back to indexWhat’s the Difference Between Types and Analogies?
00:00:00.000 |
This is Scott Anderson, CEO for Desiring God. 00:00:02.780 |
You and other friends of Desiring God make possible the work of this ministry, including this podcast. 00:00:09.400 |
Thanks for your part in helping us freely share the truth that God is most glorified in us when we are most satisfied in Him. 00:00:24.120 |
A long-time financial donor to the ministry and a faithful listener to this podcast writes in to ask a follow-up question 00:00:30.200 |
that's drawn from your article that you wrote on typology back on May 12th on the website. 00:00:36.360 |
"Hello, Pastor John. Thank you for your lesson on types. Please explain the differences between typology and analogy." 00:00:45.000 |
I think the question has enough practical relevance for those of us who preach and teach so that 00:00:52.160 |
when we get to the end, everybody should care about this, because even if we don't 00:00:57.680 |
use the concept of type as often as others say in our preaching or teaching, 00:01:05.560 |
everybody, I think, should be using biblical analogies all the time. 00:01:10.080 |
So let me do a little education here on this typology thing. I wrote an article 00:01:14.520 |
called "Typology—How God Targets Your Desires," which is at Desiring God, and I defined 00:01:24.040 |
And maybe before I mention those three traits and then how analogies are like them and not like them, 00:01:31.160 |
I should just clarify for the average listener who probably doesn't know at all what a type is 00:01:40.840 |
Let me just explain. When Paul said in Romans 5:14, "Death reigned from Adam to Moses, 00:01:49.720 |
even over those whose sinning was not like the transgression of Adam." 00:01:54.000 |
Who is a type of the one who is to come? So Paul is saying 00:01:59.360 |
Adam was a type—and that's his word, not ours—a type of 00:02:04.880 |
Christ who is to come. So we're not just spinning our wheels in interesting literary chatter here. 00:02:14.400 |
not just our idea that we've put on the text, like we created the idea of types. Types comes out of the Bible. 00:02:21.560 |
That's why it matters enough to spend time thinking about it. So the three traits that I argued 00:02:28.920 |
define what a type is, is that, number one, the person or the object or the event that we're calling a type 00:02:39.160 |
resembles what is coming. So there's a resemblance. And the thing that's coming, 00:02:44.000 |
like Christ is coming and Adam was the type, is the thing that's coming is sometimes called an 00:02:49.560 |
anti-type. So, for example, in 1 Corinthians 10.6, Paul uses the word 00:02:55.160 |
"type"—or it's translated "example" in some versions, but it's the same word as "type" in Romans 5— 00:03:02.320 |
he uses the word "type" to refer, among other things, to passing through the Red Sea 00:03:08.600 |
as a type of baptism. In other words, there's a resemblance. 00:03:13.280 |
You're moving from bondage to freedom, you're passing through water, 00:03:17.560 |
you're following a leader, and when Paul sees that, he sees a 00:03:29.000 |
resemblance is the first. And at this point, type and analogy are the same. If a person says, "Well, isn't that just an analogy?" 00:03:35.320 |
You can say, "Yes, at this point it is, but that's not all there is to a type." So, number two, 00:03:40.680 |
to be a type in the Bible, the resemblance has to be designed by God 00:03:47.840 |
to make a point. It's not just an interesting correspondence. It's a design by God 00:03:55.120 |
to link one part of redemptive history and the flow of history to a later part of 00:04:03.000 |
redemptive history. And he makes this clear—Paul makes this clear in 1 Corinthians 10 when he says, 00:04:22.840 |
resemblance to baptism. They're not just thought up by the reader; 00:04:28.120 |
they are discerned by the reader as being intended by God. And now at this point you might say, "Well, can 00:04:35.760 |
analogies also be willed by God?" Because he wills everything. His providence is over everything, so anytime there's a resemblance, 00:04:43.240 |
that would be an analogy. You could call that an analogy and not just a type. And I'm going to say at this point, 00:04:49.440 |
yes, you could. You could talk about God-willed 00:04:54.320 |
analogies. Okay, but the third characteristic of a type, I think, 00:05:01.080 |
distinguishes it from the ordinary understanding of 00:05:05.560 |
analogy. And the third trait of a type is that it's prophetic; it predicts. God designed it not just to 00:05:13.500 |
correspond to something in the future, but to point or to predict something in the future. And 00:05:21.240 |
ordinarily, we don't think of analogies that way. Analogies are simply observed 00:05:25.640 |
similarities, but types predict. They give insight into the plan that God has for 00:05:39.560 |
resembles—you could even think that analogies are designed by God to 00:05:47.200 |
resemble—but analogies, at least in the ordinary way we think, do not 00:06:02.800 |
handles the Bible with somebody else in view, or even your own self, 00:06:07.800 |
but especially if you've got others in mind, is that I don't think we're free 00:06:17.600 |
just because it resembles something else in the Bible. 00:06:22.560 |
I think we should be careful, and let the New Testament give us cautious guidance 00:06:28.300 |
what we put in the category of God-willed, predictive 00:06:33.360 |
types. But I think that in our teaching and preaching, 00:06:39.280 |
we're free to draw analogies everywhere. Anytime we see an illuminating 00:06:45.320 |
similarity, we can draw it out. Spurgeon did this like crazy. 00:06:50.520 |
He was really good at it. I might say, "Let your words fly against the devil like stones from David's sling." 00:06:59.280 |
Well, that's an analogy. I'm just making that up. When I say, "Your words flying against the devil," 00:07:05.920 |
I'm not saying, "Ah, the stones in the sling were a type of 00:07:10.760 |
your words being written in Facebook." I'm not saying that. 00:07:15.520 |
I'm just saying that I can see a connection, and I can use the connection to add a punch or a force 00:07:22.480 |
to it without making any big biblical theological claim about 00:07:26.480 |
the stones in the sling being a biblical type. Or I might say, "May the idols of secularism 00:07:34.560 |
come crashing down like Dagon in the Philistine temple." 00:07:38.680 |
I mean, that's a way of talking that is analogical. I'm seeing connections, 00:07:45.240 |
I'm drawing them out, or I could say, "Like a great avalanche on Mount Everest," for that matter. 00:07:52.480 |
It's just the way we talk, and when analogies are found in the Bible to some point we want to make, I think it can add 00:08:00.960 |
provocative, memorable twist to our point, which is what Spurgeon did so effectively. 00:08:10.400 |
let's be careful to draw out the biblically clear types 00:08:16.720 |
that weave redemptive history together, and let's be lavish and free to use as many 00:08:28.280 |
Wonderful. Thank you, Pastor John. And you can get that article that we mentioned earlier, 00:08:31.720 |
"Typology, How God Targets Your Desires," at our website at DesiringGod.org. 00:08:37.320 |
And for everything you need to know about this podcast, and to send Pastor John your question, a question like this one, 00:08:43.080 |
which was carefully crafted, it was concise, and it was specific, 00:08:50.520 |
And as many of you know, the new features in the Ask Pastor John app for Apple and Android devices now accommodates for 00:08:59.640 |
If you don't have that feature, make sure you upgrade, and you can find links to those apps as well from the landing page 00:09:06.880 |
Well, our theology is living and active. It is meant to change us and humble us, and Pastor John will explain how tomorrow. 00:09:14.040 |
I'm your host, Tony Reinke. Thank you for listening to the Ask Pastor John podcast. 00:09:18.240 |
Thank you for listening to the Ask Pastor John podcast.