back to indexBogleheads University 501 2023 - Roth Conversion and Retirement Tax Planning with Wade Pfau
00:00:06.600 |
Also, remember the slides, if you're having trouble seeing them 00:00:12.040 |
If you go to the Bogle Center website, you can click on the link 00:00:14.740 |
and you can download all the slides for this presentation. 00:00:16.880 |
All right, our next speaker, I have a page worth of introductory material on Wade. 00:00:24.500 |
He has done so much, but I am not going to read it all to you. 00:00:29.980 |
Wade has a PhD, he has a CFA, he's the founder of Retirement Researcher, 00:00:34.820 |
which is an educational resource for individuals and financial advisors 00:00:38.560 |
on topics related to retirement income planning. 00:00:40.960 |
He holds a doctorate in economics from Princeton. 00:00:44.340 |
He's published more than 60 research articles. 00:00:47.020 |
He's a past selectee for many, many lists of important people. 00:00:52.160 |
He has contributed to Forbes and Advisor Perspectives and for the Wall Street Journal. 00:00:58.420 |
He's spoken at many national conferences, including the CFA Institute, 00:01:01.720 |
the CFP Board, NAPFA, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. 00:01:05.440 |
He is a return speaker here at the Bogle Heads Conference. 00:01:09.380 |
He's been here several times, and is also the author of four books 00:01:14.100 |
Wade, thank you so much for being here, and we're going to enjoy your presentation. 00:01:22.040 |
It's great to be back at Bogle Heads, and for the next 25 minutes we're going to go 00:01:26.100 |
on a rollercoaster ride, literally when you see what these tax maps look like. 00:01:29.800 |
We're going to talk about tax-efficient retirement distributions. 00:01:33.080 |
There is a lot of content, so I'll have the same challenge as the other speakers. 00:01:36.240 |
I don't know if I'll get through all these slides or not, but let's dive into it. 00:01:39.600 |
This is a big deal, what we're talking about, just being smart 00:01:42.720 |
about where you take distributions from can have a significant impact on portfolio longevity 00:01:48.360 |
or framed a different way on the remaining legacy value of assets at the end of retirement. 00:01:56.180 |
It's because we're maneuvering in the United States a progressive tax system, 00:02:00.060 |
not just the fact that income tax rates increase as you get to higher income levels, 00:02:04.600 |
but there's a lot of other factors that we're going to be talking about. 00:02:07.600 |
And so we want to strategize around paying taxes when we can do so at a lower rate in order 00:02:13.660 |
to avoid having to pay taxes later at a higher rate. 00:02:17.000 |
The tax code is filled with a number of nonlinearities and traps that we have to deal with. 00:02:22.360 |
The effective marginal tax rates on a dollar of income, the dollar of tax paid on the last dollar 00:02:27.160 |
of income can be quite a bit higher than income tax rates, and we're not even getting 00:02:32.060 |
into state income taxes, this is purely today going to be in terms of federal income taxes 00:02:36.780 |
and all its related nonlinearities and traps. 00:02:40.100 |
And there can be many different types of tax treatment 00:02:44.400 |
So some of these nonlinearities that are relevant for what we're talking about here, 00:02:49.220 |
many tax rules do connect to adjusted gross income, not taxable income. 00:02:53.380 |
Itemized deductions only count when they're higher than the standard deduction. 00:02:58.220 |
That's not relevant, I'm just going to be assuming the standard deduction 00:03:01.840 |
But there are strategies around deduction bunching and that sort of thing as well. 00:03:05.200 |
Preferential income sources, and this is an important point 00:03:08.320 |
that if you haven't really thought about before, it's big. 00:03:13.840 |
So you can easily get yourself into a situation where when you generate ordinary income, 00:03:18.660 |
you're also pushing your long-term gains into a higher tax bracket at the same time. 00:03:22.520 |
A dollar of income can trigger tax on Social Security benefits. 00:03:26.580 |
A dollar of income can trigger higher Medicare premiums, and Mary Beth already introduced us 00:03:31.180 |
to that concept earlier with those IRMA surcharges. 00:03:34.100 |
A dollar of income can trigger the loss of subsidies if you're getting health insurance 00:03:38.500 |
to an Affordable Care Act plan that is eligible. 00:03:41.320 |
And then we have the 3.8% net investment tax as well on that investment income. 00:03:48.620 |
And then the big one is that we're going to try to plan for, and what a lot of this is doing is trying 00:03:53.200 |
to prepare in advance for the day that we're hit by required minimum distributions. 00:03:57.500 |
They can force you to generate a lot of taxable income that you may not want, 00:04:01.020 |
and that may cause all these nonlinearities to kick into effect 00:04:05.020 |
so that you'll see what we're trying to avoid by planning ahead 00:04:08.480 |
and getting those RMDs down before they begin. 00:04:10.660 |
So simply we have total income, above the line deductions removed from that, 00:04:15.400 |
give you adjusted gross income, below the line deductions or the standard deduction 00:04:19.080 |
in this context will give you taxable income, and then I'm just showing this to now simplify. 00:04:24.320 |
We're talking about different types of investment accounts, so taxable brokerage accounts, 00:04:27.800 |
tax deferred accounts, which from now on I'll just call IRA to make it simpler, 00:04:31.920 |
and then after tax or tax exempt accounts that I'll just simplify as a Roth IRA. 00:04:36.840 |
So when I'm talking about all this tax planning, it's going to be your taxable account, 00:04:41.960 |
Now, it could be much broader than that, but we only have 25 minutes to avoid, well, 00:04:46.920 |
all these potential options, tax-efficient retirement distribution strategies. 00:04:50.940 |
So the starting point, and it's not the worst thing you can do, it's reasonable, 00:04:56.480 |
but we're going to show how we can do a lot better than this, 00:04:58.100 |
but the conventional wisdom starting point for spending on assets 00:05:01.840 |
in retirement is you spend on your taxable account first, then your tax-deferred accounts 00:05:06.980 |
or your IRAs, and then your tax-exempt account you save for last, or your Roths. 00:05:11.380 |
Now, that's a starting point that we're going to talk about doing better. 00:05:16.640 |
I'll be talking about this idea of effective marginal tax rate management. 00:05:20.500 |
The idea is we're going to aim to fill up -- we're going to want to pay taxes. 00:05:26.060 |
We're going to look for opportunities to pay them at lower rates. 00:05:29.160 |
So we're going to fill up lower brackets with income and then draw from elsewhere, 00:05:33.840 |
if we can set this up in advance, to avoid getting pushed 00:05:37.060 |
into these higher effective marginal tax rates. 00:05:39.840 |
Now, RMBs are going to be a big problem in the future. 00:05:42.120 |
So we're doing a lot of this in advance of when RMBs begin. 00:05:45.060 |
A part of this is going to be you end up paying taxes 00:05:50.960 |
A lot of retirement income planning shares that theme. 00:05:53.920 |
Short-term sacrifice can create great long-term benefits, and the biggest impacts for this 00:05:59.180 |
in the tax code, they occur at a spot that's $100 a part for singles, $200 a part for couples. 00:06:05.660 |
I don't know why they made this difference, why they didn't just put it in the same spot, 00:06:09.240 |
but when you shift from right now 12% to 22% for ordinary income, that's a big jump 00:06:14.360 |
in the taxes at these income levels, and then preferential income at about the same point is 00:06:20.220 |
going to be switching from the 0% bracket to the 15% bracket. 00:06:26.980 |
I'm not really going into detail on this other than to say we've got ordinary income 00:06:31.000 |
that what I'll be showing you with these tax maps will mostly relate to IRA distributions 00:06:36.100 |
and then the taxable portion of Social Security. 00:06:39.260 |
We have our preferential income sources, qualified dividends, and long-term capital gains 00:06:43.040 |
that we may be forced to take just because if we have taxable assets, 00:06:46.220 |
it's going to be kicking off qualified dividends. 00:06:48.640 |
In addition to if we're selling shares of that, that will also generate long-term gains. 00:06:52.680 |
And then we have non-taxable sources, which will be, for this context, the Roth IRA, 00:06:59.240 |
and then the portion of Social Security that's not taxed, which we have some ability to reduce. 00:07:04.500 |
We can get more of that Social Security to not be taxable by planning ahead. 00:07:09.560 |
Now part of this is going to involve Roth conversions, which are IRA distributions to the Roth IRA. 00:07:15.640 |
You cannot Roth convert your RMD, so that's why it becomes a lot harder to do Roth conversions 00:07:28.220 |
But it's not necessarily a huge difference if you don't have any taxable assets anymore. 00:07:32.600 |
But in an ideal world, you'd be paying the taxes from somewhere else, 00:07:39.840 |
You can have a big window of opportunity to do this in your 60s if you're retired and 00:07:45.760 |
You could also be thinking ahead about potential large health bills or long-term care that's deductible, 00:07:52.660 |
having some IRA money to offset that, which would be a reason to not fully convert everything. 00:07:57.640 |
And then also during a market downturn, if you do have resources that are not losing value, 00:08:01.820 |
that can be a good opportunity to do conversions at a lower bill. 00:08:05.380 |
You get more shares moved over at a lower cost relative to before the market decline. 00:08:14.180 |
And this is not a political discussion at all, but just to the extent that we don't 00:08:17.780 |
know what the future tax code will look like, the odds are if anything changes, it's probably 00:08:22.080 |
going to be a change towards higher taxes than what we see today. 00:08:25.320 |
The current legislative code is in 2026, the tax rates are going to be going up. 00:08:30.020 |
And I've incorporated that into this analysis, but we never know. 00:08:33.120 |
Maybe the current tax code could be made permanent, or what other changes might come along. 00:08:37.400 |
Now the tax implications of a death of a spouse are pretty big, and I'll show specific tax 00:08:42.020 |
maps for single individuals versus married filing jointly. 00:08:47.220 |
A single individual can face a much higher tax bill. 00:08:50.980 |
Their spending may decline, but their overall taxes may increase, and I'll show this. 00:08:55.860 |
We want to be, again, preparing in advance for required minimum distributions and the 00:09:01.220 |
And then also with the SECURE Act that passed in 2019, the old lifetime stretch on an inherited 00:09:05.820 |
IRA for adult beneficiaries, adult children beneficiaries, now becomes a 10-year window. 00:09:11.380 |
That could push them to take these out during high earnings years potentially, if they receive 00:09:18.100 |
It's not necessarily a great time for them to have to deplete that over the next 10 years. 00:09:26.900 |
I won't have time to go through all the details, but it's just illustrating the idea. 00:09:31.100 |
This is showing how much taxes are paid every year, where the yellow is the conventional 00:09:36.620 |
Spend your taxable, then tax deferred, then tax exempt. 00:09:39.180 |
And then the purple is the tax bills related to a more tax-efficient strategy, which I 00:09:43.460 |
labeled here in a difficult way and then later realized, actually, I can make this simpler. 00:09:48.020 |
This is pretty much going to be the same as you're going to manage the 15% marginal tax 00:09:52.580 |
You pay taxes whenever you can do so at 15% or less. 00:09:56.260 |
So then what happens is you do face higher tax bills in your 60s. 00:10:00.460 |
But by the time Social Security starts at 70, you're in a position where now RMDs are 00:10:06.340 |
going to start at-- well, you do have some years where no taxes. 00:10:10.060 |
Then once RMDs begin, we didn't get this aligned perfectly between the RMDs and the taxable 00:10:15.260 |
part of Social Security, we do face a little bit of taxes. 00:10:18.780 |
And that's going up over time because the Social Security brackets are not inflation 00:10:24.560 |
So I'm not assuming any changes to the current law there. 00:10:27.720 |
That's why taxes-- in inflation-adjusted terms, this is all inflation-adjusted purchasing 00:10:34.500 |
And then we're running this plan out through age 95 with the conventional wisdom strategy. 00:10:43.260 |
With managing the 15% marginal tax rate, their after-tax legacy is about $160,000. 00:10:52.660 |
And this was a couple that had $1.5 million of investment assets at age 62. 00:11:00.420 |
What pitfalls-- so I'm saying, OK, let's pay taxes in advance. 00:11:05.900 |
Or conversely, what pitfalls can we help to avoid later when we do that? 00:11:09.660 |
Well, this is the federal income tax brackets. 00:11:16.900 |
And you have to look at the title of each slide, because they're going to be jumping 00:11:21.980 |
You have no Social Security benefit and no preferential income in this slide. 00:11:27.940 |
Later, the x-axis will change to ordinary income other than taxable Social Security. 00:11:34.180 |
The way Social Security is taxed is super complicated. 00:11:37.180 |
If they wanted to design something even more complicated, it makes it very hard to make 00:11:43.220 |
Here we've got adjusted gross income on horizontally. 00:11:49.500 |
Now let's talk about what happens when we're generating more ordinary income. 00:11:55.460 |
But we'll have the Social Security tax torpedo. 00:11:58.380 |
And this is the first one, pushing preferential income into higher tax brackets, and then 00:12:04.460 |
And then there is the Affordable Care Act issue. 00:12:06.080 |
But I'm not going to include that in these tax maps. 00:12:08.540 |
I'll show you what it looks like real quick later. 00:12:12.180 |
The preferential income brackets are not the same as the ordinary income brackets. 00:12:18.660 |
Any day now, we'll probably get the 2024 numbers. 00:12:21.660 |
OK, so here's a quick example of what I'm talking about, just so that it can make sense. 00:12:26.340 |
The idea is your preferential income stacks on top of your ordinary income. 00:12:35.360 |
So it's more than-- if this was the all ordinary income, they would be in the 22% bracket. 00:12:41.200 |
But this is the $40,625 of ordinary income, $4,000 of long-term capital gains. 00:12:52.400 |
With their $4,000 of long-term gains, $2,000 of that still falls in the 0% preferential 00:13:02.960 |
Now what happens if they take $1 out of their IRA? 00:13:12.100 |
Now when you stack your preferential income on top of that, now just $1,999 is in the 00:13:24.080 |
That's also pushing $1 preferential income into the 15% bracket. 00:13:33.760 |
So now their Social Security is still zero, but they have forced $20,000 of preferential 00:13:40.080 |
income qualified dividends off their brokerage account. 00:13:44.000 |
Now that this is what's going to happen, we're starting to create these tax maps. 00:13:47.800 |
We're going to have this range where they were in the 12% federal income bracket, but 00:13:53.320 |
And then later on when they're getting closer to that $250,000 threshold, they're then in 00:13:59.120 |
the 24% bracket, but then another 3.8% on top of that for preferential income. 00:14:08.600 |
So up to 85% of Social Security benefits are taxable. 00:14:12.880 |
I'm not going to go-- we don't have time for the whole explanation of how they're taxed. 00:14:20.540 |
And it's not inflation adjusted, one of the rare aspects of the tax code, where every 00:14:24.640 |
year more and more Americans face taxes on their Social Security benefits. 00:14:28.660 |
It is a complicated process to determine what percentage of that is taxed. 00:14:32.760 |
And proactive planning, though, does help to avoid the full tax torpedo. 00:14:35.840 |
And that is a key aspect of tax efficiency in retirement. 00:14:39.680 |
So I absolutely agree with Mary Beth that it's best for the hirer to really think seriously 00:14:47.600 |
If you're delaying until 70, you can give yourself a big opportunity to not just have 00:14:51.480 |
a higher Social Security benefit, but to have less of that benefit taxed if you're doing 00:15:12.000 |
And now the x-axis is not adjusted gross income anymore, because it makes it a lot harder 00:15:16.800 |
It's your ordinary income, not including taxable Social Security. 00:15:22.680 |
We think we're in the 10% bracket, but we're getting hit by-- this is where, if I take 00:15:27.000 |
a dollar out of my IRA, $0.85 of a dollar of my Social Security is taxed. 00:15:34.920 |
And then I get kicked up into the 12% bracket. 00:15:37.880 |
And now $1.85 with the tax torpedo that I think I'm in the 12% bracket, but I'm being 00:15:44.240 |
taxed at 22.2% when I add in the fact that this is uniquely causing Social Security to 00:15:50.280 |
Eventually, I get up to that 85% threshold, and I don't have to worry about it anymore. 00:15:57.520 |
Now for a single person, this looks a lot worse, because the full impact of the tax 00:16:01.800 |
torpedo doesn't come in the 12% bracket like with couples. 00:16:05.960 |
It comes in the 22% bracket for a single person. 00:16:10.860 |
And in a few years, that 12% and 22% is going to change to 15% and 25%. 00:16:16.160 |
But here, they're getting hit by the full burden of the tax torpedo in the 22% bracket, 00:16:21.400 |
which we're going to multiply by 1.85, because a dollar from the IRA, also then $0.85 from 00:16:33.120 |
So Irma's experience-- Mary Beth did talk about this. 00:16:36.320 |
When you hit certain thresholds, you got a big extra bill. 00:16:40.000 |
If you're a single person, and you had this in 2023-- well, two years later-- $97,000, 00:16:48.320 |
you pay your base premiums for Part B and Part D $1 more, and your base premiums are 00:16:53.840 |
jumping by $937 for the year, or a 93,700% marginal tax rate on a dollar of income. 00:17:02.680 |
Now if you do have a life-changing event, like retiring, but Roth conversions don't 00:17:06.440 |
count as an excuse here, you can file form SSA-44 and ask not to be hit by the Irma surcharge, 00:17:16.240 |
You take income from this year, and then two years later is when you look at those thresholds 00:17:20.440 |
and determine if you have to pay a higher tax. 00:17:24.140 |
As Mary Beth noted, yesterday, these numbers-- or today-- either yesterday-- the new numbers 00:17:28.280 |
are out for next year's table, but here's the 2023 table that I'll be using. 00:17:33.640 |
Now we're back to a scenario where Social Security is zero, preferential income is zero, 00:17:38.440 |
we're looking at taking money out of our IRA, generating ordinary income, we're moving along 00:17:42.520 |
the federal income brackets, but then we start getting hit by these Irma thresholds, and 00:17:46.240 |
there's five of them, and each time you hit one-- this is for a couple, so you take the 00:17:50.440 |
numbers per person and multiply them by two-- an extra $1,874 in Part B and Part D premiums, 00:17:56.600 |
then later $2,800, then later another $2,800, and then there's two more that are going beyond 00:18:06.440 |
Now if you put this all together, so now we've got $52,200 of Social Security, we have $20,000 00:18:12.940 |
of preferential income, and we're looking at what happens as we take money out of our 00:18:18.320 |
And this is where, if you think ahead, why might we take money out of our IRA? 00:18:22.640 |
Maybe there's R&Ds that we don't actually want to spend, but this is what it's doing 00:18:32.240 |
Your effective marginal tax rate goes up and down as you're generating more income, and 00:18:36.760 |
it can be a lot higher than what the federal income tax brackets look like. 00:18:41.080 |
Now with a single person, again, it looks differently because that tax torpedo hits 00:18:46.580 |
you in the 22% bracket, and with that preferential income, you think you're-- actually, in this 00:18:52.920 |
case, so you think you're still in the 12% bracket, but when you take $1 out of 12%, 00:18:58.540 |
it's pushing another $0.85 of Social Security to be taxed, and then so that's-- we're working 00:19:04.320 |
our way up, but then we're also getting the preferential income stacking issue, where 00:19:08.340 |
now we're pushing $1.85 into the 15% bracket. 00:19:13.020 |
When you put that all together, this poor person thought they were in the 12% bracket, 00:19:17.500 |
but when they take $1 out of their IRA, they're paying 49.95% as a tax rate on that dollar. 00:19:30.020 |
And I don't really have time to talk about the Affordable Care Act subsidies, but this 00:19:33.260 |
is-- if you treat the loss of subsidy as a marginal tax rate, this is an example of what 00:19:39.300 |
Now there's a lot of variables that go into it, so it's not just one of these, but right 00:19:42.500 |
now, and at least through 2026, this may change in 2026. 00:19:46.460 |
Once you get above the 400% federal poverty line threshold for the household, you get 00:19:52.140 |
this long range where incomes can go quite high, where you're losing $0.085 per dollar 00:19:59.860 |
You're losing the subsidy for your health insurance. 00:20:05.740 |
So we've got these kinds of tax maps that we're trying to figure out, what do we do 00:20:09.780 |
How can we build an effective retirement income strategy? 00:20:12.460 |
Well, the way I like to think about this is, first, what could we do to generate the least 00:20:21.100 |
And then can we justify increasing taxable income above that by generally then moving 00:20:26.140 |
away from Roth distributions to adding IRA distributions? 00:20:29.940 |
And once we meet our spending goals, should we keep going with that and also do Roth conversions? 00:20:37.220 |
Constraints on this, well, do we have available funds in our taxable account, tax deferred 00:20:43.740 |
Then another constraint is, where are we starting on the tax map? 00:20:46.740 |
We don't get to start at zero with ordinary income. 00:20:50.840 |
So we may have required minimum distributions. 00:20:53.220 |
We may have Social Security benefits, interest and dividends from our taxable accounts that 00:20:57.740 |
we can't avoid, any other taxable income sources beyond this, pensions, even employment, anything 00:21:07.860 |
And then if we're retired, what is our spending goal? 00:21:10.540 |
How much are we actually trying to spend on a pre-tax basis? 00:21:14.300 |
That's also going to put constraints on our behavior, because we have to make sure we 00:21:17.260 |
at least get the funds we're trying to achieve to meet our spending needs. 00:21:22.980 |
So then we take the tax map, and this is the way I've been thinking about this more recently. 00:21:30.940 |
There's a software out there called Covisum that helped me learn this specific methodology. 00:21:36.900 |
But what you do is, well, the question is, what we need to solve is, what tax rate should 00:21:45.980 |
And it boils down to basic options are, and we'll just use, even though there is no 15% 00:21:51.860 |
bracket right now, in 2026 it returns, should we use the 15% bracket, should we use the 00:22:01.340 |
I think most of the answers will fall somewhere along there, and it depends really how much 00:22:06.100 |
15% could be the answer for someone who has a runway to do some tax planning and maybe 00:22:14.180 |
As we're getting up, I've looked at cases where there's five and a half million dollars 00:22:17.620 |
to work with and finding that maybe going into that 28% bracket can make sense in those 00:22:23.180 |
But here, we're just simply, we have to figure out what bracket to manage. 00:22:26.920 |
Right now I'm just showing you how to make your decisions given that you have a bracket 00:22:31.220 |
So if you're trying to manage the 15% bracket, how much income should you generate? 00:22:36.700 |
The idea is, you want to look for, there's a roller coaster here. 00:22:40.500 |
The tax rate can go above 15%, but it can come back down below 15% again. 00:22:45.700 |
Sometimes it may make sense to generate some income at a higher rate because then you have 00:22:49.740 |
a big runway of income at a lower rate again, and that's what we're trying to figure out. 00:22:53.900 |
Those black dots are marking points where we go above the 15% bracket. 00:23:01.540 |
Well, if we go up to the, starting from zero, zero's identified too, but the first black 00:23:07.100 |
dot there on the 15% bracket happens with the preferential income stacking, where the 00:23:14.580 |
We can generate income up to that point at an effective marginal rate for that whole 00:23:22.860 |
Then we're going to check that next group where we're going to go back down below 15% 00:23:27.240 |
because of that $200 gap that I mentioned earlier. 00:23:30.620 |
There is another place where we're paying at 12% for $200. 00:23:35.180 |
No, that's going to be too high of an effective marginal rate. 00:23:38.620 |
So if I was managing the 15% bracket here, I would go up to where that preferential income 00:23:47.980 |
Well, in this case, I go up to that income stacking, and that's the same. 00:23:54.500 |
Then if I go into that preferential income stacking issue, once I get past that, I'm 00:24:03.060 |
But then I'm going to hit that first IRMA surcharge. 00:24:05.140 |
Well, if I check what is the effective marginal rate on that chunk of income, it's 23.3% under 00:24:15.740 |
And here, the answer is basically generate income up to the IRMA threshold. 00:24:19.740 |
And what I'm assuming about the IRMA threshold is I'm just using this year's numbers to make 00:24:23.860 |
the tax map because it's going to only be relevant-- two years later, I'll pay the tax. 00:24:29.620 |
I'm just going to assume you pay the tax this year for the purpose of making the tax maps. 00:24:33.500 |
We'd stop at the first IRMA threshold because any efforts to go beyond that are always going 00:24:37.900 |
to generate average tax rates higher than our target. 00:24:41.140 |
However, if we were wealthier, probably, so that we actually decide we want to manage 00:24:45.700 |
the 28% effective marginal rate, well, we can actually do that up to the second IRMA 00:24:55.380 |
And so each-- in this case, the first chunk of income staying under 28% gets us to the 00:25:01.660 |
We could do that at 14.4% tax, which is fine. 00:25:05.460 |
Then we have another gap to the second threshold. 00:25:13.380 |
So to conclude, we have a progressive tax code. 00:25:17.040 |
But if we use tax diversification during the accumulation phase and then use these kinds 00:25:21.460 |
of techniques to manage with Roth conversions and tax rate management, we can build retirement