back to indexHow Can I Improve Zoom Meetings?
Chapters
0:0 Cal's intro
0:11 Cal reads the question about Zoom meetings.
1:15 Cal explains processes to put in place before meetings
2:13 Make everything concrete
00:00:05.000 |
All right, let's move on here. Shane asks about effective and speedy Zoom meetings. 00:00:11.000 |
Contradiction in terms, I don't know if that's possible. 00:00:17.000 |
He's in some group. They had their first meeting with 12 members. 00:00:22.000 |
And while the agenda was set and the reports were sent out prior to the meeting, 00:00:26.000 |
it still took nearly two hours. And so Shane is frustrated with Zoom meetings. 00:00:32.000 |
Yeah, look, here's the thing about meetings like that. 00:00:35.000 |
First of all, meetings with 12 people where everyone gets to just talk are a huge waste of time. 00:00:44.000 |
So the idea is we have like a 12 person board and let's all just get together and kind of discuss things and figure things out. 00:00:50.000 |
It's better to say, OK, there's one person going to present this thing and here's our proposal. 00:00:54.000 |
And then we have like a 15 minute Q&A period and then a suggestion is going to be made. 00:01:01.000 |
In general, having more processes for work before the meetings make a big deal. 00:01:05.000 |
So the more you're trying to accomplish ad hoc and on the fly in the meeting itself, 00:01:09.000 |
the more the meeting is going to be dragged out and frustrating. 00:01:12.000 |
And the more you say this is our mechanisms for making decisions, the more that's in place ahead of time, 00:01:17.000 |
the more focused and effective your meetings can be. 00:01:20.000 |
So if there's some process ahead of time for here are the motions being proposed 00:01:25.000 |
and there will be a 10 minute discussion of the motion at one meeting. 00:01:32.000 |
Then there's going to be a period of, I don't know, I'm just making this up, of like back and forth, whatever. 00:01:38.000 |
People are marking up with emails or thoughts in like a shared doc, how they feel about it. 00:01:43.000 |
And then a concrete proposal is brought up for a vote at the next meeting. 00:01:47.000 |
There's a 10 minute Q&A portion and then the vote happens on something specific. 00:01:53.000 |
What I'm talking about here is like really clear processes for how things happen. 00:01:55.000 |
We're part of the process is like a here's where discussion happens. 00:01:58.000 |
This type of discussion on this piece for this long. 00:02:02.000 |
That gives you a lot more control as opposed to let's just figure this all out in the meeting. 00:02:06.000 |
Once you have more than three people, that's not going to go very well. 00:02:11.000 |
The other thing that's really useful is to make everything concrete. 00:02:13.000 |
Okay, we're talking about this topic in this meeting. 00:02:15.000 |
Here's a shared screen where I'm taking notes. 00:02:17.000 |
This conversation is going to conclude with a clear action item assigned to someone. 00:02:21.000 |
So when people know that like this is live ammo they're playing with, 00:02:24.000 |
they're usually a lot more circumspect and careful about just let me just chime in and bloviate. 00:02:28.000 |
When it's like, here's the thing we're trying to get to, like this person is going to do this thing. 00:02:32.000 |
Makes it more serious that they think like we're just time wasting. 00:02:36.000 |
Like let's all just talk about it and hopefully this dies away without me having to do more work. 00:02:41.000 |
I'm going to take notes on what people are saying. 00:02:44.000 |
Then let me propose that these will be the next steps. 00:02:53.000 |
It's written down, wrapped up, summarized, and assigned.