back to indexMy Planning System For Note Taking & Time Management | Cal Newport
Chapters
0:0 Studying art
1:50 Cal's general definition of note taking
6:30 Building complicated systems
10:50 Learning as a college student
15:0 Active recall
00:00:00.000 |
In the new book, "Slow Productivity," coming out in March, I talk about my growing interest in 00:00:05.760 |
movies and how for anyone who does creative work, studying and building up a good appreciation for 00:00:13.840 |
an unrelated creative field actually can really help what you're doing. And I write about in "Slow 00:00:18.320 |
Productivity" about studying films as helping my writing. If I study good writers, it's too close 00:00:23.680 |
to home. And it's kind of more of a stressful work and like, it's not inspiring. It's more, 00:00:30.240 |
"I should do more of that," or it's more anxiety producing. But you study art in another format, 00:00:35.680 |
you can come at that as like, "I don't do that art." So you can just appreciate it with open 00:00:39.680 |
eyes and it gives you an injection of creative energy for what you're doing. So I'm a big, 00:00:43.760 |
I talk about this a lot, not a lot, but I do talk about in "Slow Productivity," 00:00:47.840 |
studying an art that's not what you do will make you more inspired for what you do actually do. 00:00:53.840 |
- All right. Speaking of which, we got questions. 00:00:56.480 |
- All right. First question's from Mark. "What is note-taking for? I found note-taking most useful 00:01:02.640 |
in the short term, grounding me in my current task or noting a few to-do's throughout the day. 00:01:08.000 |
Almost all of them are immediately disposable. It seems like note-taking can become fairly 00:01:13.840 |
navel-gazing and doing it excessively takes away from execution." 00:01:17.120 |
- It's a good question because we see this a lot in our discussions of organization, 00:01:22.240 |
"notes" and "note-taking" is an excessively broad term. It covers lots of different things. And for 00:01:30.160 |
a lot of people like Mark, these things get all mixed up and they're thinking, "Well, I don't 00:01:35.440 |
know. I'm sitting here journaling all day. Is this note-taking? What should I be doing? What 00:01:39.200 |
should I not be doing?" So what I want to do here is step back and let's give a general definition 00:01:44.960 |
for note-taking. And then I want to highlight what I think the three critical types of note-taking 00:01:51.360 |
systems you need in your life if you work any sort of knowledge job. And then we can, from there, 00:01:57.200 |
move on to talk about more advanced options. So let's define note-taking more generally to mean 00:02:02.880 |
recording information on a durable written medium. So anywhere you're collecting information in a 00:02:11.200 |
written medium that's durable, that will then, you have it outside of your head so you can 00:02:14.800 |
reference it later. Here are the three types of this note-taking that I think are critical, 00:02:20.160 |
especially for most knowledge workers. One, some sort of working memory extender. 00:02:25.600 |
This is where I use my text file on my desktop of my computer's workingmemory.txt. This is for 00:02:33.520 |
strictly expanding the amount of information you can temporarily hold on to as you engage with the 00:02:40.880 |
inflow of information throughout your workday. So as things come in, you're in a meeting and people 00:02:46.000 |
are suggesting next steps, you can just write this information down in whatever medium you use for 00:02:51.680 |
your working memory extender, because it's probably more information you can keep in your head. So 00:02:56.560 |
there it is. I write it down right there. Or I'm going through my email inbox and I need to 00:03:01.680 |
remember different notes I need to act on, schedule this, get back to them. I can write it into my 00:03:06.160 |
workingmemory.extender. These are notes that exist outside of your own brain, allows you to hold on 00:03:11.200 |
and organize more information than you could do just strictly within the confines of your own 00:03:16.080 |
neurons. Now, this is something that resets all the time. It's a durable form, but you reset it 00:03:22.880 |
all the time. So as I'm going through a meeting, I'm taking quick notes on here's the five things 00:03:27.280 |
I need to do. After that meeting, those notes will then get processed out of my working memory file 00:03:34.000 |
into calendar reminders into my obligation system. So it's a temporary storage, but it allows me in 00:03:41.600 |
the moment to keep track of more things that my brain can do on its own. That's note-taking, 00:03:45.120 |
but of a very temporary type. Next comes what I just cited, which is your obligation tracker, 00:03:51.360 |
some system to maintain all of the relevant information for every obligation on your plate. 00:03:56.560 |
This is also note-taking, written durable information that you don't have to keep track of 00:04:01.040 |
in your head. So somewhere here, all the things I have to do probably categorized. 00:04:06.240 |
Here is all of the information related to each of these things all in this one place. 00:04:11.120 |
You want that information accessible and captured somewhere. That's note-taking. 00:04:16.800 |
Then finally, we get to what most people think of when they think about note-taking, 00:04:22.320 |
and this is more where you're capturing key ideas about your work in your life. 00:04:26.640 |
It could be interesting ideas, interesting articles, brainstorms, concerns that you have. 00:04:32.800 |
This is the broad category that captures what people normally think about in note-taking. 00:04:37.360 |
I might be journaling my thoughts about things. I might be writing down my plans for how I want 00:04:42.080 |
to improve my life. I might be capturing articles that are relevant to the newsletter that I run 00:04:47.520 |
and things I want to remember. And this is where you're going to use whatever type of system you 00:04:53.760 |
like to capture things in. You have a lot of different choices here. 00:04:57.120 |
All three of these things are note-taking. You need some sort of system for each. 00:05:01.280 |
So in my own life, I use a plain text file for working memory. I use Trello for obligation 00:05:10.560 |
tracking notes, one board per role, one column per type of obligation, one card per obligation, 00:05:19.280 |
all of the relevant information for that obligation on the card. 00:05:22.240 |
And I use my Remarkable 2 digital notebook for everything else. Inside my Remarkable 2, 00:05:28.720 |
I have dozens of different individual virtual notebooks for keeping track of 00:05:32.880 |
ideas, reflections, concerns, et cetera. So those are the three categories, Mark. 00:05:36.960 |
Do those three categories, different tools for each, different rates of refresh and reset for 00:05:43.440 |
each working memory. You're resetting this every 10 minutes or so. Your obligation list you're 00:05:47.840 |
working with every day. Your bigger idea capture is something you maybe go over 00:05:52.560 |
in detail much less often. Hey, I'm going to have a summit now to rethink this part of my business. 00:05:57.040 |
Let me go back and look through my notes. Maybe that's just once every few months or so. 00:06:00.080 |
So that's really it. There are more complicated systems and methodologies. We have a lot of fans 00:06:08.880 |
here of Zettelkasten type systems. We also have a lot of fans here of interesting note-taking 00:06:15.920 |
software that really gets into the details of how you store notes, how you connect notes, 00:06:21.680 |
the format in which the notes are stored. That is optional. It's more about your interest. 00:06:29.520 |
If you like information management as a hobby, you can build more complicated systems around it, 00:06:35.600 |
but you don't need complicated systems to successfully take notes. Those are the three 00:06:39.600 |
areas you have to take notes. Just make sure those are all three covered with some sort of 00:06:43.360 |
reasonable techno system, and then you're doing a fine job. I think that separation is key. Don't 00:06:49.760 |
mix all this stuff together. Don't have a moleskin somewhere in which you're trying to keep your tasks 00:06:54.960 |
next to your vision for living on a cabin in 20 years, next to a grocery list you want to remember 00:07:02.000 |
when you go to the store. We need some separation for note-taking to keep up with the complexity of 00:07:06.480 |
modern life. All right. What do we got next, Jesse? Next question is from Reshab. As a 26-year-old 00:07:14.640 |
software developer who has recently landed a well-paying job, I'm looking to pursue my interest 00:07:19.840 |
in learning to play the guitar, drawing, and some days gardening. However, I'm concerned about 00:07:25.280 |
whether it's feasible to schedule all these activities into a single week while maintaining 00:07:28.960 |
a focus on deep life core fundamentals. In your expert opinion, would it be possible to balance 00:07:34.560 |
all these pursuits effectively within a given week without compromising on essential life habits? 00:07:40.320 |
Well, I think this is a objective question for which you can get an objective answer 00:07:46.160 |
by becoming quantitative. So let's just work with your calendar. I'm assuming you're 00:07:53.040 |
professionally speaking, you're organized, you time block your days, you have a clear shutdown. 00:07:58.080 |
There's some clarity about your time outside of work. Play with that time. So start autopilot 00:08:05.840 |
scheduling some of these hobbies. Maybe you garden on weekday mornings. Maybe you alternate 00:08:11.760 |
a guitar practice session and what was the other thing? Drawing practice session on different days. 00:08:18.160 |
You do it an hour before dinner. Autopilot this out. See if it fits. And if the stuff does fit, 00:08:27.040 |
execute this autopilot schedule for a while and say, does this feel sustainable or do I feel like 00:08:32.000 |
I'm constantly running from one thing to another or it's overfilling my time? 00:08:35.680 |
I used to run this exercise with undergraduates who are trying to figure out 00:08:41.360 |
their academic programs and their extracurricular programs. And I would say, we got to sit down and 00:08:45.520 |
just build a plan for your proposal here. You want to do these five extracurriculars in double major, 00:08:50.720 |
show me the time. Then they would go through and block off the time for studying and how long is 00:08:55.440 |
this going to take and put on their meetings and the time to work on their activities. And it either 00:08:59.360 |
fit or it didn't. And sometimes if it just barely fit, they would come back a week later and say, 00:09:03.680 |
this is crazy. Every minute of my life is scheduled. So if it doesn't fit or it fits 00:09:09.520 |
and your life feels too crowded, then you just pull back. You're getting an objective feedback 00:09:13.120 |
here. You pull back and it doesn't matter if you're pulling back. These are hobbies. The thing 00:09:18.720 |
is you want to be spending quality time outside of work on things that matter. The quantity isn't 00:09:23.280 |
important. So if it doesn't fit or it barely fits, maybe you do seasonal pursuits. In the spring, 00:09:31.600 |
I'm working a lot on my garden and in the winter, I'm spending a lot more time on guitar because 00:09:36.480 |
that's sort of inside. And I do drawing in the fall. You could have seasonal pursuits. You could 00:09:41.360 |
stack these one over another. Or maybe what you need to do is just slow down your ambition for 00:09:47.200 |
these pursuits. And instead of saying, look, I'm going to do four hours of guitar a day and I want 00:09:52.640 |
to be shredding in like six months, you say, I'm going to spend less time. Good, hard practice, 00:09:58.160 |
like we talked about the deep dive, trying to move up the stair steps towards expert knowledge. 00:10:02.400 |
But I'm just willing for this to take longer. A few years from now, I'll be a pretty good guitar 00:10:06.400 |
player, but I'm playing just an hour every other day. That doesn't take up as much time. I'm doing 00:10:11.360 |
so. I have a drawing class I take once a week. And on Fridays, I get out of work early and go 00:10:15.920 |
to a park to work on the drawing. This is maybe I'm going to learn these skills slower, but that 00:10:19.200 |
makes their footprint on my schedule smaller. And I have more give and more flexibility and 00:10:23.760 |
don't feel like I'm overscheduled. So treat this like a quantitative question, get clear feedback. 00:10:29.120 |
If it's too much, reduce or slow down. It doesn't really matter for your goal here, 00:10:35.120 |
which is just to make sure that you're engaged in deeper pursuits. That's what matters. Not the 00:10:41.360 |
speed at which you're getting better at things, not the quantity of things that you're actually 00:10:44.800 |
going after. All right, who do we got next? Next question is from Craig. I'm a college student 00:10:52.480 |
trying to be more smart about how I study and organize my learning. I'm relatively new to this 00:10:57.360 |
stuff. Strangely, most productivity tips on YouTube are about the top 10 to-do lists and 00:11:02.640 |
note-taking apps. Will I be less effective if I don't use one of those apps? It seems like a lot 00:11:07.680 |
of work and setup to learn all those apps to be efficient. And I dread thinking about the heavy 00:11:11.680 |
lifting prep those apps require. What should I do? Well, I think my answer here at first is going to 00:11:18.000 |
be ironic because you may be listening to this answer on YouTube, but I'm going to tell you in 00:11:24.640 |
a second why what I'm about to say here is not oxymoronic. Don't use YouTube to get advice on 00:11:30.400 |
studying. So when you're getting information, especially information on improving your life, 00:11:37.840 |
you have to understand the incentive structures in place. And for people who are purely doing 00:11:44.320 |
YouTube, so if you're a pure study habits YouTuber, the incentive structure is for views. 00:11:52.000 |
That's what you look about. That's what we care about. I want more views on my videos. 00:11:55.760 |
To get more views on your videos on YouTube, you have to work with the idiosyncratic properties 00:12:04.080 |
of the recommendation algorithm. And you get into this feedback loop where your content 00:12:10.320 |
morphs more and more towards what's giving you this better feedback from the algorithm. 00:12:16.720 |
And after a while, it's the algorithm specifying your content. So you may be started out as a 00:12:20.880 |
YouTuber saying, I want to help students study better because this is an audience 00:12:25.360 |
out there that cares about this. And after six months of interacting with the algorithm, 00:12:30.960 |
it's the top 10 to-do list apps or whatever, because this is what's getting them the best 00:12:37.120 |
view numbers. The advice might have very little to do, however, with the nuts and bolts of becoming 00:12:42.720 |
a better student. So the incentive structure matters. So if you want to become a better 00:12:46.960 |
student, and this is going to sound very self-serving, but I'm going to say, 00:12:49.520 |
read my book, how to become a straight A student. Now, why is that better? Because what is the 00:12:55.280 |
incentive structure of books? When you write a book, like how to become a straight A student, 00:12:59.920 |
let me tell you this from experience. This is not a, we're going to go hard out of the gate. 00:13:05.680 |
There's going to be a number one New York times bestseller. I'm going to be on the today show 00:13:09.440 |
talking about this book and every major podcaster wants to have me on. That is not the play. When 00:13:14.480 |
you write a book on student advice, the play is this better work. So some people will buy this 00:13:22.080 |
because they heard about it from me or saw it on a table. I'm embarrassed to admit this Jesse, 00:13:27.120 |
but when that book came out, it was for my first, my first year at grad school at MIT, 00:13:30.880 |
I would sometimes go to the Harvard co-op as they call it the coop. And I would it was on tables 00:13:38.080 |
kind of hang around. People would pick up the book and look at it, but that's like how people 00:13:43.120 |
discovered it at first. I didn't have a social, there was no social media back then. It wasn't on 00:13:47.680 |
a big podcast. People would find it on tables and then it's all word of mouth. And what is going to 00:13:54.080 |
make someone recommend a book to someone else? This worked, this made me get better grades. 00:14:00.480 |
You should read it. My kid's grades got better after they read this. So what you want to look 00:14:04.480 |
for, if you want to align incentive structures with advice here is where you want to find a 00:14:08.640 |
book on student study habit advice that just had a quiet entry into the marketplace and over time 00:14:15.440 |
sell, sell, sell, sells. And I just looked it up before the show. I think the sales on how to 00:14:21.680 |
concentrate a student is approaching 250,000 copies. A book that has never had any major 00:14:27.600 |
promotion has never been talked about on a single major podcast show or had any footprint on social 00:14:32.720 |
media. That's all word of mouth. So there you verify the incentive there for me to make that 00:14:38.800 |
book sell that many copies. I was obsessed about this better work, what really works. 00:14:44.000 |
So books have a better incentive structure surrounding their information than YouTube does. 00:14:51.360 |
So you buy my book or any other book that has sold a lot of copies that focus on this topic, 00:14:55.360 |
you're much more likely to get advice that works. And you're not going to hear anything 00:14:59.120 |
about note-taking apps or to-do lists in that book. My book gets right down to the brass tacks 00:15:04.240 |
of what are the different academic tasks you have to do? What is the right way to do these? How do 00:15:08.720 |
you take information from a textbook and learn it efficiently to the point that you can do well on a 00:15:13.200 |
test? How do you write a paper? How do you break that down into multiple steps so that it's a good 00:15:18.000 |
paper that you're going to get good grades on? How do you learn mathematics to the level that 00:15:21.520 |
you can sit down for a mathematics exam and get a really good score on it? Well, here's exactly how 00:15:26.000 |
you want to organize your notes. Here's how you should study. These would make excessively boring 00:15:31.760 |
YouTube videos from the perspective of the algorithm, but they also lead to notably high GPAs. 00:15:37.920 |
All right, so now let's come back to the oxymoronic fallacy early on. Aren't you hearing 00:15:44.320 |
advice now on YouTube? Well, here's how I exempt what we're doing here is that if you're watching 00:15:51.120 |
this on YouTube, what you are seeing is the video of a podcast, right? The podcast is the game here. 00:15:56.640 |
We put the video of the podcast on YouTube. Podcasting has a good incentive structure. 00:16:01.920 |
It's similar to books. There is not an algorithm to please. In other words, there's not a hard, 00:16:10.400 |
inscrutable, complex feedback mechanism that drives your content in podcasting. It is just 00:16:16.560 |
like books. If someone likes your show, they will tell someone else about it and your audience grows 00:16:23.120 |
a little bit. And that's how podcasts grow is people find what you're talking about to be 00:16:29.520 |
effective enough that they will then go on to tell someone else about it. So that's what I think saves 00:16:35.280 |
us here if you're watching this on YouTube is that what we're trying to do is get more podcast 00:16:39.360 |
listeners. And I see that the exact same way as trying to get more book readers. The stuff's got 00:16:43.600 |
to work. We play some tricks with the, uh, the thumbnails and the titles to try to get some 00:16:50.800 |
algorithmic juice. Our YouTube guy does that, but the content comes out of the podcast. 00:16:56.720 |
So I think incentive structures matter. So keep that in mind. So, uh, peer YouTubers are not 00:17:04.400 |
necessarily a great source of advice on a lot of topics. You want to find sources of advice 00:17:09.600 |
where the incentive structure is for the advice to work. That's what's going to make it actually 00:17:13.440 |
do better. Hey, if you like this video, I think you'll really like this one as well. Check it out.