back to indexIsn’t Veganism Closer to God’s Original Design?
00:00:00.000 |
It is Friday. Let's talk about food. Ever since a tablecloth filled with animals descended 00:00:09.480 |
from heaven before Peter and a vision, the kitchen doors have been flung wide open to 00:00:14.960 |
all sorts of delicious dishes we have come to love, including bacon and lobster and coconut 00:00:21.040 |
shrimp and bluefin tuna sushi, on and on it goes. But there's still a lingering question 00:00:26.520 |
over whether veganism more closely maps on to God's original dietary design for us. And 00:00:33.360 |
it's a question that comes to us from Scott in Cincinnati. 00:00:35.520 |
"Dear Pastor John, several of my friends are either vegans or vegetarians, and while they 00:00:40.080 |
are mostly non-Christians, they occasionally challenge me theologically for eating meat. 00:00:45.720 |
I see in scripture that God provided quail for the Israelites in the wilderness. He demanded 00:00:50.000 |
animal sacrifices. Jesus, after the resurrection, ate broiled fish. Peter, of course, was given 00:00:55.800 |
a vision of animals clean to eat. But before the fall, they point out that God gave man 00:01:00.520 |
only seed-yielding plants and the fruit from trees for food. And in eternity, instead of 00:01:06.000 |
killing animals, the lion shall eat straw like the ox and no further blood will be shed. 00:01:11.340 |
The more I think about this, I am unconvinced that eating meat is sinful. But isn't veganism 00:01:16.880 |
closer to God's original pre-fall and even post-fall dietary design for us?" 00:01:24.280 |
What moves me in regard to eating patterns is that neither Jesus nor the apostles, though 00:01:33.960 |
they had many opportunities to do so, neither of them argued from a pre-fall eating pattern 00:01:40.840 |
forward or a future eschatological eating pattern backward to the way we should eat 00:01:49.200 |
today. They didn't argue that way. Such an argument would have solved some serious problems 00:01:56.160 |
in the church in Corinth and Rome, but Paul did not take that approach. In fact, he emphatically 00:02:03.640 |
went in another direction. And I suspect that the reason he didn't argue that way and went 00:02:10.920 |
in another direction is because he saw that God did not intend for either the pre-fall 00:02:19.320 |
world or the post-sin world to provide the model of eating in this world. The risen Christ, 00:02:31.800 |
with his new resurrection body, is the closest glimpse that we get of eating in the age to 00:02:40.560 |
come, and he ate fish—dead fish. Now, instead of arguing that way, Paul argued like this. 00:02:51.720 |
This is 1 Corinthians 10:24. "Let no one seek his own good but the good of his neighbor. 00:03:00.600 |
Eat whatever is sold in the meat market without raising any question on the ground of conscience, 00:03:10.200 |
for the earth is the Lord's and the fullness thereof." That's a quote from Psalm 24 00:03:17.360 |
that Paul uses as a ground clause. The whole question of meat offered to idols would have 00:03:23.680 |
been solved for Paul if he had taken the position that eating meat is sub-Christian in any 00:03:30.440 |
case. He argued just the opposite. Animals which provide meat do not belong to themselves. 00:03:41.040 |
They don't belong to the earth. They belong to the Lord who provides his people with their 00:03:48.280 |
needs for food, so eat them. The earth is the Lord's and the fullness thereof. That 00:03:56.440 |
was Paul's argument for eating meat. And lest we think that Paul was off on his own 00:04:02.160 |
here, Mark, in his gospel, chapter 7, verse 19, said, "Jesus declared all foods clean" 00:04:12.080 |
(Mark 7, 19). Clean, acceptable, not banned, not illegal. But here's the most important 00:04:21.360 |
and urgent biblical teaching regarding the patterns of eating among Christians today. 00:04:29.120 |
This is a classic and explicit illustration of what ought not to divide Christians or 00:04:37.120 |
hinder our precious and close and sweet fellowship with each other. This was Paul's main concern 00:04:47.160 |
in dealing with eating of meat. Romans 14 is written to deal explicitly with the conflict 00:04:54.960 |
between vegetarians and meat eaters. It is astonishingly relevant for Scott's question. 00:05:03.080 |
There are other issues in Romans 14, like what days should be honored and whether we 00:05:08.220 |
should drink wine, but vegetarianism and meat eating are front and center. So here's what 00:05:17.160 |
he says. This is Romans 12, 2, following. "One person believes he may eat anything, 00:05:24.800 |
while the weak person eats only vegetables. Let not the one who eats despise the one who 00:05:32.680 |
abstains, and let not the one who abstains pass judgment on the one who eats, for God 00:05:41.160 |
has welcomed him. Who are you to pass judgment on the servant of another? It is before his 00:05:49.120 |
own master that he stands or falls, and he will be upheld, for the Lord is able to make 00:05:56.080 |
him stand." There's the central concern and the central teaching on this issue, according 00:06:02.240 |
to Paul. Meat eaters don't despise vegetarians. Vegetarians don't pass judgment on meat eaters. 00:06:15.840 |
On such issues, each of us stands before the Lord to give his own account. Don't become 00:06:23.760 |
lords judging each other on this issue. That's the main message. Then verse 14, "I know 00:06:31.440 |
and am persuaded in the Lord Jesus that nothing is unclean in itself, but it is unclean for 00:06:38.640 |
anyone who thinks it unclean. For if your brother is grieved by what you eat, you are 00:06:44.360 |
no longer walking in love. By what you eat, do not destroy the one for whom Christ died." 00:06:52.560 |
Romans 14, verses 14 to 15. Then he continues on. Verse 17, "For the kingdom of God is 00:06:59.680 |
not a matter of eating and drinking, but of righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy 00:07:08.520 |
Spirit. Whoever thus serves Christ is acceptable to God and approved by men." Then one more 00:07:16.800 |
section, verses 20 and 21, still in Romans 14. "Do not for the sake of food destroy 00:07:23.160 |
the work of God. Everything is indeed clean, but it is wrong for anyone to make another 00:07:32.520 |
stumble by what he eats. It is good not to eat meat or drink wine or do anything that 00:07:42.160 |
causes your brother to stumble." Don't cause a brother to stumble into sin and destruction 00:07:51.360 |
by what you eat. That's not love. So in Paul's mind, the issue of vegetarian 00:07:57.920 |
versus meat eater is not an issue of health. It's not an issue of attaining the ideal of 00:08:07.200 |
pre-fall or post-sin eschatological conditions. It is an issue of love. And in that sense, 00:08:19.120 |
it's a great issue. But in only that sense, it's not a great issue in and of itself. What 00:08:27.200 |
we eat here—hear me on this, this is going to shock some—what we eat here is of almost 00:08:36.120 |
zero significance compared to righteousness, peace, and joy in the Holy Spirit, which are 00:08:45.800 |
the manifestations of the saving reign of God among his people. So let's keep things 00:08:53.440 |
in perspective. Manifest the reign of God and love one another. 00:09:00.360 |
That's a wonderful little biblical theology of food. Thank you, Pastor John. And you're 00:09:04.880 |
exactly right. It's interesting how often food is discussed in the epistles. It's surprising, 00:09:10.480 |
really. Thank you, Pastor John. And Scott, thanks for the question. And listeners, thank 00:09:14.320 |
you for joining us again and for ever being willing to prayerfully and financially support 00:09:18.480 |
our work over the years. Appreciate it very much. So thank you. Well, you can stay current 00:09:23.440 |
with the Ask Pastor John podcast on your phone or device by subscribing through your preferred 00:09:27.600 |
podcast catcher app. And if you want to search our past episodes or if you want to send us 00:09:32.200 |
an email, even questions about what the Bible says about food, you can do those things through 00:09:35.860 |
our online home at DesiringGod.org/AskPastorJohn. Well, Christians struggle with sin because 00:09:42.520 |
we Christians in this life are sinners still. Sin will not be eradicated from our lives 00:09:47.540 |
until a glorious day when we see Jesus face to face. But until that glorious moment, we 00:09:52.420 |
fight sin by faith and we can experience assurance inside of that fight. But the Reformed tradition 00:09:58.600 |
has also taught that there are forms of willful sin, willful sin, that evidences a heart that 00:10:05.800 |
has not been saved. So what is the difference between unwilled sin and willful sin? That's 00:10:13.560 |
the question on Monday. Until then, I'm your host, Tony Rank. You have a great weekend