back to indexHow Do I Lock In Higher Yields on My Cash?
Chapters
0:0 Intro
2:48 Investing in long duration bonds
12:25 Do bonds belong in your portfolio?
17:35 Lump sum vs. DCA
21:20 Should you utilize more leverage?
25:13 DCA scenario analysis
00:00:12.180 |
Welcome back to Ask the Compound, where we just did 10 minutes of a show for no one, 00:00:25.400 |
And welcome back, Duncan, from a trip to Germany. 00:00:36.160 |
I already have been chatting about this now, but, yeah, got to drive on the Audubon. 00:00:48.120 |
I was jealous last week seeing you on with Bill, so. 00:00:58.200 |
This week on The Compound is brought to you by Bird Dogs. 00:00:59.680 |
John, go ahead and throw up our Bird Dog picture from Future Proof a few weeks ago. 00:01:04.720 |
We're all wearing Bird Dogs here besides Nicole. 00:01:06.840 |
You can see John and Duncan have kind of the plain color ones, which is just fine. 00:01:11.040 |
Michael has more of the camo look, and I have more loud ones. 00:01:15.240 |
This is what I like about Bird Dogs is that they're not afraid to go a little crazy with 00:01:27.020 |
The funny thing is, I guess I can thank climate change, but it's been like 80s here through 00:01:30.960 |
October and I've still been wearing my Bird Dog shorts. 00:01:33.080 |
I thought I'd have to change over to ... I mean, before the world comes to an end, I 00:01:38.640 |
think we're going to be able to enjoy some nice weather in Michigan. 00:01:41.080 |
The great news is with Bird Dogs, go to birddogs.com/atc for Ask The Compound, and we're still giving 00:01:51.320 |
Again, just birddogs.com/atc or enter "ATC" in the promo code. 00:01:55.280 |
You're never going to want to take those Bird Dogs off, trust me. 00:01:59.680 |
My wife asked the other day, "Why do you have so many of these?" 00:02:01.160 |
And I said, "Because they're comfortable and I love them. 00:02:09.040 |
Thanks to everyone in the live chat for sticking around. 00:02:12.120 |
You missed a live show with Duncan and I just for the two of us for 10 minutes. 00:02:17.040 |
You had a really good answer to that first question too, so yeah, we'll do it again. 00:02:24.680 |
Let's do it live though, because it feels disingenuous to do it more than once because 00:02:30.240 |
I could never be an actor and do multiple takes. 00:02:31.880 |
I would have to be in only Clint Eastwood movies because he only does one take, right? 00:02:52.080 |
First today, we have a question from Kevin that I feel extra good about reading now. 00:02:53.680 |
Kevin writes, "I've always wanted to do my own Not to Brag, so here it goes. 00:02:56.800 |
I'm 33 and have $300,000 spread between a Roth IRA, Roth 401k, and a taxable account, 00:03:07.160 |
I don't really understand bonds other than when rates go up, they go down in price and 00:03:12.280 |
TLT, the 20-year bond ETF, has crashed since rates started going up in 2022. 00:03:18.600 |
Assuming we're near the end of the rate increase cycle, even if rates stay higher for longer, 00:03:26.560 |
If I hold it for a few years, it stands to reason that rates will be cut when inflation 00:03:30.520 |
concerns are behind us or the Fed has to respond to a true recession. 00:03:36.080 |
And then they say, "This just doesn't seem that risky long-term." 00:03:47.560 |
This is TLT, the 20- to 30-year Treasury bond ETF. 00:03:52.220 |
This includes income, which hasn't been very much in the past few years, by the way. 00:03:55.240 |
If you include inflation on here, we're talking about like a 60% crash, 60% plus in about 00:04:01.360 |
three years, which is kind of crazy because the period from like 1950 to 1981, long-term 00:04:06.540 |
bonds were down, I think, 70% on a real basis, inflation-adjusted basis. 00:04:11.840 |
We've done what happened in 30 years in about three years. 00:04:14.440 |
And if you look at this chart, I counted, I think, seven separate corrections of 10% 00:04:17.720 |
or worse since the inception of this fund in the early 2000s, and interest rates were 00:04:22.520 |
So long-term bonds are no joke in terms of volatility. 00:04:25.520 |
Obviously, the crash right now is another way of saying that yields have gone up. 00:04:29.200 |
And so if we look at the characteristics of this fund, John put that on, this is the characteristics 00:04:36.820 |
One is average yield maturity, which is now over 5%, which seemed unfathomable, I don't 00:04:41.640 |
know, 24 months ago that you'd go from 1% to 5%, which is kind of crazy that you can 00:04:55.040 |
So what duration tells us is that relationship between interest rates and bond prices. 00:04:59.640 |
So with an effective duration of 16.3 years, what this would tell us is basically for every 00:05:05.480 |
1% move in this bond, rates up or down, it's going to move 16%, 16.3% or so in price. 00:05:14.660 |
So rates fall 1%, you're up 16% plus whatever yield you're getting, which is pretty good, 00:05:20.120 |
So rates fall 1%, we're talking about like a 20 some percent gain. 00:05:23.400 |
Now, if rates were to rise 1%, you're down 16%, right? 00:05:27.200 |
So I guess it is worth pointing out that the maturity for this is a long time. 00:05:32.920 |
That's part of the reason the duration moves so much. 00:05:40.200 |
Rates have come up a ton off of zero to five. 00:05:42.920 |
If we go into recession or the Fed cuts rates or economic growth slows or inflation keeps 00:05:49.320 |
The timing is the thing that can bite you on this one, though. 00:05:51.440 |
What if, I don't know, what if economic growth keeps coming in hot or people decide the world 00:05:56.120 |
is burning and I'm selling treasuries because government debt is spilling out of control 00:06:01.020 |
and rates go to seven before they drop back down to three, right? 00:06:03.520 |
Can you sit through a 35% drawdown in the meantime? 00:06:08.960 |
Do you sell out after they hit 4% or wait until they get three? 00:06:14.000 |
That's the difference between a trade and an investment, right? 00:06:16.580 |
TLT rates kind of stay where they are, they stay in a range, but TLT is very volatile 00:06:22.000 |
So I just think, I understand the thinking behind the trade. 00:06:25.720 |
I just don't think it's as easy as it sounds. 00:06:27.420 |
So one of my favorite books, Winning the Loser's Game by Charlie Ellis, who is one of my favorite 00:06:33.580 |
communicators in all of finance, he had this analogy that investors, there's a difference 00:06:38.700 |
between pros and amateurs, and he used tennis as an example. 00:06:42.720 |
So there was a study done that showed most tennis players, right? 00:06:46.300 |
They strike the ball down the line, they have this laser-like precision, and there's these 00:06:49.940 |
long rallies, and finally someone hits it in, or there's an unforced error. 00:06:53.180 |
But most of the time, professional tennis players don't make errors. 00:06:55.500 |
And in fact, he said that it's been estimated 80% of the time, they hit winners, the professionals. 00:07:01.020 |
But amateur tennis players, they're double faulting it into the net, they're hitting 00:07:04.080 |
it over, they're hitting it across the line, 80% of the time, when they lose a point, it's 00:07:08.900 |
because of an unforced error, they hit out of bounds, or they made a mistake. 00:07:12.240 |
And that's the idea, is that minimizing mistakes is just as important as hitting winners in 00:07:16.980 |
investing, especially for people who aren't professionals, aren't hedge fund managers. 00:07:20.980 |
So the point is, how do you avoid beating yourself as an investor? 00:07:23.960 |
Personally, I like to have rules in place to guide my actions. 00:07:27.020 |
I try to minimize mistakes by avoiding market timing, I don't like to make short-term bets 00:07:31.320 |
on the market and try to predict what's going to happen in the short-term, and then I just 00:07:34.660 |
don't like to have investments in my portfolio that don't fit my personality or investing 00:07:39.180 |
And one of those is, I've never been a fan of owning long-term treasuries. 00:07:43.500 |
They had a wonderful run from 1980 to 2020, as rates were falling, and they were one of 00:07:49.580 |
You got almost the same return as you did in the stock market, with way less volatility. 00:07:56.040 |
And if we see double-digit yields again, like we had in the '80s, I'd be happy to take part 00:08:00.980 |
I just don't think it's worth the volatility. 00:08:03.580 |
I'd rather be paid for volatility, where it makes sense, and that's in the stock market, 00:08:07.260 |
as opposed to the bond market, where I think, for me, that's keep it safe, have some income. 00:08:11.900 |
And you can also earn higher yields in intermediate-term bonds right now, and I'd have to try to nail 00:08:17.640 |
So if we look at the historical returns for long-term bonds, the case becomes far less 00:08:23.340 |
So this is annual returns going back to 1926. 00:08:27.420 |
Even with the bond bull market from 1980 to 2020, annual returns for long-term government 00:08:35.620 |
For 5-year treasuries, far less duration risk, far less volatility and drawdown risk. 00:08:41.420 |
You get double the volatility in long-term bonds in basically the same returns. 00:08:45.740 |
So John, if we look at the next one that shows the drawdown profile, this is just since the 00:08:49.860 |
mid-2000s, early 2000s, you get way bigger drawdowns in long-term treasuries than you 00:08:54.500 |
get in these 3- to 7-year treasuries, which is essentially 5 years. 00:08:57.940 |
So I just don't think it's worth it for that volatility risk for me. 00:09:01.900 |
Now, I'm not going to try to talk you out of a trade if you're going to go into it with 00:09:07.300 |
It's just, it's entirely possible long-term bonds are setting up for a great trade here. 00:09:11.240 |
The Fed pushes too hard, we go into recession, whatever it is, but I think you really have 00:09:14.540 |
to nail the timing for a trade like this to work. 00:09:17.180 |
I guess the good news is that you don't have to participate in every trade or invest in 00:09:22.660 |
What's the point of this money in the first place? 00:09:25.020 |
I'm taking 50 grand and I'm going to put it out here just to make, what's your end game 00:09:34.540 |
You could have a great investment opportunity, but if it doesn't fit your personality or 00:09:38.460 |
your investment plan, I don't know, I think it's tempting fate to try to time something 00:09:44.120 |
It opens you up to more mistakes and unnecessary risks than you probably think. 00:09:51.460 |
Kevin says, "How high can rates actually go?" 00:10:00.180 |
I mean, the thing is, if nominal growth is going to be 5% or 6%, 5% or 6% yields in 30-year 00:10:09.100 |
It really depends on ... We had this period in the '80s and '90s where rates were much 00:10:14.940 |
Obviously, the difference then is that they're coming down and now they're going up. 00:10:24.180 |
I would have never expected yields to go from 1% to 5% so fast, but could the economy continue 00:10:29.800 |
to be strong and the government spends a lot of money still and we get 6% nominal growth 00:10:36.460 |
Then, I don't know, could rates stay at 5% or 6% for a while? 00:10:40.700 |
I guess you never throw these things out, I guess. 00:10:43.020 |
Do you think that people should stop calling bonds the safe part of your portfolio? 00:10:48.780 |
People like me, non-finance pros, people have always said, "You ask 9 out of 10 people what's 00:10:53.820 |
the point of bonds in a portfolio, they're going to say, 'Oh, that's the safe part of 00:10:58.440 |
After this recent chaos in the bond market, does that really need to be restated or rethought? 00:11:05.560 |
It depends what kind of bonds we're talking about. 00:11:07.080 |
I think that's what people have realized is that, "Oh, wait, yeah, long-term bonds are 00:11:10.840 |
great when you have a rush to safety or a recession and yields are falling, but when 00:11:15.560 |
yields rise, yeah, these are not safe because the duration is 30 years. 00:11:23.820 |
So, short-term bonds, yeah, they're still pretty safe. 00:11:26.060 |
I think anything less than one to two years is still pretty darn safe in terms of volatility 00:11:32.660 |
and losing money, but for longer duration assets, yeah, there is a risk there of inflation 00:11:39.860 |
But no, certain types of bonds and cash, and I think that's the thing people have to realize 00:11:43.460 |
that maybe you just have to be a little more conservative and not go so far out on the 00:11:48.340 |
I think a lot of young people bought TLT back a couple years ago and were like, "Oh, that's 00:11:54.700 |
The rest of it I'm putting in all these risky stocks," and then they're like, "Wait, I got 00:12:00.540 |
Yeah, when you see how volatile this stuff, and again, I was saying this before we had 00:12:05.540 |
a huge crash that these bonds are too volatile for me, so we should mention that the doc 00:12:11.660 |
this week for questions was bonds, bonds, bonds, yield, yield, yield. 00:12:14.780 |
People are really into this stuff right now and really curious about it, which makes sense 00:12:19.040 |
because I think it's more exciting and interesting than the stock market right now. 00:12:29.340 |
I'm a married 30-year-old who is just a normal IT guy. 00:12:32.740 |
I max out my 401(k) and Roth 401(k), but I like to invest in things that reward me on 00:12:40.420 |
For example, I allocate money every week to hopefully buy a vacation home in five to seven 00:12:46.420 |
I'm interested in your bond discussion from Animal Spirits as my whole life has been stocks, 00:12:52.620 |
I'm not sure how to buy bonds or if I should. 00:12:55.580 |
Could I buy bonds to achieve yield on my money for goals that have different timelines? 00:13:00.820 |
I love the idea of regularly saving like this, like the whole idea of like not just I'm going 00:13:07.700 |
I think that's one of the reasons young people have a hard time saving for retirement in 00:13:11.860 |
It's like I'm going to let future me worry about that, not present me, so I love the 00:13:14.660 |
idea of saving for a goal like this for five to seven years. 00:13:17.180 |
I think from experience, I can say you're not going to regret saving for a purchase 00:13:21.180 |
The thing is, you have options galore when it comes to yield these days. 00:13:24.020 |
We talked a lot about Series I savings bonds in the past. 00:13:32.180 |
I think a lot of people, too, who put their money into these Series I savings bonds are 00:13:35.140 |
taking them out now and paying a yield penalty, so it probably wasn't even worth it to begin 00:13:39.540 |
with, especially when you consider the website and stuff. 00:13:47.980 |
You could also do T-bills, which are still paying 5.5% or so, or an online savings account 00:13:53.060 |
Mine's 4.4%, which still feels low considering the yield environment. 00:13:57.780 |
However, this person has a defined time horizon of five to seven years. 00:14:01.660 |
These short-term solutions come with a reinvestment risk. 00:14:03.540 |
T-bills and online savings account rates could fall in the short end, and then you're stuck 00:14:08.860 |
You actually can lock in higher rates, which is like an asset liability match. 00:14:13.620 |
I want to invest for five years, so I checked bank rate today, and I'm seeing five years 00:14:18.900 |
So you can lock them in for five years, get 4.5%. 00:14:23.140 |
You can take them out early, and again, like iBonds, you'll have to pay a penalty. 00:14:30.020 |
Five-year Treasuries, as of this morning when I checked, are yielding 4.7%. 00:14:35.100 |
You could get a three-year Treasury for like 4.9%. 00:14:38.300 |
I think if you really wanted to lock in and match it up, the five-year probably makes 00:14:42.260 |
You could buy these through a broker, or Treasury Direct is pretty simple. 00:14:45.700 |
I've never personally purchased individual bonds, just because I think it's easier to 00:14:55.220 |
You could buy the three- to seven-year ETF we talked about in the last question. 00:15:00.900 |
Any total bond market index fund right now that tracks the aggregate is like 5.5% to 00:15:09.220 |
The one problem here is that these are constant maturity funds. 00:15:11.180 |
So a three- to seven-year Treasury ETF is going to stay three to seven years. 00:15:14.780 |
So as you approach your goal and get closer, your risk and duration is a little further 00:15:22.780 |
So I think the good news with a fund like this is rates can go higher, which you'd 00:15:26.740 |
see that price decline, but then you'd also immediately reinvest into those higher rates 00:15:33.100 |
This is why some people prefer individual bonds. 00:15:35.660 |
The thing is, there are now ETFs that you can buy that act like individual bonds. 00:15:40.660 |
So iShares has an item called iBonds, which sounds like something Apple created. 00:15:44.540 |
But you can actually pick the maturity of the bond line. 00:15:46.740 |
They actually have a thing where you can set up a bond ladder. 00:15:49.260 |
So it matures every year, every 24 months, or every 36 months or whatever. 00:15:53.740 |
And you can line it up with, I'm going to buy this vacation home five years from now, 00:15:57.500 |
so I'm going to buy the bond that matures in five years, or seven years and it matures 00:16:01.100 |
And so you could do that, or you could build a ladder and buy them as you are saving on 00:16:09.660 |
So if you just search iBond ladders, it's a pretty cool little tool and website that 00:16:14.100 |
I don't really think you can go wrong in today's yield environment, whatever you choose. 00:16:17.500 |
But if you wanted to lock it in, that's probably the thing, so you don't have to worry about 00:16:20.820 |
short-term rates falling if there is a recession or the Fed cuts or whatever. 00:16:24.340 |
I just think you have to understand the tradeoffs with options like CDs and short-term bonds 00:16:29.580 |
But you have options galore these days that you didn't have in the past. 00:16:37.100 |
I didn't realize they'd be able to do stuff like that in the mechanics of an ETF. 00:16:42.820 |
I don't know if it's every six months or every 12 months, but you can sort of pick the end 00:16:47.260 |
So there's one that's probably like, I don't know, 3.75 years or something right now, whatever. 00:16:50.780 |
So it's a pretty cool option if you know the end date of your goal where you have to spend 00:16:56.340 |
That's like matching your assets and your liabilities. 00:16:58.300 |
Since we have bonds on the brain today, is it true that you should never own bonds in 00:17:05.100 |
No, because if you need to spend the money, then you don't want to put them in a tax-deferred 00:17:10.740 |
So, I mean, you're paying income on those bonds, of course. 00:17:13.300 |
Yeah, I guess you could think of munis as well if you want to have the taxes not take 00:17:18.100 |
as big of a bite out, but the yield kind of is taken into account there. 00:17:23.060 |
But no, if you want to spend the money, then you don't have to put it in taxable. 00:17:28.700 |
That's just another thing that I've heard people say before is like, oh, yeah, don't 00:17:31.860 |
And this next one is one I think we've never gotten before. 00:17:38.480 |
You guys have talked about the statistical facts and the human factors of what to do 00:17:42.780 |
with a lump sum if the ultimate goal is to get into the stock market. 00:17:47.980 |
I have about $30,000 to put towards a house and a car down payment that I won't use until 00:17:55.340 |
If I plan to use a few assorted bond ETFs, would I be better off putting it all in ASAP 00:18:05.020 |
You hear dollar count cost averaging and lump sum and you immediately know. 00:18:08.580 |
Nick Majulie, who writes our wonderful blog of dollars and data, the book Just Keep Buying. 00:18:12.460 |
I don't think you've even ever written about this. 00:18:14.780 |
You think you've done a piece about diversified portfolios with lump sum or dollar cost averaging. 00:18:21.020 |
I did this for like basically every asset class. 00:18:23.060 |
I did it for Bitcoin, gold, bonds, and basically across the board, like going earlier generates 00:18:29.380 |
I mean, this has been true across every asset class. 00:18:31.500 |
I mean, you assume-- I mean, for risk assets, at least, you assume they're going up over 00:18:36.380 |
If that's the whole reason you're investing, why would you be putting money in something 00:18:40.900 |
So if you're expecting something to go up over time, the sooner you do it, on average, 00:18:46.980 |
Probably even more so with bonds, though, right? 00:18:48.700 |
So I looked at this before, and the S&P over the last 100 years is up like 300 every four 00:18:54.100 |
I think I found for five-year treasuries, it's like 88% of all calendar years are positive, 00:18:59.260 |
which makes sense, because bonds don't go down as much, because they don't go up as 00:19:03.460 |
And you're just clipping the yield and income. 00:19:07.180 |
So most of the time, bonds are up in a given year. 00:19:10.540 |
So it would make sense that you wouldn't want to overthink this, and you just want to put 00:19:13.060 |
the money into that bond and start earning the income. 00:19:16.060 |
I think in this particular question-- let's say I was in this person's shoes. 00:19:18.780 |
The only thing I'm actually slightly worried about, in just the smallest way, is we know 00:19:24.060 |
the debt ceiling is good through, I think, January 2025. 00:19:27.180 |
And this guy's talking about, I'm just going to lock my money up till, whatever, spring 00:19:31.460 |
In the event that the US actually defaults and there's madness, that's the only real 00:19:47.220 |
I'm only buying T-bills through next December. 00:19:48.220 |
I mean, there aren't any that are for next December yet, because they're only one year. 00:19:51.140 |
But once my T-bills roll over this December, I'm buying them through next December and 00:19:54.980 |
then playing a wait-and-see game, because after that, I have no clue what's going to 00:19:58.860 |
Well, the other thing is, in the last question, I talked about the options you have now for 00:20:02.900 |
If you're really worried about something like that, you could diversify your yield sources, 00:20:07.860 |
I have some in a bond ETF, or whatever it is, that is corporates or munis or something 00:20:12.420 |
So I think you can, if that's really a worry, that the money's not going to be there for 00:20:16.580 |
And hopefully, if that ever really did happen, and I don't know, maybe-- 00:20:19.020 |
I think we have bigger problems on our hands, honestly, if the US defaults. 00:20:31.300 |
There's better bonds you can buy, so the price of your bond goes down. 00:20:33.900 |
But that's OK, because you can sell that crappy bond and reinvest it at the higher rate. 00:20:38.100 |
So you're still going to get the same return. 00:20:39.700 |
So if you have a bond that's paying 5%, you're going to get 5%, even if you sell early. 00:20:43.820 |
But you just have to reinvest that money, right? 00:20:45.580 |
So bonds are all mathematically, I would say, perfect in that way, that you're going to 00:20:50.260 |
Whatever you buy, you're going to get that return if you just wait through the end of 00:20:55.860 |
You're going to deal with that volatility in the interim. 00:20:56.860 |
And especially with a shorter-term goal like this, I would think DCA would be your enemy 00:21:01.460 |
Because unless you invest in something that's really risky and it crashes in the short term, 00:21:07.940 |
So you shouldn't be taking that much risk anyway. 00:21:13.020 |
I could see the arguments for stocks and risk assets, and we can get into that. 00:21:24.620 |
I was looking at my personal balance sheet the other day and thinking about whether my 00:21:26.940 |
personal leverage ratio, total debt to net worth, is at an appropriate level. 00:21:32.620 |
To clarify, I'm not just referring to leverage in an investment portfolio, but overall leverage, 00:21:40.100 |
mortgage debt, auto loans, student debt, margin loans, et cetera. 00:21:44.700 |
In the financial planning world, is this ratio something you look at with clients? 00:21:48.700 |
And if so, would you consider a healthy range? 00:21:51.300 |
For context, my leverage ratio is currently about 0.6 to 1, and my only debt is my mortgage. 00:22:02.420 |
I've never actually thought about this before. 00:22:06.580 |
So they asked about how it works in the financial planning context. 00:22:10.300 |
I think in the financial planning world, you look at income to debt, maybe, in terms of 00:22:13.300 |
how much you're spending out of your portfolio, how much money you're making, and it's like, 00:22:16.100 |
how much do you bring in and then how much do you spend? 00:22:18.420 |
And your debt service ratio or your debt payments fall into that second category, and it's just 00:22:23.100 |
does your income, is your income big enough to cover your debt payments? 00:22:26.620 |
That's the only thing I'd be worried about, not what is your debt to your assets or net 00:22:32.140 |
This feels like a good time to say shout out to all my fellow student loan people making 00:22:40.620 |
I mean, the good news is you're paying that off and it'd be going down. 00:22:43.900 |
But John, throw up the chart here that shows U.S. household debt service as a percentage 00:22:48.440 |
The average since, I don't know, the 80s is like 11 percent. 00:22:53.860 |
So I don't know, Nick, have you ever looked into this? 00:23:00.020 |
So I haven't, but I agree with it's all about the income, right? 00:23:03.460 |
You're looking because what is debt that you have to make payments on, right? 00:23:06.900 |
And the question is, like, the risk you run into is not being able to make payments and 00:23:10.420 |
defaulting and it hurts your credit score, all the nasty things that happen there. 00:23:14.820 |
So the real issue is like, I don't care about your debt ratio. 00:23:17.320 |
It's like you could have a debt ratio of 10 percent. 00:23:19.880 |
But if you have really high interest rate debt, that could be worse. 00:23:22.200 |
And you have a higher payment than someone who has 50 or 60 percent mortgage rate debt 00:23:29.080 |
So you've got to it's the rate that matters and the size of the debt. 00:23:32.120 |
It's kind of there's multiple variables here that are moving together. 00:23:34.840 |
So I would say, like, I wouldn't focus on whether you should lever up more. 00:23:38.360 |
It's like, think about how much risk you're taking now with like your debt payments relative 00:23:42.360 |
to what your income is and look at that and what's the right ratio. 00:23:46.940 |
This is going to be different for every person. 00:23:50.640 |
Do you have a family, a large family of take care of a lot of other liabilities like all 00:23:54.200 |
those things affect how much risk you want to take. 00:23:58.680 |
Of course, like I think there's like mortgage that's useful. 00:24:01.840 |
I think education that can be very useful if you can get if you can get into a job that 00:24:10.320 |
So I can't I will say generalize answer my my outlook on debt totally changed in the 00:24:17.240 |
I took it as much debt as it possibly could when rates were 3 percent or whatever. 00:24:22.560 |
But again, I had to think in terms of payments and there's this old budgetary rule that's 00:24:28.080 |
And it's like 50 percent of income should go into necessities, which is basically housing, 00:24:31.920 |
transportation, health care, that sort of stuff. 00:24:34.280 |
Other regular bills, 30 percent on wants and then 20 percent on savings or paying off debt 00:24:40.840 |
30 percent for housing is typically a pretty good rule of thumb. 00:24:45.680 |
And I think you can think of that in terms of debt, too. 00:24:47.440 |
I would look at it more in terms of your budget as opposed to your net worth, because you're 00:24:52.340 |
right, the high the high cost of debt right now has to be taken into account way more 00:25:00.760 |
I agree in New York, I think housing is more like 80 percent of the budget, you know, you 00:25:08.240 |
Yeah, that's that's how you make it make sense. 00:25:14.360 |
Last but not least, we have a question from Stefan. 00:25:17.740 |
I've heard you discuss dollar cost averaging DCA is how we're going to abbreviate it. 00:25:22.280 |
The easy scenario to discuss is the 401k IDCA because I get paid and contribute monthly. 00:25:28.520 |
The more complex scenario deals with a self-directed IRA with an established balance where taxes 00:25:36.420 |
If we take the current bear market and compare two situations or portfolios, Portfolio A 00:25:42.320 |
has two hundred thousand dollars fully invested. 00:25:45.200 |
Portfolio B has two hundred thousand dollars with one hundred thousand invested and one 00:25:50.920 |
An advisor might tell Portfolio A to sit tight. 00:25:56.240 |
An advisor might tell Portfolio B to start DCA-ing that one hundred thousand dollars 00:26:01.160 |
over the next six months or year because you can't time the dip. 00:26:07.900 |
With one costless trade, Portfolio B could look exactly like Portfolio A, be fully invested 00:26:15.840 |
With one costless trade, Portfolio A could go to 50% cash and look like Portfolio B and 00:26:23.920 |
I've never heard of someone selling half their portfolio just to start dollar cost averaging 00:26:29.200 |
If that is the best financial advice, then why not go all cash and start dollar cost 00:26:34.760 |
I love this question because it feels like a logic puzzle and I'm pretty sure that it 00:26:40.880 |
It is kind of like a dorm room discussion if you ever talked about markets when you 00:26:45.800 |
I think he's twisted his brain into a pretzel a little bit here overthinking this. 00:26:49.320 |
So the Charlie Munger rule number one of compounding is never interrupt it unnecessarily, right? 00:26:53.560 |
And Nick, of course, your work has shown that dollar cost averaging works over the long 00:26:57.440 |
term and is a pretty good strategy, but lump sum beats it. 00:27:00.380 |
So the point is you don't want to take a portfolio that's fully invested and sell out of it 00:27:04.680 |
to dollar cost average because the market might do A, B or C over the next few months. 00:27:09.080 |
The point is to keep that money in and let it compound no matter what happens. 00:27:14.480 |
You don't do dollar cost averaging because it's a better strategy. 00:27:17.360 |
You do it because you kind of have to or you have behavioral reasons for it. 00:27:22.680 |
I think the other thing here too is, yeah, the other thing to think about with regards 00:27:26.720 |
to this is like, okay, it's not a costless trade. 00:27:29.920 |
I mean, it costs nothing because there's no transaction costs to move into like to go 00:27:37.160 |
But like with that same argument, why don't you just go 100% cash? 00:27:40.280 |
Why don't you go and take out debt and lever? 00:27:44.360 |
I mean, I don't think it's a costless trade in that sense. 00:27:46.120 |
You are making a pretty big statement about the future, right? 00:27:48.220 |
When you go from 100% stock to 50% stock, 50% cash, you're basically market timing. 00:27:54.420 |
You're saying, hey, I think the market's going to go lower, right? 00:27:58.360 |
DCA only outperforms or what I call averaging in. 00:28:00.480 |
So slowly putting your money into the market only outperforms in cases when the market's 00:28:05.440 |
So if you had 100K in cash and 100K in stock, I would say on average, the right thing to 00:28:13.160 |
do across history is you put that 100K cash in right now because on average, the market's 00:28:16.560 |
going to go up and 80% of years, you'd be right, right, versus putting it in every month 00:28:21.840 |
However, the only time where that's not right, where that would have been the wrong move 00:28:26.400 |
So you're basically saying the market's going to keep crashing, and that's why I want to 00:28:30.920 |
But I'm saying, if you're going to do that, why even DC-- why not just wait until the 00:28:34.760 |
Because that's-- you're going to-- you already think the market's going to crash. 00:28:36.800 |
Why not predict the bottom or something else, right? 00:28:38.440 |
So it's-- you can see how the logic breaks down pretty quickly once you make a little 00:28:44.600 |
And you can start kind of getting into the space where you're now in all cash. 00:28:47.760 |
And then all of a sudden, the market rips back upward, and you're not involved at all. 00:28:55.520 |
And this is like, if I invert like Munger, your whole idea about spending the portfolio, 00:29:00.680 |
too, is you want to put the lump sum in if you can early, but then you want to spend 00:29:06.200 |
So essentially what he's saying here is, you take a lump sum out of the portfolio. 00:29:10.200 |
And that's the faulty reasoning here, is you're taking it out at one time and putting it back 00:29:15.520 |
The time that you take it out could be the wrong move, too. 00:29:17.920 |
So I think, yes, you want to just-- if it's in there, you leave it in there, and you let 00:29:21.280 |
the long-term of the market take care of it, and compound, and don't work against you, 00:29:25.560 |
and overthinking it, and trying to dollar-cost average. 00:29:28.240 |
Most people do that, again, because they get the money, and they put in money out of their 00:29:32.300 |
paychecks, or because they do it for behavioral reasons and don't-- but mathematically and 00:29:38.200 |
logically, you'd want to put the money in right away if you can. 00:29:42.240 |
And if you're worried about it, then take a few months. 00:29:44.320 |
I mean, the difference between putting it all in now and putting it over three months 00:29:52.960 |
But now it's less risk you're taking, so you can sleep at night. 00:29:56.840 |
But if you take a year, two years, five years, the longer you take to get invested, that's 00:30:02.120 |
It's the foregone money you would have had, right? 00:30:03.880 |
So that's where I kind of recommend people, hey, if you're taking over a year, don't do 00:30:07.640 |
If you want to take a few months, even six months, go ahead. 00:30:09.040 |
It's not going to really make a difference in your life. 00:30:13.280 |
Speaking on behalf of the dumb money, I would just say I've gotten myself into more trouble 00:30:18.000 |
with dollar cost averaging over the years because I don't notice how much I'm down. 00:30:24.360 |
It's like I'm putting in a set amount into a certain stock, an individual stock, right? 00:30:28.240 |
And I wake up one day, I'm down like 45% in a stock, whereas if I just put everything 00:30:33.480 |
I wanted to put into that stock up front, I probably would have sold it when I was down 00:30:37.680 |
Oh, because you're averaging down and your cost basis is going down? 00:30:42.480 |
So I think that's another argument that I could potentially make for lump sum, kind of 00:30:46.000 |
maybe saving-- it would have saved me some losses. 00:30:59.640 |
So you average all the way down and then you sell it at the bottom. 00:31:16.120 |
Well, thanks for answering questions, as always. 00:31:17.120 |
Thanks for waiting for us through the technical difficulties. 00:31:18.680 |
Nick, thank you, as always, for your help here.