back to indexShould You Ditch Your To-Do List With a Slow Productivity Mindset?
Chapters
0:0 Cal's intro
0:22 Cal reads a question about slow productivity
0:31 Cal's ideal world
1:6 Cal's explains Merlin Mann
2:33 When the wheels come off
4:18 What happens in the real world
5:0 Cal talks about automation
00:00:05.000 |
Let's start as always with questions about deep work. 00:00:14.000 |
Brandon asks, "Does adopting a slow productivity mindset 00:00:20.000 |
mean you should ditch your to-do list and capture systems? 00:00:24.000 |
Am I doing too much if I need a full-fledged capture system?" 00:00:28.000 |
Well, Brandon, in an ideal world, where you had complete control 00:00:34.000 |
over what your working life looked like and you had no concerns about money, 00:00:38.000 |
you were independently wealthy, so you could completely control your working life, 00:00:41.000 |
I would say, yeah, it would be great if you didn't need all the things I talk about 00:00:51.000 |
You don't need weekly and daily time block plans. 00:00:58.000 |
And there are some people who do actually more or less accomplish this. 00:01:02.000 |
The example that I like to give comes from probably the first article I wrote 00:01:06.000 |
that began to scratch the surface on some of these ideas. 00:01:10.000 |
It's also one of the favorite articles I've written in the past two years. 00:01:14.000 |
And it was for The New Yorker, and it was called 00:01:20.000 |
And the narrative spine of this article was Merlin Mann. 00:01:25.000 |
So this name is familiar to a lot of Deep Questions listeners, 00:01:29.000 |
but Merlin Mann, in the 2000s, started this blog called 43 Folders 00:01:33.000 |
that was all about using modern technology to build these hyper-optimized, 00:01:43.000 |
He had a job as a project manager that he took in the '90s, 00:01:47.000 |
that as we fell into more and more of a culture of constant communication 00:01:52.000 |
and constant email and constant work overload, 00:01:55.000 |
the culture I talk about in my book, "A World Without Email," 00:01:58.000 |
he got more and more overloaded, and he stumbled across David Allen 00:02:01.000 |
and getting things done, and he was a real tech guy. 00:02:04.000 |
So he was like, "Man, I think if we could just build the right tools, 00:02:08.000 |
I could stop feeling this way, where I'm completely overwhelmed 00:02:14.000 |
And so he started writing about trying to build those tools, 00:02:18.000 |
So that website got very popular, and he became a real leader 00:02:23.000 |
Eventually, he was doing that website full-time and giving talks about it, 00:02:26.000 |
and then he got a book deal to write a book about it, 00:02:32.000 |
And this is the narrative that was the spine for that article, 00:02:40.000 |
"I can't fix this problem by organizing better 00:02:45.000 |
the deluge of things that are coming towards me, 00:02:48.000 |
by having better tools, having better systems, 00:02:52.000 |
better processes for dealing with the deluges coming with me." 00:02:55.000 |
He said, "Ultimately, I can fix this problem by reducing the deluge. 00:03:00.000 |
That instead of having a better system for having too much to do, 00:03:03.000 |
what if I changed my notion of work so I didn't have that much to do, 00:03:07.000 |
so that having these productivity systems that are so complex 00:03:10.000 |
would be unnecessary?" And that's roughly what he did. 00:03:16.000 |
He's like, "This is just what I'm going to do." 00:03:19.000 |
And the way he explained it to me when I talked to him about it 00:03:22.000 |
for the article was he doesn't really need those systems 00:03:25.000 |
because his life is really simple. He has a recording schedule. 00:03:29.000 |
"This is when I need to be in the studio to record my podcast." 00:03:35.000 |
Now, he keeps to-do lists for household stuff. 00:03:38.000 |
"What do I need to buy at the grocery store?" or whatever. 00:03:41.000 |
He basically simplified his working life down to the point where 00:03:44.000 |
he didn't really need to manage it. So I think, yes, kind of ideally, 00:03:47.000 |
a slow productivity ideal would be such that you're working 00:03:50.000 |
on a small number of things one at a time. It's clear what you're working on. 00:03:53.000 |
There's not that much to track. You don't have to squeeze 00:03:56.000 |
as much as possible out of an 8-hour day because you're juggling 00:03:59.000 |
16 different tasks and projects, and you have to make progress on each 00:04:02.000 |
without losing your mind. You don't need 6 Trello boards each 00:04:05.000 |
for different roles because you only have one role. 00:04:08.000 |
That's the thing you need to do right now. You're writing, or you're recording. 00:04:11.000 |
So, yes, I think, Brandon, you're on to something. Ideally, 00:04:14.000 |
you would not need all of these systems. Now, in the real world, 00:04:20.000 |
If you can't get all the way to that point, then having all these systems 00:04:29.000 |
So if you've simplified things, but there's still a non-trivial amount 00:04:32.000 |
of work on your plate, by taming that with systems, 00:04:35.000 |
you can actually get closer to the slow ideal. 00:04:47.000 |
I've been working through some of these thoughts recently about slow productivity. 00:04:53.000 |
part of what you can do with systems if you're trying to be 00:04:56.000 |
embrace more slow productivity is you can be much more automated 00:05:02.000 |
With the right systems, you can push these small 00:05:05.000 |
tasks into certain times on certain days so that they're not weighing 00:05:08.000 |
on your mind elsewise. So you can't get rid of them, but you can 00:05:11.000 |
tame them, you can automate them and control them and move them 00:05:14.000 |
into certain places where they only take your time three hours 00:05:17.000 |
a week at these set times. That requires a lot of systems, but 00:05:20.000 |
that's compressing the impact on your schedule. 00:05:23.000 |
It's compressing the impact so your mind can be free 00:05:26.000 |
in other times. I think being very careful about tracking 00:05:29.000 |
what you're working on is critical if you're going to reduce that because 00:05:32.000 |
you can figure out what is my limits, what is the limit 00:05:38.000 |
You can't figure that out if you're not carefully tracking this and tracking 00:05:47.000 |
Intel you reach the slow productivity ideal, then maybe you don't 00:05:50.000 |
need them anymore. Most of us aren't going to get there. So Brandon, most of us need 00:05:53.000 |
systems. We want to be careful about our time so that we can protect 00:06:02.000 |
where we don't need the systems anymore. But until we get there, I think