saw? Not guilty. What I see in that 00:38:08.920 |
clip is Jim Cramer trying to stir up an SEC investigation of 00:38:13.640 |
Keith Gill. For what? I mean, what exactly is he done here? 00:38:17.280 |
This is kind of the Wall Street Journal as well. If you look at 00:38:19.680 |
the Wall Street Journal today, there's an entire article 00:38:22.040 |
basically with the headline is what Keith Gill is doing 00:38:25.360 |
illegal. And I think you can view this in a different lens, 00:38:28.840 |
which is, here is an individual that is totally outside of the 00:38:33.000 |
establishment that however he's done it, has gotten a hold of 00:38:37.040 |
hundreds of millions of dollars, maybe even now billions if the 00:38:40.840 |
stock keeps going. And I think that that for the establishment 00:38:45.320 |
that controls those pipes, very disconcerting. 00:38:49.560 |
Right? If he if he was one of those apex predators on Wall 00:38:54.520 |
Street, if he was one of those major hedge funds that donates a 00:38:57.200 |
lot of money to the political elite, in other words, if he was 00:39:00.760 |
a well connected political player, I doubt anyone would be 00:39:05.040 |
For you got thoughts on this market manipulation or meme 00:39:10.200 |
stonk, fun, good times, you're buying GameStop, you're paying 00:39:14.480 |
EMC, like you buyer beware, you're you're in on the joke. 00:39:19.720 |
Nick, can you pull up the image? I'm going to talk about the 00:39:22.080 |
stupidity of buying the stock in this company. This is a company. 00:39:28.360 |
And then I think we can talk about whether that's even 00:39:30.400 |
relevant, which I think indication is that it's not. 00:39:35.360 |
GameStop finished the year 2023 fiscal year, with sales of 5.3 00:39:45.760 |
billion, down from 5.9 billion the year before. So sales 00:39:50.040 |
declined by 12% in the year, adjusted $1 billion in revenue 00:39:54.120 |
selling games, adjusted EBITDA for the year was $65 million. 00:39:57.720 |
And they have about 1.2 billion in cash. Currently, as of today, 00:40:03.480 |
the market cap is about 13 and a half billion dollars. So that 00:40:07.600 |
makes it about a 12 and a half billion dollar enterprise value 00:40:10.320 |
12 and a half billion divided by 65 million of EBITDA means that 00:40:15.480 |
this stock is currently trading at about 192 times EBITDA. A 00:40:20.280 |
business that is profitable and you can say that the profits are 00:40:23.560 |
stable and predictable and is likely not going to grow very 00:40:26.240 |
much will typically trade for seven to 12 times EBITDA. And 00:40:30.120 |
this stock is trading at 192 times EBITDA and the revenue is 00:40:32.960 |
declining 12% a year. So I'll just point out like, I don't 00:40:37.320 |
think that there's anything about the actual performance of 00:40:40.000 |
the underlying business and the security that you are buying or 00:40:42.560 |
selling when you are making a decision about whether or not to 00:40:45.120 |
buy or sell the security. And I think that that's the real 00:40:47.920 |
question. It does that even matter? Clearly, it doesn't. Let 00:40:51.760 |
people have fun, let them go to Vegas, let them play in the 00:40:54.960 |
roulette table, they know what they're getting into the 00:40:57.040 |
disclosures are all there. All the SEC filings are there, all 00:41:00.280 |
the financials of this business are there, what you're actually 00:41:02.920 |
buying is publicly viewable, you can look at it, you can make an 00:41:06.160 |
investment decision as an individual investor and trader, 00:41:09.800 |
and you want to blow your money, trying to see when the social 00:41:12.960 |
trends are going to shift one way or another. Let it be your 00:41:15.920 |
I think this is well said. If you're buying NFTs, if you're 00:41:20.600 |
buying stonks like this, if you're playing poker in a, if 00:41:24.240 |
you're playing bomb pots, look it up, folks, if you don't know 00:41:26.400 |
what bomb pots are, and you're going crazy playing bomb pots 00:41:29.760 |
for eight hours, like we did the other week, you're there to 00:41:32.240 |
gamble. If you are playing bomb bots, this is the bomb pots of 00:41:37.120 |
the stock market, have fun, go crazy. If you're buying NFTs, if 00:41:41.400 |
you're buying crypto, and you know what you're getting into, 00:41:45.640 |
there's no law, there's no law that defines why you should or 00:41:49.560 |
should not buy a security with respect to the diligence you 00:41:52.920 |
have individually done to determine whether the underlying 00:41:56.040 |
business is worth the price you're paying. Yes, the law 00:41:58.960 |
says that the businesses that are listing their securities for 00:42:02.400 |
public trading have an obligation to make disclosures 00:42:04.640 |
on their financials, and any other material events to the 00:42:07.040 |
public. And they do that through the SEC filing process. That's 00:42:10.200 |
all out there. And then what you as an individual do with it is 00:42:15.440 |
So when's the right time to put a short on this company? 00:42:18.240 |
The stock is up 40% today. And then there's these reports that 00:42:25.800 |
came out yesterday on a bunch of very big hedge funds that put 00:42:28.800 |
very big short positions yesterday on the stock and it's 00:42:31.960 |
up 40% today. Here we go to get margin call. So this is where 00:42:34.920 |
you see the same thing that happened last time where what 00:42:44.200 |
out on the wrong side of this, you're gonna get plotkins. 00:42:49.440 |
Don't get plotkin in a sour moochie. Yeah, that's what you 00:42:56.640 |
don't want to do. Because you could lose it all in a sacra 00:42:59.120 |
moochie or it's basically a game where, you know, the Redditors 00:43:02.360 |
are they bid up? They bid up the stock? Yes, to levels that 00:43:06.960 |
realistically, it's not worth that much disconnect. It's a 00:43:10.080 |
big, it basically creates a short squeeze. So the stock 00:43:13.360 |
flies up. Yeah. Then the hedge funds know it's overvalued. So 00:43:17.880 |
they basically put new shorts on. Yeah. And then they do the 00:43:21.400 |
And they'll do something that's even more dangerous, which is 00:43:23.800 |
they can get synthetically short. So they'll, they'll add 00:43:27.000 |
leverage to this, using all kinds of esoteric derivatives 00:43:30.640 |
that other banks on Wall Street will happily sell them. And then 00:43:33.800 |
when those are disclosed, then the Redditors can just pump it 00:43:36.760 |
even more, which causes massive margin call. So I think that I 00:43:40.320 |
think the thing that Friedberg you're saying, though, this is 00:43:42.520 |
this existential thing that comes back, it's happened in 00:43:45.160 |
NF T's, it's happened in the dotcom bubble, it happened in 00:43:47.800 |
SPACs, it's happened in crypto. Are we supposed to protect 00:43:51.800 |
people? And then the question is, who is the we? And are you 00:43:57.080 |
supposed to say, if you're an adult, and you can read, then 00:44:00.480 |
read the disclosures, and you're on your own. That's what the SEC 00:44:03.480 |
says. Yeah, and that's what the rule of law has been. And so 00:44:06.240 |
this is going to be an interesting test, because 00:44:07.840 |
instead of an organization, it's going to be a person in this 00:44:12.520 |
case, Keith Gill, who will be the face of what happens to the 00:44:15.240 |
stock, because if a bunch of people all of a sudden, plow 00:44:18.040 |
into this thing, and then it goes to five, it'll be really 00:44:21.760 |
interesting to see the reaction, hey, you should have saved us, 00:44:24.360 |
how could this happen? You know, he dumped this on all of us. And 00:44:27.680 |
the answer is no, he did not. Where was the government to save 00:44:30.440 |
our day? Where's the government to protect consumers? That's 00:44:32.760 |
not with the nanny state. That's the next cycle of the story. The 00:44:35.720 |
next cycle of the story is no, the government. Yeah. And you 00:44:38.920 |
showed how the government protected everybody, which was 00:44:41.120 |
you showed the revenue, and the profits and the margins, which 00:44:45.480 |
And you did it in two minutes. I mean, anybody, anybody can look 00:44:51.080 |
you didn't even use a sophisticated model, you use 00:44:53.400 |
probably the calculator app on your frickin Mac to figure out 00:44:57.160 |
No, no, I'm sure he used the calculator app. So you actually 00:45:04.520 |
have the SEO. The whole point is, you can figure out that 00:45:07.600 |
there's no logical justification for this company using one 00:45:11.000 |
Google search and the calculator app on your Mac. Yeah. It's on 00:45:15.240 |
you. I think the question is, should we make all sports 00:45:18.520 |
betting legal and all online casinos legal? So if you follow 00:45:21.200 |
this to its natural conclusion, let people do what they want. 00:45:24.320 |
Why are all of the other gambling industries so tightly 00:45:27.400 |
regulated? I think there's a difference. Well, because we 00:45:31.160 |
need a stock market, we need we need the ability for companies 00:45:33.960 |
to go public. It just so happens that you can get this weird 00:45:37.840 |
effect where some stocks can become meme stocks. But that 00:45:42.120 |
doesn't mean you want to design the entire system of securities 00:45:46.880 |
laws around one or two meme stocks. The fact of the matter 00:45:51.200 |
is that investors are sufficiently protected by robust 00:45:55.320 |
disclosure requirements that apparently GameStop has 00:45:59.160 |
followed. All that information is out there. You basically 00:46:02.560 |
dismantled the company in like two minutes. So anyone watching 00:46:06.040 |
this show has all the information they need not to buy 00:46:08.880 |
this stock at 190 times earnings, okay, if they choose 00:46:15.640 |
The other thing that you're saying, which is really 00:46:17.920 |
important is you have to remember what the capital 00:46:20.240 |
markets and the stock market is therefore it's not meant for 00:46:22.720 |
this. This is a small little cul de sac. But the overwhelming 00:46:27.200 |
majority of the capital markets and the equity markets is to 00:46:29.680 |
allocate excess capital to good ideas. That's what is usually 00:46:33.760 |
happening. There's a bunch of us that will put a bunch of our 00:46:37.360 |
money into things because we think it's the right thing to 00:46:40.200 |
do. And that is the overwhelming majority of what is happening 00:46:44.000 |
in the stock market every day. And David's right every now and 00:46:46.360 |
then one of these things randomly comes up. And every 00:46:49.680 |
period of time, there'll be a few parts of the market that go 00:46:53.120 |
crazy. But the reality is that's not what the overwhelming 00:46:56.320 |
majority of the actions and that's not why the security 00:46:59.520 |
Have you guys seen this guy? His name is Tim Nackey on 00:47:02.720 |
Instagram. So what this guy did, this guy's incredible. So this 00:47:06.640 |
guy went out. And he basically bet 10 cents and online blackjack 00:47:11.360 |
because he's legally allowed to do it where he lives. I think 00:47:13.240 |
he's in Australia or something. Oh, yeah, that's 10 cents for 00:47:15.880 |
every follower he has on Instagram. So over the last 00:47:18.360 |
couple of months, he's been right. Yeah, he's been racking 00:47:20.880 |
and racking up the bets. And he ended up doing these $100,000 00:47:24.160 |
plus bets because he got over a million followers. He ran this 00:47:27.120 |
thing up to over a million bucks and he quit. But it's it's now 00:47:29.880 |
he's formed like a blackjack syndicate. So everyone wants to 00:47:32.120 |
kind of pile in and bet with him. I think that there's this 00:47:34.880 |
really interesting phenomenon of like social betting. Everyone 00:47:37.800 |
wants to be in a group together. He's got hundreds of 1000s of 00:47:40.400 |
people that have put money in this is so great. And then he 00:47:42.560 |
goes and does this online gambling. Nick pulled the video 00:47:44.520 |
up. I just say you watch how this guy and he's so 00:47:46.560 |
entertaining. He's awesome. Oh, man. This is this could be 00:47:49.080 |
deadly for sacks. sacks didn't know about this. 00:47:51.160 |
blackjack and betting 10 cents for every Instagram follower. 00:47:54.840 |
I've got there are 940,000 of your weapons with us now. So a 00:48:00.760 |
Alrighty, ladies and gentlemen, we have a $94,000 on the line 00:48:07.720 |
for the 940,000 of your weapons with us 90 on the button. Okay, 00:48:11.480 |
each of the side bits this bloke definitely gloves up both hands 00:48:14.600 |
on the golf course never has such an impact on my life. I'm not 00:48:19.200 |
healthy for gross seven versus six. There might be a double 00:48:25.200 |
down. There might be doubling down. I'll take three. 00:48:29.760 |
That's a double down. Double down. Yeah, yeah, definitely 00:48:33.800 |
double down. God damn you go change for me here. Of course 00:48:36.560 |
we're counting cars again. I will see you tomorrow you smug 00:48:59.400 |
son. Oh my god. This is so great. This guy is so good. 00:49:05.240 |
That's some serious degeneracy. It looks so fun, though. 00:49:15.680 |
And every day his follower count goes up. So every day he bets 00:49:18.760 |
more. And then you're following he ran this thing up to a 00:49:20.960 |
million a profit. Oh, so good. I haven't seen sacks this awake 00:49:24.280 |
during the pod. You don't get the 10 cents. He keeps it from 00:49:26.920 |
so he started this just by betting his own money. And he 00:49:29.760 |
would put 10 cents down every day for how many followers he 00:49:32.200 |
had. Okay, he he started betting more and more of his own money. 00:49:35.080 |
account that he can but I'm saying is it still all of his 00:49:38.560 |
money that he's betting? So then as of a few weeks ago, or like 00:49:41.440 |
a two weeks ago, he stopped betting his own money. He took 00:49:43.840 |
the million off the table. He called it a day and he set up a 00:49:45.800 |
syndicate. And now people send their own money in and he's 00:49:48.080 |
betting the syndicates money. And he does one hand a day and 00:49:52.200 |
he keeps racking this thing up. It's just but what happens when 00:49:55.720 |
he loses? Is there a day where he's lost a lot of money? Oh, 00:49:57.760 |
dude, you gotta watch it. Man. It's so I want to see what 00:50:01.000 |
happens when he loses like this is great. Can we hit the sky at 00:50:03.480 |
the all in summit online blackjack? Right. So there's 00:50:07.840 |
always like a fake dealer. And he has all this hilarious 00:50:10.880 |
Let's set up an account right now. I'll be honest with you. 00:50:17.440 |
This is so juicy. Ah, we should get this guy out to the summit. 00:50:22.440 |
This guy's got to come to the summit and do a live hand with 00:50:24.880 |
Mr. He's big, big shout out. Is he on tiktok or no just I think 00:50:28.160 |
he only does Insta. Yeah, Tim Knack. I haven't seen sacks 00:50:31.320 |
listen to Freeberg on this podcast more than he just did. 00:50:34.520 |
That was incredible. You got sacks his attention. sacks. Did 00:50:38.200 |
you know you could play live online blackjack from your phone? 00:50:41.640 |
You know this tonight? Did I know that? This is important 00:50:46.600 |
Big day coming up. There is 514,000 of you in email and a 00:50:51.120 |
$51,400 bid coming up. All right, day 60 a monumental day. 00:50:55.960 |
We can hit the 50k button here. We will do $50,000. $800 on the 00:51:02.800 |
21 plus three $600 on the perfect peers. This is by far 00:51:07.960 |
and away the biggest bet I have put on a table in my life. We're 00:51:11.720 |
trying to itch ourselves into gambling immortality. 14 plays 00:51:16.320 |
three. No. Oh, it's a disgusting pull on day 60 with all the 00:51:21.960 |
marbles on the line. We will stand and look for 10 10 and 00:51:26.120 |
bust 10 10 and bust. 10 10 and bust. Come on. 10 10 10 heroics 00:51:30.920 |
to be a hero. Yes. Yes. Yes. Day 60. Stick that in your pipe. 00:51:37.400 |
Holy. Oh my god. We've broken the push streak with the 00:51:45.320 |
adventures of 10 10. And you better believe that means I'll 00:51:48.680 |
see you tomorrow. And I'll be betting even more. This guy's 00:51:52.080 |
got great energy. Can he do one live on the show next week? Oh, 00:51:55.280 |
day 55. Oh, here we go. Instagram follower I've got 00:51:58.200 |
outrageously. There is an extra 21,000 of you in here today. So 00:52:01.920 |
$37,600 bit going on for the 376,000 of you legends in here 00:52:07.120 |
now. Coming right up. Okay. Day 55 brings about a big I don't 00:52:12.120 |
like this deal. We have $36,000 on the button 1000. And $600 on 00:52:18.960 |
the perfect peers that D 7.6 k total bits are closed. We've 00:52:23.320 |
just had a goddamn dealer change. We've been duped here. 00:52:26.840 |
plays a 12 v king. Oh my god before I before I hit the hit 00:52:36.520 |
button. I will say this having talked to the morning rumble 00:52:39.160 |
this morning. Last time I spoke to the media about this journey. 00:52:43.080 |
I broke a six day winning streak that day and I lost so if it 00:52:46.080 |
happens again today, this one's on Roger Farrelly. We need to 00:52:49.280 |
see eight or nine go low. No. Oh my god. Come on that dealer 00:52:55.000 |
change was so good. I guess you just can't win them all. But 00:52:59.400 |
we've been and I will see you tomorrow. When we'll be bidding 00:53:03.600 |
even more that dealer change was so dirty. You saw the dealer 00:53:06.400 |
change at the last minute he came up and they changed the dealer. 00:53:08.920 |
They asked me before I've been with you and they do that every 00:53:13.360 |
time with you start running it up. They send in the dealer to 00:53:16.000 |
ice you. I think there's a particular dealer they've got. 00:53:19.040 |
You know, they do. It's like in the bullpen. The blank cooler. 00:53:22.600 |
Yeah, we know the one the black cooler. I don't want to say 00:53:25.680 |
anything but it's the cooler. We need this guy next week on the 00:53:28.840 |
pod to do the live bet and then we each give them 5k. How about 00:53:32.200 |
that? You guys in I've had them trot out the cooler. When I was 00:53:35.680 |
playing craps once, I was so mad. And I was on such a heater. 00:53:40.080 |
And what happens is, you guys have seen me play craps where 00:53:44.040 |
it's like it's all rhythm, right? So it's like, yes, I get 00:53:46.400 |
the dice in a certain way. Yeah, you know, I do. They bring in 00:53:50.600 |
this guy. And he was like a clutch. It's like Daniel Day 00:53:54.000 |
Lewis in my left foot. All of a sudden he's everything over for 00:53:58.760 |
dice fall off the table. I got so out of rhythm. It was so I was 00:54:04.040 |
so I want this guy in the pod next week. We're each putting 00:54:06.440 |
five dimes in we got 20k from all in. Let's do it. That would 00:54:10.600 |
be so much. Oh my god, we should get him to play a special all in 00:54:13.400 |
hand and let him run up our capital on the summit. Let's 00:54:16.920 |
take the profits from the summit and do a live hand. We could put 00:54:19.960 |
like a million bucks each on it. We double up and then we're done 00:54:22.880 |
with the pod. We don't have to do a summit next year. Really 00:54:25.040 |
good idea. Let's do it. Let's let it roll. All right. God, 00:54:30.200 |
this is so much action for us. I don't know if we can continue 00:54:32.760 |
but there's more stories to come. And just buyer beware. I 00:54:36.720 |
mean, if you're betting on this stuff, I mean, what do we have 00:54:41.040 |
We don't have to tell you anything. You're an adult. 00:54:43.080 |
You're an adult. Go to your own job. Well, here's something 00:54:46.400 |
really interesting. Seatbelt. Don't drink and drive. Don't use 00:54:52.120 |
drugs. I mean, it's like, all of a sudden, like we need to 00:54:57.080 |
By the way, if you swim in Cape Cod alone in the deep water in 00:55:01.400 |
the kelp, you might get hit by a great white shark. 00:55:03.600 |
Or do whatever you want. And please just take responsibility 00:55:06.280 |
for yourself. It's not our job. Absolutely. And I'm responsible 00:55:10.040 |
Well, I mean, also, it's, I just want to ask one question here. 00:55:13.800 |
Is there anything with the short selling that could there could 00:55:16.080 |
be more disclosure on that trim off that just if the SEC was 00:55:19.080 |
going to do something, I hear that bubble up once in a while, 00:55:23.440 |
I really think that's a very good idea. I do think that there 00:55:26.120 |
are some short sellers who are doing it because they have to 00:55:29.120 |
hedge a position that they have. But then there are other short 00:55:32.160 |
sellers who are doing it speculatively. And there are 00:55:34.280 |
synthetic instruments that banks will sell you to go massively 00:55:38.240 |
super short. That's how you can get a situation where 140% of 00:55:42.000 |
the stock is sold short, which doesn't shouldn't make sense. If 00:55:44.320 |
there's only 100 shares of a company, how could it be that 00:55:47.720 |
140 shares are sold short, it's because you can have these 00:55:50.640 |
expensive static for the audience, because I don't think 00:55:53.680 |
So there are ways where if you have a formal trading 00:55:58.960 |
relationship with Wall Street, and you need to be of a certain 00:56:01.880 |
size, and they go through a diligence process, they give 00:56:04.160 |
you so you know, I have one called an ISDA. And it's 00:56:07.480 |
essentially an account and a framework that you negotiate 00:56:10.640 |
with a bank that allows you to call them and say, Hey, give me 00:56:14.720 |
a B or C. And other times they'll call you and say, Hey, I 00:56:17.640 |
have this really interesting way to play XYZ. And one of the 00:56:22.200 |
things that you can do with them is you can say, Listen, I want 00:56:25.520 |
to go super, super long, or super, super short, a theme or a 00:56:30.000 |
company. And they'll create a contract with between you and 00:56:33.520 |
them. That'll allow you to get that kind of exposure. Now, 00:56:39.200 |
you're not supposed to do that on a regular basis, nor are you 00:56:42.840 |
supposed to lever this up. This is actually what blew up a 00:56:45.360 |
different hedge fund called archaic goes, I remember we 00:56:48.920 |
covered it. And in that, I guess what happened was, the gentleman 00:56:53.520 |
was calling many banks and doing all these things. And one bank 00:56:57.400 |
didn't know what the other bank was doing. So all of a sudden, 00:56:59.520 |
there was this massive synthetic leverage that he was getting on, 00:57:04.040 |
I think it was news Corp stock. And then they found out that it 00:57:06.920 |
was unwound, then he owed a bunch of money, he couldn't pay 00:57:09.200 |
it, the whole thing shut down, the stock market went crazy. So 00:57:12.640 |
so no way that disclosure, but there isn't a rule that says 00:57:15.680 |
that. And every time somebody tries to introduce it, the 00:57:20.880 |
So in a way, it's almost like a parallel universe where bets are 00:57:24.720 |
occurring on outcomes in the stock market that are not tied 00:57:30.200 |
Well, it is tied in the sense that ultimately, it all needs to 00:57:32.680 |
feed back to an actual physical share. So this is where all this 00:57:36.800 |
price behavior gets further amplified. I think the point is 00:57:39.360 |
that these forms of expressing risk, yes, can really amplify 00:57:43.240 |
what would otherwise happen. So when freebirds example, most 00:57:46.560 |
people would sit there get the financials. Some would maybe say 00:57:50.960 |
historically, this thing looks like a short or I wouldn't even 00:57:53.800 |
buy it at all, right. But other people may say, Well, if I 00:57:57.000 |
listened to the chairman, and I think about the future, maybe I 00:57:59.560 |
go long, that's a, that's a fine thing, you can enter the stock 00:58:02.600 |
market and do that. But all this other stuff amplifies all these 00:58:05.800 |
things to a degree that we're not really used to. 00:58:07.440 |
And let's be honest, the people who are betting, I'll use the 00:58:11.600 |
word betting here, the people who are betting on these things 00:58:14.200 |
are not looking to get a 7% return or beat the average. I 00:58:17.880 |
mean, they're looking to double their money in 48 hours. They 00:58:21.040 |
know what they're getting in for, they're just walking up to 00:58:23.000 |
the roulette table and putting 10k on black or red, and then 00:58:26.280 |
clapping and seeing five reds in a row and saying, Oh, it's got 00:58:29.840 |
to be black next. I mean, they're Phil Helmy within this. 00:58:32.120 |
They don't say that when they lose them. No, of course not. 00:58:35.120 |
Yeah, no, no personal ownership here. Well, here's an 00:58:37.000 |
interesting thing that's sort of related a little bit of 00:58:39.680 |
jurisdiction shopping or placing of companies and products 00:58:45.440 |
continues in Texas is very hot in this regard. BlackRock and 00:58:49.160 |
Citadel are backing new stock, a new stock exchange take on the 00:58:53.180 |
New York Stock Exchange and the NASDAQ duopoly. So according to 00:58:56.240 |
the Wall Street Journal, the exchange would be based in Texas 00:58:58.280 |
and called the Texas Stock Exchange or the TX s e, they've 00:59:02.400 |
raised 120 million so far, it seems like a low number. And the 00:59:05.340 |
general pitch here is the New York Stock Exchange and NASDAQ 00:59:09.280 |
have become expensive, and they've been increasing their 00:59:12.600 |
compliance costs. NASDAQ has a new board of diversity target 00:59:16.440 |
that went into effect at the start of this year, all the DEI 00:59:19.000 |
stuff. And so this exchange is pitching itself as a CEO 00:59:22.420 |
friendly, and the anti woke exchange. So here's the plan 00:59:26.440 |
timeline file and FCC registration docs later this 00:59:29.000 |
year start facilitating trades next year, post the first new 00:59:32.240 |
listing in 2026. Interesting, I guess that Citadel and Black 00:59:35.800 |
Rock are in this group, because they can bring a lot of 00:59:38.300 |
business, obviously. And you know, some of this other stuff 00:59:41.280 |
that's been going on with Texas, Texas is now Tesla's corporate 00:59:44.480 |
headquarters, they moved to Palo Alto in California, Texas in in 00:59:48.000 |
2021. Your thoughts here, Chamath on movie love it. Okay, 00:59:52.720 |
why? Why do you love it so much to tell competition? 00:59:56.160 |
I do think that it's hard right now for companies to get access 01:00:02.320 |
to capital. I think more diverse and more flexible ways where 01:00:08.460 |
smart investors can allocate their money into the ideas that 01:00:11.700 |
they want are better. I think that the duopoly hasn't created 01:00:16.540 |
enough competition. So the NASDAQ and, and New York Stock 01:00:19.500 |
Exchange haven't innovated. And in fact, they've, they've 01:00:22.340 |
probably been a little regressive. In terms of filing 01:00:26.820 |
requirements, listing requirements in terms of board 01:00:29.260 |
composition, they've fallen for a bunch of things that don't 01:00:33.620 |
actually point to the economic rationale or value in a company. 01:00:37.820 |
And so I think if you have a third player, there's a chance 01:00:42.020 |
that more competition will create more rational behavior, 01:00:44.780 |
which will flow into the companies themselves. So I'm a 01:00:49.220 |
huge fan of this. I think that the the stock exchanges right 01:00:52.220 |
now are too brittle, because and there's and that large reason is 01:00:57.660 |
Freeberg, any thoughts for you about more options? 01:01:01.260 |
Well, I think part of this is actually there's been these 01:01:05.180 |
rules imposed by NASDAQ and New York Stock Exchange that have 01:01:12.740 |
tried to enforce upon the listed companies, rules and regulations 01:01:17.540 |
that are not tied to securities laws, including some of these 01:01:22.020 |
aspects of diversity of your board. And I know that there 01:01:24.980 |
have been a lot of public company, board members, and CEOs 01:01:29.940 |
that have quietly tried to push back on these rules, that 01:01:33.220 |
they're imposing social systems upon, you know, what is 01:01:36.900 |
effectively a regulated exchange. And so there's 01:01:39.940 |
certainly like an interest in a pushing for a competitive 01:01:42.860 |
marketplace for exchanges. There was a survey done recently that 01:01:46.220 |
showed I got to find some of this data, but it showed the 01:01:49.260 |
cost of going public on NASDAQ, Amex or the New York Stock 01:01:52.940 |
Exchange was about $7.4 million. Cost of going public through an 01:01:57.260 |
over the counter bulletin board listing service was about $2 01:01:59.780 |
million. And then there's these additional kind of rules that 01:02:03.380 |
are being imposed if you want to be listed on the big boards. So 01:02:06.540 |
clearly, there's interest and it's great to see a competitive 01:02:08.940 |
market emerge, you know, how there have, by the way, there 01:02:11.700 |
have been other attempts. There's that long term stock 01:02:14.500 |
exchange, you guys remember that a couple years ago, that was 01:02:16.620 |
incentivized long term holdings. There was two other equity 01:02:21.900 |
security exchanges, efforts made in the last couple of years that 01:02:24.660 |
didn't take off. So this isn't super novel in terms of like 01:02:28.180 |
seeing a new challenger exchange step up, but I think more 01:02:33.900 |
All right. In other news, Apple and OpenAI have reportedly 01:02:37.260 |
struck an iPhone deal. According to Bloomberg, Apple is going to 01:02:40.380 |
announce a major partnership with OpenAI at WWDC next week 01:02:43.420 |
chat GPT will be integrated into iOS, which means Apple is 01:02:47.460 |
outsourcing its AI chatbot at least at the start. I guess 01:02:51.860 |
you could argue it benefits both sides because OpenAI gets access 01:02:54.660 |
to over a billion phone users and Apple gets a native 01:02:56.940 |
integration of a top tier language model. Terms are not 01:03:01.260 |
clear. But most people think this is going to be a short to 01:03:04.340 |
midterm deal with Apple building out its own AI chatbot in the 01:03:08.460 |
future, but it's just not ready for primetime right now also 01:03:11.180 |
plans to make Siri AI powered and bring AI features to the 01:03:13.900 |
Apple ecosystem. You have heard that Apple is going to try to 01:03:17.420 |
let Siri dive deeper into apps, ie if you're ordering your 01:03:21.980 |
DoorDash or Uber Eats or an Uber or Lyft or whatever, it might 01:03:25.900 |
actually be able to execute those things inside of an app. 01:03:29.460 |
Interesting line from the article, Apple executives were 01:03:32.100 |
concerned about reputational damage from a rogue chatbot. 01:03:34.980 |
Some people within Apple have a philosophical aversion to having 01:03:38.980 |
a chatbot at all very interesting. So thoughts on 01:03:44.220 |
this sacks, just getting you back in the loop here. 01:03:47.220 |
Well, we kind of predicted that something like this could or 01:03:50.660 |
should happen. We said that the big win for Apple in AI would be 01:03:55.140 |
to make Siri actually work based on LLM because Siri just, you 01:04:00.380 |
know, it's understanding of languages historically has not 01:04:02.940 |
been great. And that's really limited the usefulness of it. 01:04:05.620 |
Imagine if Siri worked with the conversational abilities of chat 01:04:10.500 |
GPT 4.0. If it had that level of semantic understanding, if it 01:04:13.820 |
could talk to you, the way that 4.0 can talk to you, that would 01:04:18.180 |
make Siri really powerful. And you know, for me, Siri is a 01:04:22.180 |
feature I've turned off because it's so annoying, but 01:04:26.460 |
If you give it the power of the best open AI model, and then the 01:04:32.020 |
speed of running it natively on the iPhone, I don't know what 01:04:34.740 |
they're going to do about that. But presumably, there are things 01:04:37.020 |
they can do to speed it up. And then you give it access to the 01:04:41.940 |
internal API's you're using to control apps. That would be 01:04:45.620 |
really powerful. You could be an agent that you can just tell it 01:04:49.860 |
to do things. And you know, not just ask like the weather and 01:04:54.660 |
Well, what's really interesting, I think about this deal chamath 01:04:58.220 |
is Apple is having a hard time getting people to upgrade their 01:05:01.740 |
phones, right? And people have lost faith in the stock. Now you 01:05:04.980 |
say, hey, we're going to put a language model on here, you can 01:05:07.660 |
make it a local language model, and have it be privacy 01:05:11.260 |
protected. So that means you need more memory on the phone, 01:05:14.460 |
you're going to need another chip on the phone, it's going to 01:05:16.660 |
there's a distinct reason to upgrade. Now, if you had a 01:05:20.540 |
language model on your phone, and Siri was like this super 01:05:23.140 |
Siri, that actually got stuff done, I would upgrade my phone 01:05:26.700 |
immediately. And right now I skipped two or three 01:05:28.820 |
generations. What are your thoughts on this as a way to 01:05:31.380 |
maybe reinvigorate the iPhone franchise tomorrow? You buy it 01:05:34.540 |
or not? No, the problem is that we don't know what the right 01:05:38.700 |
form factor for a super scaled consumer AI app looks like. So 01:05:45.300 |
we've all again, I'm not trying to be a wet blanket. It's just 01:05:48.340 |
that when you look at what's built and built so far, I think 01:05:50.820 |
most of the things we've seen are the Friendster and my spaces 01:05:57.380 |
of this class of app. We haven't seen the Facebook's and the 01:06:02.100 |
Instagram's yet. And the reason is because we haven't 01:06:05.420 |
experimented and push the boundaries of the form factor. 01:06:09.220 |
So for example, in the first phases of social networking, the 01:06:14.820 |
idea that you would collect information about all your 01:06:17.420 |
friends and then create something called a newsfeed was 01:06:20.060 |
totally shocking. And I remember when we first released that 01:06:24.140 |
people got really upset. And then it just became this de 01:06:26.860 |
facto. Why were they upset about it? Tell me? Well, it's this 01:06:30.460 |
idea that you collected this information, and then you 01:06:32.700 |
presented it about all of your friends was disconcerting in 01:06:35.660 |
the shot as a feature. Now, if you don't have a newsfeed of 01:06:38.340 |
some kind in your app, for many apps, it's do a right. So the 01:06:42.740 |
same problem exists today. All we've done today is we've 01:06:45.940 |
replicated an existing use case with a slightly better feature 01:06:51.260 |
here or there. Nobody has gone out and said on a blank canvas, 01:06:56.060 |
let me completely reimagine how consumers want value with these 01:07:01.300 |
things to enable it. And until that happens, we're just 01:07:04.860 |
wasting time. So the idea that Apple with this $1,000 device is 01:07:08.340 |
all of a sudden going to figure out that this is why you're 01:07:10.620 |
going to upgrade, I think is pretty speculative. And I think 01:07:14.140 |
they're going to be disappointed. I think people 01:07:15.780 |
have realized that four generations ago was more than 01:07:19.580 |
enough. And on top of this, the stuff that you value inside the 01:07:24.900 |
iPhone is not what you're going to need for AI. So spending a 01:07:30.420 |
trillion billion dollars on the fourth camera lens is not going 01:07:35.420 |
to be what solves this problem. And so you're more likely to 01:07:40.780 |
have a very simple earbud that is, you know, very 01:07:43.860 |
inconspicuous and discreetly in your inner ear. Well, speaking 01:07:47.860 |
information to you, then you are and with a companion $500 phone, 01:07:52.420 |
then I think you will be with a 1500. You're in the new form 01:07:55.780 |
factor, I am going to take the other side of the cap, I think 01:07:58.420 |
that because you have this data on your phone, all your 01:08:01.060 |
iMessages, all your documents, all your photos, videos, music 01:08:04.580 |
collection, there's a unique set of data on that phone to make 01:08:07.460 |
your personal LLM, that's going to do extraordinary things for 01:08:10.500 |
you, because it's going to watch you and all your behavior on 01:08:13.020 |
that phone. And man, if I can have a personal LLM that's been 01:08:15.860 |
watching me order very specific sushi rolls, or, you know, where 01:08:19.860 |
I send my ubers, what type of ubers I like what music I play, 01:08:23.060 |
I feel like that LLM don't need to be deep. My point is, you 01:08:26.220 |
don't need a $1500 device to do that. So if you know, but it's 01:08:29.020 |
I'm talking about data set. So cool. Don't you? Uber has the 01:08:34.020 |
data. DoorDash has the data. No, no, you're missing my point. 01:08:36.780 |
The data of me clicking on the screen, that is not apples to 01:08:40.940 |
collect. It's not there. I think they'll collect it, put it in 01:08:44.300 |
there, you would have to encrypt have to fundamentally change the 01:08:46.740 |
SDK. The idea then that Apple can take a tax on that is 01:08:49.780 |
outrageous. I think the whole app economy would blow up if 01:08:54.300 |
I think it's the opposite. I think the app economy would 01:08:56.260 |
thrive. You'd be have this a great thing where I could tell 01:08:59.540 |
Apple to try to change the terms of service and see what happens. 01:09:02.580 |
Okay, freeberg your thoughts on this. Any thoughts? No. Okay, 01:09:05.980 |
well, let's get to this. It's time for science corner 01:09:08.540 |
temperatures in the Atlantic Ocean are alarmingly high. 01:09:11.340 |
freeberg. A couple weeks ago, we saw this crazy chart on the X 01:09:15.460 |
about the Atlantic Ocean temperatures, pre Hurricane 01:09:19.020 |
Katrina right about now and take us through this because it's 01:09:24.100 |
There's not much to talk about except to highlight this image 01:09:28.700 |
which shows again, we talked about this a few months ago, hot 01:09:33.420 |
ocean temperatures drive hurricane and tropical storm 01:09:36.740 |
activity because as the wind, the air above the ocean starts 01:09:40.500 |
to move, the energy from the ocean gets pulled out, you know, 01:09:45.220 |
like things cool down, the water cools down, but that energy 01:09:48.140 |
actually goes back into pushing the wind to move faster and 01:09:51.660 |
faster. And that's how tropical storms, cyclones, and hurricanes 01:09:55.780 |
are formed is warm ocean temperatures. And there's been 01:10:00.300 |
this kind of persistent warming since last year in the Atlantic, 01:10:04.820 |
in this particular region, where all the hurricanes form. And 01:10:09.300 |
normally the hurricane season starts kind of call it August to 01:10:12.140 |
October. Right now we are seeing temperatures that are so far 01:10:16.260 |
beyond what we've seen. Anytime historically, this image that 01:10:20.500 |
you're looking at here actually compares the ocean temperatures 01:10:23.260 |
right now in the Atlantic, to where we were at the same time 01:10:26.500 |
period in 2005, which was a record hurricane year, obviously 01:10:30.740 |
with Hurricane Katrina, right? Yeah. And so their National 01:10:34.380 |
Hurricane Center, a lot of the climatologists are forecasting 01:10:37.380 |
that over the next couple of months, we could see and should 01:10:40.780 |
expect to see probabilistically, much larger, stronger, bigger, 01:10:45.380 |
more frequent hurricanes than we've ever seen historically. So 01:10:47.780 |
we'll see if it plays out. Just a very small tidbit of news to 01:10:50.660 |
share, thought it'd be worth highlighting, not getting a lot 01:10:53.380 |
of main mainstream media press attention. But, you know, 01:10:57.220 |
to just confirm a couple of things for me, because we live 01:10:59.940 |
in a time where people are questioning science and 01:11:02.220 |
scientists, and we have institutions we don't trust, 01:11:05.620 |
whether it's three letter agencies in Washington, or 01:11:08.740 |
scientists and all these papers being written and everything 01:11:11.100 |
we're finding out and nobody trusts anybody. And we're sort 01:11:14.180 |
of resetting trust. I want to just ask you as somebody I trust 01:11:17.500 |
as a scientist, number one, global warming, temperatures 01:11:21.300 |
increasing, putting aside, you know what we do about it 01:11:23.900 |
temperatures in the ocean, it is undeniable are increasing at a 01:11:27.740 |
rate that you would describe as concerning. Am I correct? 01:11:31.100 |
We have not seen in the modern era, temperatures in the ocean 01:11:36.620 |
like we're seeing now, that's a fact, right? I'm not going to do 01:11:40.220 |
this whole big prognosis on everything all in one, because I 01:11:43.580 |
think that's where people feel like there's room for 01:11:45.820 |
discrediting things. I'm trying to so we can do this. Yeah, we 01:11:48.540 |
can be very specific about things. Here's an example. So 01:11:50.980 |
this is the sea surface temperature going back to 1981. 01:11:54.020 |
Okay. And as you can see, at this point in the year, and you 01:11:57.660 |
know, the temperature oscillates because of the way the earth 01:12:00.180 |
tilts towards the sun. And so at this point in the year, we are 01:12:05.100 |
seeing right now, sea surface temperatures that are beyond 01:12:10.380 |
continuing to climb. So if this does not taper off or level off, 01:12:15.220 |
we will see record sea surface temperatures in the August to 01:12:19.060 |
October timeframe, which will almost certainly push massive 01:12:22.540 |
hurricane events out of the Atlantic, and they will find 01:12:27.020 |
So this is super clarifying, this should not be controversial 01:12:29.940 |
to anybody, we have temperature readings in the ocean, and 01:12:32.700 |
just data, data, it's just simply data, right. So you know, 01:12:35.900 |
putting aside what political party you on and what you think 01:12:38.220 |
about gas and oil, I will tell you, there's a lot of theory, 01:12:40.260 |
one of one of the theories. So there's theories about El Nino, 01:12:43.220 |
there's theories about climate change contributing to this. 01:12:45.620 |
There's also a theory about sulfur dioxide, that has now 01:12:49.380 |
been banned in shipping and cargo vessels that go across the 01:12:53.900 |
oceans. Last year, they banned sulfur dioxide use in the fuel 01:12:58.020 |
that that's coming out of these, and sulfur dioxide actually 01:13:00.700 |
reflect sunlight. So as it goes up into the air, into the 01:13:03.540 |
atmosphere coming out of these ships, it actually blocks and 01:13:08.500 |
And so a lot of folks have said that over the last couple of 01:13:11.980 |
decades, we've actually dampened the temperature and the warming 01:13:15.860 |
that's happened on earth because of all the sulfur dioxide we've 01:13:18.380 |
been putting up into the atmosphere. But because sulfur 01:13:20.700 |
dioxide causes acid rain, environmentalists have been 01:13:24.060 |
pushing for years to ban sulfur dioxide. The problem is with 01:13:27.820 |
banning sulfur dioxide, you may have this other side effect, 01:13:30.380 |
which is now more rapid increased warming got of the 01:13:35.180 |
So these are complex systems, and you we should be delicate 01:13:39.140 |
with them. If you were to give us a prescription here, 01:13:42.740 |
freeberg. What's like a basic prescription? Are we just 01:13:46.940 |
experimenting in a way that is not advisable with, you know, 01:13:52.940 |
this ecosystem? And we should just not run the experiment. I 01:13:57.900 |
think that might be like a non political non charged way to say 01:14:01.020 |
it. Like, this experiment is a little bit too crazy to run on 01:14:04.420 |
the one planet Earth we have. Yeah. Which experiment? The 01:14:07.660 |
experiment of doing things that increase global warming, which 01:14:11.980 |
would be you mean living? Well, yeah, I mean, not burning 01:14:16.660 |
fossil fuels. People are just acting in their own economic 01:14:19.860 |
best interest. Yes. And if that economic best interest increases 01:14:23.580 |
temperature so much. I think there's a freeberg that it will 01:14:27.660 |
compromise the oceans and damage them to a point that would be 01:14:31.100 |
extremely concerning is I guess what I'm getting at. 01:14:33.100 |
There is a reduction in biodiversity that's underway. We 01:14:35.740 |
can see that, like using data, but to Chamath's point, humans 01:14:41.180 |
have prioritized the progression of individuals forward. China 01:14:46.700 |
had a billion people that came out of poverty in 30 years. 01:14:49.260 |
Yeah. And they came out of poverty because of the 01:14:51.740 |
industrialization, making production of consumable goods, 01:14:55.620 |
that that population gets to consume, they get access to more 01:14:57.780 |
calories, you get access to more foods, they get to have cars, 01:15:00.380 |
they get to have houses, all of that making cement making 01:15:02.980 |
concrete, all of those things require industrial systems. And 01:15:06.820 |
those industrial systems have a cost. That cost is the dollar 01:15:10.420 |
economic cost, which we're kind of rationalizing with very 01:15:12.540 |
productivity, then there's this whole cost that's externalized. 01:15:15.500 |
Got it. Yeah, we understand that. Yeah. Right. So so that's 01:15:18.300 |
the tension is like, if you're wealthy, if you're a wealthy 01:15:21.060 |
nation, if you're the Western Europe or the United States, you 01:15:24.120 |
get to stand up and say, stop carbon. But if you're the rest 01:15:27.580 |
of the world, you're like, I want to have a home. I want to 01:15:30.060 |
write you want to have the same evolution stuff that America 01:15:34.180 |
went through, or you're I want to I want to progress as a as a 01:15:37.380 |
person, I want to progress as a society. And that's the tension 01:15:40.580 |
that makes us a very difficult problem to resolve, which is how 01:15:44.040 |
to more the world get to progress. While you were like 01:15:47.420 |
being cognizant of what I'm trying to get at free bird. I 01:15:49.740 |
am optimistic. So let me just say this. Oh, yeah, cuz that's 01:15:52.180 |
what I'm getting at. Are you optimistic? Are you pessimistic? 01:15:54.920 |
I believe strongly that there is a strong relationship between 01:16:00.440 |
the output of atmospheric carbon and the deleterious effects we 01:16:03.720 |
see in ecosystems. Okay. That is something I feel like is true 01:16:07.280 |
from data. I am not however, as pessimistic that the world is 01:16:11.480 |
going to end in the next decade or two, because I see 01:16:14.360 |
improvements in productivity, meaning how many units we get 01:16:17.860 |
out for every unit in or how many units we get out for every 01:16:21.480 |
unit of carbon that's emitted. And those productivity meaning 01:16:24.700 |
better technology systems are rapidly changing how we make 01:16:28.340 |
things and how people are accessing goods and services. And 01:16:31.540 |
I think that that's why I am like, because I'm a techno 01:16:34.180 |
optimist, I'm optimistic about where things are headed are 01:16:37.100 |
headed. And it is also why I get very angry and upset about any 01:16:40.940 |
efforts or attempts to slow down the adoption of technology, 01:16:44.220 |
because these things will pull people forward and make that 01:16:47.180 |
happen faster without all the deleterious side effects that 01:16:50.180 |
we've unfortunately had to do in the absence of technology. 01:16:53.140 |
So trim off, I'll pull you into here. So based on what freeberg 01:16:56.540 |
is saying here, yes, these things are occurring, but the 01:16:59.500 |
technology and the advances we're seeing in but one example, 01:17:02.580 |
solar, and then some people might bring up nuclear and other 01:17:04.780 |
ones, we just had filled to each of my conference this week, give 01:17:07.860 |
a great talk on this. Solar is just getting so cheap, batteries 01:17:12.580 |
are getting so cheap, putting batteries in your home, putting 01:17:14.780 |
solar in, you know, and then putting data centers next to 01:17:17.740 |
nuclear things. This is all adding up to we can solve this 01:17:20.700 |
problem. And so you to feel optimistic about this? 01:17:23.500 |
Yeah, totally. I think that climate change stalled when it 01:17:26.380 |
was an emotional and philosophical rallying cry, 01:17:30.580 |
largely of the left. When instead, it became something 01:17:35.380 |
about resilience, and domestic manufacturing, both sides came 01:17:40.460 |
together. And I think we're at a point now where the US is energy 01:17:46.540 |
independence plus, the amount of reliance on non carbon based 01:17:51.380 |
fuels will drive a sea change in the United States, I think it'll 01:17:55.180 |
be copied in Western Europe. And it's also going to be at enough 01:17:58.900 |
of a low price point where it'll get embraced in the developing 01:18:02.820 |
world. So it's a it's an incredible example of if you 01:18:07.020 |
want to take an idea, and a bunch of solutions, and want to 01:18:12.780 |
die on the hill of messaging and platitudes, it'll make no 01:18:18.500 |
progress. But if instead, you're willing to sort of be less 01:18:22.180 |
extreme about it, and actually just frame it in economic value 01:18:26.580 |
add, all of a sudden, everybody embraces it and just becomes 01:18:30.620 |
obvious. So I think that we're going to do wonders over the 01:18:34.620 |
next 20 and 30 and 40 years all over the world. To push back on 01:18:40.660 |
the general state of warming. But I think it will have 01:18:43.980 |
happened because the economic incentives aligned, not because 01:18:48.580 |
a philosophical or emotional framing of the issue. 01:18:53.420 |
All right, everybody, this has been a very productive episode 01:18:57.180 |
of the number one podcast in the world, the all in podcast. And 01:19:01.580 |
good luck tonight, gentlemen, with your fundraiser. I wish you 01:19:04.620 |
great luck. David Sachs and Chamath Palihapiti. Even if it's 01:19:07.740 |
not my preferred candidate, that's totally fine. We could 01:19:09.860 |
all differ and you can have a great, great event tonight. 01:19:13.300 |
Good luck. I have one thing. Okay, good. I have one more 01:19:16.420 |
birthday in my family. Today, making us all look bad. This is 01:19:21.340 |
one of the most incredible people in my life. charismatic, 01:19:26.140 |
funny, charming, intelligent. It is my bestie David Friedberg 01:19:32.700 |
we love you, David. We had a nice little birthday cake at the 01:19:38.260 |
liquidity summit this week for him. I had a cake made. Thank 01:19:41.540 |
you for showing your birthday. And here we go. And, and it's 01:19:45.180 |
also a k 47. Alan Keating's birthday today is all the same. 01:19:49.100 |
But I love Alan Keating is one of my 45 and one is 47. 01:19:53.780 |
Do you know the significance of that? Of course, he's gonna win 01:20:01.620 |
all the elections. And there we go. Here we go. I think it's a 01:20:05.260 |
sign. It's a sign. Listen, I wish good luck to you all 01:20:08.220 |
tonight. I hope that it goes off well for you for you, gentlemen. 01:20:11.860 |
And listen, I would love to have Trump on the pod would love to 01:20:15.980 |
have Biden the pop like all things. We just want to have a 01:20:18.140 |
great conversation here. We keep it respectful. Sometimes it gets 01:20:21.220 |
a little chippy, but we love each other. And we love you, the 01:20:24.060 |
audience for participating in this don't fall for the 01:20:26.460 |
mainstream media is nonsense in trying to divide and conquer. We 01:20:29.620 |
got important tasks to do and problems to solve in the world. 01:20:32.700 |
And the way we do that is through great conversations. 01:20:35.020 |
Hopefully we set a tone. An example for everybody else have 01:20:38.180 |
just had to do that. We still love each other. And sometimes 01:20:41.260 |
some elbows get flown. And it's all good. Chamath sacks. Good 01:20:45.660 |
luck tonight. Freeberg. Happy birthday. And bye. We'll see you 01:20:50.500 |
all next time on the number one podcast in the world. The all in 01:21:04.260 |
We open source it to the fans and they've just gone crazy with 01:21:30.100 |
We should all just get a room and just have one big huge orgy 01:21:33.300 |
because they're all just useless. It's like this like 01:21:35.140 |
sexual tension that they just need to release somehow. 01:21:37.420 |
Let your beat be. Let your beat be. We need to get merch. 01:21:45.060 |
These are. All right, listen, thanks to our friends at eight 01:21:57.660 |
sleep sacks and I are both investors and we both love the 01:22:01.580 |
pod for ultra they're an incredible company that we both 01:22:04.620 |
backed and they are supporting the all in summit and if you 01:22:09.220 |
haven't used the pod for ultra or the blah blah blah eight 01:22:12.740 |
sleep. If you haven't used a sleep, it's awesome. Go to 01:22:14.780 |
eightsleep.com slash all in and use the code all in you'll get 01:22:17.500 |
some sort of a discount there. So actually love the company use 01:22:20.060 |
the product. It's a great product. And if you sweat like a 01:22:22.420 |
pig at night like Jay cow. Yeah. Particularly good for you. It'll 01:22:26.060 |
keep you cool. Absolutely. We'll keep it cool. And if you're up 01:22:29.300 |
all night because you have so much anxiety about Ukraine, 01:22:31.860 |
Ukraine, Ukraine, like Saxon, you can't sleep in your doom 01:22:34.780 |
scrolling and tweeting all night. Maybe this will help you 01:22:37.140 |
go to bed finally, which I'm watching those tweets is staying 01:22:39.980 |
up too late sacks, get some rest here and use a sleep to do it. 01:22:43.140 |
And thanks to our friends over there. eightsleep.com slash 01:22:45.080 |
all in code all in you get like a free Hyundai or something like 01:22:48.420 |
that off the off the price really good deal. And we love 01:22:51.100 |
the company. Okay, last year at the all in summit, we had a 01:22:54.300 |
wonderful talk by Jenny just and they have a very cool program 01:22:58.700 |
called power poker. They're holding a 2024 summer bootcamp 01:23:02.940 |
and tournament for women only. So for the ladies out there, if 01:23:06.060 |
you want to learn how to play poker, just like the besties and 01:23:08.380 |
Jenny just, you can join this four week training class, get a 01:23:12.020 |
limited playing time you play in a tournament, I'm going to come 01:23:14.380 |
and play in one of the sessions. But here's the great part. We 01:23:17.620 |
donated a ticket because we think it's worth encouraging 01:23:20.820 |
women to join the poker community. And so there's a 01:23:23.660 |
$7500 all in summit 2024 ticket at stake. There's only 80 spots 01:23:28.100 |
go ahead and join at poker power.com slash summer dash 01:23:31.740 |
bootcamp poker power.com slash summer dash bootcamp. It's gonna 01:23:34.820 |
fill up quick number of the women who work at my venture 01:23:38.180 |
firm launch have joined and they're looking forward to 01:23:40.100 |
learning poker again, 80 spots, I think they charge 100 bucks to 01:23:43.020 |
just make sure you show up and there's an all in summit ticket 01:23:45.460 |
there for you. You can actually see the video of this podcast on 01:23:48.780 |
YouTube, youtube.com slash at all in or just search all in 01:23:52.860 |
podcast, and hit the alert bell and you'll get updates when we 01:23:56.820 |
post and we're going to do a party in Vegas, my 01:24:00.340 |
understanding when we hit a million subscribers. So look for 01:24:03.020 |
that as well. You can follow us on x x.com slash the all in pod 01:24:07.980 |
tick tock is all underscore in underscore talk, Instagram, the 01:24:12.140 |
all in pod. And on LinkedIn, just search for the all in 01:24:15.420 |
podcast, you can follow Chamath at x.com slash Chamath. And you 01:24:19.460 |
can sign up for a sub stack at Chamath dot sub stack.com I do 01:24:22.980 |
free bird can be followed at x.com slash free bird and Ohalo 01:24:26.220 |
is hiring click on the careers page at Ohalo genetics.com. Okay, 01:24:30.620 |
everybody follow sacks at x.com slash David sacks and check out 01:24:34.380 |
sex is slack killer glue at glue.ai I'm Jason Calacanis. I 01:24:40.700 |
am x.com slash Jason and if you want to see pictures of my 01:24:43.620 |
bulldogs and the food I'm eating, go to instagram.com 01:24:46.780 |
slash Jason in the first name club. You can listen to my other 01:24:50.380 |
podcasts this week in startups to search for it on YouTube or 01:24:53.340 |
your favorite podcast player we are hiring a researcher apply to 01:24:57.260 |
be a researcher doing primary research and working with me and 01:25:00.340 |
producer Nick working in data and science and being able to do 01:25:03.620 |
great research finance, etc. All in podcast.co slash research. 01:25:08.260 |
It's a full time job working with us the besties and really 01:25:12.020 |
excited about my investment in Athena go to Athena. Wow. Sina 01:25:16.260 |
wow.com and get yourself a bit of a discount from your boy J 01:25:20.540 |
cow. You know, wow.com. We'll see you all next time on the