back to indexWhy Men & Women Show Attraction Differently | Dr. Michael Platt & Dr. Andrew Huberman
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67e23/67e239c3c68c5d6fa97a30c68e6148621f493aac" alt=""
Chapters
0:0 Hormonal Signals
0:40 Behavioral Signals & Attraction
1:46 Exotic Dancers & Ovulation
2:45 Monkey Studies on Social Information
3:41 Economic Decision Making in Monkeys
4:42 Juice Rewards & Visual Stimuli
5:33 Monkeys' Preferences for Social Images
7:52 Human Studies on Attractiveness
9:56 Economic Tasks & Gender Differences
11:39 Brain Activity & Reward Systems
00:00:09.680 |
and other relevant hormones, and for males as well, 00:00:14.680 |
what are the external signals or behavioral signals? 00:00:18.860 |
- Yeah, so that's a really important point that you made 00:00:30.960 |
and it aligns, I think, with our own intuitions 00:00:37.440 |
well, some things are apparently not consciously perceptible. 00:00:48.520 |
okay, how attractive is this woman, or et cetera, 00:00:51.180 |
that there are changes in the face, for example, 00:00:56.960 |
this is gonna sound funny, but that the signals 00:00:59.520 |
that in non-human primates are in the rear are, 00:01:03.600 |
because we're walking upright, you can't see that really, 00:01:10.960 |
that the ovulatory cycle is reflected in the turgidity, 00:01:16.760 |
because it gets a little plumper and a little bit redder, 00:01:29.200 |
heterosexual males, how attractive is this woman, et cetera, 00:01:35.040 |
And also behavioral, so sort of flirtatious behavior-- 00:01:45.240 |
- Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, there is a classic study 00:01:57.520 |
when they were ovulating than when they're not ovulating. 00:02:02.640 |
- And it could be by virtue of their behavior, 00:02:06.120 |
but it could be the way they dance, proximity to the, 00:02:15.360 |
but it suggests that there's a latent signal there. 00:02:21.160 |
And that men are unconsciously processing this. 00:02:26.160 |
They're not saying, "Oh, her cheeks are particularly 00:02:37.740 |
or scores of attractiveness, when she's ovulating, 00:02:41.880 |
it's these features that might be drawing out that response. 00:02:45.080 |
- Correct, we can take this back to the monkey porn studies, 00:02:47.520 |
which was our first real foray into trying to quantify 00:02:52.520 |
the value of various kinds of social information 00:03:02.160 |
And we already came into this with a sense that like, 00:03:06.080 |
yeah, things like status, physical prowess, mating status, 00:03:10.760 |
are you, you look like a good mate, bad mate, 00:03:23.440 |
You could ask them, they're not gonna tell you 00:03:25.080 |
'cause they can't talk, but you have to develop 00:03:30.000 |
And so what we did, I think it was pretty clever, 00:03:33.520 |
was to riff on the studies that I had already done 00:03:38.520 |
looking at varying the expected value of two options. 00:03:41.780 |
So this was the work I did as a postdoc with Paul Glimcher, 00:03:45.200 |
where we revealed economic signals in the brain, 00:03:53.160 |
where visual signals come in and where you make a choice 00:04:02.560 |
monkeys don't work for money, though they work for juice. 00:04:07.160 |
You spend a lot of time figuring out what juice 00:04:10.120 |
And then economically, you would vary the size 00:04:13.540 |
of the juice reward that each of the two offered, 00:04:16.420 |
or its probability while maintaining size constant, 00:04:19.780 |
that when you combine those, you multiply those together, 00:04:23.180 |
That's the first model of economic decision-making 00:04:27.420 |
You compute the expected value, different options, 00:04:29.140 |
you choose the one that has the highest value. 00:04:31.340 |
It doesn't work all the time, but it's sort of a rough proxy 00:04:34.700 |
and we showed that, yeah, neurons in the parietal cortex 00:04:38.360 |
They choose the one that has a higher expected value. 00:04:42.860 |
I'm gonna have monkeys choosing between two options 00:04:54.300 |
And they don't know what picture's coming up, 00:04:56.060 |
but the picture's gonna be, it could be a nothing burger, 00:04:59.700 |
just like some gray square, it doesn't mean anything. 00:05:13.160 |
face of a subordinate male, face of female, et cetera. 00:05:18.860 |
of a female monkey for, if you reverse the experiment 00:05:23.360 |
and it's the female monkey who's making a choice 00:05:25.240 |
about male monkeys, what do they find really attractive 00:05:31.160 |
'cause it's providing a signal about how much- 00:05:43.100 |
It's a good predictor of their fighting ability, 00:05:53.860 |
then your male offspring are gonna do pretty well. 00:06:01.940 |
they'd have to give up juice to see the pictures. 00:06:04.340 |
Sometimes they get paid more to see the pictures. 00:06:06.980 |
And what we did then is we construct a choice curve 00:06:12.260 |
If it's not 50/50, if it slides one way or the other, 00:06:25.060 |
It was really, I think, scientifically revealing, 00:06:35.680 |
They will pay it to see pictures of the perineum, 00:06:43.240 |
They will pay to see the faces of dominant males. 00:06:56.140 |
to see the taints of testosterone rich male monkeys 00:07:02.020 |
and male monkeys will pay juice to see the swollen taints 00:07:07.020 |
of female monkeys that are, because of the swelling, 00:07:21.740 |
But it's just in general, it's a signal that is like, 00:07:30.660 |
So, you know, it just blew up on the internet. 00:07:32.620 |
Even back then, it was like suddenly million, 00:07:34.580 |
every website was like, oh, you've proven monkey porn, 00:07:39.860 |
It was a New York Times idea of the year in 2005, 00:07:47.900 |
You know, there's like, a little word on that. 00:08:01.260 |
So we used, and we used only, well, no, it was, 00:08:06.980 |
because all the stimulus sets that were out there 00:08:09.340 |
for visual studies of humans were like a bunch of, 00:08:17.580 |
And we wanted something that was more natural. 00:08:25.100 |
but it was a website where you could upload pictures 00:08:47.540 |
And then we had, this was really funny though too. 00:08:56.120 |
from the people who we actually tested in the experiment. 00:09:01.420 |
heterosexual males rating the female photos and vice versa. 00:09:09.620 |
we're not saying why they're attracted or anything like that, 00:09:20.940 |
And the, you know, when the women were done rating, 00:09:24.340 |
they're like, whew, okay, I'm glad that's over. 00:09:26.880 |
The hour's over and our male raters were like, 00:09:40.180 |
they got tired of rating males for attractiveness. 00:09:44.400 |
- Males did not tire of rating females for attractiveness. 00:09:46.360 |
- They did not at all, which is, that's anecdotal, 00:09:57.640 |
- And we also ran a couple of other economic lead, 00:10:03.520 |
One would be, how long are you willing to wait? 00:10:07.080 |
Like, in general, you will wait longer for a bigger reward. 00:10:14.960 |
you had to alternate pressing two keys on a keyboard. 00:10:17.080 |
It was really just menial, laborious, you know, et cetera. 00:10:27.000 |
Our female subjects basically wouldn't give up money. 00:10:38.360 |
which was proportional to how much money they actually got. 00:10:48.920 |
And the females did really well economically. 00:10:51.280 |
So they pretty much kind of ignored the pictures 00:11:05.440 |
They're paying, and they had thousands of trials. 00:11:23.600 |
quite literally to keep those pictures up on the screen. 00:11:27.560 |
Okay, so that's the setting we've established in monkeys 00:11:34.240 |
that are guiding social, you'd call it attention, 00:11:39.440 |
So we're like, okay, let's go look in the brain. 00:11:41.880 |
So we did an MRI experiment, fMRI experiment, 00:11:44.560 |
measured blood flow to different parts of the brain. 00:11:49.560 |
We only tested males because they were the ones 00:11:54.560 |
who displayed differential preferences there. 00:12:01.360 |
of the visual system that are involved in encoding faces, 00:12:15.280 |
There's basically the trade-off value, the currency, 00:12:18.320 |
the translation of pictures into money, okay? 00:12:22.440 |
Then in monkeys, we studied all the same areas, 00:12:25.180 |
but now we could record from individual neurons 00:12:27.580 |
in those areas, rather than looking at blood flow, 00:12:37.520 |
were spontaneously and strongly activated by those pictures, 00:12:52.500 |
And that correspondence, I thought, was pretty compelling.