back to indexAI integration for enterprise ft. CJ Desai of ServiceNow
00:00:07.840 |
One of those things is the what's next section 00:00:14.080 |
Another is the what's now that Sonia has been talking about, 00:00:29.800 |
We've also brought in two exceptional leaders 00:00:39.800 |
CJ has been the president and COO of ServiceNow 00:00:48.420 |
And in addition to ServiceNow being a Sequoia-backed company 00:00:56.840 |
It's the kind of business anyone in this room 00:01:07.000 |
And what was the scale of the business then, Pat? 00:01:15.280 |
Anyone have a guess as to where ServiceNow is now 00:01:52.360 |
Remarkably, when you took over as president and COO 00:02:04.480 |
So it's been a 12 plus X multiple from there. 00:02:37.480 |
doesn't last very long with that kind of growth. 00:02:39.440 |
And CJ told me virtually all of this has been organic. 00:02:44.360 |
They've made some acquisitions like Element AI. 00:03:06.680 |
This is a rule of 56 business on the rule of 40 terms. 00:03:28.200 |
Since IPO, it's been up 42 times, 42X returns. 00:03:36.240 |
and also aspirational for everyone in this room. 00:03:38.980 |
One of the main reasons why we were so excited 00:03:44.520 |
is ServiceNow has been way ahead of the curve on AI. 00:03:49.440 |
where you were talking about the AI vision with NVIDIA, 00:04:03.040 |
The specific use cases on the NVIDIA platform. 00:04:05.240 |
And at the previous conference, it comes up as a main user. 00:04:20.580 |
and how you've gotten the AI suite to where it is. 00:04:22.360 |
Yeah, so first of all, thank you for inviting me. 00:04:30.000 |
And the fun fact is that I'm a failed standup comedian. 00:04:56.680 |
The story is that before we were going public in 2012 00:05:01.360 |
is when we went public with a modest market cap 00:05:11.400 |
People were like, you know, Facebook was pretty good. 00:05:14.440 |
Back then it was called Facebook, the same year. 00:05:39.400 |
which would have been happy to take that offer 00:05:42.320 |
because they're like, wow, we don't have to go public. 00:05:44.880 |
We can be part of a great company like VMware at the time. 00:05:52.560 |
but also the management team that you can become big. 00:05:56.780 |
So we are extremely grateful for Sequoia's coaching 00:06:03.380 |
And for the $2 billion offer which we could have taken 00:06:08.220 |
versus today's $155 billion in just a matter of 12 years, 00:06:39.760 |
"Can't wait to be part of the cult that is Sequoia." 00:06:45.500 |
But I just wanted to be thankful and grateful 00:06:48.500 |
and you guys work with great people at Sequoia 00:07:06.340 |
and Frank Slootman was also placed by Sequoia 00:07:21.780 |
and I make fun of Jess all the time on this topic, 00:07:35.780 |
So he said, "No, I need to go back to operational CEO job." 00:08:03.600 |
"that'll be a massive W and let's go for it." 00:08:11.500 |
close to at age of 50, Fred Luddy, who became bankrupt. 00:08:15.880 |
So this is not a classic Stanford, Harvard story, 00:08:28.740 |
And so we always knew that TAM was pretty much unlimited 00:08:33.860 |
and the platform provided everything you need 00:08:40.840 |
And so when I joined, we were one-ish billion. 00:08:45.420 |
We had one large product and two or three small products. 00:08:56.020 |
Like the simple question on when my product team comes 00:08:58.500 |
and says, "Hey, we can create this great product." 00:09:09.460 |
"And will current buyer introduce us to that buyer 00:09:12.180 |
"or those two buyers don't talk to each other?" 00:09:14.340 |
Those kind of simple questions on who is the buyer, 00:09:23.400 |
the third one, what is the size of the price? 00:09:34.800 |
So we have been doing that level of precise execution, 00:09:39.800 |
and that's what has helped us on organic innovation. 00:09:44.640 |
We are the only SaaS company that has not bought revenue 00:09:57.940 |
But that's how we have scaled now from 2016 billion-plus 00:10:10.080 |
And then, of course, the revenue trails a little bit, 00:10:12.760 |
and we guided for 10.75 billion growing at 21%. 00:10:20.720 |
hey, you have an underlying platform that's cloud-based. 00:10:35.600 |
And without that, with my product team and engineering team, 00:10:39.320 |
and I joined as a head of products and engineering. 00:10:46.440 |
And on AI, it's as simple as we had a fundamental belief 00:10:50.760 |
from supervised machine learning and as AI evolved 00:10:57.200 |
We have been very focused on AI in service of our use cases, 00:11:02.200 |
because if we can infuse AI in our use cases, 00:11:07.160 |
it's a very easy conversation with a JPMorgan Chase 00:11:14.640 |
that, hey, you are using service now for this use case, 00:11:20.840 |
And so we have been acquiring or gaining small teams 00:11:26.700 |
that are AI experts at various stages all the way from 2016. 00:11:39.060 |
they were trying to be the next Google of Canada. 00:11:42.080 |
And they had somewhere between 170 to 180 engineers 00:11:48.120 |
between PhDs, data scientists, and engineers. 00:12:00.780 |
There are people who have written some seminal paper 00:12:24.340 |
hey, man, these people don't have any revenue, 00:12:32.700 |
If you believe this is a great talent, let's take them. 00:12:35.060 |
And they showed me Chad GPT 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 demos 00:12:47.140 |
And then when this whole thing just blew up in 2022, 00:12:51.100 |
we exactly knew where we could apply LLMs to our use cases. 00:12:55.260 |
And again, I don't know if it's a term, but SLMs. 00:13:04.860 |
And we started our monetization strategy in September. 00:13:15.940 |
And I didn't realize, frankly, until this conversation 00:13:18.940 |
that you guys are the only SaaS business ever 00:13:21.140 |
to cross the 10 billion ARR point fully organically. 00:13:27.320 |
And frankly, I've talked to a bunch of people in service now. 00:13:32.580 |
It's such a pleasure to get to learn from you. 00:13:37.680 |
So you guys had a little bit of a headstart a few years, 00:13:42.940 |
'cause I know you and Bill had been talking about AI 00:13:49.660 |
how you're gonna integrate it into your product. 00:13:57.940 |
- Yeah, so I'll just take the recent example. 00:14:07.860 |
Even on the NLU models, we worked with Stanford 00:14:16.460 |
But we are a big fan of open source community. 00:14:19.180 |
And the team in Canada, working with Hugging Face, 00:14:24.180 |
figured out for which use cases of service now 00:14:39.620 |
your profitability starts at your gross margin level. 00:14:45.060 |
82, then you add R&D cost, sales and marketing cost, 00:14:50.860 |
So we are world-class in terms of our gross margin at scale. 00:14:58.380 |
It's a constraint-driven optimization problem 00:15:03.720 |
I'm gonna run open AI everywhere in my farm, in our cloud, 00:15:07.740 |
because we are 100% cloud company with 170 billion, 00:15:12.460 |
who knows, 2 trillion parameters now, with 4.0. 00:15:17.220 |
So the constraint was, can I run smaller models faster 00:15:22.220 |
with lower latency for service now use cases? 00:15:31.900 |
and we came up with the first model on text-to-code. 00:15:39.580 |
Our text-to-code was specifically service now code, 00:16:33.880 |
"you are constantly pushing the next rev, H-class, 00:16:50.960 |
and the number of questions I get from investors, 00:16:53.560 |
like you get from VCs all the time, are not fun. 00:17:02.120 |
"I want smaller model that can run on A-100s, 00:17:09.080 |
He's a great salesman, even though he acts like he isn't. 00:17:14.120 |
to say H is faster, more efficient, which he's right. 00:17:21.280 |
smaller models is where we are going with use cases. 00:17:24.640 |
- Well, I hear you're really gonna need Blackwell. 00:17:37.760 |
so that you come up with a couple questions top of mind. 00:17:42.880 |
and they're building many consumer companies, 00:17:52.080 |
What can you tell people building products in this room 00:17:55.000 |
to help guide them towards being a great AI builder 00:17:58.720 |
that ServiceNow might consider partnering with 00:18:05.520 |
So just, when you look at me, look at my forehead, 00:18:08.240 |
and it's a $1 billion spend I have in my cloud and software. 00:18:18.960 |
on cloud and software and on the infrastructure a year, 00:18:42.740 |
you will not understand what ServiceNow does, 00:18:58.780 |
in a certain sequence between human and machines. 00:19:03.940 |
Because people at a large bank or customers tell me 00:19:13.700 |
than getting a PC from the bank or a Mac from the bank 00:19:18.340 |
I mean, that's the reality of large corporations, 00:19:34.780 |
Some banks have, for Mac, four levels of approval. 00:19:51.460 |
and these are the things that we automate behind the scene. 00:19:58.860 |
I want it to be delivered via FedEx tomorrow morning. 00:20:06.220 |
and the banks want to harden the image of the Mac 00:20:09.540 |
that they give you, if you're doing on a trading floor, 00:20:14.380 |
and then we infuse AI in making it simpler and faster. 00:20:22.020 |
and you can say, hey, CJ, for your use cases, 00:20:25.980 |
here is the great technology that we have built, 00:20:35.020 |
or whether it's a use case specific AI that you have done, 00:20:43.780 |
That if I can make the use cases for our customers better, 00:20:48.040 |
I have your attention, and I'll buy your product, 00:21:02.820 |
10 billion ARR, you can do the math pretty fast, 00:21:07.540 |
and so I'm obsessed, like OCD level obsessed, 00:21:18.780 |
So that's one, and I have enough money to spend, 00:21:25.540 |
And number two is, we have a great go-to-market team, 00:21:29.100 |
so besides our engineering, AI, science, research team, 00:21:34.960 |
and if you have something coming back to the buyer, 00:21:39.960 |
next door down person, or two doors down person, 00:21:43.460 |
and you want to leverage, CIO is our prime buyer. 00:21:46.740 |
If you think about CIOs, 10, 15, 20 years ago, 00:21:49.660 |
till ServiceNow came, CIOs were serving other C-suite. 00:22:16.020 |
The two companies that really sell to CIO well 00:22:20.980 |
These are the two companies that sell really well. 00:22:28.020 |
are interested in that $1 billion of cloud spend. 00:22:41.700 |
Some of us might already be thinking about Act Two 00:22:45.940 |
any advice in the early days of how you think 00:22:49.060 |
about resourcing and philosophy around experimentation 00:22:52.460 |
versus intentional bets around Act Two's product development? 00:23:05.820 |
people said that our TAM was only 1.8 billion. 00:23:23.220 |
where people say, "I don't know if the TAM is there." 00:23:26.140 |
So for us, that actually created a chip on our shoulder 00:23:30.140 |
because we believed that the TAM for ServiceNow 00:23:32.340 |
was a lot bigger than what the industry analyst community 00:23:41.460 |
So one thing is on your core, core being core, 00:23:45.780 |
you really, really have to understand what is the TAM, 00:23:51.580 |
before you start saying, "I wanna go multi-product. 00:24:00.940 |
with the buyer access, but the core has to be core. 00:24:08.460 |
So really understand the TAM behind that core 00:24:11.540 |
and then figure out, before you go into the next act, 00:24:15.580 |
why are you really going after that next act? 00:24:27.740 |
and we said, "We are gonna go after these three 00:24:29.220 |
"buying centers, security, HR, and customer service, 00:24:31.960 |
"in addition to IT, and here is the go-to market for it, 00:24:50.640 |
"Oh, typical thing I hear from entrepreneurs, 00:25:02.360 |
And then they flip constantly chief revenue officer, right? 00:25:14.080 |
which rarely happens, but when I'm asked for advice, 00:25:17.000 |
I say, "What problem are you really trying to solve? 00:25:23.460 |
"or you really don't know what product you are building?" 00:25:33.640 |
before you pivot, or before you go to second act, 00:25:48.840 |
act two after a billion of ARR, is what I'm hearing. 00:25:53.200 |
And I think a very powerful insight there, CJ, 00:26:07.200 |
ServiceNow is a broad platform with many capabilities. 00:26:11.000 |
You have other ways you interface with customers, 00:26:24.520 |
where AI could truly disrupt a use case, right? 00:26:32.200 |
And on the buyer side, if you're talking to a large bank, 00:26:36.600 |
if you're talking to a large government, right? 00:26:42.760 |
So US public sector, which is federal, state and local, okay? 00:26:59.400 |
So our chief revenue officer came to me and said, 00:27:06.520 |
And we had to invest 100 million plus in infra 00:27:15.880 |
And now, whether it's US Army, US Navy, Air Force, 00:27:19.760 |
to all public sector institution, even on civilian side, 00:27:36.880 |
in a positive way that customers gets higher value 00:27:44.040 |
because not all use cases are created equal, right? 00:27:51.160 |
but which use case will really provide higher value? 00:28:02.040 |
And that software ROIC, including AI ROIC, is hard. 00:28:06.800 |
Like right now, we are trying to tell everybody that, 00:28:10.560 |
okay, we have gen AI infused in ServiceNow products. 00:28:14.180 |
Number one question is, how much will it cost? 00:28:18.760 |
And if you're not doing outcome-based selling, 00:28:21.200 |
so if you're not doing outcome-based selling, 00:28:23.840 |
it's like you are another guy coming in there 00:28:32.140 |
Because you have to be very, very clear and specific 00:28:35.320 |
on here is where you will get the ROIC on that. 00:28:39.140 |
So wherever the highest ROIC is, that's where we prioritize. 00:28:57.800 |
- You have such a close understanding of what the CIO wants. 00:29:13.480 |
beyond what ServiceNow is currently harvesting? 00:29:29.440 |
about CIO being chief irrelevant officer, okay? 00:29:34.440 |
And they said, all the power is with developers. 00:29:41.200 |
You need to be like other people and sell to developers. 00:29:45.240 |
Yes, developers will buy X, Y, Z, all that is fine. 00:29:48.960 |
But the irrelevancy of CIO has been exaggerated. 00:29:53.960 |
And right now, CIO is the most technical person 00:30:04.240 |
You may have a CTO, the product person, right? 00:30:06.640 |
The product tech person, and you have the CIO. 00:30:09.320 |
But product tech person is focused on innovation, 00:30:16.120 |
has been exaggerated and over-exaggerated year after year. 00:30:23.880 |
In Fortune 500, the CEOs are only asking CIOs, 00:30:31.040 |
So that's number one, that CIO is still very relevant 00:30:40.160 |
I mean, I was one, very fickle people, right? 00:30:43.200 |
They churn and sell thing, and someday they like this, 00:30:46.920 |
and I read this on frickin' Reddit, and now I like this. 00:30:53.000 |
So CIOs right now, with the state of economy today, 00:31:11.240 |
And second, how can I help in the path to revenue? 00:31:34.440 |
and customer says, well, I want to change quantity here, 00:31:37.120 |
quantity there, then we have to re-spin the order form, 00:31:40.800 |
make sure it's in SAP, make sure it's in our CPQ system. 00:31:44.100 |
That process is still three, four hours sometimes, 00:31:54.960 |
The CFO and CRO are their biggest stakeholder, 00:32:09.960 |
and that's what I constantly see on the pattern matching. 00:32:12.840 |
- Excellent, we have time for one more question, Peter. 00:32:17.000 |
- All right, you talked a lot about use cases. 00:32:19.840 |
I'm curious if you have any stories of use cases 00:32:23.780 |
and use cases with AI that really did not work at all. 00:32:30.080 |
trying to read documents and understand documents, 00:32:37.120 |
which is accounts payable, invoices, and this and that, 00:32:50.300 |
and that is a junkyard of technologies that we have tried 00:33:02.000 |
there is still a lot of dollars to be had on productivity, 00:33:20.100 |
Their policy is that if you use your computer, 00:33:23.360 |
every three years you can refresh your computer, 00:33:38.220 |
"and you will get your new computer on that third," 00:33:40.480 |
so the depreciation and all those schedules work, 00:33:49.080 |
So far, companies don't like if we just make the decision. 00:33:51.980 |
That's where we see that when we see the pattern matching 00:34:07.880 |
Really, this is unique in that we had two separate areas. 00:34:12.920 |
We've been talking about this throughout the day, 00:34:30.720 |
You said that really actually is incredibly powerful. 00:34:33.360 |
I'll tell a quick story, which is at dinner with you 00:34:38.880 |
you guys said to me, hey, you get to a building, 00:34:41.360 |
you go to the elevator, what floor do you go to? 00:34:56.640 |
and that seems like it permeates your mentality. 00:35:13.480 |
For you, you're looking at small language models, 00:35:38.600 |
and I'm always around if you want any words of wisdom. 00:35:42.160 |
I've made a lot of mistakes as well, too many, 00:35:48.320 |
From a product perspective, engineering perspective, 00:35:50.680 |
which use cases you prioritize, which you don't, 00:36:04.240 |
Will you do stand-up for us later on tonight? 00:36:13.880 |
and Bill will not appreciate that, so I will not do it.