back to indexDid John the Baptist Advocate Divorce?
00:00:00.000 |
We get a lot of emails on relationships, everything from dating and engagements, marriage, and of course divorce and remarriage. 00:00:07.700 |
This is a genre of email that dominates all the other questions we get, as you know. 00:00:11.780 |
And we get a lot of good pushback emails as well and follow-up questions in search of greater 00:00:17.620 |
clarity like this one from a listener named Matthew. 00:00:21.380 |
Pastor John, I have a follow-up to you on episode number 920 on divorce. 00:00:26.580 |
Didn't John the Baptist want Herod to ditch his wife? 00:00:30.180 |
Because John had been saying to him, "It is not lawful for you to have her," present tense. 00:00:35.940 |
See Matthew chapter 14 verse 4. He did not say, "It is not lawful for you to have taken her," past tense. 00:00:43.460 |
And we all know how important tense is interpreting the Bible. She is called his wife. 00:00:48.560 |
So how do you reconcile this seemingly clear call for a married couple to divorce? 00:00:54.580 |
There are at least three things in this passage that are unknown to us. 00:01:02.220 |
And that keep me from using the passage to justify divorce. 00:01:08.380 |
I admit, I don't know if that was clear, I admit that sometimes divorce for a faithful believer is inevitable 00:01:17.180 |
because Paul says so in 1 Corinthians 7 15 when an unbeliever insists on leaving. 00:01:24.580 |
A believer who does everything he or she can to make the marriage work. 00:01:28.260 |
You can't stop an unbeliever from doing that and therefore 00:01:32.900 |
divorce as they carry it through may be inevitable. 00:01:37.660 |
Remarriage in that situation is another issue. We're not talking about that. So let's go back to this text. The text says, 00:01:44.780 |
"For Herod has seized John," John the Baptist, "and bound him and put him in prison 00:01:58.520 |
Because John had been saying to him, "It is not lawful for you to have her." 00:02:06.380 |
That's a good translation, by the way. "It is not lawful for you to have her." 00:02:09.780 |
So the first thing that is unknown to me is when 00:02:16.580 |
married his brother's wife, or if he actually 00:02:22.060 |
married her. When John says, "It is not lawful for you to have her," is he 00:02:32.860 |
only that they're sleeping together or living in some kind of common-law situation, some kind of situation that looks like 00:02:56.580 |
married, then John is saying, "Get out of the relationship. Stop sleeping together." 00:03:03.180 |
Not, "Get out of a marriage." I don't know. I don't know. 00:03:08.460 |
Number two, the second thing that's uncertain is— 00:03:12.660 |
let's just suppose they were married, okay? So the second thing that's 00:03:20.780 |
actually saying that the marriage should end. He is saying, "It is unlawful 00:03:26.820 |
for you to have her. You sinned in marrying her, if he married her." 00:03:33.260 |
But it may also be unlawful to throw her out after she had been married to another man, and 00:03:42.260 |
therefore make her destitute on Jewish principles, since she can't go back to that first husband. 00:03:47.860 |
It is not crystal clear from this text that John is saying, 00:03:51.820 |
"Ditch her." But now let us suppose that John was actually saying, "End the marriage." And 00:03:59.020 |
let's suppose they were married. So two uncertainties. We'll just assume both of them are true. 00:04:05.780 |
The third thing that's uncertain is whether he is saying this because 00:04:12.220 |
the unlawfulness of the marriage is owing to the fact that she was married before, 00:04:25.260 |
his brother, which according to Old Testament law would make the second marriage incestuous, 00:04:32.480 |
like marrying your sister or your sister-in-law or your daughter. 00:04:37.180 |
So Leviticus 18, 16, "You shall not uncover the nakedness of your brother's wife. It is your brother's nakedness." Or 00:04:44.620 |
Leviticus 20, 21, "If a man takes his brother's wife, it is impurity. He has uncovered his brother's nakedness. 00:04:56.540 |
and this kind of boils down to the practical reality, I have never, 00:05:05.140 |
been confronted with a situation in which a man had married his sister or sister-in-law. 00:05:12.540 |
It's difficult to know what I would say about the ongoing 00:05:21.500 |
marriage. My inclination, not having faced it and not having thought more than a little about it, is 00:05:32.740 |
say the marriage should end the way I would if the man was found to have married his own daughter. 00:05:43.980 |
hesitant to build a case in favor of divorce in general 00:05:53.060 |
uncertainties at least, I don't think Matthew 14, 4 00:05:58.380 |
can be used in any ordinary situation to justify divorce. 00:06:02.980 |
Such a good breakdown of the entangled questions and issues involved in 00:06:08.460 |
interpreting this text. Thank you, Pastor John. 00:06:10.820 |
And if you have a question of your own about a perplexing Bible text that you can't make sense of, send those questions into us 00:06:19.220 |
And as I said, we get a lot of questions about relationships, and on Monday 00:06:24.980 |
we're going to talk about engagements and what should be the special priorities as a couple moves forward towards marriage. 00:06:31.900 |
That is on Monday. You've been listening to the Ask Pastor John podcast with longtime author and pastor John Piper. 00:06:38.540 |
You can find our audio feeds and podcast archive all through our online home at DesiringGod.org/AskPastorJohn. 00:06:44.620 |
I'm your host Tony Ranke. Have a great weekend, and we'll see you on Monday.