back to indexDid Jesus Advocate Castration to Break Sex Addiction?
00:00:04.000 |
Well, when it comes to temptations to sexual sin, 00:00:08.000 |
Jesus said, "If your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off." 00:00:12.000 |
He also says that there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs. 00:00:17.000 |
In reading these texts together, a listener writes in to ask if Jesus is 00:00:22.000 |
commending surgical or chemical castration as a winning strategy for men 00:00:28.000 |
in the war against lust. No question is off limits for the Ask Pastor John podcast, 00:00:33.000 |
but you all know that by now. Here's the email from an anonymous man. 00:00:36.000 |
"Hello Pastor John, I'm a man who struggles greatly with pornography use. 00:00:40.000 |
Even though I've come to know God and try to fight these temptations with Scripture, 00:00:43.000 |
I cannot seem to win over my sexual immorality." 00:00:46.000 |
Jesus said, "For there are eunuchs who have been so from birth, 00:00:50.000 |
and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by men, 00:00:54.000 |
and there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. 00:01:00.000 |
Let the one who is able to receive this, receive it." 00:01:06.000 |
"I want to glorify God and I'm willing to sacrifice everything I have to be with Him." 00:01:12.000 |
Jesus also said, "If your hand causes you to sin, cut it off. 00:01:15.000 |
It is better for you to enter life crippled than with two hands and to go to hell, 00:01:23.000 |
So my question, Pastor John, for you is this. 00:01:26.000 |
Is surgical or chemical castration a viable option for me? 00:01:31.000 |
In Matthew 19, 9, Jesus limits remarriage after divorce so narrowly 00:01:39.000 |
that in verse 10, the disciples, as it were, throw up their hands and say, 00:01:46.000 |
"Well, if such is the case of a man with his wife, then it's better not to marry." 00:01:53.000 |
In other words, if there's no back door to marriage, better not to walk through the front door. 00:02:01.000 |
And to this, Jesus responds by saying that not everyone can fulfill his radical view of covenant keeping in marriage. 00:02:13.000 |
He says in verse 11, "Not everyone can receive this saying, but only those to whom it is given." 00:02:21.000 |
In other words, marrying and staying married under these conditions of absolute faithfulness 00:02:27.000 |
is a gift of God and not everybody receives it. 00:02:32.000 |
And then he describes three situations in which a man may be sexually pure, 00:02:39.000 |
sexually continent, while not receiving the gift of marriage. 00:02:44.000 |
Verse 12, it says, "One, for there are eunuchs who have been so from birth, 00:02:52.000 |
and two, there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by men, 00:02:58.000 |
and three, there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. 00:03:05.000 |
Let the one who is able to receive this receive it." 00:03:10.000 |
In other words, there are four possible paths of faithfulness. 00:03:14.000 |
First, to receive Jesus' radical teachings and live in a marriage according to those teachings. 00:03:20.000 |
Second, you can be born with a physical inability that prevents sexual relations. 00:03:26.000 |
Three, you may be prevented in some way by other people from having the ability for sexual relations. 00:03:34.000 |
And four, you may make a choice that would prevent sexual relations outside of marriage. 00:03:41.000 |
Now, the man who sent us this question is asking whether this fourth option, 00:03:48.000 |
which Jesus describes as making oneself a eunuch for the sake of the kingdom, 00:03:53.000 |
is in fact a legitimizing of physical or chemical castration. 00:03:59.000 |
And I think we need to respond at several levels, maybe four. 00:04:04.000 |
First, even if Jesus meant this literally, physically literally, castration literally, 00:04:13.000 |
there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. 00:04:18.000 |
Even if he meant that literally, that's not the same as saying you may or you should, 00:04:24.000 |
nor is it a prohibition that you can't use physical means to dampen or remove your sexual drive. 00:04:34.000 |
So that's the first observation. It's not a mandate, and it's not a prohibition. 00:04:39.000 |
Second, Jesus does say in relation to sexual sin, and our questioner pointed this out, 00:04:47.000 |
if your right hand causes you to sin, I mean, if your right eye, let's use eye, he does say hand, 00:04:53.000 |
if your right eye causes you to sin, tear it out and throw it away, 00:04:58.000 |
for it is better for you to lose one of your members than for your whole body to be thrown into hell, Matthew 5:29. 00:05:05.000 |
But isn't it remarkable that he only refers to the right eye, 00:05:11.000 |
which would leave the left eye perfectly free to continue with lust? 00:05:16.000 |
Now, this has led most interpreters to think, and I agree with them, 00:05:22.000 |
that Jesus is not saying that gouging out your right eye is a good remedy for lust. 00:05:30.000 |
A literal taking a screwdriver and poking it in your eye is not a good remedy for lust. It isn't. 00:05:36.000 |
The left eye will pick up right where the right eye left off. 00:05:40.000 |
This is a call to the most serious spiritual battle of mortification, but probably not self-mutilation, 00:05:52.000 |
since that, in this case, wouldn't do any good. 00:05:55.000 |
But the seriousness is no less, because he says heaven and hell hang in the balance. 00:06:02.000 |
Third, this suggests to me that probably making oneself a eunuch for the sake of the kingdom 00:06:10.000 |
refers to a radical call to chaste celibacy, like Paul in 1 Corinthians 7, rather than physical castration. 00:06:23.000 |
Fourth, finally, however, I don't want to rule out the legitimacy of taking physical steps 00:06:34.000 |
to dampen one's sexual drive if the aim is spiritual victory over sin. 00:06:43.000 |
We do this. All of us do this, at least if we're smart and if we're obedient, we do this. 00:06:54.000 |
We get sleep to dampen the bent toward the sin of irritability. 00:07:00.000 |
We jog—I jog to dampen my bent toward the sin of despondency. 00:07:07.000 |
I take walks in the beautiful October weather in Minnesota, 00:07:13.000 |
and look at these gold and yellow trees to replace inward-oriented moroseness with outward-oriented joy. 00:07:25.000 |
We drink a cup of coffee in the morning to make us more alert and effective in our working. 00:07:33.000 |
So there's a principle here that he's on to that's not wrong, 00:07:39.000 |
namely taking physical steps to mute the power of lust or of whatever impulse it is that is leading us into sin. 00:07:51.000 |
But I would beware of procedures that have permanent and unknown personal effects. 00:08:02.000 |
That's good. And if you've listened to this podcast for some time, 00:08:05.000 |
you know this twofold attack on personal sin comes up a lot. 00:08:09.000 |
We cultivate the inner heart. We feed the spiritual affections. 00:08:13.000 |
And we also battle and resist in the outer context of life with habits and boundaries and accountability. 00:08:21.000 |
And this twofold approach emerges all the time in the ethical questions. 00:08:27.000 |
and you'll hear it come up in this podcast quite a bit because of how important it is. 00:08:30.000 |
Well, thanks for listening and supporting this podcast. 00:08:32.000 |
Again, you can subscribe to our audio feeds and search our past episodes in our archive 00:08:36.000 |
and send us an email of your own, even awkward questions that you want to ask anonymously. 00:08:40.000 |
Do all that through our online home at DesiringGod.org/AskPastorJohn. 00:08:46.000 |
Well, in the end times, the Bible tells us that people will be lovers of self, 00:08:54.000 |
I'm reading into that a little bit, but when and how does our social media manifest our corrupt self-love? 00:09:05.000 |
We'll see you on the other side of the weekend. 00:09:08.000 |
And I hope you have a great one. See you then.