back to index2022-03-01-Executive_Order_1602
00:00:00.000 |
Sweet Hop is an online marketplace curating the best in premium seating at stadiums, arenas, 00:00:05.000 |
and amphitheaters nationwide. With Sweet Hop's 100% ticket guarantee, no hidden fees, and 00:00:10.500 |
the personal high-level service you expect with a premium purchase, you can relax knowing 00:00:15.000 |
you'll receive the luxury experience you deserve. Visit SweetHop.com today to book your premium 00:00:20.340 |
tickets to your favorite teams, artists, and all the must-see live events to Sweet Hop 00:00:30.000 |
Welcome to Radical Personal Finance, a show dedicated to providing you with the knowledge, 00:00:33.600 |
skills, insight, and encouragement you need to live a rich and meaningful life now while 00:00:37.560 |
building a plan for financial freedom in 10 years or less. My name is Joshua, and today 00:00:41.080 |
on the show, I want to talk to you about when something that is completely innocuous, completely 00:00:50.880 |
harmless was banned in an ostensibly free western country. And what's more is I want 00:01:02.000 |
to talk to you with proven history when not only was this banned, but it was banned for 00:01:11.580 |
very clearly ulterior motives. It was banned by the government so that the government could 00:01:18.920 |
steal from its own citizens. What was banned? Gold coins. Gold bullion. Did you know that 00:01:30.720 |
for just over 40 years in the United States, from about 1933 to 1974, it was illegal for 00:01:39.360 |
you to own something as simple and innocuous as a gold coin? Did you know that you could 00:01:49.640 |
not own gold bullion, legally speaking, in the United States for that four decade period? 00:01:58.600 |
And if you did own it, your assets, your gold coins, your gold bullion, or your gold certificates 00:02:06.520 |
could be, and in some cases were, seized and kept by the US government. If you didn't 00:02:15.200 |
know it, don't be too hard on yourself. I remember distinctly that I was quite literally 00:02:21.520 |
a financial planner, literally a certified financial planner. And one day I think somebody 00:02:27.640 |
said to me and made a claim that it was illegal to own gold coins as short of a time ago as 00:02:33.480 |
50 years ago in the United States. And I said, "Illegal to own a gold coin? Come on, that's 00:02:38.040 |
ridiculous." And I started doing my research and I found out that they were right. Today 00:02:42.080 |
I want to share with you the history of Executive Order 6102. And there are a couple of other 00:02:49.760 |
follow on pieces of legislation, but this is usually talked about as Executive Order 00:02:54.760 |
6102, which will go over for you the truth of what I have just stated. We're going to 00:03:00.640 |
go over the history. I'm going to explain to you what happened because I think in today's 00:03:05.040 |
world it's important for you and me to understand that what has happened before can and perhaps 00:03:12.120 |
will happen again. As I record this on Tuesday, March 1, 2022, there are several very current 00:03:21.400 |
cases of governments using financial laws in ways that might make us uncomfortable. 00:03:29.880 |
We've talked recently about the government of Canada authorizing Canadian banks, brokerage 00:03:36.960 |
companies, insurance companies, and other financial institutions to unilaterally freeze 00:03:42.760 |
the assets of anybody suspected of having been involved with the Freedom Convoy protest. 00:03:51.120 |
This was done under so-called Emergency Measures Act, which never did wind up getting voted 00:03:55.980 |
on fully by both houses of the Canadian Parliament. And I showed how this is a very worrying example 00:04:05.080 |
of modern financial debanking, de-financialization, which is a trend that I'm very concerned about. 00:04:12.920 |
And what was worse is that particular system was being done with no judicial oversight, 00:04:18.920 |
and the institutions were guaranteed immunity from any kind of civil liability that they 00:04:25.480 |
might incur from the actions of freezing or confiscating the assets of people suspected 00:04:32.300 |
to be involved with the protests. Now, I don't think that particular event was the end of 00:04:37.560 |
the world as we know it, but I thought it was a good example of what can happen. In 00:04:42.240 |
addition, another very current example that we see happening right now is we see governments 00:04:47.900 |
all around the world, very notably governments in Western Europe and the United States and 00:04:52.820 |
many other countries as well, seeking to freeze the assets of Russians, both specifically 00:05:01.160 |
the Russian government, Russian government officials, the so-called Russian oligarchs, 00:05:08.420 |
as well as just ordinary, common, everyday Russians getting bundled up with it. Now, 00:05:16.460 |
these are some examples that sometimes you look at, and ethically, it's harder to figure 00:05:22.020 |
out what's going on. For example, very few people are shedding tears when the news comes 00:05:29.140 |
along that Vladimir Putin or the Russian oligarchs have had their assets frozen. Currently, that's 00:05:35.180 |
not a big concern for many people from an ethical perspective. They say, "Listen, if 00:05:40.300 |
you're going to go and invade your neighbor, we're going to take your money and we're going 00:05:42.420 |
to freeze it and shut it all down." I think it's not as simple as that. I think there 00:05:46.340 |
are more important ethical considerations in terms of making Russians themselves suffer. 00:05:53.620 |
I get very concerned about any action that's going to affect those who are not in government. 00:05:59.180 |
Clearly, these current sets of sanctions and restrictions are already affecting the lives 00:06:04.980 |
of individual ordinary Russian citizens. In some way, it's an act of war. Basically, the 00:06:09.380 |
goal of these sanctions is to destabilize the country so that the population will rise 00:06:13.380 |
up and ideally, in the mind of many of those advancing it, murder their president. Of course, 00:06:20.300 |
they would say, "Well, let's go ahead and do it in a democratic sense. Let's overthrow 00:06:25.860 |
him and bring someone else in." They're going for regime change. 00:06:29.700 |
Now, time will tell. It remains to be seen what will happen. We'll be talking a good 00:06:33.420 |
bit about the Ukraine and Russia situation in the days to come. The point is that, ethically 00:06:38.260 |
speaking, very few people have any kind of reservation or qualms about seeing the assets 00:06:44.500 |
of the Russian leaders and Russian government seized, frozen, and seeing them cut off from 00:06:50.380 |
the banking system, etc., because of their evil invasion of their neighbor. 00:06:55.700 |
The Canadian situation is one in which many people would also say, "Well, hey, look, these 00:06:59.900 |
guys are breaking the law. They're making life unlivable for us in Ottawa. We got to 00:07:04.020 |
get them out." Going after their money is the way to do it. Again, I have significant 00:07:11.100 |
concerns, which I've expressed about this, but a lot of people feel that way. 00:07:15.500 |
One of the interesting things about Executive Order 6102 and the true history of what happened 00:07:21.020 |
in the United States is nobody except the government was being hurt by the hoarding, 00:07:28.060 |
quote-unquote, what they alleged, using their words, of gold. As you'll see as I go into 00:07:33.340 |
the actual history, the US government stole money directly from its citizens and seized 00:07:42.780 |
the assets of its citizens exclusively to maintain power. We will go over their alleged 00:07:49.460 |
reasoning and you can judge for yourself the ethics of it, but let's begin with the actual 00:07:53.380 |
history. I'm going to be reading to you the Wikipedia entry for Executive Order 6102. 00:08:01.820 |
Executive Order 6102 is an executive order signed on April 5, 1933 by US President Franklin 00:08:10.220 |
Delano Roosevelt. He's always all of our favorite presidents, right? Quote, "Forbidding 00:08:16.420 |
the hoarding of gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates within the continental United 00:08:24.260 |
States," close quote. The executive order was made under the authority of the Trading 00:08:29.500 |
with the Enemy Act of 1917, as amended by the Emergency Banking Act in March 1933. The 00:08:37.500 |
limitation on gold ownership in the United States was repealed after President Gerald 00:08:43.180 |
Ford signed a bill legalizing private ownership of gold coins, bars, and certificates by an 00:08:51.220 |
act of Congress, codified in publication L. 93373, which went into effect December 31, 00:09:00.660 |
1974. Rationale. The stated reason for the order was that hard times had caused "hoarding 00:09:12.300 |
of gold, stalling economic growth, and worsening the Depression as the US was then using the 00:09:20.300 |
gold standard for its currency." On April 6, 1933, the New York Times wrote, under the 00:09:28.740 |
headline "Hoarding of Gold," quote, "The executive order issued by the President yesterday 00:09:34.860 |
amplifies and particularizes his earlier warnings against hoarding." On March 6, taking advantage 00:09:42.300 |
of a wartime statute that had not been repealed, he issued Presidential Proclamation 2039 that 00:09:49.220 |
forbade the hoarding of gold or silver coin or bullion or currency under penalty of $10,000 00:09:57.380 |
and/or up to 5 to 10 years imprisonment. The main rationale behind the order was actually 00:10:04.980 |
to remove the constraint on the Federal Reserve preventing it from increasing the money supply 00:10:10.900 |
during the Depression. The Federal Reserve Act 1913 required 40% gold backing of Federal 00:10:18.780 |
Reserve notes that were issued. By the late 1920s, the Federal Reserve had almost reached 00:10:24.100 |
the limit of allowable credit in the form of Federal Reserve demand notes, which could 00:10:31.780 |
Now let me interrupt the article here to clarify. I've just read you under the section marked 00:10:36.540 |
Rationale from the Wikipedia article. But remember that what they did was use, first 00:10:44.180 |
of all, an authority that was made law under the World War I situation. So the President 00:10:53.900 |
at that time, President Franklin Roosevelt, used an act, a piece of legislation that was 00:11:02.620 |
signed in 1917 under the previous World War I. Note, of course, that at this time we were 00:11:09.980 |
in the Great Depression in the United States. This is prior to World War II. But this particular 00:11:15.060 |
law had never been repealed. And the lesson that I, reason I'm emphasizing this is, this 00:11:20.780 |
is why I get so concerned and why I publicly talk about any kind of issue that involves 00:11:26.980 |
some expansion of government authority, especially something that doesn't have a clear sunset 00:11:33.740 |
clause. So in Canada, for example, we now see that there is a clear precedent for the 00:11:42.180 |
Canadian Prime Minister to authorize institutions to go after people who are protesting in the 00:11:48.380 |
streets without ever actually following through the legally required parliamentary debate, 00:11:55.900 |
legally required parliamentary approval, etc. The recent situation in Canada was done under 00:12:02.380 |
the Emergency Measures Act, which was updated from the War, what was it, the War Protection 00:12:09.340 |
Act or something like that, something related to Emergency War Measures Act, something like 00:12:13.140 |
that before. And the idea here is you see how legislators use whatever legislation they 00:12:21.740 |
can find on the books to authorize their actions. Now, what was the actual thing that was happening? 00:12:27.900 |
Well, people were saving money. They were in the middle of a Great Depression. They 00:12:31.740 |
understood the value of their money and they wanted to save their money. At that time, 00:12:37.460 |
that's what gold was. Gold was money. Federal Reserve notes at that time depended upon the 00:12:44.180 |
fact that gold was money in order to have their validity. And the Federal Reserve was 00:12:50.820 |
trying to make sure that its notes were widely accepted, but they had to be constrained. 00:12:56.840 |
And so the government could not spend as much money, could not borrow as much money as they 00:13:01.260 |
wanted. They couldn't issue as many notes because they were required to have gold at 00:13:07.140 |
a 40% ratio. They were required to have at least 40% of their Federal Reserve notes value 00:13:13.540 |
on hand as gold, gold money, gold dollars. And so they're finding their ability to print 00:13:20.700 |
money, finance all of their things constrained by the fact that US citizens are holding gold. 00:13:26.980 |
So what should they do? Well, let's just tell the citizens they can't hold gold. Brilliant. 00:13:34.780 |
Let's take away their money and tell them they can't hold gold. Then we'll take the 00:13:39.140 |
gold. We'll now have it in a Federal Reserve vault. Then we can print more dollars. It's 00:13:44.500 |
wonderful. And we'll just tell our citizens that they have to cough up their gold bullion 00:13:50.380 |
or their gold coins, or we're going to penalize them a massive penalty. More on that in a 00:13:56.460 |
moment or we're going to imprison them for up to five or 10 years. Remember at this time 00:14:02.420 |
also that gold coins were standard forms of money in the same way that today, a hundred 00:14:10.940 |
dollar Federal Reserve note is a standard form of money. Gold coins were at that time 00:14:15.900 |
a standard form of money. A $20 gold piece was issued, created by the US Mint and was 00:14:23.000 |
commonly used in circulation. So when the government came out with this and said, we're 00:14:29.900 |
going to fine you or we're going to jail you if you keep your gold coins, they were telling 00:14:36.400 |
people you can't keep the $20 gold piece that we minted and distributed two years ago. By 00:14:43.740 |
the way, point of interest, what was a $10,000 fine like? Well, if we go to an inflation 00:14:50.340 |
calculator using all of the standard inflation measurements, the consumer price index, and 00:14:58.540 |
we go back and see what was the value of a $10,000 fine in 1933. In 2022 dollars, it 00:15:05.820 |
was $216,267. Since that time, almost basically 90 years ago when this law was passed, there's 00:15:17.060 |
been a cumulative rate of inflation of 2,062.7%, which a lot of it is related to exactly what 00:15:27.580 |
we're talking about here. So they wanted to remove the constraint on the Federal Reserve 00:15:33.420 |
from increasing the money supply by banning the ownership of gold coins. Now pay attention 00:15:39.100 |
because as we get to the end of this show, after I go over the history, I'm going to 00:15:42.020 |
talk to you about how you can protect yourself from this. I'm going to talk to you also about 00:15:45.560 |
a brand new course that I'm launching that's giving modern equivalents to this, but let's 00:15:54.780 |
Effects. Executive Order 6102 required all persons to deliver on or before May 1, 1933, 00:16:03.940 |
all but a small amount of gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates owned by them 00:16:11.140 |
to the Federal Reserve in exchange for $20.67 per troy ounce. By the way, let me interrupt 00:16:19.960 |
the article. Let's do a quick inflation calculation of $20.67. That would be in 1933. Today, that 00:16:27.740 |
would be $447 per ounce. That would be the equivalent rate. Interestingly, today's spot 00:16:35.540 |
price of gold, again March 1, 2022, is $1,945 per ounce. 00:16:46.080 |
The Executive Order required all persons to deliver on or before May 1, 1933, all but 00:16:50.100 |
a small amount of gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates owned by them to the 00:16:54.140 |
Federal Reserve in exchange for $20.67 per troy ounce. Under the Trading with the Enemy 00:17:01.580 |
Act of 1917, as amended by the recently passed Emergency Banking Act of March 9, 1933, a 00:17:09.020 |
violation of the order was punishable by fine up to $10,000 (equivalent in today's world 00:17:15.780 |
of more than $200,000) up to 10 years in prison or both. The order specifically exempted "customary 00:17:24.620 |
use in industry, profession, or art"—a provision that covered artists, jewelers, 00:17:30.340 |
scientists, sign makers, etc. The order also permitted any person to own up to $100 in 00:17:36.740 |
gold coins, a face value equivalent to 5 troy ounces (160 grams) of gold valued at approximately 00:17:48.620 |
So let me clarify. Again, you could keep 5 gold coins. Remember, at that time, there 00:17:54.540 |
was a provision for you to have a standard piece of money, so you could keep up to 5 00:18:03.380 |
of your standard $20 gold pieces of US dollars at that time. If we do the inflation calculation, 00:18:12.740 |
it's more or less $10,000. Ironically, we see then that gold at a price of just under 00:18:18.860 |
$2,000 an ounce would be similar to today. Basically, you could have about 5 ounces of 00:18:30.460 |
So it's important that you understand this to understand how the actual confiscation 00:18:36.420 |
occurred. There was an exemption. You could say, "Hey, you could have $10,000." And 00:18:42.060 |
it's up to you to judge whether or not you consider $10,000 to be a lot of money or a 00:18:49.700 |
little bit of money when it comes to your life savings. 00:18:54.100 |
The same paragraph also exempted "gold coins having recognized special value to collectors 00:18:58.740 |
of rare and unusual coins, which protected recognized gold coin collectors from legal 00:19:03.600 |
seizure and likely melting." The price of gold from the Treasury for international transactions 00:19:09.380 |
was then raised by the Gold Reserve Act to $35 an ounce, equivalent to $700 in 2020. 00:19:16.980 |
The resulting profit that the government realized funded the Exchange Stabilization Fund established 00:19:27.860 |
I interrupt the article to clarify. They gave you as a citizen $20.67 per ounce for your 00:19:37.060 |
gold. Then, shortly thereafter, as soon as everyone had put in all of their gold coins 00:19:44.220 |
and submitted them to the central treasury, they revalued the dollar and they raised it. 00:19:50.540 |
They raised the price of gold from $20 to $35 an ounce. Not quite halving, but pretty 00:19:57.420 |
much almost half. Basically, stealing half of your money. If you had kept your ounce 00:20:05.420 |
of gold valued at just over $20 and simply waited a few months in the international marketplace, 00:20:11.860 |
you could have then received $35 for your previous $20 worth of gold. So a direct stealing 00:20:19.020 |
of value from the American people in order to fund the Exchange Stabilization Fund. 00:20:28.300 |
Continuing with the article. The regulations prescribed in the Executive Order were modified 00:20:32.100 |
by Executive Order 6111 on April 20, 1933, both of which were ultimately revoked and 00:20:38.220 |
superseded by Executive Orders 6260 and 6261 on August 28 and 29, 1933, respectively. Executive 00:20:45.260 |
Order 6102 also led to the extreme rarity of the 1933 double-legal gold coin. The order 00:20:53.460 |
caused all gold coin production to cease and all 1933 minted coins to be destroyed. About 00:20:59.420 |
20 illegal coins were stolen, leading to an outstanding U.S. Secret Service warrant for 00:21:04.580 |
arrest and confiscation of the coin. Illegalized surviving coins sold for over $7.5 million 00:21:10.820 |
in 2002, making it one of the most valuable coins in the world. 00:21:15.620 |
So the question is, well, was anybody prosecuted? Did anybody have their gold taken? Did anybody 00:21:21.700 |
do time in prison? Let's answer that question. The truth is actually worse than you might 00:21:26.460 |
think because, while there weren't a lot of prosecutions, the legal basis for prosecution 00:21:32.260 |
was actually confirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court. 00:21:36.100 |
Prosecutions. Numerous individuals and companies were prosecuted relating to Roosevelt's 00:21:42.060 |
Executive Order 6102. The prosecutions took place under the subsequent Executive Orders 00:21:47.920 |
6111, 6260, 6261, and the Gold Reserve Act of 1934. There was a need to strengthen Executive 00:21:56.140 |
Order 6102 as the one prosecution under the order was ruled invalid by federal judge John 00:22:02.580 |
M. Woolsey on the grounds that the order was signed by the President, instead of the Secretary 00:22:08.060 |
of Treasury, as required. The circumstances of the case were that a New York attorney 00:22:14.100 |
named Frederick Barber Campbell had one deposit at Chase National Bank of over 5,000 troy 00:22:22.100 |
ounces of gold. When Campbell attempted to withdraw the gold, Chase refused, and Campbell 00:22:28.900 |
sued Chase. A federal prosecutor then indicted Campbell on the following day, September 27, 00:22:37.020 |
1933, for failing to surrender his gold. Ultimately, the prosecution of Campbell failed, but the 00:22:44.860 |
authority of the federal government to seize gold was upheld, and Campbell's gold was 00:22:54.100 |
confiscated. By the way, pay careful attention to these examples, because in hearing the 00:22:58.840 |
examples of what has happened in the past, you will be enlightened as to some of the 00:23:04.360 |
methodology that you can use to protect yourself in the future. 00:23:09.700 |
The case was caused for the Roosevelt administration to issue a new order under the signature of 00:23:14.820 |
the Secretary of the Treasury, Henry Morgenthau, Jr. Executive Orders 6260-6261 related to 00:23:22.700 |
the seizure of gold and the prosecution of gold hoarders. A few months later, Congress 00:23:30.060 |
passed the Gold Reserve Act of 1934, which ratified Roosevelt's orders. A new set of 00:23:36.100 |
Treasury regulations was issued, providing civil penalties of confiscation of all gold 00:23:42.740 |
and imposition of fines equal to double the value of the gold seized. Did you hear that? 00:23:50.100 |
A new set of Treasury regulations was issued, providing civil penalties of confiscation 00:23:55.780 |
of all gold and imposition of fines equal to double the value of the gold seized. You 00:24:03.140 |
have $100,000 worth of gold. They're going to seize your gold and impose fines of $200,000 00:24:10.220 |
that you now have to pay. With, of course, money that you have to earn from working, 00:24:15.580 |
which of course in today's world you pay income taxes on, and then you pay your fines 00:24:20.020 |
and/or other assets that you have to cash in to pay your fines. 00:24:25.060 |
Continuing, prosecutions of US citizens and non-citizens followed the new orders with 00:24:29.500 |
a few notable cases. Gus Farber, a diamond and jewelry merchant from San Francisco, was 00:24:36.860 |
prosecuted for the sale of 13 $20 gold coins without a license. Secret Service agents discovered 00:24:44.220 |
the sale with the help of the buyer. Farber, his father, and 12 others were arrested in 00:24:50.620 |
four American cities after a sting operation conducted by the Secret Service. The arrests 00:24:56.660 |
took place simultaneously in New York and three California cities, San Francisco, San 00:25:02.300 |
Jose, and Oakland. Morris Anilic was arrested in New York with $5,000 in US and foreign 00:25:09.660 |
gold coins. Dan Levin and Edward Friedman of San Jose were arrested with $15,000 in 00:25:17.140 |
gold. Sam Nankin was arrested in Oakland. In San Francisco, nine men were arrested on 00:25:24.300 |
charges of hoarding gold. In all, $24,000 in gold was seized by Secret Service agents 00:25:31.420 |
during the operation. David Baraban and his son Jacob owned a refining company. The Barabans' 00:25:39.540 |
license to deal in unmelted scrap gold was revoked, and so the Barabans operated their 00:25:45.620 |
refining business under a license issued to a "mini-sarch." The Barabans admitted 00:25:52.380 |
that "mini-sarch" had nothing to do with the business and that she had obtained the 00:25:56.900 |
license so that the Barabans could continue to deal in gold. The Barabans had a cigar 00:26:02.100 |
box full of gold-filled scrap jewelry visible in one of the showcases. Government agents 00:26:08.820 |
raided the Barabans' business and found another hidden box of US and foreign gold 00:26:14.020 |
coins. The coins were seized, and Baraban was charged with conspiracy to defraud the 00:26:22.440 |
United States. Louis Rufino was one individual indicted on three counts purporting to violations 00:26:29.540 |
of the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917, which restricted trade with countries hostile 00:26:35.460 |
to the United States. Eventually, Rufino appealed the conviction to the Circuit Court of Appeals, 00:26:41.140 |
9th District in 1940. However, the judgment of the lower courts was upheld based on the 00:26:47.940 |
Barabans' executive orders and the Gold Reserve Act of 1934. Rufino, a resident of 00:26:54.620 |
Sutter Creek in California gold country, was convicted of possessing 78 ounces of gold 00:27:01.020 |
and was sentenced to six months in jail, paid a $500 fine, and had his gold seized. 00:27:09.140 |
Foreigners also had gold confiscated and were forced to accept paper money for their gold. 00:27:15.340 |
The Ubersee Finance Corporation, a Swiss banking company, had $1,250,000 in gold coins for 00:27:24.100 |
business use. The Ubersee Finance Corporation entrusted the gold to an American firm for 00:27:30.020 |
safekeeping, and the Swiss were shocked to find that their gold was confiscated. The 00:27:36.460 |
Swiss made appeals, but they were denied. They were entitled to paper money, but not 00:27:41.700 |
their gold. The Swiss company would have lost 40% of their gold's value if they had tried 00:27:47.780 |
to buy the same amount of gold with the paper money they received in exchange for their 00:27:55.980 |
Another type of de facto gold seizure occurred as a result of the various executive orders 00:28:01.260 |
involving bonds, gold certificates, and private contracts. Private contracts, or bonds that 00:28:09.100 |
were written in terms of gold, were to be paid in paper currency instead of gold, although 00:28:15.420 |
all of the contracts and the bonds proclaimed that they were payable in gold, and at least 00:28:20.660 |
one, the Fourth Liberty Bond, was a federal instrument. The plaintiffs in all cases received 00:28:27.540 |
paper money instead of gold, despite the contract's terms. The contracts and the bonds were written 00:28:34.380 |
precisely to avoid currency debasement by requiring payment in gold coin. The paper 00:28:40.780 |
money, which was redeemable in gold, was instead irredeemable based on Nortz v. United States. 00:28:49.140 |
The consolidated gold clause cases were the following, Perry v. United States, U.S. v. 00:28:53.660 |
Bankers Trust Company, Norman v. Baltimore and Ohio R. Company, Nortz v. United States. 00:29:00.100 |
The Supreme Court upheld all seizures as "constitutional," with Justices James Clark McReynolds, Willis 00:29:09.380 |
Van Deventer, George Sutherland, and Pierce Butler dissenting. The four justices were 00:29:15.700 |
labeled the "four horsemen" by the compliant press, as their conservative views were in 00:29:21.580 |
opposition to Roosevelt's New Deal, supported by the press. 00:29:28.620 |
Sound familiar? You have a populist president who comes in with massive support, says "I'm 00:29:35.620 |
going to solve your problems," passes some of the most wide-ranging sets of legislation 00:29:41.580 |
in American history, but the press is cheering him on. And because the press is cheering 00:29:47.540 |
him on, then anybody who stands for things like constitutional right to privacy or the 00:29:52.820 |
right to be safe in your person's papers and effects, or the right to not be stolen 00:29:57.180 |
up by the U.S. government, well, very quickly, those four justices were labeled the "four 00:30:02.420 |
horsemen" by the compliant press, as their conservative views were in opposition to Roosevelt's 00:30:08.860 |
So the examples, I think, are important to see. Because you can see in the examples of 00:30:15.500 |
the cases listed here how the government seeks to enforce what it does. 00:30:21.260 |
Number one, if there is previous evidence or a paper trail related to your ownership 00:30:27.540 |
of the gold, such as here the attorney, Frederick Campbell, who had deposited at the bank 5,000 00:30:36.420 |
troy ounces, well now there's a formal paper trail saying "here is my 5,000 troy ounces." 00:30:42.220 |
And so he goes to withdraw his gold, most likely because the government is passing a 00:30:47.100 |
law saying they're going to seize his gold, and Chase refuses to give them the gold. The 00:30:52.140 |
bank refuses to return the money. Why? Well, because the bank is scared of the government. 00:30:58.180 |
The bank receives its license to exist and make money because of the government. And 00:31:03.500 |
so it's basically an arm of the government. A lot of people get mad when I say "all financial 00:31:09.260 |
representatives are unpaid spies of the U.S. government." And it's the same all around 00:31:14.980 |
the world in many countries. It's just a statement of fact as far as I can see it, that bankers 00:31:22.700 |
are charged, legally speaking, to spy for the U.S. government, to watch out for things 00:31:28.420 |
like money laundering. I used to be one, meaning I used to be a financial advisor. Every single 00:31:33.180 |
year we sit down and we give classes on money laundering, and it's required in order for 00:31:37.860 |
the company to stay out of legal trouble with the government. Well in this case, of course, 00:31:41.980 |
the banker is observing what's happening, and the bank refuses to abide by the terms 00:31:47.280 |
of its depository relationship and instead enforces the gold seizure from the U.S. government. 00:31:53.880 |
So Campbell gets angry and he sues the bank for breach of contract. And what do they do? 00:32:01.320 |
The federal prosecutor, clearly informed by the bank, then indicts Campbell on the following 00:32:06.160 |
day for failing to surrender his gold. So that's the first thing, his paper trail. 00:32:11.820 |
Second thing relating to it is always a sting operation. You have to remember that many, 00:32:19.420 |
many people gain their sense of superiority. People love to inform on the neighbors that 00:32:27.980 |
they don't like. Now you can have a very unified population. If there is an issue where there's 00:32:33.980 |
a unified population of people that see the world in the same way, then of course they'll 00:32:38.820 |
stand together and support one another. But if you don't have a unified population, you 00:32:43.380 |
have one segment of the population that sees the other segment of the population is not 00:32:47.500 |
doing the right thing, then they quickly inform on one another. So think about places where 00:32:52.300 |
there's, I don't know, people make fake vaccine cards. Well, all your friends that are anti-vaccine, 00:33:00.420 |
they'll stand with you. All your friends that are pro-vaccine will inform on you because 00:33:04.580 |
they see what you're doing as an evil wrong. With taxes, you see this. The IRS will pay 00:33:09.460 |
whistleblowers, whistleblowers, people who inform about tax cheats, they will pay them 00:33:16.380 |
a significant portion, I think it's almost half of the amount of money seized from the 00:33:23.780 |
company or from the individual that is prosecuted for tax evasion. Probably one of the most 00:33:29.020 |
famous cases for this over the last few years is from the Swiss banker who went to the IRS 00:33:36.660 |
and took lots of private information from, he was working for UBS, and ultimately he 00:33:41.860 |
earned over a hundred million dollars by informing on UBS. He served a couple years, I think 00:33:48.060 |
two and a half years in prison for fraud after a fraud conspiracy conviction, but the IRS 00:33:56.540 |
paid him over a hundred million dollars for informing on UBS for tax evasion. And they 00:34:02.780 |
ultimately succeeded in pressing their case. And so this is one of the things that happens 00:34:07.820 |
all the time. It happens on a public basis with companies. If a company is engaging in 00:34:14.340 |
some kind of tax evasion, then the IRS takes informants on that. It also happens with any 00:34:19.780 |
private individual, right? You evade your taxes, you tell your girlfriend about the 00:34:23.980 |
fact that you don't do it, then you dump her and she gets angry and disappears. Or 00:34:27.020 |
your ex-wife informs on the fact that you don't pay taxes. And then any money that's 00:34:32.460 |
seized, that person, the informant, will be eligible for a significant portion of it. 00:34:41.780 |
I wanted to get the numbers right, so I went to irs.gov. It's not 40%. And they have 00:34:48.460 |
a section here on what happens to a claim for an informant award, a whistleblower. And 00:34:53.820 |
it says the amount of the award will be at least 15%, but not more than 30% of collected 00:34:58.180 |
proceeds in cases in which the service determines that the information submitted substantially 00:35:03.180 |
contributed to the service's detection and recovery of tax. So somewhere between 15 to 00:35:08.780 |
30% of the amount collected by the IRS. And they have a handy number here, report suspected 00:35:16.020 |
tax fraud. So remember that there's always informants. In this case, the Secret Service 00:35:21.660 |
ran a sting operation using informants to seize the gold and the assets of the farmers 00:35:29.860 |
and their business. The trading company coming along, what do they do? Well, they require 00:35:36.860 |
a license to deal in unmelted scrap gold. Licensing systems, the same basic problem. 00:35:42.700 |
And so they have a license, but the license is issued to somebody else, and they admit 00:35:46.800 |
that she's just their licensee, they're charged, all their money is seized, etc. And then of 00:35:51.620 |
course, you have the Swiss bank, excuse me, the Swiss company, Swiss bank, which had $1.25 00:35:58.780 |
million in gold coins on deposit in the United States for their business use. And then they 00:36:03.700 |
just find that their gold was confiscated. So sucks to be you for counting on the United 00:36:07.700 |
States of America in 1933 to actually protect your money. That was dumb. And you shouldn't 00:36:13.020 |
have done that. And this is basically the same thing that you see all over the world. 00:36:16.860 |
Right? Imagine today that you have some money abroad, you have to be very careful because 00:36:22.020 |
put money in Canada, or any significant money in Canada, it sucks to be you. Canadian government 00:36:26.340 |
has a reputation of doing this. And so you want to be very thoughtful who you trust your 00:36:30.940 |
money to, and you want to pay attention to see what kinds of changes are happening in 00:36:35.020 |
their laws. So we can learn from these events. Let's continue. 00:36:40.300 |
Subsequent events and abrogation. The Gold Reserve Act of 1934 made gold clauses unenforceable 00:36:46.740 |
and authorized the president to establish the gold value of the dollar by proclamation. 00:36:52.660 |
Isn't it wonderful? Right? Let's take away previous legislation that had, that used the 00:36:58.860 |
power of gold to restrain government. And let's create a new piece of legislation that 00:37:03.260 |
allows the president, the government, to establish the gold value by proclamation. Immediately 00:37:09.120 |
following its passage, Roosevelt changed the statutory price of gold from $20.67 to $35 00:37:16.020 |
per ounce, thereby devaluing the US dollar, which was based on gold. That price remained 00:37:22.620 |
in effect until August 15, 1971, when President Richard Nixon announced that the US would 00:37:29.140 |
no longer convert dollars to gold at a fixed value, thus abandoning the gold standard for 00:37:35.340 |
foreign exchange. See the Nixon shock articles. By the way, I consider that also to be one 00:37:43.380 |
of the most beautifully recorded historical examples of proven deception. Deception isn't 00:37:54.140 |
strong enough. I'll write cheating. Deception, I guess, is the best thing. By the US government. 00:38:01.420 |
I don't want to get too off topic to dive much into that, but let me just tell you a 00:38:06.420 |
quick moment of what actually happened in that. I'll read here from an article called 00:38:13.380 |
"Vox Populi, Vox Suckers," published back in the early 2000s by recently deceased economist 00:38:20.140 |
Gary North. He wrote this, "Immediately after the devaluation of the pound," this is two 00:38:26.260 |
years later, in November 1967, the British government devalued the pound. "The Chancellor 00:38:30.300 |
of the Exchequer had of course sworn that this was not being contemplated. A few weeks 00:38:34.780 |
before this event, I, he being Gary North, I attended the first international gold conference 00:38:39.100 |
in history. It was sponsored by Harry Schultz. The hard money newsletter publisher was held 00:38:43.340 |
in Los Angeles. Rush Dooney paid my admission. I wrote it up in a report dated November 17, 00:38:48.740 |
1967, the coming credit crunch. Immediately after the devaluation of the pound, gold began 00:38:54.420 |
to rise. In 1968, the US and European central banks imposed a two-tier gold market. Central 00:39:02.380 |
banks could buy gold from the US at $35, but agreed not to sell gold to the public at this 00:39:09.020 |
price. Gold's free market price began to move up by a few dollars above $35. Still, 00:39:15.060 |
the outflow of gold from the Treasury continued. So, on August 15, 1971, Nixon closed the gold 00:39:22.820 |
window. The Secretary of the Treasury, John Connolly, had sworn to the media for weeks 00:39:28.020 |
that no such move was being contemplated. I shall never forget his press conference 00:39:32.380 |
on August 16. He admitted openly that he had lied. "If I had told the truth, there would 00:39:37.540 |
immediately have been a rush by foreign central banks to buy our gold." The press nodded 00:39:43.140 |
dutifully and nobody in the mainstream media complained. Price controls. Nixon also froze 00:39:49.420 |
all domestic prices that day. No discussion, no democracy, just one-man rule. Within days, 00:39:56.480 |
the United States Chamber of Commerce backed this move against freedom. So did the National 00:40:02.260 |
Association of Manufacturers. Normally, a gallon of gasoline sold for over $0.35 in 00:40:07.940 |
Southern California, but there was a gasoline price war that week. You could buy gasoline 00:40:12.020 |
for about $0.22, a loss leader. Those stations got locked in. A lot of them went bankrupt 00:40:17.400 |
over the next two years. That was when the shift to convenience store gas stations began. 00:40:21.660 |
Profits on the sale of candy, packaged foods, and sodas marked the end of the "service 00:40:25.300 |
station" era. Ian had predicted this move in a 1970 article in the Whole Earth Catalog. 00:40:36.380 |
I had told readers to buy US silver coins. In 1970, I bought British gold sovereigns 00:40:46.300 |
Let's go back and I'm going to skip the article. Let me go back or any more of that and go 00:40:49.140 |
back because the point is that the games didn't end when it became legal to buy gold. They 00:40:57.460 |
implemented that price fix until 1971 and it was still illegal during the Nixon shock. 00:41:05.140 |
It was still illegal for anybody to own gold coins until 1974. Continuing the article, 00:41:15.620 |
the private ownership of gold certificates was legalized in 1964 and they can be openly 00:41:20.580 |
owned by collectors but are not redeemable in gold. The limitation on gold ownership 00:41:27.100 |
in the United States was repealed after President Gerald Ford signed a bill to "permit United 00:41:31.780 |
States citizens to purchase, hold, sell, or otherwise deal with gold in the United States 00:41:37.340 |
or abroad" with an act of Congress codified in publication L. 93373 which went into effect 00:41:42.960 |
December 31, 1974. However, PL 93373 did not repeal the Gold Repeal Joint Resolution which 00:41:52.660 |
banned any contract that specified payment in a fixed amount of money as gold or a fixed 00:41:57.940 |
amount of gold. That is, contracts remained unenforceable if they used gold monetarily 00:42:04.460 |
rather than as a commodity of trade. However, an act enacted on October 28, 1977 amended 00:42:14.080 |
the 1933 joint resolution to make it clear that parties could again include so-called 00:42:23.600 |
I'm going to go on and talk about similar laws in other countries and then come back 00:42:27.400 |
to the hoax of safe deposit box seizures. Similar laws in other countries. In Poland, 00:42:32.320 |
a similar regulation was issued on November 7, 1919 which forced citizens to sell their 00:42:37.360 |
gold and silver to the state. A month later, it was extended until January 31, 1920. In 00:42:42.040 |
Australia, Part IV of the Banking Act 1959 allows the Commonwealth government to seize 00:42:48.120 |
private citizens' gold in return for paper money where the Governor General is satisfied 00:42:54.400 |
that it is expedient so to do, for the protection of the currency or of the public credit of 00:42:59.920 |
the Commonwealth. On January 30, 1976, the operation of that part of the Act was suspended. 00:43:06.800 |
United Kingdom introduced the Gold Trade Ban Law at 1966 (Exchange Control Act 1947). It 00:43:14.640 |
became illegal for UK residents to continue to hold more than four gold coins dated after 00:43:20.360 |
1817 or to buy any gold coins unless they obtained collector license from Bank of England. 00:43:28.660 |
The reasoning was to prevent people from hoarding the gold while the cost of living and inflation 00:43:38.120 |
So we can see that while of course I will always be hardest on the United States being 00:43:43.680 |
a natural born US citizen, it's not purely a US phenomenon. Any government around the 00:43:52.880 |
world that thinks it's in their best interest to seize their citizens' gold has historically 00:44:01.560 |
done this. Now I don't expect, we'll go to the hoax in just a moment, but I don't 00:44:05.680 |
expect this to happen again in the future because basically nobody owns gold anymore. 00:44:13.020 |
Could they do it? Sure, but I don't think it would make a difference. Today, if the 00:44:17.440 |
US government banned gold coins, almost nobody would count. There would be a tiny percentage 00:44:23.080 |
of us, people like me, who are 5% of the population, who would be bent out of shape about it. There 00:44:29.600 |
would be probably 20 or 30% of people that would be worried about this. What does this 00:44:33.200 |
mean? But they don't own gold coins. And then most people would say, well, hey, they 00:44:36.880 |
said it's bad people hoarding gold. Can you believe that they're hoarding gold? But 00:44:41.680 |
it wouldn't make a big deal. And at this point in time, we are very far gone from the 00:44:47.500 |
gold standard. We're very far gone from any widespread ownership of gold, etc. Central 00:44:53.520 |
banks do still own gold. I think you should own some gold. I think that gold still has 00:45:00.880 |
an important place. But we are not in the same world we were 100 years ago because gold 00:45:06.360 |
ownership today is not widespread. It was at that time. Remember, gold was money. Contracts 00:45:14.840 |
were denominated in gold. The US dollar was tied to gold. All of that is now in the past. 00:45:20.760 |
The US dollar now has no value based upon any other instrument. It's a pure fiat currency 00:45:28.040 |
that we use because it is widely accepted and the right floats freely. You can go in 00:45:33.280 |
freely today, buy gold coins. They have, of course, implemented and maintained lots of 00:45:38.520 |
significant reporting requirements. If you go and you buy gold, it's subject to currency 00:45:44.080 |
transaction reports, etc. They get filed. But it's not illegal for you to do and you 00:45:50.120 |
can you can engage in it. So I don't expect these laws in the future because gold, I don't 00:45:56.040 |
think they would get much bang for the buck. And when a government does this, it does risk 00:45:59.840 |
some kind of opprobrium from its citizenry. And so it needs to be worth it in order for 00:46:06.480 |
the governing agents to maintain and to maintain their power and accomplish their stated goals. 00:46:13.880 |
But the question remains, what could they do this with in the future? Again, we'll get 00:46:19.000 |
to that in a moment. Let's go back to the hoax of safe deposit box seizures. This is 00:46:24.680 |
important to talk about because if you're going to talk about this, you need to get 00:46:28.640 |
your history right. I'm doing my very best to be accurate with anything that I say. But 00:46:33.360 |
there is an Internet hoax that says that somehow the IRS was going in and opening people's 00:46:40.440 |
safety deposit boxes. Now, we know from some of the cases cited that if you did have safety 00:46:46.160 |
deposit boxes, they weren't necessarily safe. But the Internet hoax does exaggerate what 00:46:52.720 |
actually happened. It wouldn't surprise me if this particular hoax had been true, but 00:46:57.600 |
it's not true. So you think, as we read about it, you think about whether or not this would 00:47:02.880 |
surprise you if this had actually happened. But remember, it did not. Hoax of safe deposit 00:47:08.320 |
box seizures. According to a hoax, Roosevelt ordered all safe deposit boxes in the country 00:47:14.400 |
seized and searched for gold by an official of the Internal Revenue Service. A typical 00:47:20.600 |
example of the text of the alleged order reads, quote, "By executive order of the President 00:47:25.200 |
of the United States, March 9, 1933, by virtue of the authority vested in me by Section 5(b) 00:47:31.280 |
of the Act of October 6, 1917, as amended by Section 2 of the Act of March 9, 1933, 00:47:37.400 |
in which Congress declared that a serious emergency exists, I, as President, do declare 00:47:44.120 |
that the national emergency still exists, that the continued private hoarding of gold 00:47:49.240 |
and silver by subjects of the United States poses a grave threat to the peace, equal justice, 00:47:55.800 |
and well-being of the United States, and that appropriate measures must be taken immediately 00:48:00.320 |
to protect the interests of our people. Therefore, I hereby proclaim that such gold and silver 00:48:05.680 |
holdings are prohibited, and that all such coin, bullion, or other possessions of gold 00:48:11.440 |
and silver be tendered within 14 days to agents of the government for compensation at the 00:48:17.000 |
official price and the legal tender of the government. All safe deposit boxes in banks 00:48:23.240 |
or financial institutions have been sealed. All sales or purchases or movements of such 00:48:30.800 |
gold and silver are hereby prohibited. Your possession and/or safe deposit box to store 00:48:38.160 |
them is known by the government from bank and insurance records. Therefore, your vault 00:48:44.440 |
box must remain sealed and may only be opened in the presence of an agent of the Internal 00:48:50.160 |
Revenue Service, by lawful order, the President of the United States. 00:48:54.880 |
Now, just a moment. I'll continue with the background. Remember, this is a hoax. But 00:48:59.360 |
in what I just read, could you believe it? The most effective hoaxes are passed along 00:49:06.720 |
widely because they are believable. That, to me, is the fundamental problem. I could 00:49:12.320 |
easily believe that this actually was true history after I understand that Executive 00:49:19.960 |
Order 6102 was true history. And so, it's not a very far distance from "you're not 00:49:28.440 |
allowed to own gold" to "we're going to seal and order the banks to seal all safe 00:49:34.200 |
deposit boxes." So, thankfully, this was a hoax. But I don't see anything in the 00:49:39.640 |
hoax per se that would in and of itself be unbelievable or would violate any particular 00:49:46.960 |
aspect of the law that actually was passed. So, they didn't do that, but I could believe 00:49:57.040 |
that they would have done that in that measure. What I also just think about is that even 00:50:02.440 |
the language of the hoax. Think back to what we talked about as about the Canadian situation 00:50:09.120 |
a couple weeks ago. And just think about this language in the hoax. "I, as President, 00:50:13.640 |
do declare that the national emergency still exists, that the continued private hoarding 00:50:18.840 |
of gold and silver by subjects of the United States poses a grave threat to the peace, 00:50:24.320 |
equal justice, and well-being of the United States, and that appropriate measures must 00:50:29.120 |
be taken immediately to protect the interests of our people." In some ways, that language 00:50:35.480 |
sounds very much like the language of Prime Minister Trudeau in Canada a week or two ago. 00:50:41.680 |
Let me finish up the background of the hoax, and then we will talk about what to do about 00:50:45.600 |
this. The first known reference to the hoax was in the book "After the Crash, Life in 00:50:49.800 |
the New Great Depression." The fake text refers only to gold, not to silver, which 00:50:54.120 |
was added by 1998 to internet references. It claims to be an executive order, but its 00:50:58.520 |
text was written to apply it to specific individuals, your possession. And so, if the text originated 00:51:03.960 |
from the government, it would have been sent to individuals, not published as an executive 00:51:07.280 |
order. The first paragraph starts with the actual text of executive order 6102, then 00:51:13.040 |
edits it slightly, changing "said national emergency" to "a national emergency" 00:51:18.320 |
and "still continues to exist" to "still exists" and then adds invented text. The 00:51:24.040 |
minor edits and the way that the real text and fake text are combined mid-sentence make 00:51:28.160 |
it almost certainly an intentionally designed hoax rather than an accident. Most of the 00:51:33.720 |
text does not appear in the actual executive order. In fact, safe deposit boxes held by 00:51:37.640 |
individuals were not forcibly searched or seized under the order, and the few prosecutions 00:51:43.480 |
that occurred in the 1930s for gold hoarding were executed under different statutes. One 00:51:49.080 |
of the few such cases occurred in 1936, when a safety deposit box containing over 10,000 00:51:55.800 |
troy ounces of gold belonging to Zilick Josefowicz, who was not a US citizen, was seized with 00:52:02.720 |
a search warrant as part of a prosecution for tax evasion. The US Treasury also came 00:52:07.920 |
into possession of a large number of safe deposit boxes due to bank failures. During 00:52:12.000 |
the 1930s, over 3,000 banks failed, and the contents of their safe deposit boxes were 00:52:17.360 |
remanded to the custody of the Treasury. If no one claimed the box, it remained in the 00:52:21.120 |
possession of the Treasury. In October 1981, there were 1,605 cardboard cartons in the 00:52:27.240 |
basement of the Treasury, each carton containing the contents of one unclaimed safe deposit 00:52:33.680 |
I hope you can enjoy learning the lessons from that, and feel free to research or dig 00:52:43.480 |
into the subject more your own. I find it fascinating. Here are some points that I would 00:52:47.320 |
like to make in addition to what I've already said. 00:52:49.120 |
1. I hope that when you take stories or warnings or you hear conspiracy theories, I hope that 00:52:59.120 |
you stop and consider if they are actually plausible. One of the things that's been 00:53:05.000 |
quite disconcerting to me over the years is I have come to believe that many stories, 00:53:12.880 |
many predictions, many conspiracy theories, even many hoaxes are plausible based upon 00:53:20.520 |
past experience, based upon past evidence. If I said to you today that, say, five years 00:53:31.360 |
from now, the US government could seize your Bitcoin from you, in my opinion, that kind 00:53:38.160 |
of prediction is plausible. They could do it. Will they do it? We don't know, because 00:53:43.600 |
there is a system where they have to go based upon public constraint. If Bitcoin were widely 00:53:49.800 |
acknowledged as being useful, people liked it, people used it, then they probably couldn't 00:53:53.480 |
get away with it. If Bitcoin were seen as a way of getting evil money to evil Russian 00:53:58.880 |
oligarchs, getting around all of the world sanctions on the Russian economy, that changes 00:54:04.640 |
things. You could see so much why Bitcoin has been tarred and feathered by so many people, 00:54:10.520 |
drug dealing, money laundering, Russian oligarchs, etc. So the point is that warnings like that, 00:54:17.040 |
I consider them plausible. I remember years ago, I got interested in various conspiracy 00:54:22.840 |
theories and I started studying some of the history of various theories, and I was shocked 00:54:27.240 |
to find how much stuff actually happened. I found that a sobering experience. It's very 00:54:33.440 |
sobering when you learn, you know what, when people have wacky conspiracy theories, I can't 00:54:38.280 |
just dismiss them out of hand. I need to stop, I need to look for evidence, I need to think 00:54:42.240 |
about it and consider them, because I can go through history and I can find some really 00:54:46.640 |
wacky stuff that has happened over the time that would be unbelievable if I didn't know 00:54:52.680 |
it was actually true. Kind of like it was to me about gold confiscation and it being 00:54:59.720 |
The reason I love this example so much also, let me expand this point for you, is it's 00:55:07.280 |
hard to find something less damaging to you as an individual than a gold coin. Almost 00:55:19.880 |
any other seizure is not quite that way. If the government comes and seizes a bale of 00:55:27.400 |
marijuana, we think, well, you know, at the end of the day, maybe people shouldn't be 00:55:33.120 |
doing marijuana. After all, it's going to make them stupid and lazy, so maybe people 00:55:38.240 |
shouldn't be smoking marijuana. Or the government seizing a bunch of cocaine. Well, at the end 00:55:42.960 |
of the day, that's really bad, that's, you know, destroying people. Or the government 00:55:46.920 |
seizes a bunch of fentanyl. And you think, well, okay, they're seizing it, but I see 00:56:02.400 |
the point. I understand the point and we're probably better off having it off the streets. 00:56:07.000 |
It takes a very committed person to say free markets, total liberty, etc., when you're 00:56:11.960 |
dealing with things like that. Or you come along and you say, well, what about civil 00:56:16.960 |
asset forfeiture? And you say, well, you know, when they seize the speedboats of those nasty 00:56:21.940 |
drug runners, they're putting a dent in the drug ring. Or when they seize a sports car 00:56:26.400 |
and you go and you find the Miami Police Department logo and spray it all over some cigarette 00:56:32.560 |
boat and you think, hey, you know, at least they got those nasty drug dealers off the 00:56:36.560 |
street. Or if they make something illegal, then you say, prohibition, right? We make 00:56:42.440 |
alcohol illegal. You say, well, at least people will drink less. And so you justify those 00:56:48.720 |
things. In the modern world, again, I've already given examples of Russia. You say, at least 00:56:52.000 |
they can get rid of Putin, right? He's pretty evil. At least that'll be good. And after 00:56:56.040 |
all, I'm for the Ukrainians. But when you look at this example of banning the use of 00:57:01.400 |
gold coins, what you see is that it is exclusively about the interests of the United States. 00:57:07.760 |
Now, a fair-minded individual would say, well, the interest of the United States is for the 00:57:11.400 |
flourishing of its people. So therefore, if the United States can increase its money supply 00:57:15.600 |
and the people can improve, maybe that could get us out of the depression, right? This 00:57:18.160 |
is the classic argument that we all argue about. Went into the Great Depression, did 00:57:21.600 |
the government actions help or hinder? Was it harmful or was it helpful? And we'll save 00:57:27.080 |
that discussion for another day. But I think clearly you see here that this is backroom 00:57:33.400 |
dealing and the only people that benefit are government representatives, government agents. 00:57:42.240 |
They made the most traditional thing you could ever own, right? Gold coins, we've got them 00:57:48.600 |
back to the Romans and probably before. Thousands and thousands of years of history of people 00:57:54.160 |
using gold coins as money. This is money. This is a product that didn't come in from 00:57:58.920 |
overseas. This is a product that the US government made, stamping out gold coins. And the system 00:58:04.560 |
was intentionally designed to be a check on government excess. That's how it was designed. 00:58:11.960 |
The original Federal Reserve Act itself was a nightmare, but it was designed to be a check 00:58:17.560 |
on government excess. So they come in, use a time of extreme duress, extreme economic 00:58:23.120 |
hardship and say, we're going to change all the laws and we're going to make it illegal 00:58:28.680 |
for you to own gold because you're hoarding your money. Think about the use of that word, 00:58:37.880 |
right? In past pandemic, in a previous conversations, I've talked about how the difference between 00:58:42.800 |
stockpiling and hoarding, right? And so I think there is an example of hoarding, but 00:58:48.520 |
most of the time it's used in a pejorative sense. I remember back when we're at the beginning 00:58:54.640 |
of the pandemic, right? And I did, I think I did shows and I talked about when they came 00:58:59.480 |
in and they stole a bunch of masks from a guy who had bought them and they accused him 00:59:03.280 |
of hoarding and they did thousands of masks that he was selling to doctors on the secondary 00:59:08.520 |
market and the FBI came in and they raided his house and they stole his masks. I try 00:59:13.380 |
to stick up for my principles that I didn't, it wasn't wrong. That was, that wasn't right. 00:59:18.120 |
Talked about it on Twitter, almost, not almost. I got a great, I got a great group of listeners 00:59:23.480 |
that understand arguing things from the basis of principle, but 80% of the response was, 00:59:28.200 |
how could you believe this guy is price gouging people on the cost of the masks? And you always 00:59:33.400 |
think, well, you know, maybe, maybe, maybe, but when it's gold coins, nobody was harmed 00:59:39.400 |
by your ownership of gold coins in any way. But the government says you're hoarding money 00:59:44.280 |
and you're not allowed to hoard money. So we're just going to take it from you. Now, 00:59:48.520 |
bring that to a modern context. Think for example, about things like wealth taxes. Think 00:59:53.940 |
about even the income tax itself. See, we're not in 1933 anymore. I don't expect any kind 00:59:59.960 |
of, of repeat of this particular set of laws related to gold, but this same theory holds 01:00:07.280 |
true in other ways. And you got a bunch of people with similar theories to president 01:00:14.200 |
Roosevelt trying to build a utopia with their covetous actions. Now, brings me to the next 01:00:21.640 |
question. Don't think that it was better back then. There's often this sense that we have, 01:00:27.120 |
and especially people who are politically conservative or, or sympathetic to conservatism 01:00:32.120 |
in some way often have the sense of, well, it was better before. No, not necessarily. 01:00:37.480 |
It wasn't necessarily better before. Some things were better. Some things were worse. 01:00:41.440 |
But today, some things are much better. Some things are worse. History is a mixed bag and 01:00:46.040 |
don't fall prey to the golden era fallacy to think that, well, in 1933, they really 01:00:52.200 |
believed in constitutional rights. Nonsense. Constitution. They, they, they affirmed everything 01:00:59.640 |
I've just described here as constitutional. The press cheered it on. It all happened. 01:01:05.120 |
So what can you do? I don't know how to change a governmental system. I don't know how to 01:01:09.640 |
do it. All I know is to say, what can we learn about how to protect ourselves? First lessons 01:01:15.040 |
do relate to gold coins. I think these are the least, not least important, but just the 01:01:20.280 |
least likely again, I do for reasons stated several times. Now I don't expect this to 01:01:24.320 |
happen again. Nobody owns gold anymore, but if you do own gold, this is why in my opinion, 01:01:31.880 |
you buy it privately. If you're going to go through the hassle of buying gold, owning 01:01:37.560 |
gold, storing gold, then as I've stated in Q and A shows, what I've been asked about 01:01:43.160 |
the subject, just go that last extra step and own it privately. It is today legal anywhere 01:01:49.560 |
in the United States for you to walk into any, to a gold shop, a coin shop, and to do 01:01:56.160 |
business in cash and for you to buy gold coins. You'll pay a slight premium to deal with a 01:02:02.240 |
dealer of course. You will have some hassle factor of your having to physically go and 01:02:07.400 |
do that. You may want to separate your transactions into modest amounts so that there's no currency 01:02:12.360 |
transaction reports that have to be filed on behalf of the dealer. No, no, no, no name 01:02:18.000 |
and information required, et cetera, but it's perfectly legal to do what I have described 01:02:23.080 |
and you can own your gold. And at least that way, if a law were to be passed in the future, 01:02:29.300 |
you would have less exposure, less risk. The power of gold among other things is that it's 01:02:36.060 |
an incredibly compact traditional store of wealth with a long and storied history and 01:02:43.680 |
it doesn't have any kind of physical trails attached. It doesn't have any kind of registration 01:02:49.920 |
documents required. It's just a little coin and that's really powerful, especially in 01:02:57.120 |
times of duress when the government is passing these immoral laws like we've talked about 01:03:01.920 |
with executive order 1602. It's really useful to have that feature. And even in the modern 01:03:07.720 |
world, in a moment I'm going to talk about a new Bitcoin privacy, how to buy Bitcoin 01:03:11.480 |
immediately class that I'm working on with a friend of mine that will be launching, that 01:03:16.080 |
we have ready to launch. But one of the things that's so fascinating about it is for all 01:03:20.760 |
of the promises of Bitcoin, and I'm on board for all the promises of Bitcoin, gold is still 01:03:26.420 |
better from a privacy perspective. It's just different. The fact that you could put $100,000 01:03:33.760 |
worth of value in gold coins in a coffee can stuck in your backyard and unless somebody 01:03:39.880 |
passes over the top of the metal detector, most likely because they knew that you're 01:03:43.160 |
there, it's pretty powerful. As we get into the Bitcoin and cryptocurrency privacy stuff, 01:03:48.840 |
you need to have a basic level of knowledge about how to do it. You don't have to be super 01:03:53.320 |
sophisticated to buy it privately, but you do need to have a basic level of knowledge. 01:03:58.360 |
Gold coins, it's a lot simpler. Buy it, pay cash, take delivery, keep your mouth shut. 01:04:04.640 |
Everybody knows you have it. That's powerful. It's as powerful today as it was in 1933. 01:04:10.260 |
So when you're buying gold coins for your personal collection, do that. Pay cash, take 01:04:17.600 |
delivery, keep your mouth shut. And then you'll have the power of knowing that you have an 01:04:22.600 |
asset that you can own without anybody else necessarily knowing. Related to that, I personally 01:04:30.840 |
give a lot of attention to the idea of the safety deposit hoax. Again, I don't think 01:04:38.040 |
it unreasonable to believe that the government could, in a time of duress or in a time of 01:04:47.800 |
emergency action or something, I don't believe it unreasonable to believe that they could 01:04:52.840 |
issue a proclamation like was issued in that hoax, meaning we're sealing all the safety 01:04:59.640 |
deposit boxes. And what's unfortunate is in the modern world, a safety deposit box 01:05:05.720 |
with a financial institution is considered to have an account. Then it comes in under 01:05:11.600 |
all of the banking regulations. So as you're going to arrange for storage of your gold, 01:05:17.480 |
then I think it's better to go with some form of private storage with a non-banking 01:05:22.280 |
entity if possible. I don't think, and you ask, "Well, how big of a deal is that?" 01:05:29.560 |
Well, I don't think it's that big of a deal, but if you're going about it and you're 01:05:34.400 |
going to be paying for a safety deposit box, you might consider simply transacting with 01:05:37.960 |
a private secure storage company rather than a bank for the reasons stated. 01:05:43.000 |
The next lesson is diversify your holdings. I always think about that attorney. Just imagine 01:05:51.720 |
that guy, Barb Campbell, 5,000 ounces of gold. For all we know, that may have been 01:06:00.800 |
his life savings. I think it probably was. I wish I had more information on him and I 01:06:08.000 |
wish I could read a book that was written about that particular case. It would be interesting 01:06:12.320 |
to do so. In fact, I just found, I hadn't previously clicked on the link, here's an 01:06:18.280 |
article with more details on the case, specifically in Time Magazine, published October 9, 1933. 01:06:26.640 |
Let me read this because it's about the details of the case and I think it'll be 01:06:30.120 |
instructive. "Gold Indictment #1," name of the article. "On October 11, 1932, 01:06:35.880 |
an elderly Manhattan attorney named Frederick Barber Campbell marched into Chase National 01:06:40.760 |
Bank followed by an armed guard trundling 13 bars of gold. Mr. Campbell had just drawn 01:06:45.980 |
this bullion from the Federal Reserve Bank in return for gold certificates. Each bar, 01:06:51.240 |
worth approximately $5,000, had been cast by the U.S. Treasury and bore its stamp and 01:06:57.040 |
number. Lawyer Campbell arranged for the Chase Bank to act as hired custodian for his bullion. 01:07:03.000 |
On January 25, 1933, Mr. Campbell again appeared at Chase National Bank with 14 more gold bars 01:07:09.240 |
which were stowed away in the vault with the first batch. By gold standard reckoning, his 01:07:14.040 |
total deposit of metal amounted to $135,000. On March 9, Congress passed the Emergency 01:07:20.520 |
Banking Act, which empowered the President to call all gold into the Treasury, with heavy 01:07:25.460 |
penalties for those who disobeyed his orders. At that time, $1.4 billion in gold was in 01:07:33.240 |
circulation, most of it hoarded. In the next 30 days, more than one-third of this was turned 01:07:38.160 |
into the Treasury. On April 5, President Roosevelt issued an 01:07:41.840 |
executive order requiring holders of gold to turn it into the Treasury in exchange for 01:07:46.280 |
paper currency under penalty of 10 years' imprisonment and $10,000 fine. Department 01:07:51.860 |
of Justice agents began visiting known hoarders who, to date, have surrendered $38,901,009 01:08:00.760 |
in gold. During the same period, unknown hoarders have given up more than $300 million. Attorney 01:08:07.420 |
General Cummings issued threat of prosecution against recalcitrants who still held $560,201,000. 01:08:16.360 |
On August 28, President Roosevelt issued another order requiring every possessor of gold to 01:08:22.060 |
register his holdings with the Treasury before September 18. Those who failed to do so were 01:08:27.340 |
also to be punished by 10 years' imprisonment, $10,000 fine. On September 16, lawyer Campbell 01:08:34.060 |
appeared at Chase National Bank, demanded his 27 bars of gold. The bank told him that 01:08:39.780 |
under the law it could not deliver them to him, but would have to surrender them to the 01:08:43.740 |
government in accordance with the President's orders. On September 26, Mr. Campbell started 01:08:48.820 |
a civil suit in Manhattan federal court to compel the bank to release his gold deposits. 01:08:54.220 |
In his petition, he argued that the President's orders, which prevented him from regaining 01:08:58.560 |
his property, were unconstitutional. On September 27, after an 18-minute session, a federal 01:09:05.120 |
grand jury in Manhattan indicted Frederick Barber Campbell for failing to register gold 01:09:11.380 |
now valued at $200,574.34 before September 18, as required by the August 28 order. Also 01:09:21.340 |
imminent was a second indictment charging actual hoarding of gold in violation of the 01:09:26.740 |
April 5 order. Thus, last week was President Roosevelt's 01:09:31.340 |
whole gold policy started on its winding way to the Supreme Court for a major test on constitutionality. 01:09:38.420 |
If Defendant Campbell is convicted by a jury, and the Supreme Court sustains his conviction, 01:09:43.100 |
the Department of Justice will be on solid legal ground to move against some 30,000 citizens 01:09:47.660 |
who have so far defied the President's gold orders. If Defendant Campbell wins a Supreme 01:09:52.640 |
Court appeal, the administration's whole gold program will be set at naught, and President 01:09:56.740 |
Roosevelt will have to start all over again conserving the Treasury's gold supply. 01:10:03.420 |
In Defendant Campbell, the government picked for this test not only the largest gold hoarder 01:10:07.800 |
on its list, but also a respectable lawyer, whom Prosecutor Medley called "exceedingly 01:10:14.220 |
able." Born in Brooklyn, Mr. Campbell graduated from Harvard Law School in 1894, is a director 01:10:20.280 |
of U.S. and British insurance companies, belongs to such swank Manhattan clubs as Union, Metropolitan 01:10:26.700 |
(where he lives), and Century. When he filed his civil suit against the Chase Bank, he 01:10:31.300 |
well knew he was inviting the government to prosecute. His argument in that suit will 01:10:35.740 |
become his defense in the criminal action. To wit, 1. Congress has no constitutional 01:10:41.020 |
power to delegate its legislative authority over gold to the President. 01:10:44.820 |
2. The President is prevented by the Fifth (due process of law) Amendment to the Constitution 01:10:49.640 |
from depriving him of his property. The property in this case is not only the gold bars in 01:10:54.140 |
the Chase vault, but his $65,000 paper profit, incident to the rise in gold from $20 to $31 01:11:01.500 |
per ounce. Mr. Campbell, who promptly pleaded not guilty to the indictment and was released 01:11:06.460 |
on $1,000 bail because no moral turpitude was involved in the charge, was thoroughly 01:11:11.300 |
aware of the risks he was running in this contest with the government. If convicted, 01:11:15.280 |
he could be disbarred, fined $10,000, imprisoned for 10 years. But he was, he intimated, making 01:11:21.680 |
a fight for his constitutional rights and "if I have to go to jail, I don't care." 01:11:28.160 |
And again, that was an article published in Time Magazine on October 9, 1933. 01:11:36.460 |
So the lessons stand, the points that I had planned to make, and it's interesting to 01:11:41.400 |
read an article from the era with more details. The lesson is, if Mr. Campbell had diversified 01:11:50.640 |
his holdings, and if he had moved quickly, he very likely could have kept his gold. Now 01:11:56.720 |
I appreciate the fact that he was a man of means and a man of principle, ready to fight 01:12:02.720 |
for the constitutionality of his ability to own his gold and not be stolen by the United 01:12:08.800 |
States government. Of course, he lost. His gold was confiscated. He lost his case. The 01:12:15.000 |
Supreme Court said, "Yes, President Roosevelt can make this action," and all of the money 01:12:20.960 |
was gone. So we can see what happens sometimes when you stay and fight, even for things that 01:12:26.080 |
seem like an obvious win. If the wins are against you, I mean, it's hard for me to 01:12:31.720 |
believe if I presented the facts of that case to somebody in the modern era, I think most 01:12:36.640 |
people would say, "Yeah, that's wrong. They shouldn't take his gold." And yet, the wins 01:12:40.480 |
of that era were against him. The thinking of the time was that he was doing something 01:12:46.480 |
wrong and the president was saving the country. So it's wildly unpredictable to know what 01:12:51.680 |
the wins of the era tomorrow are going to be. So what could he have done? Well, he could 01:12:56.680 |
have diversified his holdings. Now, in 1933, that was not as easy as it is today. He was 01:13:02.160 |
a businessman doing business in New York, and the gold bars were a normal part of his 01:13:08.640 |
settling his contracts. Again, as the story stated, he would take his gold certificates, 01:13:15.440 |
which was a claim for gold, he would take his gold certificates to the US Treasury and 01:13:23.840 |
he would get gold bars backing up his US gold certificates. That was the point, was that 01:13:29.160 |
the gold was there backing up certificates. That was the point of having a gold-backed 01:13:32.800 |
dollar at the time. And so he was clearly doing business in the United States. But hopefully, 01:13:38.920 |
I don't know, but what we see is that if you're depending upon any one jurisdiction to protect 01:13:45.960 |
you, you're doing poorly. If he had taken some of his gold and gotten in a car, gotten 01:13:52.160 |
in a train, taken it to a bank in Canada and placed some of his gold into the vault of 01:13:57.520 |
a Canadian bank in Toronto, very likely he would have been able to retain that gold. 01:14:03.680 |
Very likely there was a window in which he could have done that. He could have hired 01:14:07.600 |
a courier. As soon as he got wind of the change coming, he could have perhaps hired a courier 01:14:12.360 |
and said, "Please take these gold bars and take them and put them on deposit at a bank 01:14:17.280 |
in Toronto." And that could have protected his gold. No ships, no planes necessary, just 01:14:23.400 |
a train, a car. He could have done it. For whatever reason, he didn't. And the lesson 01:14:29.560 |
is it didn't work out well for him. So let's you and I be more thoughtful. I think that 01:14:35.960 |
you should, if you're going to buy gold specifically, I think that your first, I don't know, half 01:14:41.960 |
dozen ounces, 10,000, couple, 10, 20,000, maybe 10,000 per person, right? Some reasonable 01:14:48.240 |
number. I don't have any exact science behind making up a number. But your first half dozen 01:14:52.480 |
ounces or so should probably be held in some way, some place that you can get to them in 01:14:59.280 |
case you need them. But if you're going to go with any serious amount of gold, then I 01:15:05.920 |
think very likely that gold should be stored in an offshore jurisdiction, a separate country 01:15:14.080 |
from where you live, and should be diversified if it gets to be significant amounts. If you've 01:15:20.280 |
got thousands of ounces, then it should certainly be diversified. Hundreds certainly should 01:15:24.680 |
be diversified. And so you want to choose your jurisdictions carefully. I think it's 01:15:32.880 |
interesting that they cited the example of the Swiss finance corporation that was holding 01:15:39.680 |
its gold in the United States. For the Swiss, it was unthinkable what the Americans did 01:15:43.480 |
at that time. And so this is why the Swiss have had a long and storied history of banking, 01:15:50.000 |
because they have a high respect for your rights to bank. They've always had a high 01:15:54.920 |
respect for privacy. Now, in the last years, much of that has changed. Even interesting 01:16:00.080 |
with the new set of Credit Suisse papers, the new leak, then maybe there will be more 01:16:06.080 |
changes in the future. But the point stands that a jurisdiction that culturally will respect 01:16:13.600 |
you, and I would say importantly, a jurisdiction that has strong interest to be in your camp, 01:16:22.720 |
is a better jurisdiction than just a random country. Those are the basic lessons on gold. 01:16:30.480 |
Now let's pivot for a moment. What is the 21st century version of gold? I think gold 01:16:37.960 |
still is powerful for reasons stated. But gold has downsides. It has certain attributes. 01:16:48.940 |
Some of those attributes make it wonderful, and some of those attributes don't make it 01:16:51.720 |
wonderful. For example, the attribute that gold has of being physical makes it wonderful. 01:16:58.900 |
Being owned by the possessor of it makes it wonderful. As I stated, you can own the gold, 01:17:03.780 |
you can take a gold bar, walk out in your backyard, dig up a couple of feet of worth 01:17:08.440 |
of dirt, stick it down and plant a tree over it, and you're done. Your gold is going to 01:17:13.720 |
sit there. It's not going to call out to anybody that it's there, unless you're being specifically 01:17:18.180 |
targeted with a metal detector. There you can engage in some more interesting ways of 01:17:23.480 |
concealing it. There's nothing really required. It's an ordinary person's ability to take 01:17:31.600 |
care of it and to engage in privacy. The problem is it's physical. So what if you're trying 01:17:37.240 |
to flee from a war-torn country? Your neighbor has just invaded with tanks and bombs, and 01:17:43.280 |
you have to flee and you need access to your money. And all of a sudden, the global finance 01:17:47.420 |
system is being disrupted and banks are being shuttered. And you thought you were being 01:17:50.980 |
smart because you kept your money in a foreign bank, right? Following Joshua's internationalization 01:17:57.160 |
advice, you kept your money in a foreign bank just across the border, a bigger country that 01:18:01.440 |
had more reason to think that it was going to be useful for you. Then all of a sudden, 01:18:06.720 |
that bank is basically cut off from the world banking system. And now what do you do? This 01:18:11.720 |
is where people have wanted for a long time some form of digital gold. And this is where 01:18:18.120 |
in the modern age, potentially, we have that. Potentially with Bitcoin. Now we're very early 01:18:26.080 |
in the life cycle of Bitcoin. And I'm going to be inclusive, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. 01:18:34.280 |
Bitcoin maximalists don't like it to be inclusive, but I choose to be inclusive. We're very early 01:18:40.360 |
in the testing process of this. But early indications are that this is a very useful 01:18:46.160 |
thing. So could the same thing apply? Well, I think there are very good reasons for you 01:18:52.560 |
to be concerned about future legislation that reflects things like Executive Order 6102. 01:19:01.960 |
I think there are very good reasons for you to be concerned about that. So what do you 01:19:07.200 |
do? Well, I think you apply the same caution and care in your ownership, your acquisition 01:19:13.680 |
of Bitcoin or other currencies as you would to gold. Notice at the time, from that Time 01:19:22.520 |
article that the US government maintained a list of people who were known, what they 01:19:30.640 |
called gold hoarders, people who owned gold. Well, similar lists are being created right 01:19:36.160 |
now. Last year on your US tax return, the US government asked you to declare whether 01:19:43.920 |
you owned any cryptocurrencies. And your choice of what to put on that box was a very momentous 01:19:50.520 |
one. It started the creation of a list, started the creation of data that can be used to prosecute 01:19:56.760 |
you. Now, I recommend you answer it truthfully. I don't play around with people that can put 01:20:03.600 |
me in prison. I don't play around with people that can take away my freedom. But there is 01:20:11.680 |
a lot you can do to protect against things getting worse. And all of it starts at the 01:20:16.320 |
very beginning. If you had not been registered as a known gold hoarder, again, at that time 01:20:23.920 |
it was much easier because you could just have gold, gold coins, etc. But you had had 01:20:28.240 |
your family collection of gold and it was not registered, insured, etc. You were pretty 01:20:36.600 |
well safe just to sit on it. And there was an immediate profit for you. Now, I'm not 01:20:41.200 |
sure that was the best trade because you couldn't publicly sell it for several decades. But 01:20:46.880 |
at least it would have been there for you. At least it would have been there able for 01:20:50.720 |
you to do business with. So, it's an extremely valuable thing for you to have had. And I 01:21:00.760 |
want to encourage you as you are building other assets, I want to encourage you to make 01:21:08.480 |
sure that you purchase other assets with the same basic thing in mind. And here I want 01:21:16.400 |
to introduce you to my newest course. This is a joint project with Gabriel Custodiat, 01:21:22.760 |
author of the Watchman's Guide to Privacy. Gabriel is a privacy consultant, privacy expert, 01:21:30.440 |
and we've been working on this for a while to build a course. And it's basically the 01:21:33.800 |
course that I wanted for me about how to buy Bitcoin privately. The genesis of the course 01:21:40.920 |
is exactly what I said. I was talking to Gabriel. I've become friendly with him over time. And 01:21:45.480 |
as we've talked about different things, I've gone back and forth and I've given him some 01:21:48.520 |
of my privacy questions, some of my privacy comments, made various suggestions to him. 01:21:54.680 |
And along the way I said, "Listen, here's something I'm working on. I would really like 01:21:57.560 |
to understand how to buy Bitcoin privately." And I outlined for him the reasons, which 01:22:03.480 |
I basically just stated. And I said, "How can I do this? Because it's more difficult 01:22:09.440 |
than you might think. What are the technologies? How do I do it?" We're living in a world where 01:22:14.520 |
the Bitcoin marketplace is a mixture of different things. But to actually own Bitcoin privately, 01:22:22.400 |
to have it, to create it privately and to own it without there being a paper trail is 01:22:27.440 |
more challenging than I wish it were. So here is the new course that we have created. The 01:22:33.960 |
course is called Private Cryptocurrencies, How to Buy, Own, and Use Bitcoin Like a True 01:22:39.360 |
Radical. Imagine this, your bank accounts are frozen. You must flee the country with 01:22:44.040 |
only what you carry. Gold is suspicious and cash has limits. You cross the world, find 01:22:50.280 |
a public computer, download a single program and type from memory a private key. You now 01:22:57.260 |
have access to $2 million worth of Bitcoin unattached to your identity, tucked away for 01:23:03.680 |
just this scenario and the knowledge to buy, trade and convert it into any local currency 01:23:09.520 |
in the world. Cryptocurrencies are the ultimate exit strategy for inflation, social collapse 01:23:16.320 |
and other disasters. But only if you acquire and use them correctly, which 99% of people 01:23:22.280 |
fail to do. In this two-part course, privacy consultant Gabriel Custodiat explains step-by-step 01:23:28.640 |
multiple ways to legally buy Bitcoin with no attachment to personal information. He 01:23:33.240 |
then explains how to use it, how to protect it and how to convert it to other crypto for 01:23:37.300 |
speculation or added privacy. The course includes everything you need to understand this process 01:23:42.640 |
from A to Z, no prior knowledge required. As authorities crack down on cryptocurrencies, 01:23:48.300 |
it is critical to have up-to-date, tested methods for private Bitcoin. There is much 01:23:53.040 |
confusion about this process. The aim of this course is to give you all of the information 01:23:57.540 |
you need with minimal diversion, no confusing tech vocabulary, no moralizing, no hacker-level 01:24:02.080 |
computer skills, only the focused steps to teach you how to make the most radical personal 01:24:11.120 |
That's the dream. That's the idea. So basically what we're doing is we are doing this in the 01:24:16.120 |
form of a live webinar for this initial class. We have at least about four hours of content. 01:24:22.160 |
We're going to do two live webinars with live Q&A. We've worked out the outlines and also 01:24:28.520 |
there's a couple of bonuses. So details of that on the course page. I'll let you check 01:24:31.840 |
that out. But we're going to basically teach you how to do that. That's been my dream for 01:24:38.840 |
When you look at finances, and again I'll be talking more about this in days to come 01:24:44.280 |
and other episodes more focused, but when you look at finances, in our modern era it's 01:24:53.720 |
almost a human right to say, "I must be able to have control of my money." And yet we're 01:25:00.240 |
living in a system, "I must be able to do business." We're living in a system where 01:25:06.520 |
that control has been intensely centralized. And this is a great, great risk. Bitcoin offers 01:25:18.160 |
the potential for us to do better. And so what we outlined in the promotion there is 01:25:27.920 |
exactly what my dream has been. Imagine that you go across a border with nothing other 01:25:33.240 |
than a seed phrase in your head. And you go and you find a computer and boom, you've got 01:25:38.400 |
access to your money regardless of what's happening. And that's money that's never 01:25:43.760 |
been tied to you, is never connected to you, etc. But it allows you to do business and 01:25:50.240 |
So if that sounds interesting to you, I'd love you to check it out. Here's the URL you 01:25:53.160 |
need. BitcoinPrivacyCourse.com. Go to BitcoinPrivacyCourse.com now and buy access. And we look forward to 01:26:06.400 |
talking to you on the webinar and teaching you how to accomplish that dream. BitcoinPrivacyCourse.com. 01:26:12.840 |
Do more together this holiday in a new Chevy. Take on more adventure in the strong and capable